30.04.2015 Views

Guns 2012-08.pdf - Jeffersonian

Guns 2012-08.pdf - Jeffersonian

Guns 2012-08.pdf - Jeffersonian

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

To put the Nano’s size in perspective (center), it is shown here flanked by<br />

the SIG P290 (left) and a Kahr CM9 (right), all 9mm. Photo: Massad Ayoob<br />

Said Matteo, “We take these things<br />

very seriously, as we care about the<br />

quality cachet the brand enjoys,<br />

but the reality is that a marginal<br />

percent of guns experienced this<br />

problem. CCW guns (as you know)<br />

are more susceptible than their fullsize<br />

counterparts to failures for a<br />

series of reasons, but we wanted to<br />

make sure that any Nano owner is<br />

happy with their purchase. I think<br />

we managed to do that and that<br />

our customers are standing firmly<br />

behind this product, as confirmed<br />

by the fact we’re sold out of the little<br />

gun for the next several months, and<br />

we’ve had to almost quadruple our<br />

production efforts to keep up with<br />

demand (we’re now manufacturing<br />

Nanos around the clock in all shifts,<br />

at our Accokeek facility.)”<br />

He concluded, “What I know off<br />

the top of my head is we fired 1,000<br />

rounds with no lube as part of a<br />

marketing program, without a single<br />

failure (I was personally present for<br />

that) and I know engineering has<br />

fired an impressive number of rounds<br />

through it.”<br />

Mr. Reconatini was also able to<br />

get hold of an engineer’s report and<br />

pass it on to me, which stated “We<br />

have shot several NANO (sic), with<br />

a variety of ammunition over 2,000,<br />

3,000 and even 5,000 rounds each<br />

without malfunctions.”<br />

The other source I backtracked to<br />

was the Internet itself. On one of the<br />

Beretta-focused forums, a member<br />

complained about ejection failures,<br />

but then recanted. It seems he realized<br />

on his own that he was limp-wristing<br />

the gun, and once he started holding<br />

it solidly, his reliability problems<br />

disappeared.<br />

Nano<br />

Maker: Beretta USA<br />

17601 Beretta Dr.<br />

Accokeek, MD 20607<br />

(800) 929-2901<br />

www.gunsmagazine.com/beretta<br />

Action type: Locked breech semi-auto<br />

Caliber: 9mm<br />

Capacity: 6+1<br />

Barrel length: 3.07"<br />

Overall length: 5.63"<br />

Weight: 17.67 ounces<br />

Finish: Pronox steel slide<br />

Sights: 3-dot low profile<br />

Grips: Integral fiberglass<br />

reinforced technopolymer<br />

Price: $475<br />

Remora<br />

Concealment & Security<br />

P.O. Box 990340<br />

Naples, FL 34116<br />

(239) 434-7200<br />

www.gunsmagazine.com/<br />

remora-holsters<br />

Another interesting study on<br />

this is found at http://sigforum.<br />

com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/430601935/<br />

m/7100002072/p/21. The thread<br />

was started by Mike Packwood,<br />

a/k/a “Parabellum,” the owner<br />

of SIGForum and former owner<br />

of Smith-Wessonforum.com. No<br />

punches are pulled on SIGForum, a<br />

place that is not for the faint-hearted.<br />

Packwood himself loved the gun. A<br />

review of the Nano thread shows<br />

at least one complainer said he had<br />

sent the gun back to Beretta, but did<br />

so without tracking (?!?) and when<br />

Beretta’s Reconatini responded the<br />

gun didn’t get to Beretta, remained<br />

conspicuously silent. One needs<br />

to take large grains of salt when<br />

reading Internet postings about guns<br />

from anonymous sources….<br />

All I can tell you from this end is,<br />

we put our test Beretta Nano into<br />

lots of hands: big hands and small,<br />

left hands and right, male and female.<br />

We shot it deliberately limp-wristed<br />

and from waist-level without arms<br />

locked or weight behind it. We shot<br />

it with +P+ and mild Winchester<br />

“white box” (WWB), and even with<br />

handloads that barely made the IDPA<br />

power factor for 9mm.<br />

We experienced no mechanical<br />

malfunctions in the course of those<br />

several hundred mixed rounds in the<br />

hands of mixed shooters. The single<br />

hiccup was a shooter induced error; he<br />

accidentally hit the magazine release<br />

button and dropped the mag. “My<br />

bad,” he said, as he executed a taprack<br />

and resumed shooting.<br />

The 37 returns of Nanos to the<br />

factory at this writing included<br />

things like the sights being off for the<br />

shooter (they’re easy to adjust and<br />

even replace), and is still less than .6<br />

percent of output. Our mechanical<br />

malfunction rate was absolute zero.<br />

I for one am not worried about the<br />

Nano’s reliability.<br />

Bottom Line<br />

The Beretta Nano joins a growing<br />

number of “slim-9s” designed for<br />

concealed carry. It has the very useful<br />

feature of stand-off capability, good<br />

sights, a trigger you can live with,<br />

and some other cool stuff. There’s<br />

stuff this reviewer doesn’t like, but<br />

your needs and parameters may be<br />

different. If you are in the market<br />

for a pistol of this genre, the Beretta<br />

Nano is definitely worth a look.<br />

WWW.GUNSMAGAZINE.COM 53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!