27.04.2015 Views

Comparison of two Marks of Sex Pheromone Dispensers ... - Iresa

Comparison of two Marks of Sex Pheromone Dispensers ... - Iresa

Comparison of two Marks of Sex Pheromone Dispensers ... - Iresa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Comparison</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>two</strong> <strong>Marks</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sex</strong> <strong>Pheromone</strong> <strong>Dispensers</strong><br />

Commercialized in Tunisia for their Efficiency to Monitor and<br />

to Control by Mass-Trapping Tuta absoluta under<br />

Greenhouses<br />

Khaled Abbes and Brahim Chermiti, Laboratoire d’Entomologie, Département<br />

des Invertébrés, Microorganismes, Malherbes Nuisibles: Méthodes Alternatives de<br />

Lutte. ISA Chott-Mariem, Université de Sousse, 4042 Sousse, Tunisia<br />

___________________________________________________________________________<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Abbes, K. and Chermiti, B. 2011. <strong>Comparison</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>two</strong> marks <strong>of</strong> sex pheromone dispensers<br />

commercialized in Tunisia for their efficiency to monitor and to control by mass-trapping Tuta<br />

absoluta under greenhouses. Tunisian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Protection 6: 133-148.<br />

The evaluation <strong>of</strong> the efficiency <strong>of</strong> <strong>two</strong> marks <strong>of</strong> sex pheromone dispensers used for mass-trapping <strong>of</strong><br />

males <strong>of</strong> Tuta absoluta for monitoring and pest management showed that the number <strong>of</strong> trapped males<br />

peaked the second week following lure installation for Russell® dispensers to decrease afterwards until<br />

its renewal. In the case <strong>of</strong> Pherodis® lures, the level <strong>of</strong> catches starts to decline from the fourth week<br />

after the beginning <strong>of</strong> the experience. Concerning the use <strong>of</strong> pheromone traps for pest monitoring,<br />

linear regression between trap catches and the number <strong>of</strong> mines per leaf was not significant, but trap<br />

catches and the infestation rate <strong>of</strong> leaves were significantly related in studied greenhouses (R² = 0.68<br />

and 0.70). However, the assessment <strong>of</strong> the efficiency <strong>of</strong> sex pheromone mass-trapping in controlling T.<br />

absoluta revealed that in greenhouses not equipped with insect-pro<strong>of</strong>, the level <strong>of</strong> fruit damage did not<br />

depend on the availability <strong>of</strong> sex pheromone traps suggesting that the use <strong>of</strong> this technique must be<br />

accompanied with isolation measures.<br />

Keywords: Delta traps fruit loss, infestation rate, population dynamics, sex pheromone lures, Tuta<br />

absoluta<br />

___________________________________________________________________________<br />

Since the detection <strong>of</strong> Tuta absoluta<br />

in Tunisia in late 2008 (7), it was imposed<br />

to Tunisian farmers to revise their pest<br />

management strategies in tomato crops.<br />

Presently, regular chemical sprayings are<br />

very common to control this pest in<br />

greenhouses and in industrial crops.<br />

Chemicals lead to development <strong>of</strong><br />

resistance to insecticides such as<br />

deltametrin and abamectin (16).<br />

Corresponding author: Brahim Chermiti<br />

Email: chermiti54@yahoo.fr<br />

Accepted for publication 10 October 2011<br />

Researchers are focusing on biological<br />

control as a safe and sustainable<br />

alternative for this problem (12).<br />

The Tunisian ministry <strong>of</strong> agriculture<br />

is encouraging the use <strong>of</strong> insect-pro<strong>of</strong><br />

screens with subsidies to limit damages.<br />

Besides, the use <strong>of</strong> bioinsecticides was<br />

promoted including Neem oil and<br />

Bacillus thuriengiensis based products to<br />

avoid resistance which participated to<br />

reduction <strong>of</strong> pest incidence especially in<br />

greenhouses. However, the single use <strong>of</strong><br />

each <strong>of</strong> these alternatives is not enough<br />

and an integrated pest management (IPM)<br />

program needs to be developed and<br />

Tunisian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Protection 133 Vol. 6, No. 2, 2011


promoted to ensure a better control <strong>of</strong> this<br />

miner.<br />

Among IPM strategies, the use <strong>of</strong><br />

sex pheromone traps is one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

recognized tactics against the tomato pest<br />

that is becoming increasingly used<br />

worldwide. The market <strong>of</strong> sex<br />

pheromones lures used for mass-trapping<br />

<strong>of</strong> males <strong>of</strong> the tomato miner T. absoluta<br />

is experiencing a boom in Tunisia where<br />

several marks <strong>of</strong> sex pheromone baits are<br />

commercialized. All these pheromone<br />

lures have the same active component<br />

which is a synthetic pheromone <strong>of</strong><br />

female, the 3E, 8Z, 11Z -3,8,11-<br />

tetradecatrien-1-yl acetate (13). The<br />

production technology can differ between<br />

products like the composition <strong>of</strong> the<br />

rubber capsules and the rate <strong>of</strong> diffusion<br />

<strong>of</strong> the pheromone into the air that<br />

determines its lifetime and consequently,<br />

its effectiveness.<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was: i) to<br />

compare the performance <strong>of</strong> <strong>two</strong> marks <strong>of</strong><br />

the most used sex pheromone capsules in<br />

Tunisia, ii) to find out if trap catches<br />

reflect the infestation level <strong>of</strong> the crop,<br />

iii) to assess the situation with and<br />

without sex pheromone traps under<br />

greenhouses unprotected by insect-pro<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Several parameters were studied like the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> trapped males, the abundance<br />

<strong>of</strong> the pest in the greenhouses and its<br />

population dynamics, the number <strong>of</strong><br />

mines caused by larvae, the infestation<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> tomato leaves and the fruit loss.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Tomato greenhouses.<br />

