30.01.2015 Views

How to Order and Interpret Radiology Studies

How to Order and Interpret Radiology Studies

How to Order and Interpret Radiology Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>How</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Order</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Interpret</strong> <strong>Radiology</strong> <strong>Studies</strong><br />

Thomas <strong>How</strong>ard, MD<br />

327


Musculoskeletal Imaging in Sports Medicine<br />

Thomas <strong>How</strong>ard, MD, FACSM<br />

Garry W. K. Ho, MD<br />

Objectives<br />

1. Review the<br />

musculoskeletal<br />

imaging modalities<br />

available<br />

2. Discuss radiographic<br />

evaluation of specific<br />

musculoskeletal<br />

injuries<br />

Plain Film X-Ray X<br />

Radiography<br />

Ionizing-radiation x-ray x<br />

emitter<br />

Detec<strong>to</strong>r<br />

– Pho<strong>to</strong>graphic plate<br />

– Pho<strong>to</strong>stimulable phosphor<br />

– Others<br />

Radio-opacity opacity / radio-lucency<br />

328


Plain Film X-Ray X<br />

Radiography<br />

Advantages<br />

– Inexpensive<br />

– Readily available<br />

– Excellent spatial resolution<br />

– “Real-time” availability as<br />

fluoroscopy<br />

Limitations<br />

– Two-dimensional<br />

Need > two orthogonal views<br />

– Relatively poor soft tissue<br />

contrast resolution<br />

Useful for radio-opaque<br />

opaque<br />

foreign bodies<br />

Useful if emphysema<br />

or free air present<br />

– Ionizing radiation exposure<br />

Plain Film X-Ray X<br />

Radiography<br />

– Contraindications<br />

Pregnancy<br />

– More of concern for<br />

L-spine & pelvis XR<br />

– Minimal radiation<br />

exposure <strong>to</strong> fetus<br />

with shielding when<br />

imaging other areas<br />

Computed Tomography<br />

CT uses an array of x-raysx<br />

X-ray beams directed at several<br />

different angles<br />

Processed by computer <strong>to</strong><br />

produce cross sectional images<br />

Findings are described as<br />

radio-opaque opaque or radio-lucent<br />

329


Computed Tomography<br />

Images reconstructed - 2D or 3D<br />

Kinematic CT - imaging of joint motion<br />

Computed Tomography<br />

Advantages<br />

– High contrast resolution of images<br />

– Excellent images of bones <strong>and</strong> lungs<br />

IV contrast infrequently needed for<br />

orthopedic trauma<br />

– Wide availability<br />

– Faster than MRI<br />

Computed Tomography<br />

Limitations<br />

– Can produce artifacts (motion, metal)<br />

– Less soft-tissue tissue contrast than MRI<br />

– Exposure <strong>to</strong> ionizing<br />

radiation<br />

Radiation dose much higher<br />

than for conventional<br />

radiography<br />

– Higher cost than<br />

conventional x-rayx<br />

330


Computed Tomography<br />

Contraindications<br />

– Pregnant women should not have CT<br />

