11.02.2015 Views

pdf - WHALE

pdf - WHALE

pdf - WHALE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the (Roswell UFO crash) event (sic)." Indeed, both Friedman and<br />

Moore, around the time of the initial publication of the Roswell<br />

Incident in 1980, boasted that they had interviwed more then "ninety<br />

witnesses."<br />

While these double digit figures are certainly accurate, the<br />

presentation of such a seemingly impressive number of witnesses by<br />

themselves, without qualifications, is misleading. The relevant issue is<br />

not how many witnesses were interviwed, but rather what type of<br />

wtinesses (i.e., firsthand, secondhand, etc.) these people are and how<br />

truthful and accurate their statements are.<br />

Unfortunately, a careful reading of Moore and Berlitz's Roswell<br />

Incident reveals that despite the impressive claim of having<br />

"interviewed more than seventy witnesses," the testimonies of just<br />

twenty-five people are presented. Out of these twenty-five, only seven<br />

of them are firsthand sources who claim to have seen the alleged<br />

saucer debris, and one of these accounts is suspect. Of these seven<br />

people, however, only five of them claim to have actually handled the<br />

material personally, and one of them is adamant that it was not from<br />

an extraterrestrial spacecraft. 9<br />

Researcher interviews of a few primary source "eyewitnesses": this<br />

much the Roswell ET Myth and the Nazi UFO Legend have in<br />

common. The problem thus posed by the mere existence of the Nazi<br />

Legend in this context is therefore very significant: Why does one<br />

event form such a stable and consistent foundation in t h r e<br />

historiography of the ET-UFO Mythos, and why is the other<br />

hypothesis so consistently avoided by the same community, when in<br />

general, both the ET explanation of the Roswell incident, and the<br />

Nazi UFO Legend are based upon not only the same types of<br />

evidence, but initially, the same approximate quantity of evidence<br />

Put differently, why is the ET Myth so predominant in all<br />

"unofficial" explanations of the Roswell crash, and the hypothesis<br />

of a terrestrially-originated though exotic technology as an<br />

explanation consistently avoided<br />

The answer I believe, lies in some peculiarities of the Majic-12<br />

documents themselves.<br />

9 Kal K. Korff, The Roswell UFO Crash, pp. 28-29.<br />

280

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!