23.03.2015 Views

child support 101/102 - The Gitlin Law Firm

child support 101/102 - The Gitlin Law Firm

child support 101/102 - The Gitlin Law Firm

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

this Section.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are corresponding provisions in the Illinois Public Aid Code, the Non-Support of Spouse and<br />

Children Act, the Illinois Parentage Act of 1984 (§20.7) and the Code of Civil Procedure. For<br />

further information, see my separate handout titled “Interest on Child Support and Maintenance.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> only current issue (other than the complicated nature of how to calculate the interest), in these<br />

cases involves those with a historical arrearage and whether the provisions of this Act have a<br />

retroactive effect. IRMO Thompson, 829 N.E.2d 419, 357 Ill.App.3d 854, 293 Ill.Dec. 836 (Second<br />

Dist., 2005), addressed the issue of the entitlement to statutory interest. Understand that for the<br />

period prior to January 1, 2000, it is not clear whether statutory interest is mandatory. However,<br />

Thompson ruled that clearly the trial court does not err when it grants statutory interest prior to this<br />

date because the imposition of statutory interest has been permissive prior to this date (from the date<br />

of 1987 through 2000).<br />

5. Public Act 90-476: "Discovering Hidden Assets" – Piercing the Ownership Veil<br />

in “Alter Ego” Type Cases<br />

§505(b) of IMDMA provides:<br />

If there is a unity of interest and ownership sufficient to render no financial separation<br />

between a non-custodial parent and another person or persons or business entity, the court<br />

may pierce the ownership veil of the person, persons, or business entity to discover assets<br />

of the noncustodial parent held in the name of that person, those persons or that business<br />

entity. <strong>The</strong> following circumstances are sufficient to authorize a court to order discovery<br />

of the assets of a person, persons, or business entity and to compel the application of any<br />

discovered assets toward payment on the judgment for <strong>support</strong>:<br />

(1) <strong>The</strong> non-custodial parent and the person or persons or business entity<br />

maintain records together.<br />

(2) <strong>The</strong> non-custodial parent and the person, persons or business entity fails<br />

to maintain an arms length relationship between themselves with regard to any<br />

assets.<br />

(3) <strong>The</strong> non-custodial parent transfers assets to the person, persons or<br />

business entity with the intent to perpetrate a fraud on the custodial parent.<br />

With respect to assets which are real property, no order entered under this paragraph<br />

shall effect the rights of bona fide purchasers, mortgagees, judgment creditors, or<br />

other lien holders who acquire their interest in the property prior to the time a notice<br />

of lis pendens pursuant to the Code or Civil Procedure or a copy of the order is<br />

placed of record in the office of the recorder of deeds for the county in which the<br />

real property is located. 750 ILCS 505(b).<br />

Comment: Also note that §12-112 of the Code of Civil Procedure was amended in order to<br />

<strong>Gitlin</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Firm</strong>, P.C. 1-8 www.gitlinlawfirm.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!