19.01.2015 Views

ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION - Mike Griffiths and Associates

ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION - Mike Griffiths and Associates

ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION - Mike Griffiths and Associates

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FAS_lbf01.wpd 179<br />

The subsidence hollows recorded to date at Ladybridge Farm have contained only mineral sediment fills with<br />

no evidence for waterlogging <strong>and</strong> the survival of organic matter. The palaeoenvironmental significance of these<br />

particular hollows is considered to be negligible.<br />

Other subsidence hollows may be present within lower-lying parts of the site <strong>and</strong> these may be waterlogged.<br />

If present, <strong>and</strong> depending on their history of subsidence, these hollows may contain a detailed vegetation record<br />

for the area immediately surrounding the hollow. The significance of this record will depend on its date,<br />

duration <strong>and</strong> temporal resolution. Long, high-resolution records of mid- to late-Holocene date will be of high<br />

significance in a local context as they will inform archaeologists about the local environment at a time when<br />

there was human activity in the area. Short duration, low resolution or early Holocene records will be of low<br />

to negligible significance.<br />

The larger depressions recorded at Ladybridge Farm contain waterlogged sediments, including peat, <strong>and</strong><br />

therefore have a high potential to provide palaeoenvironmental information. The value of this information will<br />

depend on the age range of the deposits but the evidence from Nosterfield suggests that the deposits will be too<br />

early to be of archaeological value. This resource is therefore considered to be of low significance.<br />

11.0 ARCHIVE<br />

A medium-sized assemblage of ceramic <strong>and</strong> clay tobacco pipe <strong>and</strong> ceramic building material were recovered<br />

during evaluation (688; 591). The material is of late post-medieval to modern date <strong>and</strong> no further analysis is<br />

recommenced for the assemblages. A medium assemblage of lithic material (410) has been the subject of<br />

assessment <strong>and</strong> selected illustration has been recommended. A small assemblage of prehistoric pottery has been<br />

the subject of assessment <strong>and</strong> selected illustration <strong>and</strong> sherd consolidation has been recommended. A small<br />

assemblage of animal bone has been the subject of a specialist assessment <strong>and</strong> no further work is recommended<br />

for the material. 230 litres of soil were retained during fieldwork <strong>and</strong> have been the subject of full processing<br />

<strong>and</strong> assessment. Other finds of glass (81) metalwork (11), slag (1) <strong>and</strong> plastic objects (1) were of late postmedieval<br />

to modern date <strong>and</strong> no further analysis is recommended; a full index of all the material is available for<br />

consultation at FAS.<br />

The site archive <strong>and</strong> material assemblages are currently held by Field Archaeology Specialists. A paper <strong>and</strong><br />

electronic copy of the report will be deposited with the Heritage Unit of North Yorkshire County Council.<br />

FIELD ARCHAEOLOGY SPECIALISTS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!