PROGRESS REPORT TWG II Renewable Energy Action ... - Casindo

PROGRESS REPORT
TWG II: Renewable Energy Action Plan
Lilies Setiartiti & Sri Atmaja P. Rosyidi
Coordinator Technical Working Group II
Mataram, March 2011
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION

Methodology
Current
Situation
Analysis
RE Action
Plan
RE Dev’t
Target
RE potential the region
RE policy in the region
RE utilization in the region
RE dev’t opportunities
Supply‐demand analysis
Implementation strategy
National policy on RE dev’t
Setting of RE dev’t target

National Energy Policy

Final Energy Consumption for Yogyakarta
(KED, Regional Energy Policy Scenario)
2007 2025
Energy Elasticity:
‐ Electricity : 1,18
‐ Fuel : 2,03
Target of Energy Elasticity:
‐ Electricity:

Chapter 2
DETAIL TARGET & GENERAL
REGIONAL PROGRAMS

Target on Renewable Energy Development Roadmap
for Yogyakarta
PLTS
2010 2015 2020 2025
25 KWp 250 KWp 2000 KWp 3000 KWp

Program/Policy of PLTS in Municipality
• To reduce the electricity use from PLN grid particularly in peak
hours.
• To increase the use of clean and environmental friendly
renewable energy in municipality
No. Customer category Total Percentage (%)
1. Social 19,684 2.44
Household 757,725 92.70
R1-450 VA 465,568 58.78
R1-900 VA 205,534 29.31
2. R1-1300 VA 53,241 7.59
R1-2200 VA 23,170 3.31
R2-3.500 - 5.500 VA 6373 0.91
R3-6.600 VA and above 626 0.08
3. Commercial use 30,562 3.79
4. Industry 476 0.06
5. Public 5564 0.69
6. Others 2613 0.31
Total 805,468 100
Source: PT PLN (Persero) APJ Yogyakarta, April 2010

PLTS System in Municipality :
Hybrid System with PLN Grid

PLTS in Municipality: The use for PLN Costumer R2 and R3
‐ Costumer3500 VA
‐ PLTS
10% x 3500 VA = 350 VA
Total: 2 unit x 175 Wp
Note:
1. Fuel cell unit installed in proper location in
house for optimal electrical generator.
2. Inverter (controller) changes electricity in DC
(from PV) to AC, therefore, it can be used for
electrical equipments.
3. Distribution box is used to distribute AC
electricity from PV to electricity grid from
PLN.
4. Use of AC system.
5. Electrical meter to measure the electricity use
from PLN.

PLTS in Rural
General Program/Policy
• To increase the energy access in isolated/rural
community
• To provide the job opportunity
• To increase level of life in rural community

Road Map Pengembangan Energi Terbarukan
Provinsi DIY
PLTMH
2010 2015 2020 2025
8 unit
terpasang
15 unit
terpasang
20 unit
terpasang
25 unit
terpasang
25 Kw 50 Kw 600 Kw 750 Kw

General Program/Policy for
PLTMH
• To optimize the potential of irrigation channel for MHPP development
• To develop “pikrohidro” for small scale (rural household)
• To promote the MHPP development for economic production activities,
increasing the community income and increasing the number of wjob
opportunity
• To develop the MHPP workshop for operation and maintenance purpose.

Target on Renewable Energy Development Roadmap
for Yogyakarta
PLT Angin
2010 2015 2020 2025
20 Kw 40 Kw 80 Kw 160 Kw

General Program/Policy of PLT Angin
Development
• To develop wind turbine technology for power plant in scale of 500 VA
– 2500 VA by wind farm configuration
• To develop the wind turbine for electricity generator, which can be
used for economic production activities and water supply in irrigation
system or water resources for coastal area in southern part of
Yogyakarta
• To develop the workshops of PLT Angin for operation and
maintenance purposes

Target on Renewable Energy Development Roadmap for
Yogyakarta
Biogas
2010 2015 2020 2025
300
installed unit
1,000
installed unit
2,500
installed unit
5,000
installed unit

General Program/Policy for Biogas
• To do biogas potential identification in Yogyakarta in which
feasible developed.
• To optimize the use of animal dugs in rural community.
• To promote the liquid energy from biogas by using the
appropriate technology.
• To promote the private partnership in biogas development
For lighting
For alternative energy
sources

Renewable Energy Development
Opportunities
Type of Energy Local Tradable
Hydro -
Mini/Micro hydro 1,490 kW 1,490 kW
Geothermal -
Biodiesel - -
Bioethanol - -
Biomass 143.25 MWh 38.54 MWh
Biogas 37,377 sbm/year 37,377 sbm/year
Wind 2,390 kW 2,390 kW
Solar 10 kW/year 10 kW/year
Other - -

SUPPLY AND DEMAND ANALYSIS

Introduction
• Renewable Energy categorized in two:
• Local energy
• Tradable energy
The categorize change within a certain condition,
before : no available grid connection
after : grid connection available

Utilization of renewable energy :
• only available energy in region, i.e. solar home
system in remote area
• Substitute fossil fuel , i.e. using biogas to
replace diesel oil for genset
• Utilize waste, for biomass and biogas
• Business, i.e. grid connecting microhydro,
biomass power plant, jatropha plantation

Microhydro
No Kab/Kota Location
Potency Micro hydro (KW)
Local
Tradable
1Kulonprogo 946.7 880
2Sleman 537.7 395
3Yogyakarta 12.4 ‐
4Bantul 185 180
5Gunungkidul 56.6 35
Total 1738.4 1490

