17.05.2015 Views

Current issues, news and updates. - NSW Farmers Association

Current issues, news and updates. - NSW Farmers Association

Current issues, news and updates. - NSW Farmers Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Industrial Relations Update<br />

August 2012<br />

<strong>Current</strong><br />

<strong>issues</strong>,<br />

<strong>news</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>updates</strong>.<br />

Quad Bike Safety<br />

You would have noticed the increased media interest<br />

on the issue of quad bike safety, <strong>and</strong> obviously, this<br />

affects many of our members. As an industry, a<br />

strategy to reduce injuries <strong>and</strong> fatalities related to<br />

quad bike use was developed last year through the<br />

Heads of Workplace Safety Authorities.<br />

Manufacturers <strong>and</strong> dealers have agreed to improve<br />

point of sale material to guide farmers in purchasing<br />

the vehicle best suited to the needs <strong>and</strong> conditions of<br />

the farm. Also, part of the strategy is to encourage<br />

riders’ behavioural change by requiring the wearing<br />

of appropriate helmets, compliance with<br />

manufacturers’ guidelines on load or rider age, <strong>and</strong><br />

training.<br />

One of the most contentious <strong>issues</strong> that still remains<br />

in relation to quad bike safety is the use of crush<br />

protection devices (“CPD”), <strong>and</strong> there is a large<br />

degree of uncertainty <strong>and</strong> disagreement in this<br />

area. It is expected that some resolution of this issue<br />

will come soon following recent decisions by<br />

governments to give quad bike safety the attention<br />

<strong>and</strong> resources it needs. The Federal Minister for<br />

Employment <strong>and</strong> Workplace Relations, Bill Shorten,<br />

has convened a round table meeting to address this<br />

matter <strong>and</strong> announced the creation of a community<br />

based network, QuadWatch. In addition, the <strong>NSW</strong><br />

Minister of Finance, Greg Pearce has announced an<br />

investment of $1 million to fund research into quad<br />

bike safety. <strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Farmers</strong> believes that a CPD is<br />

useful to lessen the gravity of injury related to the risk<br />

of quad bike roll over. However, we look forward to<br />

the results of the research.<br />

Workers Compensation Reform<br />

As you may be aware, the <strong>NSW</strong> government recently<br />

passed a piece of legislation (Workers Compensation<br />

Legislation Amendment Bill 2012) which will result in<br />

some significant changes to the workers compensation<br />

scheme in <strong>NSW</strong>. We will have a briefing note to<br />

members shortly on the changes.<br />

The key dates for implementation of the changes notified<br />

by the Minister:<br />

• Seriously injured workers (those with more that<br />

30% whole person impairment) who are on weekly<br />

benefits, will receive the new weekly benefit amount<br />

from 1 September 2012 (there are currently about<br />

500 claimants in this category),<br />

• Claims for injuries occurring on or after 1 October<br />

2012 will be covered by the new arrangements.<br />

This means that these injured employees will be<br />

receiving more compensation in the initial 13 weeks<br />

under the new “pre-injury earnings” definition,<br />

• Claims for injuries occurring before 1 October<br />

2012 will stay in the old scheme <strong>and</strong> move across<br />

to the new system from 1 January 2012, <strong>and</strong><br />

• The changes to treatment of journey claims, lump<br />

sums, nervous shock <strong>and</strong> employers return to work<br />

obligations have already commenced as of 19 June<br />

2012.<br />

Reforming the workers compensation scheme is a<br />

mammoth task for the government <strong>and</strong> WorkCover.<br />

<strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Farmers</strong> is in close communication with<br />

WorkCover on their progress of implementing this<br />

reform. We have been informed that new forms <strong>and</strong><br />

operational guidelines are still in development. We will<br />

inform members of further progress as they are finalised<br />

progressively.


Employment law<br />

reminders…<br />

helping you to<br />

remain compliant.<br />

What’s the<br />

difference<br />

between IR<br />

Basics <strong>and</strong> IR<br />

Essentials<br />

membership?<br />

All <strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Farmers</strong>’ producer<br />

members have an IR Basics (IRB)<br />

membership. This gives them<br />

access to phone support (4 x per<br />

year) <strong>and</strong> limited access to the IR<br />

website.<br />

For an additional fee, members<br />

can upgrade to the IR Essentials<br />

(IRE) membership option giving<br />

them unlimited access to the<br />

support services provided by the<br />

IR team, including assistance with<br />

drafting all forms of employment<br />

documentation such as contracts,<br />

policies <strong>and</strong> Individual Flexibility<br />

Agreements (IFA’s).<br />

This month: The importance of notification of workplace<br />

injuries<br />

It has come to our attention recently that a number of members<br />

have been penalised as a result of failing to notify their scheme<br />

agents of injuries within the specified time frame, so it was timely<br />

to give a reminder about the importance of this.<br />

In the first instance, whenever an injury occurs in the workplace,<br />

the employer needs to be notified as soon as possible. This<br />

requirement needs to be communicated to all employees <strong>and</strong><br />

managers, so that when an injury does occur, the employer is not<br />

placed in a position of failing to notify simply by virtue of the fact<br />

that they were unaware of the injury occurring. It may be<br />

appropriate to implement a workplace health <strong>and</strong> safety policy in<br />

