The Green Belt as a European Ecological Network strengths and gaps

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Norbert Grosser, Valeska Krebs ENERGY WOOD USE AS A MEASURE OF LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT – AN APPROACH TO PRESERVATION OF BIODIVERSITY IN THE GREEN BELT? Agricultural use as extensive grazing ore mowing supported by combined programmes between nature conservation and agriculture ore forestry may be a help to preserve and develop biodiversity in the green belt. REFERENCES [1] BUND, 2007. The Green Belt Borders separate – Nature unites –. Retrieved December 19, 2011, from http://www.bund.net/green-belt-europe. [2] Retrieved December 19, 2011, from http://stiftung-naturschutzthueringen.de/index.php/gruenes-band-thueringen/. [3] Thust, R., Kuna, G. & Rommel, R.-P., 2006. Die Tagfalterfauna Thüringens. Zustand in den Jahren 1991 bis 2002. Entwicklungstendenzen und Schutz der Lebensräume. Naturschutzreport 23, Jena, pp. 168-172. [4] Retrieved December 19, 2011, from http://www.energetischebiomassenutzung.de/de/vorhaben/liste-aller-vorhaben/details/projects/64/57.html. [5] LFU Bayern, 2011. Merkblatt Artenschutz 39 Heckenwollafter Eriogaster catax (LINNAEUS, 1775). [6] Fritzlar, F., Westhus, W., 2001. Rote Liste der gefährdeten Tier- und Pflanzenarten, Pflanzengesellschaften und Biotope Thüringens. Naturschutz-Report Jena, 18. [7] Binot, M., Bless, R., Boye, P., Gruttke, H. & Pretscher, P., 1998. Rote Liste gefährdeter Tiere Deutschlands. Schriftenreihe für Landschaftspflege und Naturschutz 55. [8] Bundesartenschutzverordnung vom 16. Februar 2005 (BGBl. I S. 258, 896), die zuletzt durch Artikel 22 des Gesetzes vom 29. Juli 2009 (BGBl. I S. 2542) geändert worden ist. [9] RICHTLINIE 92/43/EWG DES RATES vom 21. Mai 1992 zur Erhaltung der natürlichen Lebensräume sowie der wildlebenden Tiere und Pflanzen (ABl. L 206 vom 22.7.1992, S. 7) u.a. geändert durch: Richtlinie 2006/105/EG des Rates vom 20. November 2006. [10] Weidemann, H.-J., 1995. Tagfalter: Beobachten, Bestimmen – 2. Aufl., Augsburg, Naturbuch- Verlag. 50
Olaf Bastian, Christina Wachler, Markus Leibenath, Martin Neruda THE EUROPEAN NATURA 2000 NETWORK AS A FACTOR FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE ORE MOUNTAINS (GERMANY / CZECH REPUBLIC) THE EUROPEAN NATURA 2000 NETWORK AS A FACTOR FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE ORE MOUNTAINS (GERMANY / CZECH REPUBLIC) ABSTRACT Olaf Bastian, Christina Wachler, Markus Leibenath Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development Weberplatz 1, D-01217 Dresden, Germany o.bastian@ioer.de, c.wachler@ioer.de, m.leibenath@ioer.de Martin Neruda Faculty of Environment, University J. E. Purkyně Králova výšina 7, Ústí nad Labem, CZ-40096, Czech Republic martin.neruda@ujep.cz In the Ore Mountains (Germany / Czech Republic), there are many NATURA 2000 sites, which constitute in some cases extensive complexes straddling the border between the two countries. The Ore Mountains Green Network EU project identified synergies between nature conservation and rural development, with the three main topics being landscape management, tourism, and environmental education. Starting from a SWOT analysis focusing on the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats concerning these three main topics in a cross-border context, an assessment of potentials showed the wide variety of ecosystem services that such protected areas provide. Based on these results, the opportunities and risks for enhancing synergies between nature conservation and rural development were discussed with relevant stakeholders, and a draft strategy was elaborated, which addresses such key aspects as landscape management, protection of the black grouse, energy questions (biomass, wind turbines), and environmental tourism (esp. Nordic skiing and visitor management). 1 INTRODUCTION Protected areas, such as national parks, biosphere reserves and NATURA 2000 sites, not only support biodiversity, but also provide a wide range of provisioning, regulating and socio-cultural ecosystem services, and thus enable various forms of economic activity. They can contribute to gains in local income and employment (e.g. benefits from investments in NATURA 2000 sites by local, national and EU sources). They can also be a key tourist attraction generating external purchases of local products and services, as well as helping visitors gain greater awareness of habitats and their function and value. They may contribute to strengthening the sense of place and regional identity which can promote greater civic responsibility, safeguard the cultural and natural heritage, and provide opportunity for environmental education and leisure, health and amenity. Thus, they may improve living conditions and be part of a framework for successful sustainable rural development, e.g. [1], [2], [3], [4]. This applies, too, to the Ore Mountains (German: Erzgebirge/ Czech: Krušné hory), which are characterized by outstanding natural assets and a typical cultural landscape on both sides of the border between the German state of Saxony and the Czech region of Northern Bohemia. The ridge of the Ore Mountains, averaging 800-1000 m above sea level, contains many NATURA 2000 sites, including both Special Areas of Conservation under the EU 51
Page 1:
Ilke Marschall (ed.) Marion Müller
Page 5 and 6: Proceedings of the 1 st GreenNet Co
Page 7 and 8: Proceedings of the 1 st GreenNet Co
Page 9 and 10: Rob H.G. Jongman ECOLOGICAL NETWORK
Page 19 and 20: Liana Geidezis, Melanie Kreutz GREE
Page 29 and 30: Uwe Riecken, Peter Finck THE GERMAN
Page 35 and 36: Karl-Friedrich Thöne THE GREEN BEL
Page 37 and 38: Karl-Friedrich Thöne THE GREEN BEL
Page 39 and 40: Schlumprecht, H., Laube, J. MONITOR
Page 51 and 52: Norbert Grosser, Valeska Krebs ENER
Page 53 and 54: Norbert Grosser, Valeska Krebs ENER
Page 55: Norbert Grosser, Valeska Krebs ENER
Page 59 and 60: Olaf Bastian, Christina Wachler, Ma
Page 67 and 68: Hans-Jörg Raderbauer, Judith Drape
Page 79 and 80: Marco Neubert, Sylvi Bianchin DETEC
Page 87 and 88: Hayriye Esbah, Edward Allen Cook, S
Page 93 and 94: Andrew J. Gregory, Paul Beier RESEA
Page 103 and 104: Cheryl de Boer, Hans Bressers RIVER
Page 105 and 106: Cheryl de Boer, Hans Bressers RIVER
Page 107 and 108:
Cheryl de Boer, Hans Bressers RIVER
Page 109 and 110:
Cheryl de Boer, Hans Bressers RIVER
Page 111 and 112:
Kun Zhang REVIEW AND GAPS: EUROPEAN
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Stefanie Maack, Tuuli Veersalu, Hen
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Andrea Früh PERCEPTIBILITY OF THE
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
show all

The Green Belt as a European Ecological Network strengths and gaps

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?