A guide to commissioning cardiac surgical services - NHS ...
A guide to commissioning cardiac surgical services - NHS ...
A guide to commissioning cardiac surgical services - NHS ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A <strong>guide</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>commissioning</strong> <strong>cardiac</strong> <strong>surgical</strong> <strong>services</strong><br />
Reduction in length of stay for non-elective <strong>cardiac</strong> surgery patients, from an<br />
average of 15.7 days in Q3 2008/09, <strong>to</strong> 13.3 days in Q3 2009/10.<br />
Days<br />
23<br />
21<br />
19<br />
17<br />
15<br />
13<br />
11<br />
9<br />
7<br />
Length of Stay - Non-Elective Cardiac Surgery<br />
Cardiac Network<br />
project commenced<br />
Surgical pathway<br />
coordina<strong>to</strong>r in place<br />
Transformation<br />
team involved<br />
AoD commenced<br />
Apr08 Jun08 Aug08 Oct08 Dec08 Feb09 Apr09 Jun09 Aug09 Oct09 Dec09<br />
May08 Jul08 Sep08 Nov08 Jan09 Mar09 May09 Jul09 Sep09 Nov09<br />
Baseline figures<br />
Cardiac Surgery Non-Elective LoS<br />
April - March 2008/09<br />
April 2009 - present<br />
Oct - Dec 2008/09 average<br />
Oct - Dec 2009/10 average<br />
Linear (Cardiac Surgery Non-Elective LoS)<br />
Length of stay for non-elective <strong>cardiac</strong> surgery<br />
Mean Median Range<br />
15.5<br />
13.2<br />
15.7<br />
13.3<br />
15.4<br />
13.3<br />
16.0<br />
13.1<br />
10-21 days<br />
10-16 days<br />
14-17 days<br />
12-15 days<br />
Top tips<br />
1. Engagement at senior level and<br />
alignment of the project <strong>to</strong> the<br />
strategic direction of the trust<br />
specifically saving 10 beds.<br />
2. Regular reporting <strong>to</strong> senior<br />
management supported by robust<br />
data across a defined set of<br />
measures agreed early on in the<br />
project <strong>to</strong> ensure focus.<br />
3. Access <strong>to</strong> data. A member of the<br />
team with access <strong>to</strong> data was vital <strong>to</strong><br />
measuring improvement as the<br />
network project manager struggled<br />
<strong>to</strong> gain access <strong>to</strong> data, being<br />
perceived as an ‘outsider’. The<br />
internal data manager was able <strong>to</strong><br />
retrieve and analyse data shared<br />
across the project team <strong>to</strong> drive the<br />
work.<br />
4. Interdisciplinary core project team<br />
was reflective of the key staff vital <strong>to</strong><br />
implementing and maintaining<br />
changes being tested.<br />
a.The core team consisted of the<br />
lead for each work stream; these<br />
individuals were the people who<br />
would plan and measure the<br />
changes – they were the people<br />
who could really make a<br />
difference.<br />
b.The core team held the five points<br />
outlined as a shared vision of<br />
change, and worked <strong>to</strong>gether <strong>to</strong><br />
achieve these goals.<br />
c. As well as for planning purposes,<br />
the team meetings were important<br />
for boosting morale for when the<br />
work was facing opposition or<br />
difficulties.<br />
d.As a result of the project,<br />
relationships and communications<br />
throughout the team and across<br />
the pathway boundaries have<br />
been improved.<br />
5. Keep in the forefront that<br />
improvement does not need <strong>to</strong> come<br />
at a financial cost – but that by<br />
working more efficiently and more<br />
productively, patients can receive<br />
better care that is value for money.<br />
Contact details:<br />
Jane Fisher,<br />
General Manager, Cardiovascular,<br />
St George’s Healthcare <strong>NHS</strong> Trust<br />
Jane.Fisher@stgeorges.nhs.uk<br />
Laura Gillam,<br />
Senior Project Manager, South London<br />
Cardiac and Stroke Networks.<br />
Laura.Gillam@slcsn.nhs.uk<br />
14 www.improvement.nhs.uk/heart