Historic Resource Evaluation Project - Tuolumne Utilities District

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TUOLUMNE UTILITIES DISTRICT DITCH SUSTAINABILITY PROJECT HISTORIC RESOURCE EVALUATION REPORT Algerine Ditch Columbia Ditch Eureka Ditch Kincaid Ditch Deadman/Matelot Ditch Montezuma Ditch Phoenix Ditch Roach’s Camp Ditch San Diego Ditch Section 4 Ditch Shaws Flat Ditch Soulsbyville Ditch Table Mountain Ditch Prepared for: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 3875 Atherton Road Rocklin, California 95765 Prepared by: Foothill <strong>Resource</strong>s, Ltd. Murphys, California Francis Heritage, LLC Sonora, California January 2012
Page 1: TUOLUMNE UTILITIES DISTRICT DITCH S
Page 5 and 6: TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PROJECT OVERVI
Page 7 and 8: 19. Western portion of John Wallace
Page 9 and 10: 1. PROJECT OVERVIEW AND EXECUTIVE S
Page 11 and 12: Figure 2. Project location. A compr
Page 13 and 14: Geologically, the area begins east
Page 15 and 16: preparing and processing other item
Page 17 and 18: and there are other resources in Ca
Page 19 and 20: 2. RESEARCH METHODS Research method
Page 21 and 22: Various segments of most of the thi
Page 23 and 24: 3. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW As were most
Page 25 and 26: County Water Company’s system was
Page 27 and 28: magnitude. The cost will be about $
Page 29 and 30: all concerned in the undertaking, f
Page 31 and 32: Figure 8. The High Flume. (Kuchel &
Page 33 and 34: Figure 10. Portion of the John Wall
Page 35 and 36: For more than half a century the Tu
Page 37 and 38: 1882:172). The day’s festivities
Page 39 and 40: the plank lumber necessary, conside
Page 41 and 42: October 31, 1856. At that time wate
Page 43 and 44: Figure 11. Shaw’s Flats, as drawn
Page 45 and 46: Wood’s creeks to Shaw’s Flat an
Page 47 and 48: Foothill Resources, Ltd. 3.25 TUD D
Page 49 and 50: emaining portion of the Soulsby Dit
Page 51 and 52: 1882…one can not say that mining
Page 53 and 54:
Fork, generally in earthwork channe
Page 55 and 56:
Foothill Resources, Ltd. 3.33 TUD D
Page 57 and 58:
4. DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION OF HI
Page 59 and 60:
Water conveyance features are ubiqu
Page 61 and 62:
and is historic in its own right, o
Page 63 and 64:
Algerine Ditch. In between are seve
Page 65 and 66:
Figure 17. Northwest portion of 187
Page 67 and 68:
Evaluation. The Algerine Ditch appe
Page 69 and 70:
Figure 19. Western portion of John
Page 71 and 72:
Figure 21. John Wallace’s undated
Page 73 and 74:
Figure 23. Wallace’s undated cons
Page 75 and 76:
No longer in operation, but origina
Page 77 and 78:
original location, replaced in 1888
Page 79 and 80:
When laying out the town, the West
Page 81 and 82:
By the early 1860s the ditch was th
Page 83 and 84:
addition, water was conveyed to the
Page 85 and 86:
Peppermint Ditch, on the east side,
Page 87 and 88:
(Carlo M. De Ferrari Archive No. 31
Page 89 and 90:
16), taking water from Phoenix Rese
Page 91 and 92:
Foothill Resources, Ltd. 4.35 TUD D
Page 93 and 94:
An older parallel alignment was not
Page 95 and 96:
The route of the San Diego Ditch is
Page 97 and 98:
long). It conveys water managed by
Page 99 and 100:
Canal Company, was incorporated Aug
Page 101 and 102:
Twenty-two features were recorded.
Page 103 and 104:
Lower Phoenix Reservoir. At that ti
Page 105 and 106:
the Table Mountain Company claims (
Page 107 and 108:
5. REFERENCES CITED AND CONSULTED A
Page 109 and 110:
Delano, Alonzo 1854 Life on the Pla
Page 111 and 112:
Hoover, M.B., H.E. Rensch, E.G. Ren
Page 113 and 114:
Muñoz, Pedro 1806 Diario de la Exp
Page 115 and 116:
Weston, Otheto 1948 Mother Lode Alb
show all

Historic Resource Evaluation Project - Tuolumne Utilities District

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?