23.02.2015 Views

D.3.3 ALGORITHMS FOR INCREMENTAL ... - SecureChange

D.3.3 ALGORITHMS FOR INCREMENTAL ... - SecureChange

D.3.3 ALGORITHMS FOR INCREMENTAL ... - SecureChange

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Dealing with Known Unknowns: A Goal-based Approach 13<br />

where the configuration is not useful. To be more conservative, in this paper we<br />

consider as risk measure the complement of the Total Belief and namely the sum<br />

of the total chances that a configuration would turn out to be utterly useless.<br />

Building on the above considerations, we introduce two quantitative metrics:<br />

Residual Risk 1 and Max Belief as follows.<br />

Max Belief (MaxB): of an configuration C is a function that measures the maximum<br />

belief supported by Domain Expert such that C is useful after evolution<br />

happens.<br />

Residual Risk (RRisk): of an configuration C is the complement of total belief<br />

supported by Domain Expert such that C is useful after evolution happens.<br />

In other words, residual risk of C is the total belief that C is not useful when<br />

evolutions happen.<br />

They offer two independent dimensions upon which a designer can chose.<br />

Given an evolutionary enterprise model 〈EM, r o,r c〉, max belief and residual<br />

risk can be formally defined as follows.<br />

MaxB(C) max p i<br />

∀EM p i<br />

−→EM i .EM i ∈SDA(C)<br />

X<br />

RRisk(C) 1 −<br />

∀EM p i<br />

−→EM i .EM i ∈SDA(C)<br />

p i<br />

(1)<br />

where SDA(C) is the set of design alternatives which a configuration C comprises<br />

(or support), also called as design alternative set of a configuration C.<br />

The residual risk, as discussed, is the complement of total belief. Hence, for<br />

convenience, the Total Belief of C is denoted as:<br />

RRisk(C) = 1 − RRisk(C)<br />

The selection between two configurations based on max belief and residual risk<br />

is obvious: “higher max belief, and lower residual risk”. However, it is not always<br />

a case that a higher max belief configuration has lower residual risk. Thus decision<br />

makers should understand which criterion is more important. In this sense, these<br />

metrics could be combined using weighted harmonic mean. Suppose that w 1 , w 2<br />

are weights of max belief and residual risk, respectively. The harmonic mean is<br />

defined as follow.<br />

w 1 + w 2<br />

MaxB(C) · (1 − RRisk(C))<br />

H(C) = w 1<br />

MaxB(C) + w 2<br />

= (1 + β)<br />

β · MaxB(C) − RRisk(C) + 1<br />

1 − RRisk(C)<br />

where β = w 1/w 2 means max belief is β times as much important as residual risk.<br />

1 One should not confuse this notion of residual risk with the one in security risk analysis<br />

studies which is different in nature.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!