02.05.2015 Views

Civil Litigation Track Hot Cases of the New Jersey Supreme Court ...

Civil Litigation Track Hot Cases of the New Jersey Supreme Court ...

Civil Litigation Track Hot Cases of the New Jersey Supreme Court ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Certification granted 1/27/11<br />

Posted 1/28/11<br />

Argued: 9/26/11<br />

Reargued: 3/12/12<br />

Decided:<br />

A-67-10 State v. Stanford Yough (066950)<br />

Did <strong>the</strong> Appellate Division err in reversing <strong>the</strong> Law Division’s order denying a mistrial based on<br />

<strong>the</strong> victim’s prejudicial comments made during defense counsel’s cross-examination concerning<br />

identification?<br />

Appeal as <strong>of</strong> right (Appellate Division dissent)<br />

Posted 1/28/11<br />

Argued: 9/27/11<br />

Decided: 11/30/11<br />

A-66-10 Borough <strong>of</strong> Sayreville v. 35 Club, L.L.C. t/a XXXV Gentlemen’s Club (067092)<br />

In determining whe<strong>the</strong>r N.J.S.A. 2C:34-7(a), which prohibits sexually oriented businesses within<br />

1000 feet <strong>of</strong> a public park or residential zone, is unconstitutional as applied, may <strong>the</strong> trial court<br />

consider whe<strong>the</strong>r out-<strong>of</strong>-State locations are adequate alternative sites for such businesses?<br />

Appeal as <strong>of</strong> right (Appellate Division dissent)<br />

Posted 1/28/11<br />

Argued: 9/12/11<br />

Decided: 1/19/12<br />

A-65-10 Mazdabrook Commons Homeowners’ Association v. Wasim Kahn (067094)<br />

May a homeowners’ association constitutionally limit <strong>the</strong> display <strong>of</strong> homeowners’ signs to only<br />

“for sale” signs?<br />

Appeal as <strong>of</strong> right (Appellate Division dissent)<br />

Posted 1/28/11<br />

Argued: 10/24/11<br />

Decided:<br />

A-64-10 State v. Kevin J. Hudson (066660)<br />

Did <strong>the</strong> court abuse its discretion in imposing a consecutive extended term where defendant was<br />

previously sentenced to an extended term for charges originating from <strong>the</strong> same indictment, but<br />

which involved a separate crime against a different victim and for which he had a separate trial?<br />

Certification granted 1/20/11<br />

Posted 1/24/11<br />

Argued: 9/12/11<br />

Decided: 2/6/12<br />

A-63-10 John Rogers v. Cape May County Office <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Public Defender (067048)<br />

For purposes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> notice provisions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Tort Claims Act, N.J.S.A. 59:1-1 to 59:12-3, did<br />

plaintiff’s legal malpractice claim accrue when <strong>the</strong> Appellate Division reversed his conviction<br />

based on ineffective assistance <strong>of</strong> counsel or when <strong>the</strong> indictment against him was subsequently<br />

dismissed with prejudice?<br />

Certification granted 1/20/11<br />

Posted 1/24/11<br />

Argued: 9/27/11<br />

Decided: 12/5/11<br />

A-61/62-10 Paris Wilson v. City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Jersey</strong> City (066782)<br />

Are defendants entitled to governmental immunity from liability based on N.J.S.A. 52:17C-10<br />

(Title 52 immunity) or <strong>the</strong> particularized immunity provisions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Tort Claims Act, N.J.S.A.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!