29.01.2015 Views

Volume 4 Issue 1 (February 2012) - Ozean Publications

Volume 4 Issue 1 (February 2012) - Ozean Publications

Volume 4 Issue 1 (February 2012) - Ozean Publications

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

European Journal of Educational Studies 4(1), <strong>2012</strong><br />

Table 2: The means of graduate’s ratings of the importance of competencies<br />

and the program ability in preparing them at these competencies<br />

Assessment and evaluation competencies<br />

Importance<br />

Ability<br />

Identification of current performance level<br />

Using different assessment and diagnosis methods in special education<br />

Using evaluation results in identifying special education needs<br />

Evaluating individual educational plan efficacy<br />

Knowing the appropriate use and limitations of different methods of evaluation<br />

Participating in evaluation in multi-disciplinary team<br />

Assessing learning, achievement and behavior by formal and informal procedures<br />

Using and interpreting different evaluations data<br />

Monitoring the student’s improvement in regular and special curricula<br />

Using curriculum based assessment<br />

3.90<br />

3.63<br />

3.60<br />

3.60<br />

3.60<br />

3.53<br />

3.46<br />

3.36<br />

3.36<br />

3.36<br />

3.33<br />

3.00<br />

2.95<br />

3.28<br />

3.09<br />

2.71<br />

2.90<br />

3.00<br />

2.71<br />

2.52<br />

Instruction Planning Competencies: All these competencies are considered very important; the means<br />

range from (3.46 to 3.73) except for competency no. 7, which is considered important. The highest mean<br />

is competency no. 1. Concerning the ability of the program to prepare the graduates at these<br />

competencies, it has been found that it is moderate in general. The means range from 2.85 to 3.23, except<br />

no.5, which considered high (See Table 3).<br />

Table 3: The means of graduate’s ratings of the importance of competencies<br />

and the program ability in preparing them at these competencies<br />

Instruction planning competencies<br />

Importance<br />

Ability<br />

Developing plan for behavior modification<br />

Planning within cooperative context including individuals with special needs<br />

and their families<br />

Developing the curriculum based on individual educational plan<br />

Developing individual educational plan based on regular curriculum<br />

Adapting and modifying instructional plans based on continuous analysis of<br />

individual improvement<br />

Instruction design to suit individual differences<br />

Creating supportive and safe instructional environment<br />

3.73<br />

3,66<br />

3.63<br />

3.56<br />

3.50<br />

3.46<br />

3.23<br />

3.14<br />

3.18<br />

3.23<br />

3.09<br />

3.47<br />

2.85<br />

2.85<br />

Practicing Instructions Competencies: The graduates perceive all these competencies as very important;<br />

the means range from 3.27 to 3.80. Competencies 1, 2, and 3 have the highest means; on the other hand,<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!