29.01.2015 Views

academic achievement and retention in social studies among junior ...

academic achievement and retention in social studies among junior ...

academic achievement and retention in social studies among junior ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

European Journal of Educational Studies 4(1), 2012<br />

European Journal of Educational Studies 4(1), 2012<br />

© 2012 Ozean Publication<br />

GENDER DIFFERENCES AND STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND<br />

RETENTION IN SOCIAL STUDIES AMONG JUNIOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN<br />

EKITI STATE<br />

B.O. ABDU-RAHEEM<br />

Department of Educational Foundations <strong>and</strong> Management, Faculty of Education,<br />

University of Ado-Ekiti, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria.<br />

E-mail address for correspondence: dr_boabduraheem@yahoo.com<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Abstract: This paper exam<strong>in</strong>ed gender differences <strong>and</strong> <strong>academic</strong> <strong>achievement</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>retention</strong> of students <strong>in</strong> <strong>social</strong><br />

<strong>studies</strong> <strong>among</strong> Junior Secondary schools <strong>in</strong> Ekiti State. The study adopted quasi experimental pre-test, post-test<br />

control group design. The sample for the study consisted of 240 Junior Secondary school class II students selected<br />

from 6 schools, 3 boys only <strong>and</strong> 3 girls only <strong>in</strong> Ekiti State. Simple r<strong>and</strong>om sampl<strong>in</strong>g was used to select 40 students<br />

from each s<strong>in</strong>gle-sex school. The <strong>in</strong>strument used for the study was the Social Studies Achievement Test (SSAT)<br />

designed by the researcher. Section A of the SSAT conta<strong>in</strong>ed the bio-data of the respondents while section B<br />

consisted of 40 multiple-choice items designed to f<strong>in</strong>d the level of <strong>achievement</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>retention</strong> of students <strong>in</strong> <strong>social</strong><br />

<strong>studies</strong>. 6 hypotheses were formulated <strong>and</strong> tested at 0.05 level of significance. The data were analysed us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

ANOVA <strong>and</strong> ANCOVA statistical analyses. The f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong>dicated that there is no significant difference between<br />

the <strong>achievement</strong> mean scores of male <strong>and</strong> female students <strong>in</strong> the experimental <strong>and</strong> control groups. There is no<br />

significant difference between the <strong>retention</strong> mean score of male <strong>and</strong> female students <strong>in</strong> the experimental <strong>and</strong> control<br />

groups. It was concluded <strong>in</strong> the study that gender does not play any significant role on students‟ <strong>achievement</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>retention</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>social</strong> <strong>studies</strong>. It was therefore recommended that female students should be more encouraged both at<br />

home <strong>and</strong> school <strong>in</strong> order to develop their untapped <strong>in</strong>tellectual resources <strong>and</strong> erase the old gender stereotype aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

them.<br />

Keywords: Gender differences, <strong>academic</strong> <strong>achievement</strong>, <strong>retention</strong> significant relationship, stereotype, significant<br />

role, significant difference, <strong>social</strong> <strong>studies</strong>, <strong>junior</strong> secondary schools<br />

____________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

One of the most topical issues <strong>in</strong> the current debate all over the world has been that of gender differences <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>academic</strong> <strong>achievement</strong> <strong>among</strong> students <strong>in</strong> schools. Over the years, there has been a grow<strong>in</strong>g awareness of the role of<br />

women at home, <strong>in</strong> schools, <strong>and</strong> community <strong>in</strong> general. However worries have equally been expressed about the role<br />

of women <strong>in</strong> the political, <strong>social</strong>, cultural, psychological, economic, spiritual, scientific <strong>and</strong> technological<br />

155


European Journal of Educational Studies 4(1), 2012<br />

development of the nations. A major area of concern has been the effects of gender differences on <strong>academic</strong><br />

<strong>achievement</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>retention</strong> of students <strong>in</strong> secondary schools.<br />

However, the major focus of this paper is to exam<strong>in</strong>e the differences between the <strong>achievement</strong> mean scores of male<br />

