30.01.2015 Views

(JBED) - Summer 2006 - The Whole Building Design Guide

(JBED) - Summer 2006 - The Whole Building Design Guide

(JBED) - Summer 2006 - The Whole Building Design Guide

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1. COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE<br />

SOLUTIONS: AUTOMATED BLINDS<br />

AND SHADES<br />

Blinds and shades are used in most<br />

U.S. buildings today but unlike European<br />

experience, virtually none are motorized<br />

and few are externally mounted. <strong>The</strong> assumption<br />

is that that these shading systems<br />

are available for occupants to control<br />

localized glare and solar gain but they<br />

are not relied on to control building envelope<br />

performance. Accordingly, most energy<br />

standards do not provide any credits<br />

for systems that rely on occupant action<br />

since the response is unknown and uncertain.<br />

Furthermore, engineers will generally<br />

size HVAC systems assuming worst case<br />

operating procedures—e.g. that the shading<br />

systems are not operated as planned.<br />

Large glazed areas, even if heavily tinted<br />

and reflective, may be insufficient to fully<br />

control glare on sunny days.<br />

the U.S., nor are systems that further link<br />

the blinds to dimmable lighting controls.<br />

Beginning with “off the shelf” blind and<br />

lighting components, we developed and<br />

tested an integrated, automated blind and<br />

daylighting system in two identical sideby-side<br />

test rooms in a southeast facing<br />

office building in Oakland, CA (Figures 2.1<br />

and 2.2). Large cooling and lighting energy<br />

savings were achieved, peak electrical savings<br />

were measured and the resultant automated<br />

systems were acceptable to occupants<br />

in a limited occupancy study.<br />

Despite the success of the demonstration,<br />

the lack of a cost-effective delivery system<br />

managed by a single vendor or groups of<br />

vendors continues to limit use of such systems.<br />

<strong>The</strong> project illustrated the market obstacles<br />

from a building owner and manufacturer<br />

perspective in terms of who<br />

serves the “systems integrator” role when<br />

Figures 2.1 and 2.2<br />

Smart controls on the automated blind systems (left photo) keep direct sun out of the space, reducing glare and cooling loads. <strong>The</strong> same hardware<br />

system with different control strategies (right photo) admits sunlight to offset heating loads but creates excessive glare.<br />

AUTOMATED VENETIAN BLIND AND<br />

INTEGRATED DAYLIGHTING SYSTEMS<br />

Venetian blind systems are widely<br />

specified for control of solar gain and<br />

glare. Because both the optical properties<br />

of the slats and their tilt can be controlled,<br />

they provide a wide range of optical and<br />

solar control. But a number of field studies<br />

have shown that manually operated<br />

blinds are rarely controlled in an optimal<br />

manner. Adding sensors and controls and<br />

automating the blind operation should<br />

permit better control of both energy use<br />

and comfort, assuming that the proper<br />

control strategies can be successfully developed,<br />

implemented and maintained.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se integrated, automated control<br />

systems are not yet commonly available in<br />

12 Journal of <strong>Building</strong> Enclosure <strong>Design</strong><br />

the different system elements are provided<br />

from different vendors. Development<br />

of smart, automated blind systems is<br />

more advanced in Europe and Japan. Although<br />

a growing number of these systems<br />

are now being installed in buildings it<br />

is still difficult to find measured performance<br />

data that clearly demonstrates the<br />

overall energy use of such systems.<br />

AUTOMATED MOTORIZED SHADE SYSTEMS<br />

AND INTEGRATED DAYLIGHTING CONTROLS:<br />

NEW YORK TIMES BUILDING<br />

A second widely used operable shading<br />

system is based on roller shades.<br />

Roller shade systems can utilize different<br />

fabrics encompassing a wide range of solar<br />

optical properties, ranging from blackout<br />

shades to highly transmissive veiling<br />

fabrics. Although mechanically simpler<br />

than blinds, once the fabric is chosen the<br />

shade systems have more limited optical<br />

control than blinds, largely based on their<br />

position between up and down. It is possible<br />

to layer blinds or use optically variable<br />

fabrics but this is not common practice.<br />

An extensive field test program was conducted<br />

using an automated shade system<br />

in conjunction with a high transmittance,<br />

all glass façade for the New York Times<br />

headquarters building, now under construction<br />

in New York City. <strong>The</strong> 52-storey,<br />

140,000 m 2 building will utilize fixed exterior<br />

shading and fritted glass in some locations<br />

(Figure 3.1) but will require interior<br />

shades for sun control and glare control<br />

and for thermal and visual comfort as well<br />

as energy management.<br />

<strong>The</strong> exterior of the building utilizes a<br />

transparent floor-to-ceiling, all-glass<br />

façade that encourages openness and<br />

communication with the external world,<br />

consistent with the owner’s dedication to<br />

creating a high quality work environment<br />

for their employees. Low partitions were<br />

used to reinforce the sense of openness<br />

and to let the daylight penetrate deeper<br />

into the space. <strong>The</strong> cruciform floor plan<br />

(Figure 3.2), with distances from interior<br />

offices to façade of less than 7.6 m, permits<br />

view in three directions from most

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!