your workplace that includes a clause on injury notification to<br />

ensure that everyone in the workplace underst<strong>and</strong>s the<br />

requirements in relation to notification.<br />

Once the employer has been notified of the injury, the injury<br />

should be entered into an injury register. We have provided a<br />

template injury register document which members may wish to<br />

use for these purposes. It can be accessed through the IR<br />

website here.<br />

Importantly, the employer has a legal requirement to notify the<br />

Scheme Agent or insurer within 48 hours of the injury being<br />

notified. If this notification is not made within the specified<br />

timeframe, employers are at risk of paying a claims excess on the<br />

claim, which is the equivalent of one weeks pay. Notification of the<br />

scheme agent can be done in a number of ways including phone<br />

<strong>and</strong> email.


Employee or contractor?<br />

<strong>Farmers</strong> often engage contractors on the farm to help them out in busy<br />

times or to do jobs they are unable to do. Many farmers believe that hiring<br />

someone as a contractor means that they don’t have to worry about the<br />

various laws which apply to employment. This is not always the case.<br />

The law says that just because a person has an ABN <strong>and</strong> calls themself a<br />

contractor does not necessarily stop them being regarded as an employee<br />

- <strong>and</strong> this means you could be liable for such things as employment<br />

entitlements, superannuation guarantee charge <strong>and</strong> workers<br />

compensation.<br />

So how do you decide if the law will support someone’s claim to<br />

being a contractor?<br />

Sometimes it will be easy to work out, for instance in the case of a<br />

contractor who provides a crop spraying service to you <strong>and</strong> others in the<br />

district.<br />

At other times it may not be so clear, for instance if your neighbour comes<br />

in <strong>and</strong> does some tractor work for you. Initially, the courts applied the<br />

control test, that if you can control the way work is done, where it is done<br />

<strong>and</strong> when it is done, the person is an employee. If not, they are an<br />

independent contractor.<br />

Over time the courts have adopted a totality approach where various<br />

different considerations are taken into account, <strong>and</strong> decide if on balance<br />

the total picture points to employment or independent contracting. We have<br />

summarised matters considered by the courts into a to assist you in<br />

considering whether a worker is a contractor or employee. You can access<br />

the list via the IR website here.<br />

The Australian Tax Office (ATO) has a useful online decision tool to assist<br />

in distinguishing between employee <strong>and</strong> contractor for the purpose of<br />

deciding whether you will need to make superannuation guarantee<br />

contributions. The tool can be found here. WorkCover also has an online<br />

self-assessment tool designed to assist employers to determine whether a<br />

person is an employee or contractor for workers compensation purposes.<br />

What are the consequences for not correctly classifying a<br />

person as a contractor?<br />

An employer may be in trouble under three heads of claim for wrongly<br />

classifying a person as a contractor rather than an employee. First, an<br />

employer may be required to back-pay superannuation guarantee<br />

contributions <strong>and</strong> the relevant charges. Secondly, an employer may be<br />

required to back-pay workers compensation premium because the wage<br />

declaration for premium calculation is inaccurate. Thirdly, the Fair Work Act<br />

2009 provides for penalties for sham contracting. Falsely classifying an<br />

employee as a contractor is breach of the Fair Work Act 2009 sham<br />

contracting provisions.<br />

What is an IFA?<br />

Award covered employees need to<br />

be given the conditions prescribed<br />

by the Award <strong>and</strong> be paid in<br />

accordance with the Award<br />

provisions. Awards generally<br />

prescribe a base rate of pay <strong>and</strong><br />

additional penalties <strong>and</strong> loadings<br />

payable in certain circumstances<br />

(e.g. overtime penalty, annual leave<br />

loading).<br />

Employers in agreement with<br />

employees can use Individual<br />

Flexibility Agreements (IFA’s) to<br />

vary certain award conditions.<br />

IFA’s are not a substitute for an<br />

employment contract but they<br />

provide a degree of flexibility in<br />

adopting a flat hourly rate or above<br />

award salary by absorbing award<br />

entitlements (e.g. annual leave<br />

loading, penalty rates, overtime<br />

rates, allowances), thereby<br />

simplifying the administration for<br />

payment of wages.<br />

In implementing an IFA, employers<br />

must ensure that the employees pay<br />

is greater than the award condition<br />

by applying the Better Off Overall<br />

Test (BOOT).<br />

In essence, by adopting an IFA, the<br />

employee should not be worse off<br />

compared to the award conditions<br />

they would be entitled to.<br />

Employees must willingly agree to<br />

the conditions of the IFA.<br />

See Grant Smith, IR Advisor,<br />

talking about IFAs here.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!