scans<br />

Except in life-threatening<br />

emergencies<br />

Can be scanned with<br />

shielding depending<br />

on body part (minimal<br />

radiation exposure <strong>to</strong><br />

fetus if ankle or knee<br />

is scanned)<br />

– Scanner weight-limits for obese patients<br />

Bone Scan (Scintigraphy(<br />

Scintigraphy)<br />

Biologically active<br />

drugs are labeled<br />

with radioiso<strong>to</strong>pes<br />

Radioiso<strong>to</strong>pe<br />

administered <br />

Giving off gamma<br />

rays<br />

Detected by<br />

gamma camera<br />

Processed by<br />

computer<br />

Bone Scan (Scintigraphy(<br />

Scintigraphy)<br />

Forms a functional image<br />

of soft tissues <strong>and</strong> bone<br />

Two main types:<br />

– Planar (“traditional(<br />

bone scan”)<br />

Three phase bone scan<br />

– SPECT – cross-<br />

sectional <strong>and</strong><br />

reconstructed bone<br />

scans<br />

331


Bone Scan (Scintigraphy(<br />

Scintigraphy)<br />

Triple phase bone scan:<br />

– Flow (perfusion) study<br />

60 seconds after injection<br />

Blood flow<br />

– Blood Pool<br />

Increased circulation, blood<br />

vessel dilation<br />

– Delayed<br />

2 -33 hrs after injection<br />

Bone uptake<br />

– Clearance from extraosseous<br />

tissues<br />

Scintigraphy - SPECT Imaging<br />

(Single Pho<strong>to</strong>n Emission Computed Tomography)<br />

Three-dimensional imaging technique used in<br />

conjunction with radioiso<strong>to</strong>pe injection<br />

Enhanced tissue contrast<br />

Improved sensitivity <strong>and</strong> specificity of lesion<br />

detection & localization<br />

Bone Scan (Scintigraphy(<br />

Scintigraphy)<br />

Advantages<br />

– Images metabolic activity<br />

of osteoblasts<br />

Very sensitive for acute<br />

fractures & tumors<br />

Old, less metabolically<br />

active fractures & tumors<br />

may not show up<br />

– Less radiation exposure<br />

than chest x-ray x<br />

& CT<br />

332


Bone Scan (Scintigraphy(<br />

Scintigraphy)<br />

Limitations<br />

– Lacks significant detail<br />

– Poor spatial resolution<br />

– Poor specificity<br />

– Displays activity of osteoblasts<br />

Old fractures (eg(<br />

eg. . pars defects) may not show up<br />

Certain tumors with little osteoblastic activity (eg(<br />

eg.<br />

multiple myeloma <strong>and</strong> lytic mets) ) not reliably seen<br />

Contraindications<br />

– Exposes patient <strong>to</strong> ionizing radiation<br />

– Children & pregnant women should be carefully<br />

shielded<br />

Magnetic Resonance<br />

Imaging (MRI)<br />

Majority of clinical MRI utilizes the magnetic<br />

moment of hydrogen nuclei (pro<strong>to</strong>ns)<br />

Magnetic Resonance Imaging<br />

Magnetic field pro<strong>to</strong>ns excited alignment<br />

Pro<strong>to</strong>ns snap back in<strong>to</strong> original alignment <br />