<strong>and</strong> female students <strong>and</strong> the difference between the <strong>retention</strong> mean scores of male <strong>and</strong> female students. Also, the<br />

paper will f<strong>in</strong>d out whether or not there is a significant relationship between gender <strong>and</strong> <strong>academic</strong> <strong>achievement</strong> of<br />

students <strong>in</strong> school. The study will therefore give <strong>in</strong>sight on the effects of gender on students‟ <strong>academic</strong> <strong>achievement</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>retention</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>social</strong> <strong>studies</strong> <strong>in</strong> secondary schools <strong>in</strong> Ekiti State.<br />

Fisho-Oridedi (2001) <strong>in</strong> her book The Girl Child noted that “the Nigerian population <strong>in</strong> 1991 was 88,514,501. The<br />

population of men (male) is 44,544,053 which is 50.32% while that of women (female) is 43,969.970 which is<br />

49.7% of the total population”. The above data <strong>in</strong>dicate that women constitute almost half of Nigerian population<br />

<strong>and</strong> their potentialities <strong>in</strong> contribut<strong>in</strong>g to the national development cannot be over-emphasised. Ibraheem (2001)<br />

confirmed the above statement that “women constitute about 50% of Nigerian population <strong>and</strong> their potentiality <strong>in</strong><br />

contribut<strong>in</strong>g to the national development cannot be ignored”.<br />

In African culture, girls are not familiar with toys that promote <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> science <strong>and</strong> technology. Their major duty<br />

is home management <strong>and</strong> child-bear<strong>in</strong>g. They are expected to cook <strong>and</strong> clean while the boys engage <strong>in</strong> activities<br />

such as play<strong>in</strong>g football, mak<strong>in</strong>g bows <strong>and</strong> arrows, play<strong>in</strong>g with catapults, fly<strong>in</strong>g kites <strong>and</strong> so on. Bozimo (1991)<br />

noted that these activities promote scientific knowledge <strong>and</strong> thus give them an edge over girls. Babalola <strong>and</strong> Adedeji<br />

(1997) also confirmed that women, throughout the ages <strong>and</strong> everywhere <strong>in</strong> the world, have always been considered<br />

<strong>in</strong>ferior to men. Scottish local authorities did not <strong>in</strong>troduce gender policies until the early 1990s (Ridwell 2000).<br />

Jekay<strong>in</strong>oluwa (2005) lamented that schools <strong>and</strong> the nation at large are mak<strong>in</strong>g profound contributions to the creation<br />

of positive learn<strong>in</strong>g environment that could motivate learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>achievement</strong> more <strong>in</strong> boys than girls.<br />

In their own study, Jegede <strong>and</strong> Inyang (1990) worked on gender differences <strong>and</strong> <strong>academic</strong> <strong>achievement</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrated<br />

science <strong>in</strong> Junior Secondary Schools. They confirmed that males performed better than females. They affirmed that<br />

males demonstrated significantly more positive attitudes towards science than females. Schibbeci (1984) also noted<br />

that females exhibit more positive attitudes towards Biology <strong>and</strong> males towards Physics. Owuamanam <strong>and</strong><br />

Babatunde (2007) noted that the girls tend to go for courses that do not require more energy <strong>and</strong> bra<strong>in</strong> task<strong>in</strong>g such<br />

as home mak<strong>in</strong>g while boys looked for jobs <strong>in</strong> management, eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, bank<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> other bra<strong>in</strong>-task<strong>in</strong>g<br />

professions.<br />

In her own research carried out <strong>in</strong> London, Osler (2002) confirmed that girls excluded or self-excluded from formal<br />

education were rampant <strong>among</strong> African girls than White girls. In another research carried out <strong>in</strong> London, Claire<br />

