17.05.2015 Views

Advances in perturbative thermal field theory - Ultra-relativistic ...

Advances in perturbative thermal field theory - Ultra-relativistic ...

Advances in perturbative thermal field theory - Ultra-relativistic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Thermal <strong>field</strong> <strong>theory</strong> 363<br />

Figure 3. One-loop correction to the self-energy <strong>in</strong> scalar φ 4 -<strong>theory</strong>, and some-higher-loop<br />

diagrams with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g degree of IR divergence when the propagators are massless.<br />

smaller but still exponentially large cutoff, the n = 4 <strong>theory</strong> seems perfectly acceptable. For<br />

our purposes we shall just have to restrict ourselves to temperature scales smaller than (3.3)<br />

when consider<strong>in</strong>g the f<strong>in</strong>ite-temperature effects <strong>in</strong> this scalar <strong>theory</strong>.<br />

3.2. Thermal masses<br />

To one-loop order, the scalar self-energy diagram is the simple tadpole shown <strong>in</strong> the first<br />

diagram of figure 3, which is quadratically divergent <strong>in</strong> cutoff regularization, but strictly zero <strong>in</strong><br />

dimensional regularization. The Bose distribution function occurr<strong>in</strong>g at non-zero temperatures<br />

provides a cutoff at the scale of the temperature which gives<br />

= (m (1)<br />

th )2 = 4!g 2 ∫<br />

d 3 q<br />

(2π) 3 θ(q0 )δ(q 02 − q 2 )<br />

{<br />

n(q 0 ) + 1 2<br />

}<br />

= g 2 T 2 (3.4)<br />

and so the <strong>in</strong>itially massless scalar <strong>field</strong>s acquire a temperature-dependent mass. As we shall<br />

see, <strong>in</strong> more complicated theories the <strong>thermal</strong> self-energy will generally be a complicated<br />

function of frequencies and momenta, but the appearance of a <strong>thermal</strong> mass scale ∼gT is<br />

generic.<br />

It should be noted, however, that <strong>thermal</strong> masses are qualitatively different from ord<strong>in</strong>ary<br />

Lorentz-<strong>in</strong>variant mass terms. In particular they do not contribute to the trace of the energy–<br />

momentum tensor as m 2 T 2 , as an ord<strong>in</strong>ary zero-temperature mass would do [63]. So while<br />

the dispersion law of excitations is changed by the <strong>thermal</strong> medium, the <strong>theory</strong> itself reta<strong>in</strong>s<br />

its massless nature.<br />

At higher orders <strong>in</strong> perturbation <strong>theory</strong>, the <strong>thermal</strong> contributions to the scalar self-energy<br />

become non-trivial functions of frequency and momentum, which is complex-valued, imply<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a f<strong>in</strong>ite but parametrically small width of <strong>thermal</strong> (quasi-)particles [64, 65], so that the latter<br />

concept makes sense <strong>perturbative</strong>ly.<br />

In the large-N limit the self-energy of the scalar <strong>field</strong> rema<strong>in</strong>s a momentum-<strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

real-mass term also beyond one-loop order and is given by the Dyson equation,<br />

= 4!g 2 0 µ4−n ∫<br />

d n q<br />

(2π) n−1 {n(q 0 ) + 1 2<br />

}<br />

θ(q 0 )δ(q 2 − ). (3.5)<br />

(Note that <strong>in</strong> (3.4) we had simply replaced g0 2 by g2 , disregard<strong>in</strong>g the difference as be<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

higher than one-loop order.) The appearance of a <strong>thermal</strong> mass <strong>in</strong>troduces quadratic ultraviolet<br />

(UV) divergences <strong>in</strong> , which are however of exactly the form required by the renormalization<br />

of the coupl<strong>in</strong>g accord<strong>in</strong>g to (3.2). Includ<strong>in</strong>g the latter, one f<strong>in</strong>ds a closed equation for the<br />

<strong>thermal</strong> mass of the form<br />

{∫<br />

m 2 th = d n ( )}<br />

q<br />

24g2 (2π) n−1 n(q0 )θ(q 0 )δ(q 2 − m 2 th ) + 1<br />

32π 2 m2 th ln m2 th<br />

¯µ − 1 2<br />

=: 24g 2 {I T (m th ) + I f 0 (m th, ¯µ)}. (3.6)<br />

The last term <strong>in</strong> the braces <strong>in</strong> (3.6), which has been neglected <strong>in</strong> [58, 66, 10], is responsible<br />

for a non-trivial <strong>in</strong>terplay between <strong>thermal</strong> and vacuum contributions. Its explicit dependence

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!