101rvk
101rvk
101rvk
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Film<br />
26<br />
Preserving<br />
The Laxá Explosion<br />
Blowing up dams and restrictions on democracy<br />
Stills<br />
It's dark and silent—nothing unusual around midnight by the river Laxá and lake Mývatn in the<br />
north of Iceland. But somewhere behind the darkness, beneath the silence, something extraordinary<br />
is about to happen. Suddenly, a dynamite explosion disturbs the silence—in what has gone<br />
down in history as a single, but highly important step in a much greater movement of resistance.<br />
More than a hundred farmers officially claimed responsibility<br />
for the explosion, which annihilated a small<br />
dam in the river on August 25, 1970. The area's inhabitants<br />
were determined to prevent the construction of a<br />
much bigger dam, which would have destroyed vast<br />
quantities of this natural area, as well as most of the<br />
surrounding farmlands.<br />
Just as determined to keep the saboteurs away from<br />
legal troubles, those who claimed responsibility kept a<br />
strict policy of silence, making it hard for the authorities<br />
to single out alleged leaders or protagonists. Now,<br />
almost half a century and a saved river later, another<br />
bang has broken that silence.<br />
A WATERSHED ACT IN<br />
ICELANDIC HISTORY<br />
Namely, that is Grímur Hákonarson's documentary<br />
‘Hvellur’ (“Bang”), which premièred at Bíó Paradís earlier<br />
this year. Through dialogues with some of the participants,<br />
many of whom still reside by the river, the<br />
film tells the story of the Laxá conflict. “We kept all<br />
commentators and university professors out,” Grímur<br />
told me a few days before the première, “focusing instead<br />
entirely on those who took part in it.”<br />
The case is often considered the beginning of environmentalism<br />
in Iceland. Shortly thereafter, Nobel<br />
Prize-winning author Halldór Laxness wrote his famous,<br />
hard-headed call-out for nature conservation—<br />
titled ‘The Warfare Against the Land’—and the Laxá<br />
conflict also brought about the Environmental Impact<br />
Assessment, which up until then had been completely<br />
absent in Iceland's energy production.<br />
“What makes the Laxá conflict peculiar is that those<br />
who resisted also succeeded,” Grímur says. “The<br />
planned dam was never built and the area was saved.”<br />
Four years later, parliament passed a law securing the<br />
protection of Laxá and Mývatn, contributing to the explosion's<br />
status as “the most remarkable and powerful<br />
event in the history of environmentalism in Iceland,” as<br />
Sigurður Gizurarson, the bomber’s defence lawyer, put it.<br />
Celebrating the forty-year anniversary of the act in<br />
August 2010, one of Iceland's most remarkable environmentalists,<br />
Guðmundur Páll Ólafsson, remarked<br />
that the act “literally saved the ecosystem of Mývatn<br />
and Laxá.” He also maintained that the dynamite “blew<br />
up a democracy-restriction imposed on the district's<br />
inhabitants and all those who loved the land, by the authorities<br />
and the board of Laxárvirkjun,” the company<br />
that owned the dam. “The arrogance of the authorities<br />
hovered over the land until the bomb exploded, but<br />
then we became free—for a while.”<br />
Sixty-five people were charged for sabotage, but no<br />
one spoke out about any details and the Supreme Court<br />
ended up handing out mild suspended sentences. The<br />
film now reveals that there were three men responsible<br />
for igniting the dynamite. Only one of them is still alive.<br />
STILL THE BONE OF CONTENTION<br />
In any case, exposing secrets is much less the film's<br />
aim than documenting and preserving this extraordinary<br />
story. And for a good reason—it could easily fall<br />
into oblivion. “People over fifty remember this event<br />
very well, but those who are younger don't really<br />
know the story,” Grímur says, adding that during the<br />
film's making, they were told numerous times that they<br />
should have started filming much earlier, as many involved<br />
have since passed away.<br />
But how do those still alive recall these events today<br />
“No one looks back regretfully, and most of them<br />
are still politically radical, opposed to large-scale destruction<br />
of natural areas for energy production. They<br />
“What makes the Laxá conflict peculiar is<br />
that those who resisted also succeeded.”<br />
Laugavegur 54<br />
are proud of the results of their act,” Grímur says.<br />
But as Guðmundur Páll's words, “then we became<br />
free—for a while,” imply, the plans had not been cancelled<br />
for good. During the construction of the huge<br />
Kárahnjúkar dams in Iceland's eastern highlands, a<br />
new construction plan for Laxá was put on the drawing<br />
table. However, as words of warning came from<br />
Mývatn—including that the locals surely hadn't forgotten<br />
how to use dynamite—the plans were later drawn<br />
back. Siv Friðleifsdóttir, then Minister of the Environment,<br />
stated that never before had she been so pleased<br />
to cancel a project.<br />
Many of Iceland's most remarkable natural areas<br />
are still the bone of contention between environmentalists<br />
and industrialists, including geothermal areas<br />
close to Mývatn. Grímur doesn’t consider the film to<br />
be part of the current conflict, but it doesn’t mean that<br />
people won't feel some connection with today's most<br />
pressing environmental issues. “One only needs to listen<br />
to the debates in parliament,” Grímur concludes,<br />
“to notice that the same old discussion is still going on<br />
today.” - Snorri Páll Jónsson Úlfhildarson