detectable rotating magnetic field<br />

Pro<strong>to</strong>ns in different tissues realign at different<br />

speeds detected as differing signal intensities<br />

333


Magnetic Resonance Imaging<br />

MRI studies – many different type of studies,<br />

sequences, <strong>and</strong> pro<strong>to</strong>cols<br />

Basically two types:<br />

– T1<br />

Ideal for studying ana<strong>to</strong>my<br />

Fat is white<br />

– T2<br />

More valuable in studying<br />

pathology<br />

Water is white (H2O)<br />

Contrast studies<br />

– Highlight certain structures<br />

& abnormalities<br />

Magnetic Resonance Imaging<br />

Advantages<br />

– Excellent contrast<br />

resolution<br />

Especially for<br />

soft tissue pathology<br />

– High sensitivity in<br />

bone marrow<br />

diseases<br />

– Electromagnetic radiation instead of<br />

ionizing radiation<br />

Magnetic Resonance Imaging<br />

Limitations<br />

– Most sensitive <strong>to</strong> artifact from motion & metal<br />

– Claustrophobia<br />

– Some findings are subtle<br />

Dependent upon<br />

interpretation<br />

Eg. labral tears<br />

– High cost; lower availability<br />

334


Magnetic Resonance Imaging<br />

Contraindications<br />

– Pacemakers<br />

(under investigation)<br />

Pracically, , an absolute<br />

contraindication<br />

– Prosthetic cardiac valves<br />

safe after 6 weeks<br />

– Stents & grafts<br />

Non-ferromagnetic are safe<br />

Ferromagnetic are safe after 6 weeks<br />

– Due <strong>to</strong> epithelialization<br />

Abdominal aortic aneurysm stents check with<br />

radiologist<br />

– Pumps – check with radiologist<br />

– Other devices may malfunction or be contraindicated<br />

Magnetic Resonance Imaging<br />

Contraindications (continued)<br />

– Metal objects<br />

Can migrate, heat up, <strong>to</strong>rque<br />

Foreign bodies, body piercings, jewelry<br />

Situational clearance<br />

– Fragment in brain or<br />

eye contraindicated<br />

– Bullet in femur or<br />

muscle likely OK<br />

– Tat<strong>to</strong>os & cosmetics can<br />

heat up<br />

Metallic dyes<br />

Magnetic Resonance Imaging<br />

Contraindications (continued)<br />

– Obese patients<br />

Scanner table weight limits<br />

Gantry opening might be<br />

<strong>to</strong>o small<br />

– Pregnancy<br />

Animal studies conflicting<br />

Avoid during 1 st trimester<br />

No gadolinium unless<br />

absolutely necessary<br />

335


Ultrasonography<br />

Uses high-frequency sound<br />

waves <strong>to</strong> produce images<br />

Can define masses, fluid, &<br />

localize foreign bodies<br />

Findings are described as<br />

hyperechoic, hypoechoic, , or<br />

anisotropy<br />

Allows for dynamic<br />

evaluation<br />

Newer systems are more<br />

compact with higher<br />

resolution<br />

Ultrasonography - Tendons<br />

Bright structure with longitudinally oriented bundles<br />

Ultrasonography - Tendons<br />

Blurring, thickening, loss of normal architecture<br />

336


Ultrasonography - Muscles<br />

Gastrocnemius<br />

with hema<strong>to</strong>ma<br />

Complete disruption<br />

of fibers on dynamic<br />

evaluation of rectus<br />

femoris<br />

Low Back Pain<br />

Who do you image<br />

Ask yourself:<br />

– Do you have a<br />

pathoana<strong>to</strong>mic<br />

diagnosis<br />

– Do you need <strong>to</strong> rule out<br />

tumor, infection, or<br />

fracture<br />

– Will imaging change<br />

your treatment<br />

“Red Flags” for imaging:<br />

– major trauma<br />

– age > 50<br />

– unrelenting pain at<br />

rest or night pain<br />

– fever, chills, sweats<br />

– unexplained weight loss<br />

– his<strong>to</strong>ry of cancer<br />

Low Back Pain<br />

– incontinence of bowel or bladder<br />

– progressive weakness<br />

337


Low Back Pain<br />

Conventional x-rayx<br />

(plain films)<br />

– AP<br />

– Lateral<br />

– Lumbosacral (LS) spot view<br />

L5 centered view<br />

Minimizes potential for over-read<br />

read<br />

of disk space narrowing<br />

– Disk space narrowing,<br />

osteophytes, , fracture, tumor,<br />

or spondylolisthesis<br />

Low Back Pain<br />

Conventional x-rayx<br />

– Oblique views<br />

Best if concern for<br />

pars interarticularis<br />

fracture<br />

(spondylolysis)<br />