(2005) highlighted the high number of black girls be<strong>in</strong>g excluded from school <strong>and</strong> also looked at the way language<br />

is used <strong>in</strong> education. Both ethnicity <strong>and</strong> <strong>social</strong> class are factors which comb<strong>in</strong>ed with, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g with gender,<br />

are seen as hav<strong>in</strong>g a direct bear<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>achievement</strong> (Plummer 2000 <strong>and</strong> Arnot 2003). Archer (2003) noted that<br />

gender <strong>in</strong>equalities are <strong>in</strong>terwoven with <strong>social</strong> class, ethnicity, sexuality <strong>and</strong> disability. Another factor identified as<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g atta<strong>in</strong>ment is ethnicity (Arnot 2003).<br />

In his own f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs, Murphy (2001) l<strong>in</strong>ked <strong>academic</strong> <strong>achievement</strong> with patterns of behaviour. He noted that there<br />

are signs of boys be<strong>in</strong>g vulnerable to becom<strong>in</strong>g disaffected. He expla<strong>in</strong>ed further that boys tend to be less careful<br />

about rules <strong>and</strong> more <strong>in</strong>different to be<strong>in</strong>g reprim<strong>and</strong>ed. Head et al (2002) revealed that boys are also more likely to<br />

be referred to Behavioural Support Services. Younger et al (2005) cautioned by po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g out that there are many<br />

boys who cont<strong>in</strong>ue to do well <strong>in</strong> school <strong>and</strong> only few of them become affected.<br />

Of particular <strong>in</strong>terest is the fact that girls, to a large percentage, avoid physical science subjects when choice is<br />

offered. Studies <strong>in</strong>dicated that girls are more satisfied with school life <strong>and</strong> their school-related attitudes are more<br />

positive than those of boys (Balogun 1983 <strong>and</strong> Yoloye 1983). They expla<strong>in</strong>ed further that the <strong>in</strong>tellectual potential<br />

of girls is an untapped labour resource for science <strong>and</strong> technology. Average levels of atta<strong>in</strong>ment for boys are lower<br />

than those of girls at all stages <strong>and</strong> across almost all areas of the curriculum (Croxford, 2000). A similar picture can<br />

be observed <strong>in</strong> Engl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Wales (Younger et al 2005).<br />

In Social Studies, sex factor has no <strong>in</strong>fluence on the <strong>academic</strong> <strong>achievement</strong> of students. Their <strong>achievement</strong> is based<br />

on their levels of underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> commitment. In his study on differences <strong>in</strong> the cognitive <strong>achievement</strong> towards<br />

Social Studies, Ak<strong>in</strong>bote (1999) confirmed that there is no significant difference between the cognitive <strong>achievement</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> attitude towards Social Studies of boys <strong>and</strong> that of the girls. In his own contribution, Adeosun (2002) confirmed<br />

that there is no significant difference <strong>in</strong> the <strong>achievement</strong> score between males <strong>and</strong> females while conduct<strong>in</strong>g <strong>studies</strong><br />

156


European Journal of Educational Studies 4(1), 2012<br />

on effects of multimedia packages on students‟ <strong>achievement</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>retention</strong> <strong>in</strong> Social Studies. Abdu-Raheem (2010)<br />

also concluded that gender does not play any significant role on students‟ <strong>achievement</strong> <strong>in</strong> Social Studies.<br />

Statement of the Problem<br />

In spite of the fact that women constitute almost half of the Nigerian population <strong>and</strong> contribute immensely to<br />

economic development, they are still been discrim<strong>in</strong>ated aga<strong>in</strong>st by the society especially <strong>in</strong> the African countries. It<br />

has also been observed that the stereotype aga<strong>in</strong>st ladies is affect<strong>in</strong>g their <strong>academic</strong> <strong>achievement</strong> adversely. This<br />

paper therefore aims at <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g the effects of gender on students‟ <strong>academic</strong> <strong>achievement</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>retention</strong> <strong>in</strong> Social<br />