Six commercial greenhouses with<br />

three tomato cultivars (Pacal, Colibri, and<br />

Sahel) situated in the tomato cropping<br />

area <strong>of</strong> Teboulba (Sahel, Tunisia) were<br />

provided for free by a local farmer who<br />

volunteered to submit them to the<br />

experience. Tomato greenhouses planted<br />

with cultivars Colibri and Pacal were<br />

situated next to each other while<br />

Control[1] with Pacal cultivar, without<br />

sex pheromone trap, was 100 m away.<br />

Tomato greenhouses Sahel1 and Sahel2,<br />

planted with the cultivar Sahel, were<br />

located close to each other and 100 m far<br />

from the greenhouse Control[2] <strong>of</strong> the<br />

same cultivar. The distance between<br />

greenhouses with different marks <strong>of</strong> sex<br />

pheromone dispensers was 1 km to avoid<br />

interference.<br />

Experimental greenhouses were 60<br />

m length, 8 m wide and 3 m height with a<br />

total area <strong>of</strong> 500 m². They were covered<br />

with <strong>two</strong> years old polyethylene screens.<br />

Tomato plants were transplanted on the<br />

end <strong>of</strong> December with a density <strong>of</strong> 3<br />

plants/m² and a total number <strong>of</strong> 1500<br />

plants/greenhouse. No insecticides were<br />

sprayed against T. absoluta in all<br />

greenhouses throughout the test period<br />

and the same cultural practices were<br />

performed in all the six experimental<br />

greenhouses.<br />

Mass-trapping.<br />

Colibri and Pacal tomato<br />

greenhouses were equipped with one<br />

delta trap each as recommended under<br />

greenhouses with a density <strong>of</strong> one trap per<br />

500 m² (5). Water traps were baited with<br />

sex pheromone capsules mark Pherodis®<br />

installed from 05/03/2009 to 10/06/2009.<br />

Two other Delta traps loaded with<br />

Russel® sex pheromone lures were<br />

installed in the greenhouses Sahel1 and<br />

Sahel2 during the period between<br />

15/04/2009 and 03/06/2009. Sticky<br />

cardboards in all mentioned traps were<br />

renewed once a week from the beginning<br />

<strong>of</strong> the observations till April 1 st and twice<br />

a week during the rest <strong>of</strong> the experience<br />

period due to the increase <strong>of</strong> the<br />

population <strong>of</strong> the insect and their rapid<br />

saturation. <strong>Sex</strong> pheromone capsules were<br />

renewed every 4 weeks and the number <strong>of</strong><br />

captured males <strong>of</strong> T. absoluta was<br />

Tunisian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Protection 134 Vol. 6, No. 2, 2011


ecorded every week before the change <strong>of</strong><br />

the sticky cardboards. Traps were<br />

removed on 10/06/2009 from Pacal and<br />

Colibri crops and on 03/06/2009 from<br />

Sahel1 and Sahel2 greenhouses. Both<br />

types <strong>of</strong> pheromone capsules were<br />

standard pheromone lures, loaded with<br />

0.5 mg <strong>of</strong> synthetic sex pheromone <strong>of</strong><br />

females <strong>of</strong> T. absoluta and bought from<br />

local suppliers.<br />

Sampling.<br />

In order to assess the infestation<br />

level in the experimental tomato crops<br />

with and without sex pheromone traps,<br />

sampling started on 05/03/2009 in Pacal<br />

and Colibri greenhouses and on<br />

19/03/2009 in Control[1] and took end on<br />

27/05/2009 and 03/06/2009, respectively.<br />

Sampling concerned the first fully<br />

developed leaf from the upper part <strong>of</strong><br />

tomato plants as recommended by<br />

Gravena (15). The number <strong>of</strong> samples<br />

was 20 leaves per unit. Greenhouses were<br />

divided into 20 equal plots and limits<br />

between plots were marked by white<br />

paint on the black plastic mulch. Every<br />

week, one tomato leaf was collected from<br />

each plot and from a different tomato<br />

plant. Sampled plants were marked with<br />

red plastic stickers so that they would not<br />

be used for next week sampling. Leaves<br />

were observed under binoculars type<br />

Leica® Model MS5 and all present<br />

instars <strong>of</strong> T. absoluta were identified and<br />

counted. Only one sampling was missed<br />

in Control[1] on 15/04/2009 because <strong>of</strong> a<br />

fungicide spraying.<br />

Damaged fruits as well as the total<br />

production <strong>of</strong> each greenhouse were<br />

weighted after each harvest using an<br />

electronic scale.<br />

Statistical analysis.<br />

A linear regression analysis between<br />

the total number <strong>of</strong> mines per leaf (with<br />

and without larvae) as well as the<br />

infestation rate and the number <strong>of</strong><br />

individuals per trap was performed in<br />

greenhouses Pacal and Colibri equipped<br />

with traps using GraphPad Prism Version<br />

5.00 to assess the efficiency <strong>of</strong><br />

pheromone Delta traps for monitoring.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Performance <strong>of</strong> tow marks <strong>of</strong> sex<br />

pheromone lures.<br />

<strong>Sex</strong> <strong>Pheromone</strong> Bait Pherodis®<br />

mark. The number <strong>of</strong> trapped males in<br />

Colibri greenhouse started relatively low<br />

with 98 individuals per week to reach a<br />

maximum <strong>of</strong> 852 adults on 20/05/2009.<br />

During this gradual increase, each<br />

renewal <strong>of</strong> the capsule was <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

followed by an increase in the number <strong>of</strong><br />

trapped adults (Fig. 1A).<br />

The figure <strong>of</strong> the evolution <strong>of</strong> masstrapping<br />

in Pacal greenhouse shows a<br />

similar shape to that <strong>of</strong> Colibri. Indeed,<br />

after 66 adults caught on 11/03/2009, the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> trapped males continued to<br />

increase steadily to exceed 883 on<br />

20/05/2009. The change <strong>of</strong> the<br />

pheromone bait on 27/05/2009 led to the<br />

raise <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> caught males with<br />

a maximum <strong>of</strong> 961 individuals per trap<br />

recorded on 10/06/2009 in Pacal<br />

greenhouse. Besides, the renewal <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sticky boards tow times per week, starting<br />

from April 1 st , highly participated to the<br />

increase <strong>of</strong> trap efficiency (Fig. 1B).<br />

Tunisian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Protection 135 Vol. 6, No. 2, 2011


