The Rhetoric and Death of U.S. Freemasonry In this essay I argue ...
The Rhetoric and Death of U.S. Freemasonry In this essay I argue ...
The Rhetoric and Death of U.S. Freemasonry In this essay I argue ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Death</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Freemasonry</strong> 23<br />
it should be said Burke's thinking here is very much in sympathy with the mysteries; if<br />
he is not an occultist proper, Burke certainly thought like one). For both Burke <strong>and</strong><br />
Pike, the precondition <strong>of</strong> drama is mystery or uncertainty about others <strong>and</strong> the<br />
unknown. 52<br />
Consequently, for Pike the secrets <strong>of</strong> <strong>Freemasonry</strong> were functionally<br />
fundamental to the fraternity's philosophical teachings; curiosity in <strong>this</strong> respect is not<br />
merely intellectual, but performative.<br />
Finally, Pike's belief that the structure <strong>of</strong> the Mysteries informing Masonic<br />
degree work inspired "respect" is in keeping with Burke's observation that "once a<br />
believer is brought to accept mysteries, he will be better minded to take orders without<br />
question from those persons whom he considers authoritative." 53 Such is the relation<br />
between teacher <strong>and</strong> pupil, preacher <strong>and</strong> parishioner, Master Mason <strong>and</strong> Apprentice--<br />
<strong>and</strong> as Burke would have it, God <strong>and</strong> Satan. Like Pike, Burke suggests that "mystery is<br />
inescapable" because "symbol-systems are necessarily inadequate for the ab intra<br />
description <strong>of</strong> the non-symbolic." 54<br />
Pike, however, failed to reckon with the point that<br />
Burke's dialectical thinking on the drama <strong>of</strong> mystery quickly led him to, a point that a<br />
number <strong>of</strong> Masons throughout history have had difficulty estimating: inasmuch as<br />
mystery can comm<strong>and</strong> respect <strong>and</strong> curiosity, it will also--<strong>and</strong> necessarily so--inspire<br />
distrust <strong>and</strong> a fear <strong>of</strong> subjection. Mystery inspires fantasies <strong>of</strong> conspiracy that only<br />
intensify scrutiny when coupled with the ideal <strong>of</strong> publicity.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Perils <strong>of</strong> Publicity, or, Dumbing Down the Mystery<br />
<strong>The</strong> conflict between secrecy <strong>and</strong> democracy would appear to be a<br />
recurrent phenomenon in our national history. <strong>In</strong>deed, since the<br />
flowering <strong>of</strong> the modern secret society in the eighteenth century,