Studies <strong>in</strong> Ekiti State Secondary Schools.<br />

Research Hypotheses<br />

1. There is no significant difference between the <strong>achievement</strong> mean scores of male <strong>and</strong> female students <strong>in</strong><br />

the experimental <strong>and</strong> control groups.<br />

2. There is no significant difference between the <strong>retention</strong> mean scores of male <strong>and</strong> female students <strong>in</strong> the<br />

experimental <strong>and</strong> control groups.<br />

Purpose of the Study<br />

The purpose of this study is to proffer a last<strong>in</strong>g solution to the problem of gender differences <strong>and</strong> its effects on<br />

<strong>academic</strong> <strong>achievement</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>retention</strong> of students <strong>in</strong> Social Studies <strong>in</strong> schools. The outcome of this study could also<br />

create enabl<strong>in</strong>g situation for girls to develop their untapped <strong>in</strong>tellectual sources <strong>and</strong> improve on their <strong>achievement</strong>.<br />

METHODOLOGY<br />

The study is a quasi experimental pre-test, post-test control group design. The sample consisted of 240 Junior<br />

Secondary School class II students selected from 6 s<strong>in</strong>gle-sex schools(3 boys <strong>and</strong> 3 girls) <strong>in</strong> Ekiti State. Simple<br />

r<strong>and</strong>om sampl<strong>in</strong>g was used to select 40 students from each school for the study.<br />

Instrument<br />

The <strong>in</strong>strument used for the study was the Social Studies Achievement Test (SSAT) designed by the researcher. The<br />

<strong>in</strong>strument consisted of 40 multiple choice items used as pre-test, post-test <strong>and</strong> <strong>retention</strong> test respectively. The<br />

validity of the <strong>in</strong>strument was ascerta<strong>in</strong>ed by the experts <strong>in</strong> Educational Management, Guidance <strong>and</strong> Counsell<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>and</strong> Social Studies. Face, content, construct validity <strong>and</strong> item analysis procedure were done to validate the<br />

<strong>in</strong>strument. The reliability of the <strong>in</strong>strument was determ<strong>in</strong>ed through test-re-test <strong>and</strong> estimation of <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />

consistency. The reliability coefficient of 0.73 <strong>and</strong> 0.71 were obta<strong>in</strong>ed respectively.<br />

Experimental Procedure<br />

The students were first exposed to pre-test to check their knowledge base l<strong>in</strong>e. The students were then r<strong>and</strong>omly<br />

assigned to experimental <strong>and</strong> control groups where they were exposed to different treatment. The experimental were<br />

157


European Journal of Educational Studies 4(1), 2012<br />

exposed to treatment through problem-solv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> discussion methods while the control group cont<strong>in</strong>ued with their<br />

lessons through the normal conventional lecture method.<br />

Data Analysis<br />

The data were analysed us<strong>in</strong>g ANOVA <strong>and</strong> ANCOVA statistical tools.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Hypothesis 1<br />

There is no significant difference between the <strong>achievement</strong> mean scores of male <strong>and</strong> female students <strong>in</strong> the<br />

experimental <strong>and</strong> control groups.<br />

Table 1:ANCOVA Summary of Gender <strong>and</strong> Treatment on students‟ Achievement <strong>in</strong> Social Studies.<br />

Source Ss Df Ms Fcal Ftable<br />

Corrected model 36625.918 6 6104.320 545.773 2.09<br />

Covariate<br />

(pretest)<br />

126.429 1 126.429 11.304 3.84<br />

Sex 5.390 1 5.390 .482 3.84<br />

Group 36392.432 2 18196.216 1626.882 2.99<br />

Sex Group 43.668 2 21.834 1.952 2.99<br />

Error 3948.205 353 11.185<br />

Corrected Total 40574.122 359<br />

Total 275992.000 400<br />

P>0.05<br />

The null hypothesis is accepted (F=.482, P>0.05). Therefore, there is no significant difference between the<br />

<strong>achievement</strong> mean scores of male <strong>and</strong> female students <strong>in</strong> Social Studies. The <strong>in</strong>teraction of gender <strong>and</strong> treatment on<br />

students‟ <strong>achievement</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>social</strong> <strong>studies</strong> is not statistically significant at 0.05 level (F=1.952, P>0.05). However, the<br />

ma<strong>in</strong> effect of treatment on students‟ <strong>achievement</strong> is significant at 0.05 level (F=1626.882, P