– Pars interarticularis<br />

narrow portion of<br />

bone between<br />

superior & inferior<br />

articular facets<br />

Low Back Pain<br />

Bone Scan / Scintigraphy<br />

– Suspected spondylolysis not seen on plain<br />

film x-raysx<br />

– Determine old versus new spondylolysis<br />

338


Low Back Pain<br />

Lumbar Spine MRI<br />

– Excellent for<br />

Disc disease & herniation<br />

Cord compression<br />

– Also will demonstrate:<br />

Spinal cord anomalies<br />

Tumors<br />

Discitis<br />

Vertebral osteomyelitis<br />

Low Back Pain<br />

CT Scan<br />

– Excellent bone study for vertebral fracture<br />

Usually done in conjunction with MRI<br />

– Useful for spondylolysis<br />

Chronic non-union / fibrous union<br />

Chronic Low Back Pain<br />

Consider guided injections<br />

– Fluoroscopic SI, facet injections,<br />

epidural steroids<br />

339


Cervical Spine Injuries<br />

Initial C-spine C<br />

trauma series<br />

– Cross-table lateral<br />

– Anteroposterior (AP)<br />

– Open-mouth<br />

odon<strong>to</strong>id<br />

Cervical Spine Injuries<br />

Lateral view<br />

All vertebrae on the<br />

lateral<br />

Presence of lordosis<br />

Vertebral alignment<br />

– Anterior vertebral line<br />

– Posterior vertebral line<br />

– Spinolaminal line<br />

– Posterior spinous line<br />

Soft tissue examination<br />

Cervical Spine Injuries<br />

Anterior soft tissue<br />

– “66 at 2 <strong>and</strong> 2 at 6” 6 rule<br />

< 6 mm at C2<br />

< 2 cm (20 mm) at C6<br />

– C1-C3 C3 < 5-7mm5<br />

– C4-C7 C7 = 14-22 mm<br />

– Increased soft tissue<br />

space suggests occult<br />

fracture<br />

340


Cervical Spine Injuries<br />

AP view<br />

– Spinous processes<br />

should line up<br />

midline<br />

– Vertebral bodies &<br />

articular pillars also<br />

line up<br />

– Vertebral body<br />

height<br />

Cervical Spine Injuries<br />

Odon<strong>to</strong>id view<br />

– C1-2 2 articulation<br />

– Alignment<br />

Gaps between C1<br />

lateral masses &<br />

C2 dens (odon<strong>to</strong>id(<br />

odon<strong>to</strong>id)<br />

Lateral margins of<br />

C2 articulating<br />

facet & C1 lateral<br />

masses<br />

– Fractures<br />

Dens<br />

Jefferson fracture – ring of C1 broken<br />

from axial loading<br />

Cervical Spine Injuries<br />

Dynamic flexion-extension<br />

extension<br />

– Active voluntary test<br />

– Undetected<br />

ligament<br />

disruption or<br />

instability<br />

– Requires alert,<br />

cooperative<br />

patient<br />

s<strong>to</strong>pping for<br />

pain or<br />

paresthesias<br />

341


Cervical Spine Injuries<br />

Widening of the predental space from rupture of<br />

the transverse ligament<br />

Cervical Spine Injuries<br />

CT scan<br />

– Suspect bony injury<br />

despite normal plain<br />

films<br />

– Suspect instability on<br />

plain films<br />

– Better visualize<br />

fracture, evaluate for<br />

displacement<br />

MRI<br />

– Evaluate spinal canal,<br />

nerve roots, <strong>and</strong>/or<br />

soft tissue injury<br />

Shoulder Injury<br />

“St<strong>and</strong>ard” series<br />

– AP in external rotation<br />

& internal rotation<br />

– Axillary lateral view<br />

342


Shoulder Injury<br />

Scapular Y view<br />

– AKA: supraspinatus outlet view,<br />

scapular lateral view<br />

– Dislocation & angulation of<br />

proximal humerus fractures<br />

– Acromial morphology<br />

– Good lateral view when patient<br />

cannot <strong>to</strong>lerate an axillary view<br />

Shoulder Injury<br />

MRI <strong>and</strong> MRI arthrography<br />

– Nonsurgical diagnostic test of choice for<br />

internal derangements <strong>and</strong> structural<br />

instability assessment<br />

– Soft tissue <strong>and</strong> bone lesions well demonstrated<br />

Shoulder Injury<br />

Ultrasound<br />

– Non-invasive<br />

– Allows for dynamic<br />

evaluation<br />

– Both opera<strong>to</strong>r &<br />

equipment<br />

dependent<br />

343


St<strong>and</strong>ard views<br />

– PA view:<br />

2 mm intercarpal<br />

joint space<br />

3 arcs<br />

– Lateral view:<br />

4 Cs<br />

Wrist Injury<br />

Wrist Injury<br />

Complex joints may<br />

require additional views<br />

Scaphoid fracture:<br />

– Scaphoid views<br />

