08.02.2015 Views

Solutions to Chapter 4 - Communication Networks

Solutions to Chapter 4 - Communication Networks

Solutions to Chapter 4 - Communication Networks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Communication</strong> <strong>Networks</strong> (2 nd Edition)<br />

<strong>Chapter</strong> 4 <strong>Solutions</strong><br />

which is 4x 1/3 x 80% STS-3 or 16/15 STS-3. Adding the other 20% of the traffic which is<br />

destined <strong>to</strong> the higher tier link and has <strong>to</strong> traverse some of the lower tier links in both directions,<br />

the average link capacity in the lower tier links should be 16/15 STS-3 + 2 x 20% STS-3 or 22/15<br />

STS-3, which is almost 1.5 STS-3 on average.<br />

On the higher tier ring, the traffic from each subring will be routed equally <strong>to</strong> each other subring.<br />

Thus the bandwidth required on each link will be four times the average traffic between two<br />

subrings or 4 x 1/3 of the <strong>to</strong>tal traffic from each subring. Because each ring produces 4×0.2 ×<br />

STS-3 amount of traffic, the bandwidth required on each link of the higher tier ring is on the order<br />

of 4/3 × 0.8 × STS-3 ≈ STS-3.<br />

b. Discuss the bandwidth requirements that are possible if 80% of the traffic generated by each<br />

site is destined <strong>to</strong> sites in other rings.<br />

If 20% of the traffic is <strong>to</strong> stay within the same ring, then the required bandwidth on the higher tier<br />

ring will be increased. The required bandwidth on the lower tier rings will not change significantly,<br />

as each source still produces and receives STS-3 of traffic.<br />

The higher tier ring will now support 4 times more traffic. Thus, the bandwidth requirement is<br />

around STS-12.<br />

15. Compare the efficiency of BLSR and UPSR rings in the following two cases:<br />

a. All traffic originating at the nodes in the ring are destined for a given central node.<br />

Considering that the <strong>to</strong>tal capacity of working and protection lines in both BLSR and<br />

UPSR is the same, the <strong>to</strong>tal bandwidth utilized in both BLSR and UPSR in this scenario is<br />

the same. The difference is the distribution of the traffic and unused capacity across the<br />

ring in the two cases.<br />

As an example we consider the ring shown in the figure below, consisting of four nodes.<br />

We first consider the UPSR scenario. The last hop before the central node is the<br />

bottleneck in this case limiting the traffic in the other hops on the working ring shown with<br />

solid lines. Assuming equal distribution of bandwidth among the nodes, if the last hop is<br />

fully utilized the hop prior <strong>to</strong> the last hop will be utilized up <strong>to</strong> 2/3 of its capacity and the<br />

one before that will be utilized up <strong>to</strong> 1/3 of its capacity. The remaining hop will not be<br />

utilized at all. The lines on the protection path will be utilized similarly but in the opposite<br />

order, shown with dotted lines. As a result the sum of working and protection lines<br />

<strong>to</strong>gether will be utilized only <strong>to</strong> half of the <strong>to</strong>tal capacity all across the ring.<br />

UPSR<br />

BLSR<br />

Leon-Garcia/Widjaja 8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!