European Journal of Educational Studies 4(1), 2012<br />

Table 2: ANOVA summary of Gender <strong>and</strong> treatment on Retention Mean Scores of Social Studies Students‟<br />

Source Ss Df Ms Fcal Ftable<br />

Corrected model 46036.656 5 9207.331 966.463 2.21<br />

Sex 2.844 1 2.844 .299 3.84<br />

Group 46000.572 2 23000.286 2414.263 2.99<br />

Sex Group 33.239 2 16.619 1.744 2.99<br />

Error 3372.500 354 9.527<br />

Corrected Total 49409.156 359<br />

Total 249726.000 360<br />

P>0.05<br />

Table 2 shows that Fcal (.299) is less than F table (3.84) at 0.05 level of significance. The null hypothesis is<br />

accepted. Therefore, there is no significant difference between the <strong>retention</strong> mean scores of male <strong>and</strong> female<br />

students <strong>in</strong> the experimental <strong>and</strong> control groups. Similarly, the <strong>in</strong>teraction effect of gender <strong>and</strong> treatment on<br />

<strong>retention</strong> mean scores of the students <strong>in</strong> <strong>social</strong> <strong>studies</strong> is not statistically significant at 0.05 (F=1.74, P>0.05).<br />

However, the effect of treatment on <strong>retention</strong> mean scores of students <strong>in</strong> Social Studies is statistically significant at<br />

0.05 (F=2414.263, P


European Journal of Educational Studies 4(1), 2012<br />

Conclusion <strong>and</strong> Recommendations<br />

It was concluded <strong>in</strong> the study that gender does not play any significant role on students‟ <strong>achievement</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>retention</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>social</strong> <strong>studies</strong>. It was therefore recommended that girls should be assisted <strong>and</strong> encouraged by the parents, teachers<br />

<strong>and</strong> the society <strong>in</strong> order to develop their untapped <strong>in</strong>tellectual resources, to improve on their <strong>academic</strong> <strong>achievement</strong>.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Abdu-Raheem, B.O. (2010). Relative effects of problem-solv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> discussion methods on secondary school<br />

students‟ <strong>achievement</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>social</strong> <strong>studies</strong>. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis, University of Ado-Ekiti, Ado-Ekiti.<br />

Adeosun, O.V. (2002). Relative effects of three multi-media packages on students‟ <strong>achievement</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>retention</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>social</strong> <strong>studies</strong>. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ado-Ekiti, Ado-Ekiti.<br />

Ak<strong>in</strong>bote, O.A. (1999) Sex differences <strong>in</strong> the cognitive <strong>and</strong> effective outcomes <strong>in</strong> <strong>social</strong> <strong>studies</strong> of primary school<br />

pupils. African Journal of Educational Research 5(1). 34-38.<br />

Arnot, M. (2003). Male work<strong>in</strong>g-class <strong>in</strong> identities <strong>and</strong> <strong>social</strong> justice: a reconsideration of Paul Willis‟s „Learn<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

Labour‟ <strong>in</strong> light of contemporary research. Inc V<strong>in</strong>cent (ed.) Social justice, education <strong>and</strong> identity. London:<br />

Routledge Falmer.<br />

Balogun, T.A. (1983). Obstacles to teacher effectiveness <strong>in</strong> Nigeria school sett<strong>in</strong>g. Paper presented at the 2 nd<br />

International Conference of Curriculum Organisation of Nigeria, University of Jos, September.<br />

Bozimo, H. (1991). Role modell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> concomitant attitude change strategies as determ<strong>in</strong>ants of <strong>achievement</strong>s of<br />

girls <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrated science. An unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ibadan.<br />

Claire, H. (Ed.) (2005). Gender <strong>in</strong> education 3-19-A fresh approach. London: Association of teachers <strong>and</strong> Lecturers.<br />

