21.04.2015 Views

The Green Belt as a European Ecological Network strengths and gaps

The Green Belt as a European Ecological Network strengths and gaps

The Green Belt as a European Ecological Network strengths and gaps

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Karl-Friedrich Thöne<br />

THE GREEN BELT IN THURINGIA – A VISIONARY IDEA<br />

CLARIFYING PROPERTY RIGHTS<br />

An important step towards realising the development strategies w<strong>as</strong> the clarification of<br />

l<strong>and</strong> ownership rights, which w<strong>as</strong> particularly complicated by the former partitioning of<br />

Germany. Almost all l<strong>and</strong> parcels in the <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Belt</strong> were the property of the Federal Republic<br />

of Germany following the laws p<strong>as</strong>sed after the reunification of Germany. To prevent<br />

undesirable developments within the <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Belt</strong>, the then Thuringian Ministry for<br />

Agriculture, Forestry, Environment <strong>and</strong> Nature Conservation in cooperation with the Federal<br />

Assets Office <strong>and</strong> other concerned parties set out recommended guidelines for the future use<br />

<strong>and</strong> le<strong>as</strong>ing of l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

This w<strong>as</strong> recognised <strong>as</strong> an interim solution for regulating l<strong>and</strong> use until final resolution<br />

of the l<strong>and</strong> ownership situation. <strong>The</strong> law governing property in the border region also<br />

regulated the sale of properties to their former owners or legal heirs.<br />

Thuringia w<strong>as</strong> the first federal state to take over responsibility for nationally significant<br />

natural heritage sites in the <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Belt</strong> from the German state, following an agreement signed<br />

on 9 November 2008. <strong>The</strong> Free State of Thuringia is in turn committed to continuing the work<br />

already undertaken to maintain the <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Belt</strong> <strong>as</strong> a historical memorial <strong>and</strong> to develop its<br />

natural potential. In addition, the Federal Forestry Agency h<strong>as</strong> been commissioned to<br />

undertaken work over a period of 8 years totalling some 380,000 € for personnel costs,<br />

material costs not included.<br />

<strong>The</strong> l<strong>and</strong> formerly owned by the German state – 3800 hectares of the 6400 hectares of<br />

the <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Belt</strong> – h<strong>as</strong> been transferred to the Stiftung Naturschutz Thüringen (Thuringian<br />

Nature Conservation Trust). Together with agricultural <strong>and</strong> forestry enterprises, the Trust<br />

ensures that this l<strong>and</strong> remains accessible <strong>and</strong> can be experienced while simultaneously<br />

safeguarding long-term nature conservation aims.<br />

RECONCILING CONSERVATION WITH LAND USE - MODERN ORGANISATIONAL<br />

CONCEPTS<br />

Since the reunification of Germany, the former border region h<strong>as</strong> become much more<br />

attractive. <strong>The</strong> special charm of the l<strong>and</strong>scape h<strong>as</strong> given rise to many different dem<strong>and</strong>s by<br />

different user groups, <strong>and</strong> to incre<strong>as</strong>ing conflicts of interest. To avoid risking losing the<br />

irreplaceable value of the l<strong>and</strong>scape, valid l<strong>and</strong> use claims have to be reconciled with the aims<br />

of nature conservation.<br />

To implement the project aims, new approaches were adopted. Local work groups<br />

were established to deal with the problems in their are<strong>as</strong>. Specific development strategies<br />

were devised for each section of the <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Belt</strong> to ensure that the strategies are carried out on<br />

an ongoing b<strong>as</strong>is. Work me<strong>as</strong>ures were coordinated by three regional work groups under the<br />

direction of the Authorities for Rural Development <strong>and</strong> L<strong>and</strong> Management in Gotha,<br />

Meiningen <strong>and</strong> Gera. <strong>The</strong> work groups consisted of representatives from the relevant<br />

authorities <strong>and</strong> interest groups. L<strong>and</strong> owners, agricultural <strong>and</strong> forestry enterprises, local<br />

tourism agencies <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> interested citizens worked together to find balanced approaches<br />

for individual sections of the <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Belt</strong> along the former border.<br />

<strong>The</strong> work groups were charged with the following t<strong>as</strong>ks:<br />

– Consultation <strong>and</strong> professional <strong>as</strong>sistance in the realisation of local projects.<br />

– Coordinating the interests of l<strong>and</strong>owners <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong> users.<br />

– Resolving conflicts of l<strong>and</strong> use interests.<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!