04.04.2015 Views

Download This Issue - US Concealed Carry

Download This Issue - US Concealed Carry

Download This Issue - US Concealed Carry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

STREET TACTICS<br />

Stay back about six<br />

feet from the cover to<br />

prevent ricochets from<br />

hitting you.<br />

[ B Y G A B E S U A R E Z ]<br />

<strong>Concealed</strong> carry trainees<br />

are often admonished by<br />

their instructors to use<br />

cover in a gunfight.<br />

Use of cover is a good idea that has<br />

saved many good guys, but its<br />

tactical use must be understood<br />

and put in the correct context in order<br />

to be effective.<br />

The difference lies in the issue of who<br />

has initiative in the fight. In other words,<br />

who is being proactive and who is being<br />

reactive. Here are a couple of examples:<br />

An armed good guy sees a criminal<br />

with a knife attacking a woman and realizes<br />

that although he is not involved in<br />

the fight directly, he must get involved<br />

to save the woman’s life. So, he purposely<br />

and proactively draws his pistol and<br />

shoots the bad guy. There was no need<br />

for cover, but there was a need to take<br />

the initiative.<br />

A similar situation may be where the<br />

armed good guy happens to be at the<br />

scene of a robbery at a business. Seeing<br />

the bad guys draw their guns and approach<br />

the cashier, he may elect to take<br />

a covered position behind a stone pillar.<br />

At this point he may engage or not,<br />

depending on what he sees, but he had<br />

the ability to take a safer position than<br />

simply standing out in the open like the<br />

proverbial deer in the head lights.<br />

Both of these events developed such<br />

that the good guy had ample time to<br />

realize something was happening and<br />

make a decision to act. In the first one,<br />

cover would have been unnecessary,<br />

while in the second event, it may have<br />

been essential.<br />

There is also the second type of<br />

event—the pure surprise attack. As unpopular<br />

as it is in the gun culture to admit<br />

that these occur, not everyone can<br />

be alert in condition yellow all of the<br />

time. In these reactive events, the bad<br />

guy has the initiative, and to survive, the<br />

good guy must be able to react. In these<br />

cases, counter-attacking the assailant is<br />

probably a far better option than trying<br />

to look for cover.<br />

An example may be an armed good<br />

guy who is walking into a business. The<br />

next thing he sees is a bad guy pointing<br />

or firing a pistol at him from across the<br />

room. There is no time to do anything<br />

but move off the line of fire, draw, and<br />

shoot back. To think of cover at this<br />

point might cause a delayed response<br />

with terminal results for the good guy.<br />

Please don’t think I am eschewing<br />

<br />

<strong>US</strong>CONCEALEDCARRY.COM n CONCEALED CARRY MAGAZINE n JULY 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!