04.03.2015 Views

eu-europol-org-crime-report

eu-europol-org-crime-report

eu-europol-org-crime-report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

58<br />

In the current context of increasing globalisation<br />

and geopolitical instability, with emerging<br />

forms of criminality, legislative initiatives and<br />

criminal policies are needed regarding the<br />

prevention of radicalisation and extremism,<br />

actions against aspiring foreign fighters and<br />

returnees and passive training in terrorism<br />

(currently not covered by national legislation).<br />

Cross-border <strong>crime</strong> and, increasingly, <strong>crime</strong>s<br />

without clear borders such as cyber<strong>crime</strong>,<br />

present a particular challenge due to the<br />

involvement of different jurisdictions and<br />

are therefore an additional hindrance for the<br />

prosecution to determine the competent<br />

authorities. Legal obstacles to judicial cooperation<br />

in criminal matters remain a challenge.<br />

Consistently transposing and effectively<br />

implementing key existing legal measures<br />

and policies, mutual recognition instruments<br />

and newly developed instruments (e.g. the<br />

Directive on freezing and confiscation and<br />

the Directive on the European Investigation<br />

Order), are needed to ensure the prosecution<br />

and conviction of perpetrators, particularly<br />

through the freezing and confiscation of<br />

the proceeds of <strong>crime</strong>, making the effective<br />

dismantling of criminal networks feasible.<br />

Among the rules applicable, those regulating<br />

the fundamental rights of suspected and<br />

accused persons are crucial. The adoption and<br />

implementation of relevant legal provisions<br />

on the protection of the rights of victims of<br />

<strong>crime</strong> and the procedural safeguards for the<br />

suspects or accused must be ensured. 46<br />

Provisions and time limits on data retention,<br />

the identification of the competent<br />

jurisdiction (including in cases of conflicts of<br />

jurisdiction), the different rules on gathering,<br />

admissibility and disclosure of evidence, and<br />

differences in substantive and procedural<br />

laws, can affect judicial cooperation. Eurojust<br />

will continue to contribute to improving<br />

judicial cooperation and mutual trust, also<br />

with third States, by building bridges between<br />

the different judicial systems. Effective and<br />

efficient support for the competent national<br />

authorities calls for closer operational cooperation<br />

and partnership between EU partners,<br />

based on an effective information exchange<br />

and complementarity.<br />

In this context the strengthening of mutual<br />

trust between law enforcement and judicial<br />

authorities is essential. Eurojust’s coordination<br />

meetings allow for law enforcement<br />

and judicial authorities to complement each<br />

other in developing common investigative<br />

and prosecutorial strategies (e.g. issuing and<br />

executing European Arrest Warrants; simultaneous<br />

arrests and searches; controlled<br />

deliveries), with the support of Europol and<br />

involved third States. Joint investigation teams<br />

have also proven to be very effective, obliging<br />

law enforcement and judicial authorities to<br />

work together in ensuring that the information<br />

and evidence collected will be admissible<br />

and properly assessed in court. Last but not<br />

least are the coordination centres established<br />

at Eurojust providing real-time support during<br />

action days by facilitating decision making and<br />

immediate responses.<br />

Eurojust has managed various strategic<br />

projects 47 , such as in the area of trafficking<br />

in human beings and drug trafficking, <strong>org</strong>anised<br />

thematic seminars to bring together<br />

practitioners and involved actors, such as the<br />

Prosecutors General, to exchange experience<br />

and best practice and consequently<br />

produced <strong>report</strong>s and other products, such<br />

as the Terrorism Convictions Monitor. These<br />

activities remain necessary, as well as training,<br />

the latter being a permanent challenge for<br />

prosecutors and judges.<br />

The European Public Prosecutor’s Office<br />

(EPPO), as a future new EU actor in the fight<br />

against <strong>crime</strong>s affecting the financial interests<br />

of the European Union, will profit from<br />

Eurojust’s operational experience in international<br />

judicial cooperation and the tools it has<br />

developed to succeed in its operational work.<br />

Partnership and synergies between EU actors<br />

are indispensable. In the next 10 years,<br />

Eurojust will continue to promote close cooperation<br />

with all the partners concerned.<br />

© Shutterstock<br />

EUROPOL / Exploring tomorrow’s <strong>org</strong>anised <strong>crime</strong> / 2015

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!