27.01.2015 Views

The Bible,The Qur'an and Science - Islamicbook.ws

The Bible,The Qur'an and Science - Islamicbook.ws

The Bible,The Qur'an and Science - Islamicbook.ws

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

lllrcRow@h'Sorrca ordfilffit tU 55<br />

bywhichonemighthaverecognlgedaeollecfronofgvsngpllc<br />

ODe have recognised a collection of evangelic<br />

#tings". writings". firie This stat€m€nt statement is the opposite of what A. Tricot TricOt<br />

writ€E writes (1960) in thecomlnentaty commentary to his translation of the New<br />

Tegtoment: Testament: "Very eerly early on, from the begiinning th9 it 'Goapel' beginning of the Second<br />

century A.D., it became a habit to say 'Gospel' meaning thet 160 h8d aleo 'Ttre the books<br />

that Saint Justin around 150 A.D. had also called '<strong>The</strong> Memoirs<br />

of the Apoetles'." Apostles'." Unfortunately, assertions of this kind anc are<br />

sgfrciently sufticiently common for the public publie to have ideas on tfie the date of<br />

the Goepels Gospels which whieh ere are mistaken.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Gospels did not form a c'omplete complete whole 'very 'very eerly early on';<br />

it did not happen until more than a centurt' centurY after the end of<br />

Jesus's mission. <strong>The</strong> Ecrtmertcal Ecumenical Ttawlntimt Translation of the <strong>Bible</strong> Bibln esti' estimates<br />

the date the four Gospels acguired aequired the status of canonic canonie<br />

literature at arsund around 10 170 A.D.<br />

Justin'g Justin's statement which calls the authors 'Apostles' ·Apostles' is not<br />

acceptable aceeptable either, as w€ we shall see.<br />

As far as the dste date the Gospgls Gospels were written is concerned, eoncerned, A' A.<br />

Tricot Trieot states ststes that Matthew's, Mstthew'g, Mark's <strong>and</strong> Luke's Gospels were<br />

written before 70 0 A.D.: but this is not acceptable, exeept except perhaps<br />

for Mark. Following many others, this thie commentator goes out of<br />

his way to present pres€nt the authors of the Gospels as the apostles or<br />

the companions companiotts of Jesus. For this reason he suggests dates detes of<br />

writing that tttst plaee place them very near to the time Jesus lived. As for<br />

John, whom *tto* A. Tricot has us believe lived until roughly 100 A.D., A.D.'<br />

Christians christians have always slways been used to seeing him depicted as being<br />

very near to Jesus on ceremonial ceremonisl occasions. It is very difficult<br />

however to assert sssert that he is the author of the Gospel that bears<br />

his name. For A. Tricot, as for other commentators, the Apostle<br />

John (like Matthew) was the officially offieislly qualified witness of the<br />

facts fects he recounts, although the majority of critics do not support<br />

the hypothesis which says he wrote the fourth Gospel.<br />

If however the four Gospels in question cannot reasonably be<br />

sup-<br />

regarded as the 'Memoirs' of the apostles or companions of<br />

Jesus, where do they theY come from<br />

<br />

O. o. Culmann, culmann, in his book <strong>The</strong> New Testament (Le Nouveau<br />

Testament)', \ says seys of of this that the evangelists were only the<br />

"spokesmen ,,spokesmen of of the early Christian christian community eommunity which wrote<br />

down the oral tradition. For thirty or forty years, years' the Gos-<br />

1. 1. Pub. P"b. Preases FreEE€s Universitaires Univereitsires de de France, Fr'nce, Paris, 1967

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!