wind tunnel paper.pdf - aero.com

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 13: Comparison between the measured and calculated (linear) lift coefficients as a function of the angle of attack. Figure 14: The measured lift coefficient as a function of the angle of attack; C Lmax = 1.04 at α = 17.6°. 12
Figure 15: The measured and calculated (quadratic) drag coefficient vs. lift coefficient. Figure 16: The measured lift-to-drag ratio vs. angle of attack. After establishing the level of confidence and proving the adequacy of the RP model, several tests for the controllability of the air vehicle have been conducted. Figure 17 presents the <strong>wind</strong> <strong>tunnel</strong> results for the evaluation of the control surfaces. 13
Page 2 and 3: LESSONS FROM WIND TUNNEL MODELS MAD
Page 4 and 5: (a) Figure 1: Preliminary CAD model
Page 6 and 7: Strength and Stiffness: Both are si
Page 8 and 9: MODEL DESIGN STRUCTURAL CONSIDERATI
Page 10 and 11: Stiffening plates Figure 9: The CER
Page 14 and 15: (a) C m 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 C m Vs
Page 16: REFERENCES 1. Barlow, J.B., Rae, W.

wind tunnel paper.pdf - aero.com

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?