Fig. 1. Weekly evolution <strong>of</strong> trapped males <strong>of</strong> Tuta absoluta in greenhouses with Delta trap and Pherodis® sex<br />

pheromone lures in Teboulba in 2009. A: Greenhouse Colibri; B: Greenhouse Pacal; : Lure renewal.<br />

<strong>Sex</strong> <strong>Pheromone</strong> Bait Russel®<br />

mark. As far as greenhouses Sahel1 and<br />

Sahel2 were concerned, the level <strong>of</strong><br />

captures was important. In fact, the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> captured males was<br />

respectively about 455 and 346 after the<br />

first week <strong>of</strong> the trap installation. The<br />

level <strong>of</strong> trapped adults peaked during the<br />

third week after the beginning <strong>of</strong> the<br />

survey at 690 and 703 correspondingly<br />

in greenhouses Sahel1 and Sahel2. The<br />

reduction <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> strained<br />

males <strong>of</strong> T. absoluta at an average <strong>of</strong> 276<br />

individuals per trap and per week,<br />

between 13/05/2009 and 20/05/2009, can<br />

be partially explained by the reduction <strong>of</strong><br />

the attractiveness <strong>of</strong> Russel® pheromone<br />

lures especially near the end <strong>of</strong> its<br />

lifetime. The renewal <strong>of</strong> both lures on<br />

13/05/2009 combined with the high level<br />

<strong>of</strong> population in May and June can<br />

explain in part the gradual increase <strong>of</strong><br />

the number <strong>of</strong> trapped males which<br />

reached 898 and 1111 per trap and per<br />

week on 27/05/2009 and 03/06/2009 in<br />

Sahel1 and Sahel2, respectively (Fig. 2).<br />

Efficiency <strong>of</strong> pheromone traps for<br />

monitoring.<br />

Tunisian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Protection 136<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the most important questions<br />

about the use <strong>of</strong> mass sex pheromone<br />

traps for monitoring this pest is: does the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> trapped males <strong>of</strong> T. absoluta in<br />

the sex pheromone bait traps reflects the<br />

real level <strong>of</strong> damage in tomato crops and<br />

the infestation rate <strong>of</strong> plants?<br />

To assess the relationship between<br />

trap catches, the infestation rates and the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> mines per leaf, a linear<br />

regression analysis was performed<br />

between the number <strong>of</strong> caught males <strong>of</strong><br />

T. absoluta in the sex pheromone traps<br />

equipped with Pherodis® lures, the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> mines per leaf and the<br />

infestation rate <strong>of</strong> leaves. Analysis<br />

showed a non significant relationship<br />

between the number <strong>of</strong> mines per leaf<br />

and the number <strong>of</strong> trapped males <strong>of</strong> the<br />

miner in both studied greenhouses (R² =<br />

0.26, P = 0.058 > 0.05 for Pacal and R² =<br />

0.18, P = 0.12 > 0.05 for Colibri) (Fig.<br />

3A, B). However, linear regression<br />

between the infestation rate <strong>of</strong> leaves and<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> catches in sex pheromone<br />

traps was highly significant in Pacal (R²<br />

= 0.68, P = 0.003 < 0.05) and Colibri (R²<br />

= 0.70, P = 0.0002 < 0.05) (Fig. 4A, B).<br />

Vol. 6, No. 2, 2011


Fig. 2. Weekly evolution <strong>of</strong> trapped males <strong>of</strong> Tuta absoluta in greenhouses with Delta trap and Russel® sex<br />

pheromone lures in Teboulba in 2009. A: Greenhouse Sahel1; B: Greenhouse Sahel2; : Lure renewal.<br />

Y= -0.0010X-18.16<br />

A<br />

Fig. 3. Linear regression between the number <strong>of</strong> caught males <strong>of</strong> Tuta absoluta and the number <strong>of</strong> mines per leaf<br />

in Pacal (A) (R² = 0.26) and Colibri (B) (R² = 0.18) in Teboulba in 2009 (Values at 95% confidence level).<br />

Efficiency <strong>of</strong> mass-trapping in<br />

pest management.<br />

Greenhouses with traps. Results <strong>of</strong><br />

Pacal and Colibri experimental<br />

greenhouses reflected the occurrence <strong>of</strong><br />

all instars <strong>of</strong> the pest on young tomato<br />

leaves with the continuous dominance <strong>of</strong><br />

eggs and first instar caterpillars during all<br />

the period <strong>of</strong> the study. However, the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> older instars even with low<br />

