20.04.2015 Views

Testing 100G Ethernet - Xena Networks

Testing 100G Ethernet - Xena Networks

Testing 100G Ethernet - Xena Networks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Testing</strong> <strong>100G</strong><br />

©<strong>Xena</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>, May 2012


Who works with <strong>100G</strong> <strong>Ethernet</strong>?<br />

What is it used for?<br />

How to test it?<br />

©<strong>Xena</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>, May 2012


What is driving <strong>100G</strong> <strong>Ethernet</strong>?<br />

Explosive traffic demand pushing existing networks<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Mobile broadband data and video<br />

<strong>Ethernet</strong> wholesale and mobile backhaul services<br />

Cloud services and cloud-based applications<br />

Simplify networks<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Already, many are using n x 10GE links to interconnect sites<br />

Operate fewer, higher-capacity links, overcome link<br />

aggregation limitations, simplify routing, simplify MPLS<br />

Looking to take better advantage of statistical ti ti multiplexing<br />

l i<br />

Ride down the <strong>Ethernet</strong> cost curve<br />

With “<strong>Ethernet</strong> everywhere” <strong>100G</strong>E solutions will become<br />

affordable enough to be deployed to control network costs<br />

©<strong>Xena</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>, May 2012


<strong>100G</strong> <strong>Ethernet</strong> adoption<br />

Infrastructure components<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Multiple suppliers shipping <strong>100G</strong>E optical modules<br />

Component companies shipping FPGA’s, ASICs, NPUs<br />

A dozen equipment vendors shipping platforms with <strong>100G</strong>E<br />

Test solutions are available for <strong>100G</strong>E Layer 1-3 testing<br />

Operators and service providers<br />

First strategic adoptions by the end of 2012<br />

Significant adoption of <strong>100G</strong>E by end of 2013<br />

Datacenters<br />

<br />

Intel Romley server 10GE "LAN-on-Motherboard Motherboard” , and PCI<br />

Express Gen 2/3 to drive growth in top-of-rack 40GE<br />

interconnect<br />

©<strong>Xena</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>, May 2012


<strong>100G</strong> <strong>Ethernet</strong> <strong>Testing</strong> Status<br />

