01.04.2015 Views

Peripheral vision and pattern recognition: a review - strasburger - main

Peripheral vision and pattern recognition: a review - strasburger - main

Peripheral vision and pattern recognition: a review - strasburger - main

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Peripheral</strong>_Vision.doc<br />

E 2 <strong>and</strong> M values estimated from psychophysics, fMRI, <strong>and</strong> EEG<br />

Study Task / Stimuli E 2 (deg) M 0<br />

Methodology<br />

ΨΦ Cowey & Rolls (1974) Phosphenes (Brindley &<br />

Lewin, 1968) + MAR<br />

(Wertheim 1894)<br />

ΨΦ<br />

ΨΦ<br />

Rovamo & Virsu<br />

(1979)<br />

Vakrou, Whitaker,<br />

McGraw, McKeefry<br />

(2005)<br />

MRI /<br />

lesions<br />

mfVEP Slotnick, Klein,<br />

Carney, Sutter (2001)<br />

fMRI<br />

fMRI<br />

fMRI<br />

1.746 M 0 =8.55<br />

mm/°<br />

Scaled gratings 3.0 M 0 =7.99<br />

mm/°<br />

temporal 2-afc<br />

L/M: 0.91 or 0.75<br />

L/M: 0.1°<br />

color grating CSF<br />

S/(L+M): 8.1 or 8.5<br />

S/(L+M): 0.15°<br />

Achrom.: 2.4 or 1.6<br />

Horton & Hoyt (1991) Perimetry, 3 patients 0.75 M 0 =23.1<br />

mm/°<br />

M-scaled checkerboard 0.20±0.26 • 0.92±0.28 (sj TC) M 0 =43,4 ±<br />

segments, 37.5 Hz. 0.10±0.39 • 0.48±0.18 (sj HB) 9,6 mm/° (*)<br />

Dipole source distance <strong>and</strong> 0.68±0.49 • 0.52±0.11(sj SD) (goes up to<br />

200!)<br />

size<br />

Weighted mean 0.50±0.08<br />

Duncan & Boynton<br />

(2003)<br />

Larsson & Heeger<br />

(2006)<br />

Henriksson, Nurminen,<br />

Hyvärinen, Vanni<br />

(2008)<br />

Achrom: 0.8°<br />

Checkerboard rings 8Hz 0.831 M 0 =18.5<br />

mm/°<br />

Checkerboard exp<strong>and</strong>ing 0.785 M 0 =22.5<br />

ring 0.375°/TR) +<br />

mm/°(*)<br />

rotating wedge 15°/TR<br />

b/w sinewave-modulated<br />

rings<br />

1,007 (ν=1/optimum_SF for<br />

V1, derived from text to Fig. 6,<br />

p. 7 top, r 2 =99%)<br />

ν=0.55°(*)<br />

Table 5. E 2 <strong>and</strong> M 0 values obtained with non-invasive objective techniques, with psychophysical studies (ΨΦ) added<br />

for comparison. Asterisks (*) denote values added by Strasburger.<br />

Threshold task<br />

(K) Foveal S E 2 (S –1 ) Source on which estimate is based<br />

value<br />

(arc min)<br />

Unreferenced motion 0.56 0.18 5.6 Levi et al., 1984<br />

Panum’s areas 6.5 0.18 5.6 Ogle & Schwartz, 1959<br />

Grating acuity 0.625<br />

0.6<br />

0.38<br />

0.37<br />

2.6<br />

2.7<br />

Slotnick et al., 2001<br />

Virsu et al., 1987<br />

L<strong>and</strong>olt C acuity 0.57 0.88 1.14 Virsu et al., 1987<br />

1.5 1.0 1.0 Weymouth, 1958Weymouth, 1958 (low luminance <strong>and</strong><br />

short exposure)<br />

Referenced or relative motion 0.19 0.95 1.05 Levi et al., 1984<br />

Stereoscopic acuity 0.1 1.23 0.81 Fendick & Westheimer, 1983<br />

Vernier acuity 0.16<br />

0.44<br />

1.43<br />

1.57<br />

0.7<br />

0.64<br />

Levi et al., 1985<br />

Weymouth, 1958 (Bourdon’s data)<br />

Table 6. E 2 values from Drasdo (1991, Table 19.2 on p. 258) for the horizontal meridian.<br />

3.3 Schwartz’s logarithmic mapping onto the cortex<br />

The cortical magnification factor M relates cortical sizes to retinal sizes. It is a local mapping in<br />

that a small circular patch in the visual field is mapped onto an elliptical area in one of the early<br />

visual areas. From the relationship M(E), one can, under the assumption of retinotopy, derive<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!