- Page 1 and 2: The Bichard Inquiry Report A Public
- Page 3: © Parliamentary copyright 2004 The
- Page 7 and 8: 4 NATIONAL SYSTEMS AND STRUCTURE -
- Page 9 and 10: 7 The detailed facts and findings a
- Page 11 and 12: eason for the information about the
- Page 13 and 14: 35 For example, although national I
- Page 15 and 16: 48 I must therefore conclude that t
- Page 17 and 18: of the responsibility of deciding w
- Page 19 and 20: no interview panel for staff workin
- Page 21 and 22: 6 The quality and timeliness of PNC
- Page 23 and 24: The new register would be administe
- Page 26 and 27: The Inquiry process 1 On 17 Decembe
- Page 28 and 29: The focus of the Inquiry 12 Counsel
- Page 30 and 31: 1 Contacts, recruitment and vetting
- Page 32 and 33: • the Police National Computer (P
- Page 34 and 35: Huntley and AB. I make clear that M
- Page 36 and 37: Huntley interviewed under caution 1
- Page 38 and 39: 1.58 CPD: No record exists. There a
- Page 40 and 41: ecord, were removed from the system
- Page 42 and 43: 1.86 There is no indication that So
- Page 44 and 45: 1.101 Ms McLoughlin’s diary sheet
- Page 46 and 47: Record keeping: Contact 3 1.114 PNC
- Page 48 and 49: Record keeping: Contact 4 1.132 PNC
- Page 50 and 51: 1.153 CIS Crime: An entry was made
- Page 52 and 53: Conditional bail 1.173 On 29 May 19
- Page 54 and 55:
would have fallen to be automatical
- Page 56 and 57:
Information’ screen). The relevan
- Page 58 and 59:
Police note that, while this defini
- Page 60 and 61:
Record keeping: Contact 10 1.233 PN
- Page 62 and 63:
• Cambridgeshire Constabulary (pa
- Page 64 and 65:
happening was in Huntley’s case.
- Page 66 and 67:
1.275 ‘Part C’ was to be comple
- Page 68 and 69:
1.288 The senior police line manage
- Page 70 and 71:
1.303.1 On arrival, a Police Check
- Page 72 and 73:
1.306 Miss Lightley believed that m
- Page 74 and 75:
The failings within the old system
- Page 76 and 77:
1.334 When conducting the PNC searc
- Page 78 and 79:
course, that such a charge should n
- Page 80 and 81:
1.358 If Humberside Police had rece
- Page 82:
1.366 This is because it seems to m
- Page 85 and 86:
2.6 There were six major failures
- Page 87 and 88:
2.16 My view is that all those at
- Page 89 and 90:
2.32 There was not merely one isol
- Page 91 and 92:
2.39.3 no check was made against m
- Page 93 and 94:
2.53.3 Indeed, the statements from
- Page 95 and 96:
to be as confident as DCS Baggs tha
- Page 97 and 98:
on the basis of the complainant dec
- Page 99 and 100:
‘some concern’. In fact, as DS
- Page 101 and 102:
elying solely on such a confession,
- Page 103 and 104:
2.101 Chief Constable Westwood acc
- Page 105 and 106:
2.116 I do not find it necessary t
- Page 107 and 108:
2.127 Humberside Police are also i
- Page 109 and 110:
2.140 However, there were occasion
- Page 111 and 112:
2.148 The investigation was conduc
- Page 113 and 114:
2.156 Chief Constable Lloyd was un
- Page 115 and 116:
Education Personnel Management Ltd
- Page 117 and 118:
3.4 On application, an individual w
- Page 119 and 120:
and direction. Under section 6(2) o
- Page 121 and 122:
3.32 HMIC’s effectiveness therefo
- Page 123 and 124:
disclosure of information obtained
- Page 125 and 126:
3.58 The Case Preparation applicati
- Page 127 and 128:
ecord and recommended that the guid
- Page 129 and 130:
Different guidance at local level 3
- Page 131 and 132:
3.91.2 It informs them that the acc
- Page 134 and 135:
4 €National systems and structure
- Page 136 and 137:
4.10 € Historically, there has be
- Page 138 and 139:
• legal powers to insist on a nat
- Page 140 and 141:
4.35 € It may be that the new pow
- Page 142 and 143:
4.41 € The evidence also suggeste
- Page 144 and 145:
The nature of the allegation 4.46.1
- Page 146 and 147:
issues. In giving evidence, Mr Eade
- Page 148 and 149:
opportunity to develop these skills
- Page 150 and 151:
depend on the application of the 19
- Page 152 and 153:
information (which includes names a
- Page 154 and 155:
4.92 € I understand that the Over
- Page 156 and 157:
4.105.1 €The current system depen
- Page 158 and 159:
4.117 € The central body would ta
- Page 160 and 161:
4.129.1 €Information should only
- Page 162:
Taking things forward 4.135 € The
- Page 165 and 166:
Caution (1) - when a suspect is adv
- Page 167 and 168:
Human Rights Act 1998 - imposes spe
- Page 169 and 170:
R Registered Body - an organisation
- Page 171 and 172:
3. What were/are the systems, polic
- Page 173 and 174:
Organisation Name Oral (O) Written
- Page 175 and 176:
Organisation Name Oral (O) Written
- Page 178 and 179:
Appendix 3 Humberside Police record
- Page 180 and 181:
tool ... to store and supply compre
- Page 182 and 183:
22.1 In essence, the system grades
- Page 184 and 185:
etention marker (‘retain’) coul
- Page 186 and 187:
Appendix 4 Vetting, the List scheme
- Page 188 and 189:
National and local checks 11 Checks
- Page 190 and 191:
Stage 1 - referrals 20 The POCA Lis
- Page 192 and 193:
40 EU: Belgium, Denmark, France, Ge
- Page 194:
Appendix 5 The Inquiry team Sir Mic