21.05.2015 Views

SOCIO - ECONOMIC DISPARITIES AMONG MUNICIPALITIES IN MACEDONIA

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>SOCIO</strong> - <strong>ECONOMIC</strong> <strong>DISPARITIES</strong><br />

<strong>AMONG</strong> <strong>MUNICIPALITIES</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>MACEDONIA</strong><br />

November 2004


Socio-economic disparities among municipalities in Macedonia<br />

Project team<br />

Project Manager<br />

Katerina Kostadinova-Daskalovska<br />

Authors of the Analysis:<br />

Prof. Dr Verica Janeska<br />

Dr Anica Dragovic<br />

Prof. Dr Ilo Trajkovski<br />

Dimitar Bogov<br />

Aleksandar Ivanovski<br />

Methodology expert:<br />

Ljubinka Popovska Toseva<br />

Data base expert:<br />

Kliment Simoncev<br />

Editor<br />

Zoran Andonovski<br />

Proofreader<br />

Suzana Mitrevska<br />

UNDP Support team:<br />

Vesna Dzuteska-Biseva, UNDP Macedonia<br />

Jordanka Cerepnalkova-Trajkoska, UNDP Macedonia<br />

This Report would not be able to be realized without the valuable contribution and participation of<br />

the following institutions:<br />

The State Statistical Office, the State Public Health Institute, the Employment Agency, the State<br />

Pension and Disability Insurance Fund, the State Health Insurance Fund, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry<br />

of Interior, as well as from the Civil Servants Agency, Ministry of Culture, Ministry of Environment and Physical<br />

Planning, the Privatization Agency, the Agency for Youth and Sports and the Macedonian Centre for<br />

International Cooperation.<br />

Disclaimer<br />

The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position<br />

of the United Nations Development Programme.<br />

The designations employed and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any<br />

opinion on the part of the United Nations Development Programme or the Secretariat of the United Nations<br />

concerning the legal status or name of any country, territory, city or area or of its authors, or concerning the<br />

delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply<br />

endorsement by the United Nations.<br />

Print:<br />

Reprint


FOREWORD<br />

Over the past decade and half, Macedonia has passed through dynamic period of transformation<br />

of its political, economic and social system. The Macedonian transition, which per se is a very complex<br />

process, was additionally complicated by several external and internal negative shocks that had serious<br />

consequences over the country’s development. Especially the domestic product, the economic<br />

growth, the unemployment and the poverty were the mostly affected, and for that reason the policy makers<br />

were dominantly focused on these issues. Unfortunately, the appropriate development of the statistical<br />

information system on a sub national and regional level was put aside, which recently has shown as<br />

a very serious shortcoming.<br />

Having the decentralization of the government as one of the priority processes and policies in the<br />

country, the comprehensive set of indicators that could help the policy makers to precisely identify the<br />

most vulnerable groups and underdeveloped areas and to direct the effort towards them, is more than<br />

valuable.<br />

The Ministry of Local Self Government and the Government have already established certain<br />

data bases and done analysis in the course of relevant decision making processes. Some of them were<br />

supported by the international community, and United Nations Development Programme in many occasions<br />

supported the Ministry with technical assistance and expertise, as well as with pilot projects with<br />

regard of the decentralization issues.<br />

The present analysis and the availability of and access to the data bases of indicators are complementary<br />

to the Ministry’s Decentralization Campaign and to the actions towards better transfer of competences<br />

to the local governments. Even more, regarding the latest, this analysis would help to focus our<br />

attention on the most relevant issues concerning the local needs while making important decisions.<br />

The report gives an insight of the development trends in various social and economic areas on a<br />

sub national level that, again I stress, can draw the attention of the policy makers on the most urgent<br />

decisions.<br />

For the first time we will have profile of each of the existing municipalities which points out their<br />

different levels of development, and which pictures the social, institutional and communal infrastructure.<br />

Here I would also like to mention the studies about the municipalities’ capacities with regard of<br />

the forthcoming transfer of competences that UNDP has implemented in collaboration with Ministry,<br />

which along with this report gives a comprehensive basis for the Ministry to make appropriate political<br />

decisions.<br />

Using this occasion, I would like to express gratitude on behalf of the Ministry and on behalf of the<br />

