Final Report of the Evaluation of the Pupil Learning Credits Pilot ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

43 ANNEX A STATISTICAL MODELLING: BACKGROUND VARIABLES Multilevel modelling analyses reported in Section 3.3 included the following pupiland school-level variables: Pupil-level: Prior attainment at the end of Key Stage 2 or Key Stage 3 Pupils in the same school since Year 7 Sex Age Eligible for FSM First language English Special educational needs Ethnic background School-level: Percentage of pupils eligible for FSM School size Boys only school Girls only school Religious school School with sixth form Grammar school EiC Phase PLC school Specialist school Beacon school School in EiC Action Zone
ANNEX B CHARACTERISTICS OF PLC SURVEY AND OTHER SCHOOLS Characteristics [mean (standard deviation)] of the Year 9 PLC survey schools compared with those of other PLC schools Number on roll % eligible for FSM Authorised absence Survey schools (N=14) Non-survey PLC schools (N=237 to 242) % with Special Educational Needs (SEN) % with SEN but without a statement % achieving 5 or more A*-C grade GCSEs % achieving 5 or more A*-G grade GCSEs Unauthorised absence 892 (323) 46 (12) 3 (2) 28 (13) 33 (15) 85 (10) 9 (2) 2 (2) 908 (324) 46 (12) 3 (2) 26 (11) 31 (13) 84 (10) 9 (3) 2 (2) Characteristics [mean (standard deviation)] of the Year 11 PLC survey schools compared with those of other PLC schools Number on % eligible roll for FSM Year 11 Survey schools (N=23) Non-survey PLC schools (N=233) % with Special Educational Needs (SEN) % with SEN but without a statement % achieving 5 or more A*-C grade GCSEs % achieving 5 or more A*-G grade GCSEs Authorised absence (% half days missed) Unauthorised absence (% half days missed) 906 (325) 46 (11) 3 (1) 25 (12) 33 (11) 86 (7) 9 (3) 2 (1) 908 (324) 46 (12) 3 (2) 26 (11) 31 (13) 84 (10) 9 (2) 2 (2)
Page 1 and 2: RESEARCH Final Report of the Evalua
Page 3 and 4: 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMA
Page 5 and 6: 4 where pupils in PLC schools repor
Page 7 and 8: 6 1. INTRODUCTION The Pupil Learnin
Page 9 and 10: 8 2. METHODS This report draws toge
Page 11 and 12: 10 As part of the evaluation of Exc
Page 13 and 14: 12 curricular activities, departmen
Page 15 and 16: 14 in ten respondents stated that t
Page 17 and 18: 16 Main strengths and weaknesses of
Page 19 and 20: 18 not only intended to assess whet
Page 21 and 22: 20 • pupils in PLC schools report
Page 23 and 24: 22 School experience and behaviour
Page 25 and 26: 24 Around four out of ten pupils re
Page 27 and 28: 26 We examined whether there were s
Page 29 and 30: 28 Aspirations for the future Pupil
Page 31 and 32: 30 Multi-level modelling Summary Th
Page 33 and 34: 32 Pupils’ progress from KS2 to G
Page 35 and 36: 34 Difference-in-differences and ec
Page 37 and 38: 36 when using the discrete measures
Page 39 and 40: 38 4. SUMMARY AND POLICY IMPLICATIO
Page 41 and 42: 40 In particular, the PLC pilot sch
Page 43: 42 MCNALLY, S. (2005) Economic Eval

Final Report of the Evaluation of the Pupil Learning Credits Pilot ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?