Layer 2/3<br />

• High port density testbeds<br />

• Automated production testing for <strong>100G</strong>E<br />

• Switching and routing performance<br />

• QoS and stream integrity<br />

• Industry benchmarks (RFC2544, RFC2889)<br />

• Telecom PoC aggregation links, and WDM<br />

• Forwarding and Throughput Capacity<br />

Layer 1<br />

• PCS layer<br />

• Packet Integrity<br />

• Optical transceiver and cable bit-error ratio<br />

©<strong>Xena</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>, May 2012


<strong>100G</strong> Optical Family<br />

100 and 40G optical<br />

<strong>100G</strong> SR10<br />

<strong>100G</strong> LR4, ER4<br />

<strong>100G</strong> migrating to<br />

100m MMF (OM3/4) 10, 40 km SMF<br />

smaller form factors<br />

CXP, CFP CFP CFP<br />

Current <strong>100G</strong> LR4<br />

cost too high<br />

<br />

<br />

10x10 CFP, lower<br />

cost (Santur,<br />

Google, Brocade,<br />

JSDU)<br />

New CMOS-based<br />

<strong>100G</strong> LR4 Gearbox<br />

devices will reach<br />

market in 2012,<br />

reducing power and<br />

cost<br />

<strong>100G</strong> 10x10<br />

10 km SMF<br />

CFP CXP CFP CFP<br />

CXP2 (2013) CFP2 (2013) QSFP2 (2014)<br />

40G SR4<br />

100m MMF (OM3/4)<br />

QSFP+, CFP<br />

QSFP+ CFP CFP CFP<br />

40G LR4, ER4<br />

10, 40 km SMF<br />

CFP<br />

?<br />

QSFP+<br />

©<strong>Xena</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>, May 2012


CFP-based Test Equipment<br />

All 10/40/<strong>100G</strong> optical interfaces available in CFP<br />

<br />

<br />

10G LR/SR, 40G LR4/SR4, <strong>100G</strong> LR4/SR10<br />

Natively or via CFP adapter<br />

CFP adapters (QSFP+, CXP, SFP+)<br />

CFP QSFP+ CFP CXP CFP 4 x SFP+<br />

(Cisco ”FOURX”)<br />

Forward compatible<br />

Future CFP2, QSFP2, CXF2 is<br />

optical and host compatible<br />

with existing CFP optics<br />

<strong>Xena</strong> 40/<strong>100G</strong> tester compatible with 10GE<br />

<br />

The only Tri-Speed: 8 x 10G, 2 x 40G, or 1 x <strong>100G</strong><br />

©<strong>Xena</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>, May 2012


New 100/40G PCS and PMA architecture<br />

PCS and PMA architecture<br />

<br />

<br />

CAUI, <strong>100G</strong>, 20 x 5 Gbps lanes<br />

XLAUI, 40G, 4 x 10 Gbps lanes<br />

CAUI <strong>100G</strong> LR4 PCS/PMA architecture<br />

PCS Lanes<br />

20 x 5 Gbps<br />

CAUI Interface<br />

10 x 10.3125<br />

Gbps SerDes<br />

4 x 25 Gbps 4 x λ<br />

SMF<br />

λ0<br />

PCS<br />

0<br />

1<br />

2<br />

.<br />

.<br />

.<br />

PMA<br />

20:10<br />

0<br />

1<br />

.<br />

.<br />

.<br />

PMA<br />

10:4<br />

Gearbox<br />

λ1<br />

λ2<br />

λ3<br />

0<br />

1 PMD<br />

2<br />

3 λ0<br />

19 9<br />

9 λ2<br />

λ1<br />

λ3<br />

©<strong>Xena</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>, May 2012


Physical Layer <strong>Testing</strong> (PMA)<br />

Increased complexity of <strong>100G</strong> optics<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<strong>Testing</strong> and screening during development and production<br />

