16.11.2012 Views

1 Hotel cover.indd - Nicola Cottam

1 Hotel cover.indd - Nicola Cottam

1 Hotel cover.indd - Nicola Cottam

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Tips and troncs<br />

Arguably the biggest development for the hospitality industry in 2006 was the resolution of the long-running<br />

dispute over the National Insurance Contributions (NICs) and National Minimum Wage (NMW) position for<br />

tips and troncs. HM Revenue & Customs’ (HMRC) guidance material (known as E24) reached what was effectively<br />

its fourth edition in three years and in doing so, accepted the arguments put forward by the British Hospitality<br />

Association, as advised by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Most businesses that use troncs will benefit now that<br />

HMRC have agreed issues including:<br />

1. Troncs are outside NICs unless management is actively involved in the allocation of the monies;<br />

2. Retaining some of the tronc to <strong>cover</strong>, for example, credit card processing costs does not lose the NIC exemption;<br />

3. Employees can be promised participation in the tronc in their contract without losing the NIC exemption<br />

(unless and to the extent that they are promised a minimum tronc amount);<br />

4. Using an employer-recommended system for tronc allocation or the employer’s administrative systems for<br />

paying the tronc monies does not lose the NIC exemption, provided it is the employees’ choice to do so;<br />

5. Tronc monies can be used to make up NMW requirements, provided payments are made through the employer’s<br />

payroll, and may still qualify for NIC exemption.<br />

These agreements put an end to the long-running disputes under HMRC’s ‘Operation Gourmet’, with many businesses<br />

affected now in a position to re<strong>cover</strong> overpaid tax and NICs and, in some cases, claim for costs incurred.<br />

Rumblings on hotels allowances<br />

Key Issues: Legislation: Tax<br />

The hotel industry has benefited since the 1970s from the 4% capital allowance on ‘qualifying hotels’. Placing<br />

restrictions on which buildings qualified was intended to focus the relief on ‘traditional hotels’ – interpreted as<br />

those establishments that provided breakfasts and evening meals.<br />

Current practices in the industry differ widely from those of the 1970s, as exemplified by the rise in budget hotels<br />

and apart-hotels, fuelled in part by the much wider restaurant market. This has led many individual hotels and<br />

chains to either not provide catering facilities or to outsource them, meaning that an increasing proportion of<br />

the hotel sector no longer conforms to the original conditions set for the hotels allowance.<br />

HMRC is looking carefully at this issue, which has led to a number of challenges and not just on the provision<br />

of meals. Questions have also been raised about the frequency of linen changes, no children policies, minimum<br />

two night stays and meals only being available to guests. It is not just new claims that are being affected. Existing<br />

claims can also be overturned with a cessation of allowances and possibly a reclaim of allowances granted for<br />

recent years.<br />

March 2007 <strong>Hotel</strong> Report Guide to UK <strong>Hotel</strong>s l © William Reed Publishing 40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!