Tunisian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Protection 137<br />

densities from March confirms that the<br />

infestation occurred earlier and started<br />

before the beginning <strong>of</strong> the experiment<br />

(Figs. 5A, 5B). The analysis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

population structure <strong>of</strong> T. absoluta on<br />

young tomato leaves in the <strong>two</strong> studied<br />

greenhouses revealed that the overall<br />

density <strong>of</strong> individuals per leaf remained<br />

low throughout March till mid-April.<br />

During this phase, the number <strong>of</strong><br />

Vol. 6, No. 2, 2011


individuals did not exceed 3 per leaf<br />

corresponding to a total number <strong>of</strong> larvae<br />

fewer than 2 per leaf (Fig. 6). One week<br />

later, T. absoluta population began to<br />

increase with favorable temperatures to<br />

reach 20 individuals per leaf in Pacal<br />

greenhouse on 27/05/2009 and 21<br />

individuals in Colibiri on 13/05/2009<br />

(Figs. 5A, 5B) corresponding to a total<br />

number <strong>of</strong> larvae peaking at 13.3 and 16.6<br />

larvae per leaf in Pacal and Colibri,<br />

respectively (Fig. 6). The maximum <strong>of</strong><br />

leaf mines was closely related to the<br />

density <strong>of</strong> T. absoluta caterpillars,<br />

especially that <strong>of</strong> neonate larvae. Indeed,<br />

peaks <strong>of</strong> mines in both crops<br />

corresponded perfectly to those <strong>of</strong> first<br />

instar larvae respectively recorded on<br />

27/05/2009 for Pacal and on 13/05/2009<br />

for Colibri greenhouses (Figs. 5B, 5D).<br />

In both greenhouses with<br />

pheromone traps, the maximum density<br />

<strong>of</strong> the pest on the crops, resulting mainly<br />

from the increase <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> eggs<br />

on leaves, caused a high infestation rate<br />

around 100% on 22/04/2009 (Figs. 7B,<br />

7D). The damage caused by T. absoluta<br />

larvae on tomato leaves in both<br />

greenhouses led to a high density <strong>of</strong><br />

mines rising up to an average <strong>of</strong> 26 mines<br />

per leaf starting from 13/05/2009 (Figs.<br />

7A, 7C).<br />

In the first half <strong>of</strong> May, all the<br />

studied parameters were at their<br />

maximum with an infestation rate <strong>of</strong><br />

young leaves around 100% and an<br />

average <strong>of</strong> 30 mines per leaf. The end <strong>of</strong><br />

the experiment was characterized by a<br />

reduction <strong>of</strong> the density <strong>of</strong> all instars on<br />

tomato leaves.<br />

Y=0.050X+9.10<br />

Fig. 4. Linear regression between the number <strong>of</strong> caught males <strong>of</strong> Tuta absoluta and the infestation rate <strong>of</strong> leaves<br />

in Pacal (A) (R² = 0.68) and Colibri (B) (R² = 0.70) in Teboulba in 2009 (Values at 95% confidence level).<br />

Tunisian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Protection 138<br />

Vol. 6, No. 2, 2011


Fig. 5. Population dynamics <strong>of</strong> Tuta absoluta under greenhouses with sex pheromone Delta traps in Teboulba in<br />

2009. A: Pacal; B: Colibri; W: eggs; L1: first instar larvae; L2: second instar larvae; L3: third instar larvae; L4:<br />

fourth instar larvae; N: nymphs.<br />

Fig. 6. Evolution <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> Tuta absoluta larvae per leaf in Colibri and Pacal tomato<br />

cultivars.<br />

Tunisian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Protection 139<br />

Vol. 6, No. 2, 2011


B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

Fig. 7. Weekly evolution <strong>of</strong> the infestation rate and the average number <strong>of</strong> mines <strong>of</strong> Tuta absoluta on tomato<br />

leaves in greenhouses with sex pheromone Delta traps in Teboulba in 2009. A and B: Pacal; C and D: Colibri.<br />

Greenhouses without traps.<br />

Population dynamics <strong>of</strong> T. absoluta in<br />

Control[1], without sex pheromone trap,<br />

followed almost the same pattern as<br />

greenhouses equipped with Delta traps<br />

baited with sex pheromone lures. Indeed,<br />

throughout the month <strong>of</strong> March, the<br />

overall density <strong>of</strong> all biological instars <strong>of</strong><br />

the pest hardly exceeded 3.5 individuals<br />

per leaf with predominance <strong>of</strong> eggs.<br />

During the month <strong>of</strong> May, the population<br />

increased significantly and continuously,<br />

reaching a maximum <strong>of</strong> 25 individuals<br />

Tunisian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Protection 140<br />

(Fig. 8) and 15.17 larvae per leaf on<br />

27/05/2009 (Fig. 9) causing a raising<br />

infestation rate around 100% on<br />

06/05/2009 (Fig. 10B).<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> leaf mines was<br />

initially low on March and April, and<br />

increase during May to reach a maximum<br />

<strong>of</strong> 37 mines per leaf on 03/06/2009 (Fig.<br />

10A). The same decline <strong>of</strong> population<br />

observed in greenhouses with pheromone<br />

traps at the end <strong>of</strong> May was recorded<br />

again in Control[1].<br />

Vol. 6, No. 2, 2011


Fig. 8. Population dynamics <strong>of</strong> Tuta absoluta on tomato leaves in Control[1], without sex pheromone<br />

trap, in Teboulba in 2009. W: eggs; L1: first instar larvae; L2: second instar larvae; L3: third instar<br />

larvae; L4: fourth instar larvae; N: nymphs.<br />

Fig.9. Evolution <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> Tuta absoluta larvae per tomato leaf in the Control[1]<br />

greenhouse.<br />

Tunisian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Protection 141<br />

Vol. 6, No. 2, 2011


Fig. 10. Weekly evolution <strong>of</strong> the average number <strong>of</strong> mine <strong>of</strong> Tuta absoluta (A) and the infestation rate (B)<br />

on tomato leaves in the Control[1] greenhouse, without sex pheromone traps in Teboulba in 2009.<br />