– If initially negative<br />

Immobilize x 2 - 3 weeks<br />

Repeat plain films<br />

– If still negative <strong>and</strong><br />

symp<strong>to</strong>matic MRI<br />

Chronic Wrist Pain<br />

Hamate Fracture<br />

– CT scan<br />

Keinbock’s Disease<br />

– X-ray, bone scan, MRI<br />

Carpal Instability<br />

– X-ray angles,<br />

MR arthrogram<br />

TFCC Injury<br />

– MR arthrogram<br />

Occult Ganglion<br />

– MR arthrogram<br />

Complex Regional Pain<br />

Syndrome, Type I<br />

– Bone scan<br />

344


Plain film X-raysX<br />

Hip Pain/Injury<br />

– Good initial study<br />

– Arthritis<br />

– Late avascular necrosis<br />

– Initial evaluation for<br />

femoral neck stress<br />

fracture<br />

– Can miss grade 4<br />

cartilage damage<br />

Hip Pain/Injury<br />

MRI<br />

– At least 1.5 T magnet<br />

– Surface coil<br />

– Poor for for IA cartilaginous injuries<br />

– Good for evaluation of femoral neck<br />

stress fractures<br />

MR Arthrogram<br />

– Labral pathology<br />

Increased sensitivity, but also<br />

increased false positive<br />

– Gad sequences can obscure bone<br />

– Diagnostic anesthetic injection<br />

Bone Scan<br />

– Good study for stress fractures<br />

Ultrasound<br />

Hip Pain/Injury<br />

345


X-rays<br />

AP<br />

view<br />

Knee Injuries<br />

Lateral<br />

view<br />

Sunrise /<br />

Merchant view<br />

Tunnel /<br />

Notch view<br />

Advanced imaging<br />

Knee Injuries<br />

– CT scan – more detailed evaluation of bony injuries<br />

– MRI -- imaging modality of choice for soft tissue<br />

Exertional Leg Pain<br />

Shin splints (MTSS) vs. stress fracture<br />

Shin Splints<br />

– Clinical diagnosis<br />

– Plain films: look for stress fracture<br />

– Triple Phase Bone Scan<br />

346


• Stress fractures<br />

Exertional Leg Pain<br />

• Initial radiograph:<br />

normal in up <strong>to</strong> 70%<br />

• Fluffy, ill-defined<br />

sclerotic line<br />

perpendicular <strong>to</strong> major<br />

trabecular lines<br />

• Periosteal reaction<br />

Stress Fractures<br />

• Thin incomplete lucent line<br />

• May proceed <strong>to</strong> completion<br />

• Beware of the “DBL”<br />

• Bone scan helpful<br />

Imaging of Early Stress Fractures<br />

• MRI <strong>and</strong> bone scan near 100% sensitivity<br />

• MRI improved specificity<br />

347


Exertional Leg Pain<br />

Exertional Compartment<br />

Syndrome<br />

– Routine MRI & bone<br />

scan not helpful<br />

– Compartment pressure<br />

testing<br />

Popliteal Artery<br />

Entrapment<br />

– MRA<br />

– Angiography<br />

Acute Ankle Trauma<br />

When do you x-ray x<br />

– Ottawa Ankle Rules:<br />

Stiell IG, McKnight RD, Greenberg GH, McDowell I, Nair RC, Wells GA, et al. Implementation of the<br />

Ottawa ankle rules. JAMA 1994;271:827-32.<br />

Ankle Injuries<br />

Normal ankle<br />

(AP view)<br />

Normal ankle<br />

(Lateral view)<br />

Normal ankle<br />

(Mortise view)<br />

348


Don’t t forget the foot films!<br />

AP, lateral <strong>and</strong> oblique<br />

Contralateral foot films<br />

Weight-bearing views<br />

Lateral view<br />

– Metatarsal shafts &<br />

tarsal bones align<br />

AP <strong>and</strong> obliques<br />

– 2nd met medial<br />

border & middle<br />

cuneiform align<br />

Chronic Ankle Pain<br />

MRI<br />

– Imaging modality of choice for soft-tissue tissue <strong>and</strong><br />

osteochondral lesions<br />

CT<br />

– Ankle fractures & bony pathology<br />

Bone scan<br />

– Diffuse, non-specific pain<br />

– F/U CT if needed for further evaluation of stress<br />

fractures<br />

Conclusions<br />

Initial imaging of choice: plain radiography<br />

– Image before injection<br />

– Image all trauma<br />

CT: good for bone<br />

MRI: good for soft tissue<br />

– T1: ana<strong>to</strong>my; T2: pathology<br />

Scintigraphy: : good for metabolic activity<br />

Ultrasound: great potential<br />

– Opera<strong>to</strong>r / interpreter & technology dependent<br />

Imaging selection<br />

– Based on his<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>and</strong> physical<br />

– Know your specialists’ imaging preferences<br />

– Consult radiologist as needed<br />

349


Thank You<br />

350

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!