Careful inspection and cleaning of connectors<br />

Use an unframed PRBS per lane to determine if your<br />

100/40 Gbps optical transceivers function correctly.<br />

How To:<br />

1. Insert the transceiver optics into the <strong>Xena</strong> tester and an<br />

optical loopback cable in the CFP module.<br />

2. Then enable PRBS for all lanes, and run the test for 24<br />

hours minimum to verify no PRBS errors are detected.<br />

The loopback cable must be clean and able to pass error-free<br />

traffic on any other known good transceiver.<br />

©<strong>Xena</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>, May 2012


Physical Layer <strong>Testing</strong> (PMA)<br />

CAUI/XLAUI SerDes characterization<br />

<br />

<br />

Access to electrical CAUI SerDes allows for accurate host<br />

PCB characterization ti during R&D<br />

Tune host board voltage swing and pre-emphasis settings<br />

©<strong>Xena</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>, May 2012


λ0<br />

λ0<br />

λ2<br />

λ0<br />

λ0<br />

λ2<br />

λ0<br />

Physical Layer <strong>Testing</strong> (PCS)<br />

Lane skew<br />

Skew is an issue for any parallel high-speed bus<br />

Validate per lane buffer and alignment using skew insertion<br />

Skew tolerances specified by IEEE 802.3ba<br />

PCS<br />

Rx PCS<br />

0<br />

1<br />

2 PMA<br />

20:1<br />

.<br />

.<br />

.<br />

0<br />

SP6<br />

0<br />

1<br />

PMA<br />

10:4<br />

SP5<br />

0<br />

1<br />

.<br />

. Gearbo<br />

. x 2<br />

PMD<br />

SP4<br />

3 λ0<br />

Skew<br />

point<br />

SP1<br />

SP2<br />

SP3<br />

SP4<br />

Maximum Skew at<br />

<strong>100G</strong>BASE-R<br />

29 ns (150 UI)<br />

43 ns (222 UI)<br />

54 ns (278 UI)<br />

134 ns (691 UI)<br />

19<br />

Tx PCS<br />

9<br />

SP1<br />

SP2<br />

SP3<br />

SP5<br />

SP6<br />

At Rx PCS<br />

145 ns (748 UI)<br />

160 ns (824 UI)<br />

180 ns (928 UI)<br />

Note that for 40GBASE-R, 1 UI is equal to 97 ps at PCS lane signaling g rate of 10.3125 Gbps<br />

Note that for <strong>100G</strong>BASE-R, 1 UI is equal to 194 ps at PCS lane signaling rate of 5.15625 Gbps<br />

©<strong>Xena</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>, May 2012


Physical Layer <strong>Testing</strong> (PCS)<br />

Lane skew<br />

Lane skewing errors can lead to interface link-down problems<br />

that t are difficult to debug in deployed d systems.<br />

How to:<br />

1. Insert 10 UI (bits) skew on multiple lanes and verify that the<br />

PCS markers remain aligned.<br />

2. Then, increase the skew incrementally until lane alignment<br />

lock is lost to find the maximum skew for the DUT.<br />

IEEE 802.3ba requires a skew tolerance of 928 UI at the Rx PCS<br />

©<strong>Xena</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>, May 2012


Physical Layer <strong>Testing</strong> (PCS)<br />

Lane swapping<br />

Lane swapping errors can lead to interface link-down problems<br />

that t are difficult to debug in deployed d systems.<br />

How to:<br />

1. Configure tester to transmit L2/3 traffic from the tester<br />

across the DUT and back to the same tester port.<br />

2. Then, verify that header lock and alignment lock works on<br />

all Rx lanes, to check all lanes are recognized and are<br />

aligned.<br />

3. Then swap lanes randomly and verify the new Rx lane<br />

mapping and that L2/3 traffic is passing error free<br />

©<strong>Xena</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>, May 2012


RFC 2544 benchmarking<br />

RFC 2544 - PURPOSE<br />

Verifies forwarding performance, including<br />

throughput h t (performance availability), back-to-back<br />

b k<br />

(link burstability), latency (transmission delay) and<br />

frame loss (service integrity) measurements.<br />

<strong>Xena</strong> testers can perform RFC 2544 for <strong>100G</strong> and<br />

40G <strong>Ethernet</strong> interfaces at all frame sizes and at fullline<br />

rate.<br />

BENEFIT<br />

Helps vendors and service providers certify that the<br />

link is efficient and error-free at 100% utilization at<br />

Layer 2 (VLAN) or layer 3 (IP).<br />

©<strong>Xena</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>, May 2012


RFC 2889 benchmarking<br />

RFC 2889 - PURPOSE<br />

For testing 40G and <strong>100G</strong> datacenter switches<br />

Mesh testing of large-scale switches, and<br />

multicast-only throughput test cases where latency<br />

and throughput are key performance parameters<br />

<strong>Xena</strong> testers t can perform RFC 2889 for <strong>100G</strong> and<br />

40G <strong>Ethernet</strong> interfaces at all frame sizes and at<br />

full-line rate.<br />

BENEFIT<br />

Helps data centers verify the switch can meet<br />

stringent demand for low-latency and lossless<br />

throughput performance<br />

©<strong>Xena</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>, May 2012


Automation environments for quality<br />

Automated test environments for production<br />

Multirate test equipment for testing multirate data center<br />

switches, and telecom equipment<br />

Broadcom 40/<strong>100G</strong> switch silicon is multirate 10/40/<strong>100G</strong><br />