B<br />

Tomato fruit loss.<br />

Loss <strong>of</strong> tomato fruits in<br />

experimental greenhouses was<br />

considerable. Indeed, they became<br />

obvious from 15/04/2009 with around 50<br />

kg/greenhouse, but with the growing <strong>of</strong><br />

T. absoluta population, damage has<br />

become increasingly important reaching<br />

1440 kg for a total harvest <strong>of</strong> 3280 kg in<br />

Colibri greenhouse, representing 43.90%<br />

loss (Fig. 11C). As for Pacal greenhouse,<br />

the damage caused by this pest was<br />

about 1290 kg for a total production <strong>of</strong><br />

2980 kg, representing 43.28% <strong>of</strong> yield<br />

loss (Fig. 11D). Fruit loss in Control[1]<br />

greenhouse was 1570 kg <strong>of</strong> a total<br />

production <strong>of</strong> 3720 kg corresponding to<br />

42.22% <strong>of</strong> the total harvest, similarly to<br />

greenhouses with sex pheromone traps.<br />

Loss in Control[2] greenhouse was about<br />

18.35% (Fig. 11B).<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The high number <strong>of</strong> caught<br />

individuals <strong>of</strong> T. absoluta per week in<br />

Delta traps with Russel® sex pheromone<br />

lures was probably due to a greater<br />

attractiveness <strong>of</strong> this lure towards males<br />

<strong>of</strong> the tomato miner or may be a<br />

consequence <strong>of</strong> a superior level <strong>of</strong><br />

populations in the greenhouses where<br />

evaluation took place. <strong>Pheromone</strong> lures<br />

were not evaluated in the same<br />

greenhouse to avoid interference.<br />

However, some evaluation works <strong>of</strong> sex<br />

pheromone lures <strong>of</strong> T. absoluta and their<br />

longevity were carried out in Spain like<br />

that <strong>of</strong> Alfaro et al. (2) who used one<br />

greenhouse to evaluate 6 pheromone<br />

dispensers <strong>of</strong> different marks with weekly<br />

rotation <strong>of</strong> traps loaded with different<br />

types <strong>of</strong> capsules. They concluded that<br />

the pheromone capsule type Trécé179®<br />

has a higher level <strong>of</strong> capture and a better<br />

longevity. The area <strong>of</strong> the greenhouse<br />

used for this experiment was not<br />

mentioned in the paper but even in a big<br />

one and rotation <strong>of</strong> Delta traps, the risk <strong>of</strong><br />

interference is still high. In open field<br />

conditions, a distance <strong>of</strong> 25 m between<br />

traps may reduce trap interference.<br />

Tunisian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Protection 142<br />

Vol. 6, No. 2, 2011


A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

E<br />

F<br />

Fig. 11. Cumulated loss <strong>of</strong> tomato fruits due to Tuta absoluta infestation recorded in the experimental<br />

greenhouses in Teboulba in 2009. A: Control[1]; B: Control[2]; C: Colibri; D: Pacal; E: Sahel1; F: Sahel2.<br />

Tunisian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Protection 143<br />

Vol. 6, No. 2, 2011


Concerning the second type <strong>of</strong><br />

tested pheromone lures, the average <strong>of</strong><br />

weekly catches in traps with Pherodis®<br />

dispensers was in constant increase even<br />

after the first four weeks <strong>of</strong> the beginning<br />

<strong>of</strong> the experiment. However the slight<br />

decrease <strong>of</strong> catches recorded between<br />

15/04/2009 and 29/04/2009 in greenhouse<br />

Pacal could be explained by the end <strong>of</strong><br />

the life time <strong>of</strong> the lure. Another decrease<br />

in the number <strong>of</strong> caches in both<br />

greenhouses with Delta traps and<br />

Pherodis® pheromone baits was observed<br />

on 20/05/2009, three weeks after the<br />

renewal <strong>of</strong> the lures. The number <strong>of</strong><br />

strained males <strong>of</strong> T. absoluta declined<br />

from 852 to 532 and from 883 to 442 in<br />

Colibri and Pacal greenhouses,<br />

respectively. As pheromones are very<br />

volatile, this sharp decrease can be<br />

explained by the elevated temperatures<br />

which increased from an average <strong>of</strong><br />

16.25°C in April to 19.6°C (6) in May<br />

that can accelerate the release <strong>of</strong> the<br />

pheromone from the rubber septa (4).<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> Russel® pheromone<br />

capsules, there was a significant reduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> catches in the traps even in April<br />

characterized with cool temperature (11<br />

to 20°C) (6). By the end <strong>of</strong> the fourth<br />

week from the second renewal <strong>of</strong> the lure<br />

on 13/05/2009, the number <strong>of</strong> catches was<br />

350 to 450 individuals less.<br />

Based on these results, we can<br />

deduce that Russel® capsules may have<br />

greater attractiveness toward males <strong>of</strong> the<br />

tomato leaf miner than those <strong>of</strong><br />

Pherodis® due to the high number <strong>of</strong><br />

attracted males immediately after its<br />

installation, but the number <strong>of</strong> strained<br />

males <strong>of</strong> the miner decreased significantly<br />

from the second week. In the other hand,<br />

Pherodis® pheromone lures have<br />

apparently better performance due to the<br />

relatively high number <strong>of</strong> trapped males<br />

even four weeks after their installation.<br />

Results <strong>of</strong> linear regression between<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> trapped males and the<br />

infestation level suggest the utilization <strong>of</strong><br />

the sex pheromone traps as good<br />

indicators <strong>of</strong> the infestation rate <strong>of</strong> the<br />

crop. Some authors recommend 30<br />

trapped males per trap and per week to<br />

start chemical curative measures (4).<br />

Monitoring is very important in IPM<br />

programs; it allows the detection <strong>of</strong> the<br />

early infestations. Sprayings <strong>of</strong> chemicals<br />

based on data from pheromones traps are<br />

usually more effective in controlling first<br />

attacks and avoiding the rapid<br />

colonization <strong>of</strong> the crop. This can<br />

significantly reduce the number <strong>of</strong><br />

sprayed insecticides, and preserve natural<br />

enemies <strong>of</strong> the pest. For instance, Merid<br />

bug Nesidiocoris tenuis, an efficient<br />

natural enemy <strong>of</strong> T. absoluta, especially<br />

in open field (1), was very influenced by<br />

chemicals in Brazil where pest control<br />

was mainly based on heavy insecticide<br />

sprays reaching 36 treatments per season<br />

(14). Cônsoli et al. (11) reported a<br />

decrease in parasitism <strong>of</strong> Trichogramma<br />

pretiosum by application <strong>of</strong> tebufenozide.<br />

The assessment <strong>of</strong> the efficiency <strong>of</strong><br />

sex pheromone mass-trapping as pest<br />

management technique in Pacal and<br />

Colibri greenhouses as compared to<br />

Control[1] showed a relatively lower pest<br />

density than in greenhouses equipped<br />

with sex pheromone traps. However, the<br />

infestation rate and the number <strong>of</strong> mines<br />

per leaf were similar in different<br />

greenhouses. The decrease <strong>of</strong> the density<br />

<strong>of</strong> the pest population at the end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

