02.05.2015 Views

Civil Litigation Track Hot Cases of the New Jersey Supreme Court ...

Civil Litigation Track Hot Cases of the New Jersey Supreme Court ...

Civil Litigation Track Hot Cases of the New Jersey Supreme Court ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

APPEALS ADDED IN THE NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT<br />

LISTED NEWEST TO OLDEST<br />

The following statements <strong>of</strong> issues on appeal are prepared by <strong>the</strong> Office <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Clerk for <strong>the</strong><br />

convenience <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reader. They have been nei<strong>the</strong>r reviewed nor approved by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Supreme</strong><br />

<strong>Court</strong>. Please note that, in <strong>the</strong> interest <strong>of</strong> brevity, not all issues may have been summarized.<br />

Beginning on July 16, 2010, each appeal summary posted on this website includes its "posted"<br />

date, which is necessary for calculating certain due dates for filing briefs and motions under<br />

revised Rule 1:13-9, "Amicus Curiae."<br />

Last Updated: 04/11/2012<br />

A-103-11 Harlan W. Waksal v. Director, Div. <strong>of</strong> Taxation (069599)<br />

May <strong>the</strong>se taxpayers follow federal accounting rules to deduct a non-business bad debt as a<br />

capital loss on <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>New</strong> <strong>Jersey</strong> gross income tax returns in accordance with Koch v. Director,<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> Taxation, 157 N.J. 1 (1999)?<br />

Certification granted 3/29/12<br />

Posted: 4/3/12<br />

Argued:<br />

Decided:<br />

A-102 & A-38-11 Robert Sipko v. Koger, Inc. (068417)<br />

Was <strong>the</strong> gift <strong>of</strong> stock to plaintiff conditioned on his continued employment and did he surrender<br />

his interest in <strong>the</strong> corporations?<br />

Certification granted 11/18/11 & 3/23/12<br />

Posted 11/21/11 & updated 4/3/12<br />

Argued:<br />

Decided:<br />

A-101-11 Lorraine Gormley v. Latanya Wood-El (069717)<br />

Are defendants entitled to qualified immunity in this case alleging violation <strong>of</strong> a constitutional<br />

right to substantive due process for failing to protect plaintiff while she was providing legal<br />

services to her involuntarily-committed client?<br />

Motion for leave to appeal granted: 3/22/12<br />

Posted: 4/3/12<br />

Argued:<br />

Decided:<br />

A-100-11 Darnice Green v. Morgan Properties (069540)<br />

Where provisions in plaintiffs' residential leases provide for <strong>the</strong> landlords' recovery <strong>of</strong> specific<br />

amounts as attorney's fees, have plaintiffs stated a cause <strong>of</strong> action under <strong>the</strong> Consumer Fraud<br />

Act or for negligent misrepresentation based on <strong>the</strong>ir allegation that <strong>the</strong> charges exceed <strong>the</strong><br />

landlords' actual cost for in-house legal representation and thus results in illegal fee sharing?<br />

Certification granted: 3/22/12<br />

Posted: 4/3/12<br />

Argued:<br />

Decided:<br />

A-99-11 State v. Troy N. Nate (069314)<br />

Should defendant's conviction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> charge <strong>of</strong> possession <strong>of</strong> a weapon for an unlawful purpose<br />

be merged with <strong>the</strong> aggravated manslaughter conviction?<br />

Certification granted: 3/14/12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!