16.11.2012 Views

1 Hotel cover.indd - Nicola Cottam

1 Hotel cover.indd - Nicola Cottam

1 Hotel cover.indd - Nicola Cottam

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

REITs: An Overview<br />

by Peter Hackleton, senior manager in the Tourism, Hospitality and Leisure team at Deloitte<br />

Is it better to separate the business of running the hotels from owning the bricks and mortar, or to keep them<br />

together under one enterprise? This is a question that has occupied the hotel industry for decades and with the<br />

introduction of Real Estate Investment Trusts in the UK, the question has become a hot topic once more.<br />

Those in favour of a division have pointed out that real estate investments tie up capital and that the stock market<br />

tends to value management companies higher than those involved in real estate. Many believe the property<br />

ownership element of an integrated hospitality company can drag down an organisation’s overall value. They cite<br />

several clear benefits for breaking away.<br />

Breaking away allows hotel operators to improve the return on their assets by partnering with property investors,<br />

who bring in asset management expertise and capital. They can also secure long-term management or franchise<br />

tenure over their portfolio and improve their debt rating. Critically, they can stay focused on the hotel brand.<br />

The underlying rationale that the sum of the parts is greater than the whole was illustrated perfectly by Marriott<br />

Corporation when it decided to divide up its hotel business in 1992. The split created two separate entities – Host<br />

Marriott, which is today the world’s largest hotel Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), and Marriott International,<br />

which now mainly manages and franchises hotels on behalf of owners such as Host Marriott.<br />

The split enabled each team to focus on its core skills. However, while the corporate finance aspects of this initiative<br />

were enticing, few operators initially decided to follow suit. Operators were concerned about the tax implications<br />

of selling relatively low property prices, and the relinquishing of control of their property portfolios.<br />

However, over the past decade there has been a change of opinion. Now, no operator can ignore the opportunity<br />

to free up capital to fund further expansion.<br />

Today, there are several good reasons why hotel properties are now more widely regarded as an asset class. In<br />

particular, the growth of REITs worldwide – which are willing to pay generously for hotel property and looking<br />

for a hotel operator to do business with – is significant.<br />

Tracking the changes<br />

Key Issues: Real Estate Investment Trusts: An Overview<br />

REITs can be traced right back to the 1880s in the US, but they didn’t become popular until the 1960 real estate<br />

investment trust tax provision gave them advantageous tax status. Through these trusts, investors could avoid<br />

double taxation, as they were not taxed at the corporate level if income was distributed to beneficiaries. This has<br />

continued to be the main pull ever since.<br />

March 2007 <strong>Hotel</strong> Report Guide to UK <strong>Hotel</strong>s l © William Reed Publishing 32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!