Biomass
No.
Regency/City
Biomas Potential (ton)
Wet (ton) Dry (ton) MWH SBM
1 Kulonprogo 230,307.31 115,153.66 115,153.66 72,661.96
2 Bantul 312,829.73 156,414.87 156,414.87 98,697.78
3 Gunungkidul 976,933.46 488,466.73 488,466.73 308,222.51
4 Sleman 485,764.97 242,882.48 242,882.48 153,258.85
5 Yogyakarta 1,912.67 956.34 956.34 603.45
Total 2,007,748.14 1,003,874.07 1,003,874.07 633,444.54

Calculation local potency
green (wet) ton of biomass 2,007,748.14
dry ton (assume with 50% moisture) 1,003,874.07
1 dry ton of biomass burned in typical commercial burner will produce 10,000 lbs
of steam
10,000 lbs of steam will produce about 1,000 hours power or generate 1 MWH of
electricity
assume:
plant efficiency 30%
operation hours 7008 hours/year (capacity factor of 80%)
equivalent capacity 143.25 MWh

tradable
tradable
green (wet) 540221.357
dry (50 %) 270110.6785
assume:
plant efficiency 0.3
operation hours 7008hours/year
(capacity factor of
80%)
equivalent
capacity 38.54319043MWh ‐‐‐> 270110.6785 165577.8459 SBM

Biogas Potency
Cows
No Kab/Kota
Total % Sapi Biogas
Manure (kg) Gas (m3) /kg Kerosene (L) Kliter SBM/hari SBM/tahun
19.6147339
1 Kulonprogo 44478 20 177912 5337.36 3309.1632 3.3091632 5 5727.502314
21.2371676
2 Bantul 48157 20 192628 5778.84 3582.8808 3.5828808 5 6201.252955
72.2269646
3 Gunungkidul 109187 30 655122 19653.66 12185.2692 12.1852692 6 21090.27368
14.8860166
4 Sleman 45007 15 135021 4050.63 2511.3906 2.5113906 4 4346.71686
5 Yogyakarta 181 10 362 10.86 6.7332 0.0067332 0.03991037 11.65382795
Total 247010 37377.39964
Note: % Sapi Biogas = percentage number of cows that can
be use for biogas

Wind
No Kab/Kota Location
Potensi PLT Angin (MW)
Local Tradable
1 Kulonprogo Jangkaran 0.2 0.17
Glagah 0.2 0.17
Karangwuni 0.3 0.2
Garongan 0.2 0.17
Pleret 0.2 0.17
Banaran 0.2 0.17
2 Bantul Kretek
Sanden
Srandakan
0.6 0.5
3 Gunungkidul Girisubo 0.2 0.17
Purwosari 0.2 0.17
Saptosari
Tanjungsari
Tepus
0.6 0.5
Total 2.9 2.39

Solar energy
• potency based on capability of region to
provide/build
No Kab/Kota Lokasi
Potensi PLTS (unit)
Local
Tradable
1 Kulonprogo 3 desa 200 75
2 Bantul Bantul 100 50
3 Gunungkidul 11 desa 200 75
Total 500 200

• Microhydro
Development Scenario
• Local household demand
No Kab/Kota Lokasi
Jumlah
KK
Listrik/K
K (watt)
Total
Daya
(MW)
SBM/tahun
1 Kulonprogo 769 0.1885 42.1759325
2 Sleman 4430 1.0556 236.185222
3 Yogyakarta 176 0.0176 3.937912
4 Bantul 736 0.1184 26.491408
5 Gunungkidul 955 0.1183 26.4690335

Skenario Demand ‐‐> assumption 2.5 % /year
Local Household Demand (SBM/year)
No Lokation
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
1 Kulonprogo 42.18 43.23 44.31 45.42 46.55 47.72 48.91 50.13 51.39 52.67 53.99 55.34 56.72 58.14 59.59 61.08
2 Sleman 236.19 242.09 248.14 254.35 260.70 267.22 273.90 280.75 287.77 294.96 302.34 309.90 317.64 325.58 333.72 342.07
3 Yogyakarta 3.94 4.04 4.14 4.24 4.35 4.46 4.57 4.68 4.80 4.92 5.04 5.17 5.30 5.43 5.56 5.70
4 Bantul 26.49 27.15 27.83 28.53 29.24 29.97 30.72 31.49 32.28 33.08 33.91 34.76 35.63 36.52 37.43 38.37
5 Gunungkidul 26.47 27.13 27.81 28.50 29.22 29.95 30.70 31.46 32.25 33.06 33.88 34.73 35.60 36.49 37.40 38.34
Total 335.26 343.64 352.23 361.04 370.06 379.32 388.80 398.52 408.48 418.69 429.16 439.89 450.89 462.16 473.71 485.56
Development Plan
Lokasi
No
Totally Installed Capacity (MW)
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
1 Kulonprogo ‐ 0.60 0.03 0.045 ‐ 0.12 0.10 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
2 Sleman 0.0065 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.02 0.02 0.08 0.025 0.02 0.65 0.45 0.45 0.04 0.32 0.04
3 Yogyakarta ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
4 Bantul ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.18 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
5 Gunungkidul ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.035 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

Biogas

And so for :
• Biomass
• Wind energy
• Solar energy
Development scenario based on realistic target
that can be achieve by Local stakeholders
depend on its capability to provide

Target Development
Power Plant
Microhydro
PLTAngin
PLTBiomass
Solar energy
Total
(SBM)
2010 2015 2020 2025
1.20 190.61 191.51 192.81
300.12 600.25 900.37
73.56 102.03
231.04 434
8.314 10.642 13.089 15.661
83.07 603.402 1035.889 1542.84

Thank you
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta