25.03.2015 Views

7 Chapter 2 Literature Review: Markets, Intermediation and E ...

7 Chapter 2 Literature Review: Markets, Intermediation and E ...

7 Chapter 2 Literature Review: Markets, Intermediation and E ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Markets</strong> can be categorised as business-to-business (markets for manufacturers’<br />

goods) <strong>and</strong> business-to-consumer (markets for consumers’ goods). A business-tobusiness<br />

market can be said to be concentrated (in the sense of being oligopolistic) if<br />

nearly all dem<strong>and</strong> is concentrated in a few large firms making large orders <strong>and</strong><br />

dominating the market. Business-to-consumer markets are concentrated if dem<strong>and</strong> is<br />

very large in a particular geographical area due to a high concentration of population<br />

there. <strong>Markets</strong> which have neither large firms dominating the dem<strong>and</strong> side nor large<br />

numbers of small consumers in one single area are diffuse.<br />

The historical trend identified is the increasingly concentrated nature of the market,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the reduced costs of exchange. Changes in technology <strong>and</strong> market conditions<br />

created an economic situation that favoured manufacturer-controlled distribution<br />

systems. However, although the general pattern is clear, there are other factors which<br />

must also be taken into consideration, namely (1) that of minimum efficient scale in<br />

distribution, <strong>and</strong> (2) the complexity of the marketing system that is required.<br />

Furthermore, where markets remained diffuse, it would remain less economical for<br />

the manufacturer to create a sales network, so it could instead be better either to sell<br />

the goods locally or through independent intermediaries.<br />

Ch<strong>and</strong>ler also argues that new technology is an important contributing factor to the<br />

changing organisational structure of firms. Alongside the development of rail <strong>and</strong><br />

telegraph networks, was the emergence of a new class of professional salaried<br />

managers <strong>and</strong> the modern organisational structure, which had a very hierarchical form<br />

<strong>and</strong> relied upon divided labour to maximise mass production. Reorganisation was<br />

required to effectively manage the operations of increasingly large <strong>and</strong> complex<br />

organisations, exemplified by the first railway companies. Increasing profits after the<br />

onset of the Civil War in 1861, had allowed manufacturers to finance their own<br />

expansion.<br />

In fact, this literature identified at least four ways in which technological innovations<br />

can have impact: by necessitating new organisational structures to h<strong>and</strong>le<br />

complexities, by encouraging administrative or other process changes that reduce<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!