25.04.2015 Views

subchapter c -- federal hazardous substances act regulations

subchapter c -- federal hazardous substances act regulations

subchapter c -- federal hazardous substances act regulations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

16 CFR Ch. II (1–1–05 Edition) – proposed modification – 6/25/06<br />

Positive” in the EPA guidelines on male<br />

reproductive risk assessment.<br />

(ii) Probable Human Male Reproductive<br />

Toxicant. A substance is considered a<br />

”probable human male reproductive toxicant”<br />

if there is ”limited” human evidence or<br />

”sufficient” animal evidence to establish a<br />

causal association between human exposure<br />

and the adverse effects on male reproductive<br />

main endpoints. This category is comparable<br />

to the one termed ”Probable Positive” in the<br />

EPA guidelines on male reproductive risk<br />

assessment. However, the EPA category is<br />

based only on sufficient animal evidence.<br />

CPSC believes that limited human evidence is<br />

also sufficient for a chemical to be placed in<br />

this category.<br />

(iii) Possible Human Male Reproductive<br />

Toxicant. A substance is considered a<br />

”possible human male reproductive toxicant”<br />

if there is limited animal evidence, in the<br />

absence of human data, or in the presence of<br />

inadequate human data, or which does not fall<br />

into any other group, to establish a causal<br />

association between human exposure and<br />

adverse effects on male reproductive main<br />

endpoints. This category is comparable to the<br />

one termed ”Possible Positive A” in the EPA<br />

guidelines on male reproductive risk<br />

assessment. EPA proposes to use either limited<br />

human or limited animal evidence data to<br />

classify a toxicant as a ”Possible Positive A”<br />

toxicant. As described above, CPSC would<br />

elevate limited human evidence to the category<br />

”Probable Human Male Reproductive<br />

Toxicant.”<br />

(4) Female Reproductive Toxicants.<br />

Female reproductive toxicants can be grouped<br />

into the following different categories based<br />

on evidence obtained from human or animal<br />

studies. EPA has proposed guidelines for<br />

assessing female reproductive risk but has not<br />

yet proposed a specific system for<br />

categorization of female reproductive<br />

toxicants.<br />

(i) Known Human Female Reproductive<br />

Toxicant. A substance is considered a ”known<br />

human female reproductive toxicant” if there<br />

is ”sufficient” human evidence to establish a<br />

causal association between human exposure<br />

and adverse effects on female reproductive<br />

function such as mating ability, fertility, and<br />

prenatal and postnatal development of the<br />

conceptus.<br />

-- 92 --<br />

(ii) Probable Human Female Reproductive<br />

Toxicant. A substance is considered a<br />

”probable human female reproductive<br />

toxicant” if there is ”limited” human evidence<br />

or ”sufficient” animal evidence to establish a<br />

causal association between human exposure<br />

and adverse effects on female reproductive<br />

function.<br />

(iii) Possible Human Female Reproductive<br />

Toxicant. A substance is considered a<br />

”possible human female reproductive toxicant”<br />

if there is ”limited” animal evidence, in the<br />

absence of human data, or in the presence of<br />

inadequate human data, or which does not fall<br />

into any other group, to establish a causal<br />

association between human exposure and<br />

adverse effects on female reproductive<br />

function.<br />

(d) Germ Cell Mutagenicity. Substances<br />

are toxic by reason of their germ cell<br />

mutagenicity when they are known to induce<br />

heritable mutations or regarded as if they<br />

induce heritable mutations in the germ cells of<br />

humans.<br />

(1) Known Germ Cell Mutagenicity<br />

Substances. Substances are known to induce<br />

heritable mutations in the germ cells of<br />

humans based on positive evidence from<br />

human epidemiological studies.<br />

(2) Substances regarded as if they induce<br />

heritable mutations in the germ cells of<br />

humans. Substances should be regarded as if<br />

they induce heritable mutations in the germ<br />

cells of humans based on:<br />

• Positive result(s) from in vivo heritable<br />

germ cell mutagenicity tests in mammals; or<br />

• Positive result(s) from in vivo somatic cell<br />

mutagenicity tests in mammals, in<br />

combination with some evidence that the<br />

substance has potential to cause mutations to<br />

germ cells. This supporting evidence may, for<br />

example, be derived from<br />

mutagenicity/genotoxic tests in germ cells in<br />

vivo, or by demonstrating the ability of the<br />

substance or its metabolite(s) to inter<strong>act</strong> with<br />

the genetic material of germ cells; or<br />

• Positive results from tests showing<br />

mutagenic effects in the germ cells of humans,<br />

without demonstration of transmission to<br />

progeny; for example, an increase in the<br />

frequency of aneuploidy in sperm cells of<br />

exposed people.<br />

(3) Other Considerations. Conclusions<br />

about heritable effects in human germ cells

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!