27.01.2015 Views

The Royal Society Report - Push-Pull

The Royal Society Report - Push-Pull

The Royal Society Report - Push-Pull

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Case study 3.2. <strong>The</strong> development of hybrid maize<br />

Hybrid vigour<br />

While testing his theory on the origin of species, Darwin compared inbred and cross-pollinated (hybrid) maize and<br />

found that the hybrids were taller than the inbred plants and were more tolerant of cooler growing conditions. This<br />

‘hybrid vigour’ (heterosis) was further studied by William Beal at Michigan State College, who observed increased grain<br />

yields in hybrids of different varieties.<br />

Single and double crosses<br />

In the early 1900s, experiments were conducted in which plants were self-pollinated for several generations to<br />

produce pure-breeding lines, which were then crossed to produce hybrids. <strong>The</strong> resulting high-yielding hybrids could<br />

be produced every year. <strong>The</strong>se hybrid seeds could easily be produced by removing the tassels from one block of<br />

inbred maize plants to allow pollination by an adjacent block of a second inbred line. This is more easily done on a<br />

large scale with maize than other cereal crops as maize is wind pollinated and the male and female flowers are on<br />

separate organs.<br />

However, as seed yields of the inbred parents were low with this method, the cost of hybrid seed was too high for<br />

farmers. When an additional, ‘double cross’ was performed (by crossing two of the single cross hybrids to produce the<br />

seed sold to farmers), yields were better than open pollinated varieties although not as good as the best single crosses.<br />

Seed production from ‘double crosses’ between high-yielding single cross hybrid parents became routine in the 1930s.<br />

Because of the doubling of yields, adoption of hybrid maize increased from 0 to 50% of Iowa’s corn acreage in just<br />

six years following its release in 1932.<br />

Commercial development<br />

Farmers could either grow hybrid maize by purchasing the single cross parent seed and performing the cross on their<br />

farm, or by purchasing ready to plant hybrid seed from farmer cooperatives or commercial seed companies. <strong>The</strong> latter<br />

emerged as the preferred choice.<br />

Although hybrid maize was first developed in the 1930s, the basis of hybrid vigour is still unknown. Further<br />

improvements in yield have largely resulted from improvements in the yield of the inbred lines. By the 1960s, the inbred<br />

lines were high yielding enough to use as seed parent and produce single cross hybrids for sale (which had a higher<br />

yield and were cheaper to produce than the best double crosses). Yields are now 4–5 times greater than those achieved<br />

with self-pollinated varieties in the 1920s. <strong>The</strong> aim of commercial seed companies is to increase yields again from about<br />

150 to 300 bushels per acre by 2030.<br />

Source: Duvick (2001).<br />

increased biomass production and light energy harvesting<br />

(Kebeish et al. 2007).<br />

Transfer of C4 metabolism into rice could achieve a yield<br />

increase of up to 50% (Hibberd et al. 2008), but the real<br />

gain could be a substantial increase in water use efficiency,<br />

a character normally associated with C4 plants.<br />

Engineering a bona fide C4 metabolism into a C3 plant may<br />

take at least 10 years but the metabolic shunt method<br />

could be achieved sooner.<br />

3.3.2 Abiotic stress<br />

Abiotic stress describes the impact of non-living factors<br />

such as drought, salinity, heat and toxic heavy metals.<br />

Genetic improvement and modified management of crops<br />

both have a role to play in dealing with abiotic stress.<br />

3.3.2.1 Crop management strategies to mitigate the<br />

effects of abiotic stress<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are diverse crop management strategies to mitigate<br />

the effects of abiotic stress. Some of these strategies have<br />

been derived empirically. <strong>The</strong> use of seed mixtures has<br />

been trialled to increase the robustness of yield against<br />

environmental stresses (see Case study 3.3). For example,<br />

genotypes of beans selected for high capacity to acquire<br />

phosphorus often have shallow roots (Lynch 2007). This<br />

can cause problems for crops in water-scarce<br />

environments, where deep roots can be advantageous for<br />

water scavenging. Mixtures of genotypes can be planted to<br />

buffer the crop yield against combinations of stresses. In<br />

such mixtures, it is possible that shallow rooted genotypes<br />

may also benefit from the extraction of water by deep<br />

rooters in the community (Caldwell & Richards 1989).<br />

Development of these techniques requires an<br />

understanding of the different crop ideotypes that are<br />

helpful to combat different environmental stresses.<br />

Turner (2004) has shown how wheat yields in Western<br />

Australia have increased by around 3-fold in 70 years, as<br />

rainfall has decreased. This has been achieved largely by<br />

changing the planting date of the crop to cover the ground<br />

while there is water available in the soil. This greatly<br />

reduces unproductive water loss via soil evaporation.<br />

Other options which would not require major scientific<br />

advances for their initial implementation, where<br />

26 I October 2009 I Reaping the Benefits <strong>The</strong> <strong>Royal</strong> <strong>Society</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!