Pdf http://www.atl.org.uk.<br />

Croxford, L. (2000). Gender <strong>and</strong> national curricular: shift<strong>in</strong>g agendas <strong>in</strong> the UK <strong>and</strong> Europe. London: Routledge.<br />

http://www.ero.govt.nz/publications/pubs2000/promot<strong>in</strong>g%20boys%20achmt.htm.<br />

Fisho-Oridedi, D. (2001). Develop<strong>in</strong>g the potentials of the girl-child-A National challenge. Nigeria: The REGENT<br />

Pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g & Publish<strong>in</strong>g Ltd.<br />

Head, G. Kane, J. & Cogna, N. (2002). An evaluation of behaviour support <strong>in</strong> secondary schools <strong>in</strong> south<br />

Lanarkshire. Glasgow: University of Glasgow. www.scotl<strong>and</strong>.gov.uk/library3/education/lacr03.asp.<br />

Ibraheem, I. (2001). W<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g more girls <strong>and</strong> women for science <strong>and</strong> technology: A challenge for Women. In O.<br />

Busari, (Ed) Women <strong>in</strong> science, technology <strong>and</strong> mathematics education <strong>in</strong> Nigeria, 43 rd STAN Annual<br />

Conference Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

Jegede, O.J. & Inyang, N. (1990). Gender difference <strong>and</strong> <strong>achievement</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrated science <strong>among</strong> <strong>junior</strong> secondary<br />

school students: A Nigerian study". International Reviews of Education, 36 (3), 364-368.<br />

Jekay<strong>in</strong>oluwa, R. (2005). Sex-role stereotypes <strong>and</strong> career choice of secondary school students. Unpublished M.Ed<br />

Thesis. University of Ife, Nigeria.<br />

160


European Journal of Educational Studies 4(1), 2012<br />

Murphy, P. (2000). Equity, assessment <strong>and</strong> gender. In J. Salisbury <strong>and</strong> S. Ridwell, (eds.) Gender policy <strong>and</strong><br />

educational change shift<strong>in</strong>g agenda <strong>in</strong> the UK <strong>and</strong> Europe, London: Routledge.<br />

www.scotl<strong>and</strong>.gov.uk/library3/education/lacr-03.asp.<br />

Osler, A. Street, C. Lall, M. & V<strong>in</strong>cent K. (2000). Not a problem Girls <strong>and</strong> school exclusion. London: National<br />

Children‟s Bureau.<br />

Owuamanam, T.O. & Babatunde, J.O. (2007). Gender-role stereotypes <strong>and</strong> career choice of secondary school<br />

students <strong>in</strong> Ekiti State. Journal of Educational Focus. 1(1): 103-110<br />

Plummer, G. (2000). Fail<strong>in</strong>g work<strong>in</strong>g class girls. Stoke-on Trent: Trentham Books.<br />

Ridwell, S. (2000). Equal opportunities <strong>in</strong> Scotl<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> J. Salisbury & Ridwell (Eds.). Gender, policy <strong>and</strong> educational<br />

change: shift<strong>in</strong>g agendas <strong>in</strong> UK <strong>and</strong> Europe. London: Routledge.<br />

http://www.ero.govt.nz/publications/pubs2000/promot<strong>in</strong>g%20boys%20achmt.htm.<br />

Schibeci, R.A. (1984). Attitude to science: An update. Studies <strong>in</strong> Science Education. 11, 26-59.<br />

Yoloye, E.A. (1983). The evaluation of teach<strong>in</strong>g. Paper Presented at the Workshop on Effective Teach<strong>in</strong>g, Institute<br />

of Education, University of Ibadan.<br />

Younger, M., Warr<strong>in</strong>gton, M., Gray, J. Rudduck, J. McLellan, R. Bearne, E. Kershner, R. & Bricheno, P. (2005).<br />

Rais<strong>in</strong>g boys’ <strong>achievement</strong>. DFES Research Report 636. London:<br />

http://www.ero.govt.nz/publications/pubs2000/promot<strong>in</strong>g%20boys%20archmt.htm.<br />

161

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!