before the company law board - Company Law Board Mumbai Bench
before the company law board - Company Law Board Mumbai Bench
before the company law board - Company Law Board Mumbai Bench
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
12<br />
R1 being a separate entity must have requested to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Company</strong><br />
seeking inspection of records and documents independently. Even<br />
o<strong>the</strong>rwise <strong>the</strong> petitioners being 50% shareholders and directors are<br />
entitled to inspect <strong>the</strong> records and registers of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Company</strong> with<br />
prior intimation and can obtain <strong>the</strong> copies <strong>the</strong>reof as per <strong>law</strong>.<br />
Accordingly, <strong>the</strong> issue is answered.<br />
Now I deal with <strong>the</strong> issue No.4<br />
CP 17/2008<br />
Arsh<br />
The o<strong>the</strong>r contentions of <strong>the</strong> petitioners are that <strong>the</strong><br />
respondents increased <strong>the</strong> Share capital from Rs.50,000/- to Rs.1<br />
lakh without <strong>the</strong> knowledge of <strong>the</strong> petitioners. The respondents<br />
have contended that <strong>the</strong> increase in <strong>the</strong> share capital was made<br />
after due compliance of <strong>the</strong> provisions of <strong>the</strong> Companies Act. As<br />
per <strong>the</strong> provisions of <strong>the</strong> Act, a Private Limited <strong>Company</strong> now<br />
must have minimum paid up share capital of Rs.1 lakh.<br />
Accordingly, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Company</strong> increased <strong>the</strong> share capital prior to<br />
family arrangement. To establish <strong>the</strong> same, <strong>the</strong> petitioners have<br />
enclosed balance sheet as on 31 st<br />
March, 2004 wherein <strong>the</strong><br />
Authorised Share Capital of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Company</strong> is shown as Rs.1 lakh<br />
for <strong>the</strong> current year and also previous year and also one of <strong>the</strong><br />
petitioner and one of <strong>the</strong> respondents have signed <strong>the</strong> balance<br />
sheet. There is no dispute with regard to this balance sheet and <strong>the</strong><br />
petitioners have admitted that <strong>the</strong>y signed <strong>the</strong> balance sheet apart<br />
from <strong>the</strong> auditor of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Company</strong> at para 6.5 of <strong>the</strong> petition. The