22.02.2015 Views

APPENDIX I: Noise Monitoring Data - Xstrata Coal Mangoola

APPENDIX I: Noise Monitoring Data - Xstrata Coal Mangoola

APPENDIX I: Noise Monitoring Data - Xstrata Coal Mangoola

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3 METHODOLOGY<br />

3.1 Attended <strong>Noise</strong> <strong>Monitoring</strong><br />

Attended monitoring was conducted in accordance with OEH ‘Industrial <strong>Noise</strong> Policy’ (INP)<br />

guidelines and Australian Standard AS 1055 ‘Acoustics, Description and Measurement of<br />

Environmental <strong>Noise</strong>’. Atmospheric condition measurement was also undertaken. The<br />

duration of each measurement was 15 minutes.<br />

Attended monitoring is preferred to the use of noise loggers when determining compliance<br />

with prescribed limits; it allows an accurate determination of the contribution, if any, to<br />

measured noise levels by the source of interest (in this case <strong>Mangoola</strong> <strong>Coal</strong>).<br />

The equipment detailed in Table 3.1 was used to measure environmental noise levels.<br />

Table 3.1 ATTENDED NOISE MONITORING EQUIPMENT<br />

Model Serial Number Calibration Due Date<br />

Rion NA-28 sound level analyser 370304 10/05/2013<br />

Rion NA-28 sound level analyser 701424 27/04/2013<br />

Larson Davis 150 Calibrator 3333 25/07/2014<br />

Rion NC-73 Calibrator 11248306 09/02/2014<br />

Calibration certificates are provided in Appendix B.<br />

Meteorological data was obtained from <strong>Mangoola</strong> <strong>Coal</strong> meteorological stations. This allowed<br />

correlation of atmospheric parameters and measured noise levels. Sigma theta is used to<br />

calculate vertical temperature gradient (VTG) in accordance with procedures detailed in the<br />

INP.<br />

Met data used in this report was sourced from <strong>Mangoola</strong> <strong>Coal</strong>’s north and south<br />

meteorological stations and is provided in Appendix C.<br />

<strong>Data</strong> from the southern meteorological station appeared to contain errors during the day<br />

period of 4 July 2012, so all meteorological data for the day period was sourced from the<br />

northern meteorological station only for this day.<br />

As indicated in the notes below Condition 3, Schedule 3 of the project approval, modifying<br />

factors from Section 4 of the INP should be implemented where applicable. Tonality and low<br />

frequency from <strong>Mangoola</strong> <strong>Coal</strong> were assessed by analysis of the measured L Aeq spectrum.<br />

Years of monitoring have indicated that noise levels from mining operations, particularly<br />

those levels measured at significant distances from the source are relatively continuous.<br />

Given this, noise levels from <strong>Mangoola</strong> <strong>Coal</strong> at the monitoring locations are unlikely to be<br />

intermittent. In addition, there is no equipment on site at <strong>Mangoola</strong> <strong>Coal</strong> that would generate<br />

impulsive noise as defined in the INP. However, low frequency noise from <strong>Mangoola</strong> <strong>Coal</strong><br />

10<br />

12324_R01.doc<br />

Page 10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!