Government to United Nations Development Programme as a reliable partner in these challenging time<br />

for this country.<br />

Aleksandar Gestakovski<br />

Minister of Local Self Government<br />

Development is a priority issue for governments of all countries. The widely shared vision of<br />

joining the European Union further underlines this priority. Long-term development, and in particular<br />

human development, requires indicators and measures that will track progress and provide feedback on<br />

the effectiveness of policies.<br />

Having indicators and measures though is not enough. They also have to be understandable,<br />

accessible and built into the normal capacities of national institutions. Only when accessed and used will<br />

indicators and measures be valuable.<br />

Macedonia of today is a centralised state. This means that disaggregated data has not been in<br />

demand, because data on national level has been more applicable. Statistics on local level have not been<br />

3


produced because the apex of the nation has been on a purely central level. However, there is a consensus<br />

among all political parties and in all communities that decentralisation is necessary. This means that<br />

socio-economic data needs to reflect realities and differences on local level and policy-makers are likely<br />

to demand localised statistics much more in the future. In spite of recent controversies regarding the new<br />

boundaries of municipalities, decentralisation has to be implemented. Not only is it a key pillar of the<br />

Ohrid Framework Agreement, but it is also a prerequisite for compliance with the European Union principle<br />

of subsidiarity, that is that decisions shall be on the lowest applicable level possible.<br />

However, the importance of disaggregated statistics is more than a formalistic requirement for<br />

EU accession. It becomes even more evident in the context of human development and in the context of<br />

the ongoing process of nationalising the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Even though there is a<br />

lot of potential for progress on these agendas on national level, discrepancies and challenges becomes<br />

more evident once indicators and measures become available on municipal level. Differences between<br />

municipalities are now identifiable and in particularly obvious is the divide between urban and rural<br />

municipalities.<br />

If the decentralisation agenda is not to lead to an increase in current disparities, the Law of<br />

Financing of Municipalities has to ensure that a transfer mechanism is in place to ensure the ability and<br />

capacity to uphold an agreed set of minimum standards across the country. It is impossible to envisage<br />

accountability and transparency in ensuring this without statistical feedback in the form of reliable socioeconomic<br />

data on local level. Also when it comes to measures to achieve the MDGs by 2015, it is necessary<br />

to have access to information on where problems are the biggest.<br />

This report is a result of the project “Mapping of the Socio-Economic Disparities among<br />

Macedonian Municipalities”. It is part of a systematic and substantial collaboration between the Ministry<br />

of Local Self-Government and the United Nations Development Programme on a number of issues in support<br />

of implementing the decentralisation process. This is the first assessment report and contains the<br />

most complete and definite set of core indicators important to track human development on municipal<br />

level. The report also identifies remaining gaps and lack of indicators crucial for human development<br />

and suggests new methodologies or improvement of existing ones. Nevertheless, now for the first time<br />

we have information such as GDP per capita on local level, and the additional data than constitutes<br />

human development indicators. Part of the initial information available was used by UNDP in its<br />

National Human Development Report 2004.<br />

The information this mapping exercise provides we believe will be an invaluable source for policy<br />

makers, but also civil society. Citizens have a right to information, but it has to exist to become available.<br />

Those who have an interest in development of their communities now have information and this report<br />

responds to part of their needs. This report seeks to focus attention on specific development issues and<br />

raise awareness about the responsibility towards development that rests with government but is also followed,<br />

criticised or supported by civil society, private sector and the international community.<br />

For UNDP ‘sustainability’ is a key criterion for the work we do. This mapping should not be a one<br />

time exercise. The data requires constant updating and trends identified. That is why the report was produced<br />

in a close cooperation between our team of national experts and the State Statistical Office, the<br />

institution that holds the responsibility for producing statistical data in the country. It has been an<br />

unusual privilege that the leader of the expert’s team, Ms. Katerina Kostadinova-Daskalovska, recently<br />

became the Director of this institution. I congratulate her and the whole team for the precious efforts<br />

they have made in producing what is likely to be a benchmark report for tracking local human development<br />

in Macedonia.<br />

Frode Mauring<br />

Resident Representative<br />

UNDP Macedonia<br />

4


<strong>IN</strong>TRODUCTION<br />

The local development planning and decentralization created a need of high quality indicators<br />

required for monitoring and analysis of the socio-economic aspects of the human development<br />

at a local level. Attempting to meet this need, the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) and<br />

the Ministry of Local Self-government initiated in 2003 the project “Mapping the Socio-economic<br />

Disparities between the Macedonian Municipalities”. The results of the project are the four<br />

Publications: Publication I, “Socio-economic Disparities between the Municipalities in Macedonia”;<br />

Publication II, “Data and Indicators of Municipalities in Macedonia”; Publication III, “Profiles of<br />