enabled<br />

Ideal having a single unified testbedtb for production testingti of<br />

both 10, 40, and 100 Gbps modes of operation<br />

Command line TCP/IP based scripting<br />

from any client environment<br />

(Tcl, Java, Perl, Python, VBA)<br />

Cisco Catalyst 6500, 4 x 40G, or 16 x 10G<br />

©<strong>Xena</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>, May 2012


CASE STUDY - Cabling Manufactures<br />

Furukawa Industrial - Japan<br />

Tested OM4 MMF channel links over distances from 70 to 520<br />

meters by simulating a real network. (The standard defines<br />

150m with OM4 MMF Cables.)<br />

<strong>Xena</strong>Compact<br />

<strong>100G</strong><br />

MMF<br />

a<br />

b<br />

c<br />

Optical MPO to MPO cables 12 Fibers MMF OM4<br />

Reichle & De-Massari (R&M) – Switzerland<br />

Lossless transmission over 550 meters of fiber optic cable and<br />

nine MPO connectors / 6-hour demonstration with no bit errors<br />

©<strong>Xena</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>, May 2012


CASE STUDY – Global ISP<br />

London<br />

New York<br />

Infinera DTN<br />

Infinera DTN<br />

Brocade<br />

Router<br />

10x 10G<br />

connections<br />

10x 10G<br />

connections<br />

Brocade<br />

Router<br />

Tier 1 ISP<br />

Global IP<br />

Network<br />

<strong>Xena</strong> <strong>100G</strong><br />

Tester<br />

<strong>Xena</strong> <strong>100G</strong><br />

Tester<br />

©<strong>Xena</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>, May 2012


Selecting a 40/<strong>100G</strong> test platform (1/2)<br />

High port density for 40 GE and 100 GE testing<br />

<br />

<br />

6 x <strong>100G</strong>E, 12 x 40GE, or 48 x 10G in 4U chassis<br />

Industry’s only 1U rackmount 1 x <strong>100G</strong> / 2 x 40G / 8 x 10G<br />

Industry yp price/performance leader for 100/40G testing<br />

Comprehensive testing of the physical coding sublayer<br />

<br />

<br />

Checks compliance to IEEE-STD 802.3ba<br />

Unframed layer 1 BERT per PCS lane, for testing both MMF<br />

and SMF optics.<br />

Software selectable 8 x 10 GE, 2 x 40 GE or 1 x <strong>100G</strong>E<br />

<br />

Industry’s only 10G compatible <strong>100G</strong> Tester<br />

©<strong>Xena</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>, May 2012


Selecting a 40/<strong>100G</strong> test platform (2/2)<br />

Layer 1-3 testing with wire rate traffic generation<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Wire-speed stream based traffic generation and statistics<br />

Traffic filter statistics, histograms<br />

Jumbo frame support (9200B)<br />

Analyzes full wire rate 40 / 100 GE traffic<br />

<br />

<br />

Real-time latency, Packet loss, Data integrity, Packet capture<br />

Packet capture with Wireshark support<br />

Scripting by TCP/IP socket Command Line Interface<br />

<br />

From any TCP/IP environment, no drivers or APIs needed<br />

Same CLI spec for any port speed (10M – <strong>100G</strong>)<br />

Industry benchmark tests RFC2544, RFC2889<br />

<br />

Y.1564 test suite to be released soon<br />

©<strong>Xena</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>, May 2012


Corporate Profile<br />

Founded 2007 by group of communications professionals<br />

Corporate HQ in Copenhagen (Denmark), Boston (US)<br />

Self-funded funded through organic growth<br />

Winner of global awards for price-performance p leadership<br />

incl. Frost & Sullivan and Red Herring<br />

©<strong>Xena</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>, May 2012


Thank You!<br />

QUESTIONS?<br />

Jacob Nielsen<br />

(CEO, <strong>Xena</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>)<br />

jvn@xenanetworks.com<br />

781-502-5887<br />

©<strong>Xena</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>, May 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!