02.05.2015 Views

Civil Litigation Track Hot Cases of the New Jersey Supreme Court ...

Civil Litigation Track Hot Cases of the New Jersey Supreme Court ...

Civil Litigation Track Hot Cases of the New Jersey Supreme Court ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A-53-10 Mark Tannen v. Wendy G. Tannen (066951)<br />

Under <strong>the</strong> circumstances <strong>of</strong> this case, is it proper to impute income to defendant based on her<br />

beneficial interest in a discretionary trust for purposes <strong>of</strong> determining plaintiff’s alimony and child<br />

support obligations?<br />

Certification granted 1/7/11<br />

Posted 1/10/11<br />

Argued: 9/13/11<br />

Decided: 12/8/11<br />

A-51/52-10 Cast Art Industries, LLC v. KPMG, LLP (066891)<br />

Did <strong>the</strong> plaintiff’s evidence satisfy <strong>the</strong> prerequisites <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Accountant Liability Act, N.J.S.A.<br />

2A:53A-25, for imposing upon an accountant a duty <strong>of</strong> care to a party o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong><br />

accountant’s client?<br />

Certification granted 1/7/11<br />

Posted 1/10/11<br />

Argued: 9/13/11<br />

Decided: 2/16/12<br />

A-49/50-10 State v. Demetrius M. Diaz-Bridges (067065)<br />

Did defendant invoke his right to remain silent by asking to speak to his mo<strong>the</strong>r or by stating<br />

that he wanted to go home and could not answer any more questions?<br />

Leave to appeal granted 12/10/10<br />

Posted 12/14/10<br />

Argued: 9/12/11<br />

Decided: 1/12/12<br />

A-48-10 State v. James Mauti (067006)<br />

Does <strong>the</strong> spousal privilege apply to protect defendant’s wife from being compelled to testify<br />

against him under <strong>the</strong> circumstances presented?<br />

Leave to appeal granted 12/10/10<br />

Posted 12/14/10<br />

Argued: 10/11/11<br />

Decided:<br />

A-45/46/47-10 Steven J. Winters v. North Hudson Regional Fire & Rescue (066968)<br />

Where <strong>the</strong> employer’s decision to terminate <strong>the</strong> employee for misconduct was upheld in<br />

administrative proceedings and on appeal, may <strong>the</strong> employee maintain a claim that he was<br />

terminated in violation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Conscientious Employee Protection Act, N.J.S.A. 34:19-1 to -8?<br />

Leave to appeal granted 12/10/10<br />

Posted 12/14/10<br />

Argued: 5/3/11<br />

Reargued: 1/5/12<br />

Decided:<br />

A-44-10 Karen Wood v. <strong>New</strong> <strong>Jersey</strong> Manufacturers Ins. Co. (066643)<br />

Is <strong>the</strong>re a right to a jury trial on a bad faith claim against an insurer under Rova Farms Resort,<br />

Inc. v. Investors Ins. Co. <strong>of</strong> Am., 65 N.J. 474 (1974)?<br />

Certification granted 12/10/10<br />

Posted 12/14/10<br />

Argued: 5/3/11<br />

Decided: 6/14/11<br />

A-43-10 Vasil Kovalcik v. Somerset County Prosecutor’s Office (066529)<br />

Do records <strong>of</strong> a public employee’s coursework or training beyond those demonstrating <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!