survey is probably due to the widespread<br />

devastation <strong>of</strong> the canopies <strong>of</strong> tomato<br />

plants due to the high number <strong>of</strong> feeding<br />

larvae, causing a decrease <strong>of</strong> the number<br />

<strong>of</strong> eggs and juvenile instars on leaves.<br />

Indeed, young leaves are preferential<br />

oviposition sites for T. absoluta females<br />

which move to lay eggs on stems and<br />

Tunisian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Protection 144 Vol. 6, No. 2, 2011


especially fruits causing considerable<br />

losses.<br />

Fruit loss in experimental crops was<br />

similar and does not depend on the<br />

availability <strong>of</strong> sex pheromone traps in the<br />

greenhouses. Admittedly, sex pheromone<br />

traps attract a considerable number <strong>of</strong><br />

males and therefore may reduce<br />

possibilities <strong>of</strong> mating and oviposition on<br />

tomato plants. This is true only when<br />

greenhouses are isolated with an insectpro<strong>of</strong><br />

to avoid gravid females coming<br />

from outside. In the opposite case, the<br />

trap can attract a significant number <strong>of</strong><br />

males from the outside and may increase<br />

the mating probabilities inside the<br />

greenhouse especially when the sex<br />

pheromone baits are old and attracted<br />

males are not trapped. This can explain<br />

the situation in greenhouses Sahel1 and<br />

Sahel2 equipped with sex pheromone<br />

traps which showed an average loss <strong>of</strong><br />

1155 kg compared to an average total<br />

production <strong>of</strong> 4240 kg, corresponding to<br />

27% damage (Fig. 11F). Hence, fruit loss<br />

in Control[2] greenhouse <strong>of</strong> the same<br />

cultivar, not equipped with a sex<br />

pheromone trap, was 760 kg for a total<br />

production <strong>of</strong> 4140 kg representing<br />

18.35% <strong>of</strong> non commercialized fruits<br />

which means 8.65% less damage.<br />

Chermiti et al. (10) found that fruit loss<br />

was between 11 and 43.33% <strong>of</strong> the total<br />

yield in greenhouses with similar<br />

conditions. In the same context, Caffarini<br />

et al. (9) reported non significant<br />

regression between damaged leaf areas<br />

and fruit injuries in case <strong>of</strong> low<br />

infestation levels <strong>of</strong> T. absoluta. In other<br />

words, fruit loss was unpredictable (R² =<br />

0). Therefore, it is clear that the use <strong>of</strong><br />

mass-trapping alone for controlling T.<br />

absoluta is not sufficient and may even<br />

worsen the situation; so it must be<br />

accompanied at least by the use <strong>of</strong> insectpro<strong>of</strong><br />

and strict isolation measures in<br />

greenhouse doors (double door system)<br />

and aeration windows and if necessary<br />

additional chemical sprayings.<br />

Nevertheless, the wrong use <strong>of</strong> insectpro<strong>of</strong><br />

can cause high temperature and<br />

relative humidity inside greenhouses<br />

leading to fungal attacks (Grey mold, late<br />

blight, etc…) as well as extra production<br />

charges.<br />

Independently <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong><br />

population in studied greenhouses, tested<br />

pheromone lures showed different<br />

performance among the experiment<br />

period. Pherodis® lures were relatively<br />

more stable since they ensured a high<br />

number <strong>of</strong> trapped males even after four<br />

weeks <strong>of</strong> their installation which is not<br />

the case for Russel® lures where a<br />

significant decrease <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong><br />

strained males was observed.<br />

Mass-trapping can be an interesting<br />

technique to monitor and to control the<br />

tomato pest T. absoluta especially in an<br />

IPM program. However, special<br />

precautions should be taken such as the<br />

choice <strong>of</strong> sex pheromone capsules which<br />

must have a sufficient longevity (4-5<br />

weeks) and constant rate <strong>of</strong> pheromone<br />

release, the use <strong>of</strong> insect-pro<strong>of</strong> to prevent<br />

the infiltration <strong>of</strong> adults from outside and<br />

the regular renewal <strong>of</strong> the capsules<br />

according to recommendations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

producer. Besides, pheromone dose in the<br />

lures must be analyzed before importation<br />

in credible laboratories to guarantee their<br />

quality.<br />

Within IPM strategies, sex<br />

pheromone mass-trapping could be very<br />

promising to help establishment <strong>of</strong> both<br />

exotic and endemic natural enemies <strong>of</strong><br />

this pest and reduce high costs <strong>of</strong><br />

chemical control as well as side effect on<br />

beneficial insects (19). However, experts<br />

are very concerned about “arbitrary mass<br />

promotion” <strong>of</strong> T. absoluta pheromones to<br />

untrained farmers and the abusive use <strong>of</strong><br />

this technique as a “political quick fix” <strong>of</strong><br />

the problem. <strong>Pheromone</strong>s should not be<br />

Tunisian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Protection 145 Vol. 6, No. 2, 2011


considered in any case as “feel good<br />

factor”. While companies are focusing on<br />

increasing dosing level in pheromones<br />

dispenser looking for more effective<br />

mass-trapping product, little work was<br />

done to study the influence <strong>of</strong> other<br />

factors on mass-trapping such us trap<br />

design. Fernando et al. (13) proved that<br />

this latter can significantly influence trap<br />

capture which was recently confirmed in<br />

recent studies in Morocco (3). The<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> super dosed pheromone<br />

capsules with inefficient trap designs<br />

raises concerns about possibilities to an<br />

increase in insect population in<br />

greenhouses and potential amplification<br />

in damage especially that farmers are<br />

making their own traps in the most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

invaded countries. Researches need to be<br />

continued with sex pheromones <strong>of</strong> T.<br />

absoluta to develop a reliable technique<br />

<strong>of</strong> sexual confusion which is potential<br />

management strategy (17, 18).<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

