28.01.2015 Views

Pian-Upe Wildlife Reserve - Frontier-publications.co.uk

Pian-Upe Wildlife Reserve - Frontier-publications.co.uk

Pian-Upe Wildlife Reserve - Frontier-publications.co.uk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Pian</strong>-<strong>Upe</strong> <strong>Wildlife</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong>: biological and socio-e<strong>co</strong>nomic survey 11<br />

2.3 Methods<br />

The survey was <strong>co</strong>nducted between April and June 1997.<br />

The reserve was stratified into broad physiognomic vegetation types using the available<br />

reference material and the 1:50,000 topographic maps. This stratification was also used as the<br />

basis for the large mammal and small fauna surveys.<br />

Volunteer research assistants were trained in basic navigation skills including the use of maps<br />

and <strong>co</strong>mpasses and the Global Positioning System (GPS), and learned to pace distances<br />

accurately.<br />

They were trained in the <strong>co</strong>llection and preparation of botanical specimens, data re<strong>co</strong>rding,<br />

and in the use of appropriate field guides and keys: Coates Palgrave (1988), Eggeling & Dale<br />

(1951), Hamilton (1981), ICRAF (1992), Katende et al. (1995), and Noad & Birnie (1989)<br />

for woody plants, Haines & Lye (1983) for sedges and rushes, and Eggeling (1941), Harker<br />

(1961), and van Oudtshoorn (1992) for grasses.<br />

The sampling unit was a 100m x 100m (1ha) plot for woody plants and a 25m x 25m sub-plot<br />

within this for herbs and grasses. Within a stratum plots were located subjectively where the<br />

vegetation seemed most ‘typical’. Each plot was surveyed by a small team which re<strong>co</strong>rded<br />

general information on the physiognomy of the vegetation. Every species in the plot was then<br />

listed and its percentage <strong>co</strong>ver estimated in Braun-Blanquet classes (after Zandri & Viskanic,<br />

1992).<br />

Voucher specimens of every species or re<strong>co</strong>gnisable taxonomic unit (rtu) of flowering plant<br />

en<strong>co</strong>untered were <strong>co</strong>llected and pressed following Liesner (1990). They were then given<br />

preliminary field identifications where possible, and used as a basic working reference<br />

<strong>co</strong>llection. At the end of the study period, the preliminary field identifications were <strong>co</strong>nfirmed<br />

by Ms Olivia Wanyana Maganyi at the Makerere University Herbarium.<br />

Opportunistic re<strong>co</strong>rds of species not occurring in the plots were also made throughout the<br />

reserve.<br />

<strong>Frontier</strong>-Uganda <strong>Wildlife</strong> Protected Areas Project January 1998<br />

Baseline Surveys Programme Report No. 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!