21.03.2015 Views

The surface science of titanium dioxide - Niser

The surface science of titanium dioxide - Niser

The surface science of titanium dioxide - Niser

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

88 U. Diebold / Surface Science Reports 48 (2003) 53±229<br />

2.2.2. Reconstructions<br />

2.2.2.1. Reconstruction under reducing conditions: the structure(s) <strong>of</strong> the (1 2) phase. <strong>The</strong> most<br />

commonlyobserved reconstruction on TiO 2 (1 1 0) <strong>surface</strong>s has a (1 2) symmetry with a doubling <strong>of</strong><br />

the periodicityalong the ‰1 10Š direction. Various models have been suggested for this reconstruction and<br />

the most popular ones are depicted in Fig. 18 [113].<br />

A(1 2) LEED pattern was originallyobserved after high-temperature annealing <strong>of</strong> a reduced<br />

TiO 2 (1 1 0) sample in ultrahigh vacuum (UHV). Based on Ti:O AES ratios it was interpreted as<br />

alternate rows <strong>of</strong> bridging oxygen missing from the regular (1 1) <strong>surface</strong> (``missing-row model''<br />

[111], Fig. 18a). One <strong>of</strong> the ®rst atomicallyresolved STM results on this <strong>surface</strong> was also interpreted as<br />

missing bridging oxygen rows [114,158]; however, the Ti atoms underneath the missing oxygen atoms<br />

had to be shifted byhalf a unit cell in [0 0 1] direction to account for the observed image contrast. A<br />

structure with a (3 2) symmetry was reported in [159]. A model for this reconstruction was discussed<br />

where this symmetry is achieved by removing 1/3 or 2/3 <strong>of</strong> the oxygen in the bridging oxygen rows.<br />

However, such a reconstruction has not been reported byother groups.<br />

<strong>The</strong> simple missing row model for the (1 2) structure in Fig. 18a has been abandoned on the basis<br />

<strong>of</strong> more recent results. In STM the (1 2) reconstruction is commonlyobserved as a series <strong>of</strong> bright<br />

strings along the [0 0 1] direction [113,114,123,158,160±162], see Fig. 16. At low coverage, the strings<br />

grow preferentiallyout <strong>of</strong> the upper terrace onto the lower one (Fig. 16a) [123]. At ®rst, theyare<br />

scattered across the terraces with a minimum distance <strong>of</strong> 13 AÊ along the [0 0 1] direction. <strong>The</strong>yconsist<br />

<strong>of</strong> bright double strings (although the double-ridge structure is <strong>of</strong>ten not resolved), with a bright dot at<br />

the end. Antiphase boundaries are observed in high-resolution images <strong>of</strong> a fullydeveloped (1 2)-<br />

reconstructed <strong>surface</strong> [113]. Higher periodicities, i.e., a local (1 3) reconstruction, have also been<br />

observed [161,163,164]. In STM images the (1 2) strands generallyhave an apparent height smaller<br />

than a regular TiO 2 step edge <strong>of</strong> 3.2 AÊ , and are in registrywith the bright rows <strong>of</strong> the (1 1) substrate.<br />

Because most researchers report empty-state images and because these are dominated by the tunneling<br />

into mostlyTi3d-derived states (see Section 2.2.1.3), bright strands in line with bright substrate rows<br />

implythat the (1 2) strands are at the position <strong>of</strong> ®vefold coordinated Ti atoms and not at the bridging<br />

oxygen atoms. STM images <strong>of</strong> a simple missing row structure are expected to show a bright feature<br />

above the missing bridging oxygen row (provided the STM tip is a reasonable distance from the <strong>surface</strong><br />

[112]), inconsistent with the registryobserved experimentally. <strong>The</strong> rows can be removed bytunneling<br />

under `extreme conditions' (V s ˆ‡1:5 V,I ˆ 10 nA [113]). First-principles total-energycalculations<br />

show that the added Ti 2 O 3 model (discussed next) is energeticallyfavored [165] and that the missing<br />

row structure is energeticallyequivalent to a (2 1) structure (where everyother bridging oxygen is<br />

removed) [99]. For all these reasons, the missing-row reconstruction is no longer considered a viable<br />

model.<br />

Earlyon, Onishi et al. [122,123] suggested a quite different model. It consists <strong>of</strong> double rows <strong>of</strong> Ti<br />

cations in a distorted tetrahedral con®guration (Fig. 18b). <strong>The</strong> structure has Ti 2 O 3 stoichiometry, and<br />

the model is <strong>of</strong>ten called `added Ti 2 O 3 rows'. However, it needs to be emphasized that the structure<br />

does not resemble the one found in the corundum Ti 2 O 3 structure. Rather, the Ti cations reside in<br />

positions similar to interstitial sites in the rutile lattice [91]. Self-consistent total-energyand electronic<br />

structure calculation found that this added `Ti 2 O 3 ' row structure has a lower <strong>surface</strong> free energythan<br />

the missing row structure and that it is consistent with the contrast in STM [165]. Recent VASP<br />

calculations show that such strands can be added at low energycost [91], but also that manyother

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!