30.04.2015 Views

Guns 2012-08.pdf - Jeffersonian

Guns 2012-08.pdf - Jeffersonian

Guns 2012-08.pdf - Jeffersonian

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

STORY: Jacob Gottfredson<br />

Elite Tactical<br />

Riflescope<br />

Bushnell’s new DMR 3.5-21x50mm.<br />

Bushnell has entered the tactical market, and the<br />

result is surprisingly good. From the massive bubblewrapped<br />

genre to the rigors of an upscale tactical<br />

riflescope, is this a leap of faith or a change in the<br />

manufacturer’s direction?<br />

I reported some months ago on<br />

Bushnell’s new Legend Ultra HD<br />

binocular. It is a fine piece of glass and<br />

goes well with my favorite carry laser<br />

rangefinder, which Bushnell also calls<br />

the Legend.<br />

They then proceeded to blow the lid<br />

off that combo by offering the Bushnell<br />

Fusion 1600 ARC! No more having to<br />

carry two instruments. And I found<br />

the Fusion to work exceedingly well,<br />

in many cases to a mile. The bino also<br />

tells the rifleman his comeups to the<br />

target. I used it during a recent hunt<br />

in the Rocky Mountains and was not<br />

disappointed.<br />

Now they have entered the tactical<br />

market as well. The last few tactical<br />

matches over the past year and a half<br />

have seen more and more of their<br />

new glass atop expensive, competitive<br />

tactical rifles.<br />

Having seen them at matches, I was<br />

excited to get one in my hands to do a<br />

test and review. However, the exercise,<br />

over a period of year, was unsuccessful<br />

in getting exactly what I wanted. To wit:<br />

they have several innovative reticles for<br />

holdover as well as wind and moving<br />

target holds. What I finally received was<br />

a Mil-Dot scope of the Army variety,<br />

i.e., big round balls in the front focal<br />

plane.<br />

I am a rear focal plane guy, which is<br />

strictly a personal preference. There are<br />

advantages and disadvantages to each.<br />

In a front focal plane, the reticle<br />

has little chance of changing point of<br />

impact through power changes, and you<br />

can still range and use the hashmarks at<br />

any power. But the reticle becomes very<br />

small at low powers and sometimes too<br />

big at high powers. The rear focal plane<br />

reticle does not have the latter problem,<br />

but you can become confused and miss<br />

a target because the hashmarks change<br />

with different power settings.<br />

I remember a befuddling range<br />

session with a 7mm Remington<br />

Magnum. I would pick a hashmark<br />

and miss a shot at a known distance.<br />

The rifle had always performed<br />

perfectly. I finally decided something<br />

was wrong with the scope and started<br />

driving home, trying to sort out in my<br />

mind what could have gone wrong.<br />

Suddenly it dawn on me. I stopped<br />

and looked at the power setting. Just<br />

as I thought, the power setting was not<br />

on max. I returned to the range, put<br />

the power on max, and all was once<br />

again well. That would not happen<br />

with a front focal plane reticle. Still, I<br />

can vary the hashmark subtension by<br />

simply changing the power on a rear<br />

focal plane reticle. If the standard is 2<br />

MOA per hashmark on max power, it<br />

is 4 MOA at half power, which presents<br />

great flexibility.<br />

The new Bushnell Elite<br />

3.5-21x50mm Tactical scopes set<br />

up on LaRue rifles for field trials.<br />

8<br />

WWW.GUNSMAGAZINE.COM • AUGUST <strong>2012</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!