12.03.2015 Views

View - Martin Kröger - ETH Zürich

View - Martin Kröger - ETH Zürich

View - Martin Kröger - ETH Zürich

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1306 FANG, KRÖGER, AND ÖTTINGER<br />

FIG. 5. Magnitude of the strain p at which the maximum in the stress overshoot occurs as functions of shear<br />

rate for shear stress under startup of steady shear flow predicted by the models and experiment.<br />

reptation represented by a smaller value of d in the MLDS model. This behavior is<br />

also in accordance with the other experimental results Attane et al. 1985; Menezes and<br />

Graessley 1982.<br />

C. Steady shear flow<br />

In Fig. 7 the steady-state values of the shear stress xy and the first normal stress<br />

difference N 1 are plotted as functions of shear rate. Our model and the FCS model<br />

predict a slight decrease of the shear stress over a range of shear rates that extends from<br />

roughly ˙ 0.3 to ˙ 2s 1 , where the MLDS model predicts a slight increase which<br />

is consistent with the experimental data. This new observation of the MLDS model may<br />

be attributed to the fact that we use a relatively small ratio d / s 10 here. Over the<br />

same range of shear rates, all the model predictions for the first normal stress difference<br />

FIG. 6. Relaxation of the shear stress reduced by its value at steady state as a function of time after cessation<br />

of steady shear flow at two shear rates predicted by experiment and the models.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!