The authors thank the General Directorate <strong>of</strong><br />

the Protection and the Control <strong>of</strong> the Agricultural<br />

Product Quality (Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture) and Mrs.<br />

Naziha Trimech from Agricultural Service<br />

Cooperative “ESSAADA”, Teboulba, for their<br />

serious involvement to achieve this field work.<br />

___________________________________________________________________________<br />

RESUME<br />

Abbes K. et Chermiti B. 2011. Comparaison de l’efficacité de deux marques de capsules à<br />

phéromone sexuelle commercialisées en Tunisie pour la surveillance et la lutte par le piégeage de<br />

masse contre Tuta absoluta sous serres. Tunisian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Protection 6: 133-148.<br />

L’évaluation de l’efficacité de deux marques de capsules à phéromones sexuelles utilisées dans le<br />

piégeage de masse des mâles de Tuta absoluta comme un moyen de détection et de lutte a montré que<br />

le volume des captures atteint son maximum à la deuxième semaine pour les capsules Russel® pour<br />

diminuer par la suite jusqu’à son renouvellement. Dans le cas de la capsule Pherodis®, le niveau des<br />

captures commence à diminuer à partir de la quatrième semaine de l’installation de la capsule.<br />

Concernant l’utilisation des pièges à phéromone sexuelle pour la surveillance des populations, la<br />

régression linéaire entre le niveau des captures et le nombre des galeries par feuille était non<br />

significative; alors que le taux d’infestation et le nombre des captures dans les pièges étaient<br />

significativement liés dans les serres étudiées (R² = 0,68 et 0,70); ceci suggère son emploi comme un<br />

indicateur du niveau d’infestation des cultures de tomate pour la prise de décision. Cependant,<br />

l'évaluation de l'efficacité de piégeage de masse a révélé que le niveau de dégâts sur les fruits ne<br />

dépend pas de la pose des pièges à phéromone sexuelle, mais plutôt de l’isolation de la serre du milieu<br />

extérieur par des filets insect-pro<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Mots clés: Capsules à phéromone sexuelle, dynamique des populations, pertes en fruits, pièges Delta,<br />

taux d’infestation, Tuta absoluta<br />

___________________________________________________________________________<br />

.2011<br />

الطماطم/البندورة Tuta absoluta<br />

Tunisian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Protection 6: 133-148.<br />

ملخص<br />

عباس،‏ خالد وبراهيم شرميطي.‏<br />

لرصد ومكافحة حافرة<br />

مقارنة فعالية نوعين من آبسولات الفيرومون الجنسي المسوقة في تونس<br />

باستعمال الصيد المكثف.‏<br />

اهتمت هذه الدراسة بمقارنة نوعين من آبسولات الفرومون المستخدمة في المصائد الفيرومونية لحافرة الطماطم/‏<br />

البندورة.‏ وقد بينت أن عدد الفراشات الممسوآة يبلغ أقصاه في الأسبوع الثاني من بدء استعمال المصيدة بالنسبة للكبسولة<br />

فإن عدد<br />

من نوع Russel® لتنخفض بعد ذلك حتى موعد تغييرها.‏ أما بالنسبة إلى الكبسولة من نوع<br />

الفراشات الممسوآة لا ينخفض إلا انطلاقا من الأسبوع الرابع.‏ أآدت هذه الدراسة عدم وجود علاقة بين عدد الفراشات<br />

الممسوآة وعدد الأنفاق في الأوراق ولكن وجود علاقة وثيقة بين نسبة إصابة الأوراق وعدد الفراشات في المصيدة = R²)<br />

Pherodis®<br />

Tunisian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Protection 146 Vol. 6, No. 2, 2011


مما يشير إلى إمكانية الاعتماد على المصائد الفيرومونية آمؤشر جيد على مستوى الإصابة لأخذ التدابير<br />

اللازمة.‏ بين تقييم مدى نجاعة تقنية المكافحة باستعمال المصائد الفيرومونية في الدفيئات دون وضع شباك واقية من<br />

الحشرات أن مستوى إصابة الثمار لا يعتمد على وجود المصائد الفيرومونية من عدمه وان استعمال هذه الأخيرة يجب أن<br />

يكون مصاحبا بإجراءات عزل.‏<br />

0.68 0.70)<br />

آلمات مفتاحية:‏ آبسولات فيرومونية،‏ دينامكية المجتمع الحشري،‏ خسائر الثمار،‏ مصيدة دلتا،‏ نسبة الإصابة.‏<br />

