17.05.2015 Views

Advances in perturbative thermal field theory - Ultra-relativistic ...

Advances in perturbative thermal field theory - Ultra-relativistic ...

Advances in perturbative thermal field theory - Ultra-relativistic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Thermal <strong>field</strong> <strong>theory</strong> 407<br />

In the physics of the very Early Universe, which is filled with a hot plasma of various<br />

elementary particles, the gravitational polarization tensor is also of <strong>in</strong>terest. It describes<br />

the (l<strong>in</strong>ear) response to metric perturbations, and its IR behaviour determ<strong>in</strong>es the evolution<br />

of large-scale cosmological perturbations, which provide the seeds for structure formation<br />

that are nowadays be<strong>in</strong>g studied directly through the anisotropies of the cosmic microwave<br />

background and which are be<strong>in</strong>g measured with stunn<strong>in</strong>g accuracy [446,447]. The gravitational<br />

polarization tensor is also a central quantity <strong>in</strong> the <strong>theory</strong> of stochastic (semiclassical) gravity<br />

[448,449], which aims at a general self-consistent description of quantum statistical fluctuations<br />

of matter <strong>in</strong> a curved background geometry as a stepp<strong>in</strong>g-stone towards a full quantum <strong>theory</strong><br />

of gravity.<br />

9.1. HTL gravitational polarization tensor<br />

If Ɣ denotes all contributions to the effective action besides the classical E<strong>in</strong>ste<strong>in</strong>–Hilbert<br />

action, the energy–momentum tensor is given by the one-po<strong>in</strong>t 1PI vertex function<br />

2 δƔ<br />

T µν (x) = √ (9.1)<br />

−g(x) δg µν (x)<br />

and the gravitational polarization tensor by the two-po<strong>in</strong>t function<br />

δ 2 Ɣ<br />

− µναβ (x, y) ≡<br />

δg µν (x)δg αβ (y) = 1 δ( √ −g(x)T µν (x))<br />

. (9.2)<br />

2 δg αβ (y)<br />

From the last equality, it is clear that αβµν describes the response of the (<strong>thermal</strong>) matter<br />

energy–momentum tensor to perturbations <strong>in</strong> the metric. Equat<strong>in</strong>g αβµν to the perturbation<br />

of the E<strong>in</strong>ste<strong>in</strong> tensor gives self-consistent equations for metric perturbations and, <strong>in</strong> particular,<br />

cosmological perturbations.<br />

In the ultra<strong>relativistic</strong> limit where all bare masses can be neglected and <strong>in</strong> the limit<br />

of temperature much larger than spatial and temporal variations, the effective (<strong>thermal</strong>)<br />

action is conformally <strong>in</strong>variant, that is Ɣ[g] = Ɣ[ 2 g] (the conformal anomaly like other<br />

renormalization issues can be neglected <strong>in</strong> the high-temperature doma<strong>in</strong>).<br />

This conformal <strong>in</strong>variance is crucial for the application to cosmological perturbations for<br />

two reasons. First, it allows us to have matter <strong>in</strong> <strong>thermal</strong> equilibrium despite a space–time<br />

dependent metric. As long as the latter is conformally flat, ds 2 = σ(τ,x)[dτ 2 −dx 2 ], the local<br />

temperature on the curved background is determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the scale factor, σ . Second, the <strong>thermal</strong><br />

correlation functions are simply given by the conformal transforms of their counterparts on<br />

a flat background, so that ord<strong>in</strong>ary momentum–space techniques can be employed for their<br />

evaluation.<br />

The gravitational polarization tensor <strong>in</strong> the HTL approximation has been first calculated<br />

fully <strong>in</strong> [450], after earlier work [451–454] had attempted (<strong>in</strong> va<strong>in</strong>) to identify the Jeans mass (a<br />

negative Debye mass squared signall<strong>in</strong>g gravitational <strong>in</strong>stability rather than screen<strong>in</strong>g of static<br />

sources) from the static limit of the momentum–space quantity ˜ µναβ (k), k 0 = 0, k → 0<strong>in</strong><br />

flat space.<br />

Like the HTL self-energies of QED or QCD, µναβ is an <strong>in</strong>herently non-local object.<br />

Because it is a tensor of rank 4, and the local plasma rest frame s<strong>in</strong>gles out the time direction, it<br />

has a much more complicated structure. From η µν , u µ = δµ 0 and k µ, one can build 14 tensors<br />

to form a basis for ˜ µναβ (k). Its HTL limit (k 0 , |k| ≪T ), however, satisfies the Ward identity,<br />

4k µ ˜ µναβ (k) = k ν T αβ − k σ (T ασ η βν + T βσ η αν ), (9.3)<br />

correspond<strong>in</strong>g to diffeomorphism <strong>in</strong>variance as well as a further one correspond<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

conformal <strong>in</strong>variance, the ‘Weyl identity’,<br />

η µν ˜ µναβ (k) =− 1 2 T αβ, (9.4)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!