___________________________________________________________________________<br />

LETERATURE CITED<br />

1. Abbes, K. and Chermiti B. 2010. Integrated pest<br />

management essay against the tomato leafminer<br />

Tuta absoluta Povolny (Lepidotera:<br />

Gelecheiidae) in an open field tomato crop in<br />

the region <strong>of</strong> Raggueda, Tunisia. African J.<br />

Plant Sci. Biotech. 3: 91-95.<br />

2. Alfaro, C., Vacas, S., Vicente, N., and Jaime, P.<br />

2009. Evaluciόn de Emisores Comerciales de<br />

feromona para el seguimiento poblacional de la<br />

polilla del tomate Tuta absoluta (Povolny).<br />

Agricola Vergel: Fruticultura, Horticultura,<br />

Floricultutra 326: 124-128.<br />

3. Anonymous, 2009. Feell good factor is not the<br />

way to use pheromone in the fight against Tuta<br />

absoluta. http: //www.tutaabsoluta.com/<br />

4. Anonymous, 2009. FREDON, Corse, Mesures<br />

de lute contre Tuta absoluta. Fédération<br />

Régionale de Lutte et de Défense contre les<br />

Organismes Nuisibles-Corse. 4 pp.<br />

5. Anonymous, 2009.<br />

http://www.koppert.com/products/monitoring/p<br />

roducts-monitoring/detail/pherodis-2/<br />

6. Anonymous, 2009. Institut Nationale de la<br />

Météorologie de Tunisie. http://www.meteo.tn<br />

7. Anonymous, 2009. OEPP/EPPO Service<br />

d’information. 5 pp.<br />

http://www.archives.eppo.org/EPPOReporting/<br />

2009/Rsf-0903.pdf/<br />

8. Armstrong, J.S., Supergeon, D.W., and Suhic,<br />

P.C. 2006. <strong>Comparison</strong>s <strong>of</strong> standard and<br />

extended-life Boll weevil (Coleoptera:<br />

Curculionidae) pheromone lures. J. Econom.<br />

Entomol. 99: 323-330.<br />

9. Caffarini, P.M., Folia, A.M., Panzaradi, S.R.,<br />

and Pérez, A. 1999. Incidencia de bajos niveles<br />

de daño foliar de Tuta absoluta (Maeyrick) en<br />

tomate. Bol. San. Veg. Plagas. 25: 75-78.<br />

10. Chermiti, B., Abbes, K., Aoun, M., Ben<br />

Othmane, S., Ouhibi, M., Gamoon, W., and<br />

Kacem, S. 2009. First estimate <strong>of</strong> Tuta absoluta<br />

(Povolny) (Lepidoptera: Gelecheiidae) and<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> the efficiency <strong>of</strong> sex pheromone<br />

traps in greenhouses <strong>of</strong> tomato crops in the<br />

Bekalta region. African J. Plant Sci. Biotech. 3:<br />

49-52.<br />

11. Cônsoli, F.L., Parra, G.R.P., and Hassan, S.A.<br />

1998. Side-effects <strong>of</strong> insecticides used in<br />

tomato fields on the egg parasitoid<br />

Trichogramma pretiosum Reley (Hym.,<br />

Trichogrammatidae), a natural enemy <strong>of</strong> Tuta<br />

absoluta (Merick) (Lep., Gelechiidae). J. Appl.<br />

Entomol. 122: 43-47.<br />

12. Desneux, N., Wajnberg, N.W., Wychuys,<br />

K.A.G., Brugio, G., Arpaia, S., Narvaez-<br />

Vasquez, C.A., Gonzales-Cabrera, J., Ruescas,<br />

C., Tabone, E., Frandon, J., Pizzol, J., Poncet,<br />

C., Cabello, T., and Urbaneja, A. 2010.<br />

Biological invasión <strong>of</strong> European tomato crops<br />

by Tuta absoluta: Ecology, geographic<br />

expansión and prospects for biological control.<br />

J. Pest. Sci. 83: 197-215.<br />

13. Fernando, A.A.F., Evaldo, F.V., Gulban, N.J.,<br />

Álvaro, E.E., Marcelo, C.P., Athula, B.A., Ales,<br />

S., Rosa, T.S.F., and Jerrold, M. 2001.<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> major component <strong>of</strong> the sex<br />

pheromone <strong>of</strong> Tuta absoluta (Meyrick)<br />

(Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 27:<br />

907-917.<br />

14. Filho, M.M., Vilela, E.F., Jham, J.M.,<br />

Attygalle, A., Svatos, A., and Meinwald, J.<br />

2000. Initial studies <strong>of</strong> mating disruption <strong>of</strong> the<br />

tomato moth, Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera:<br />

Gelechiidae) using synthetic sex pheromone. J.<br />

Braz. Chem. Soc. 11: 621-628.<br />

15. Gravena, S. 1991. Manejo integrado de pragas<br />

do tomateiro. Pages 105-157. In Proceedings <strong>of</strong><br />

2 nd Encontro Nacional de Produção e<br />

Abastecimento de Tamate. October 8-11, 1991,<br />

Jaboticabal, Brazil.<br />

16. Lietti, M.M.M., Botto, E., and Alzogara, R.<br />

2005. Insecticide resistance in Argentine<br />

populations <strong>of</strong> Tuta absoluta<br />

(Meyrick)(Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Neotr.<br />

Entomol. 34: 113-119.<br />

17. Martí, S.M., Muñoz, M.C., and Casagrande, E.<br />

2010. El uso de feromonas para el control de<br />

Tuta absoluta: Primeras Experiencias en<br />

Campo. Phytoma-La Défense des Végétaux<br />

217: 35-38.<br />

18. Navarro, V.L., Alfaro, C., Vaca, S., and Primo,<br />

J. 2010. Applicaciόn de la confuciόn sexual al<br />

control de la polilla del tomate Tuta absoluta<br />

Povolny (Lepidoptera: Gelecheiidae). Phytoma-<br />

La Défense des Végétaux 217: 32-34.<br />

Tunisian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Protection 147 Vol. 6, No. 2, 2011


19. Picanço, M.C., Bacci, A.L.B.C., Miranda,<br />

M.M.M., and Martins, C. 2007. Effect <strong>of</strong><br />

integrated pest management practices on<br />

conservation <strong>of</strong> natural enemies. Agr. For.<br />

Entomol. 9: 327-335.<br />

-----------------------<br />

Tunisian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Protection 148 Vol. 6, No. 2, 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!