Municipalities in Macedonia”; and Publication IV, “Municipal Indicators – Definitions and Sources”.<br />

The four Publications complement each other. They are all aimed at the same and only goal:<br />

enabling an insight into and providing relevant indicators on the municipalities.<br />

The municipalities are expected to be the primary users of the gathered and published data.<br />

The data will, however, be also available to government agencies, primarily to the Ministry of Local<br />

Self-government and the Agency for Development of Economically Underdeveloped Municipalities,<br />

and to the international community.<br />

In this way, assistance is given in the efforts to change the course of the existing negative<br />

tendency in the geographic-wise unbalanced development, which enlarges not only the gap<br />

between the urban and rural areas, but also the social gap between the citizens in the country.<br />

The indicators included and presented in a conceptual and methodological manner were<br />

prepared by consulting several lists of internationally accepted indicators: the indicators required for<br />

monitoring the human development and attaining the millennium development goals (developed<br />

by the UN), indicators for monitoring the European Regional Statistics (gathered by the Regional<br />

Development Monitoring EUROSTAT), urban indicators (gathered by EUROSTAT as part of the Urban<br />

Audit Project, for the purpose of monitoring 258 cities in 27 - 25 EU member countries and Romania<br />

and Bulgaria), the List of Indicators of Sustainable Development of the UN Committee for<br />

Sustainable Development, as well as individual lists of indicators created as part of projects underway<br />

in Macedonia.<br />

The data and indicators, as well as the consultations on the methodology issues were provided<br />

from the institutions authorized to implement the statistical research program: the State<br />

Statistical Office (which provided the largest number of data), the State Public Health Institute, the<br />

Employment Agency, the State Pension and Disability Insurance Fund, the State Health Insurance<br />

Fund, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Interior, as well as from the Civil Servants Agency,<br />

Ministry of Culture, Privatization Agency, the Agency for Youth and Sports and the Macedonian<br />

Centre for International Cooperation.<br />

The four Publications, along with the database – available on the Internet - providing a huge<br />

number of data relevant at local levels, may serve as a tool for analysis and creation of a policy of<br />

support for the overall local development. At the same time, the transparency and availability of<br />

data and the analysis allow for a more active participation of the local authorities, which will be able<br />

to refer to the data to strengthen their position in communications with the policy creators and the<br />

central government.<br />

The analytical study also produces recommendations for introducing new indicators and<br />

improving the existing methodologies in the regular statistical programs of the State Statistical<br />

Office and the other institutions authorized to conduct statistical research. This particularly refers to<br />

data and indicators required for monitoring the local human development and calculating the<br />

5


human development index at a regional and local level, as well as setting up a statistical database<br />

that will facilitate the process of Government monitoring the indicators of the millennium development<br />

goals. To this goal, UNDP has already made the first steps in this year’s Report on Human<br />

Development, which for the first time includes an attempt to identify the Human Development<br />

Index at a municipality level.<br />

6


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

The main goal of this Publication is to make an assessment of the available statistical indicators<br />

for municipalities in Macedonia and to provide the directions of the future development of a<br />

statistical information system at a municipality level.<br />

The study includes analyses of the demographic indicators (Chapter 1), living and working<br />

conditions indicators (Chapter 2), education, culture, and civil life indicators (Chapter 3), economic<br />

indicators (Chapter 4), and environmental indicators (Chapter 5).<br />

The data about the indicators have been systematized in accordance with the NUTS 1 classification.<br />

There are eight regions (NUTS3) in Macedonia: the Pelagonia, Vardar, Northeast, Southwest, Skopje,<br />

Southeast, Polog, and East regions, 30 groups of municipalities (NUTS 4), which correspond to the municipalities<br />

as under the territorial division before 1996 and 123 municipalities (NUTS 5). (See Annex 1)<br />

The analyses, whenever the data allowed, were conducted at a regional (NUTS3) and at a<br />

municipal level (NUTS 5). The smallest number of data were available regarding the sector of social<br />

services in the municipalities, the public services sector, as well as the indicators of environmental<br />

protection and quality of life.<br />

Depending on the availability of data required to conduct the mapping by various indicators,<br />

the analyses are more in-depth and more analytical in areas on which there are more data available.<br />

An attempt was also made to come up with proposals for all areas with the aim of developing<br />

a comprehensive statistical data base, which will enable monitoring of the local economic and<br />

human development and the level of attainment of the millenium goals at a local level, with the use<br />

of measurable indicators.<br />

* * *<br />

The changes in the total population numbers and its territorial dispersal are to be observed<br />

in terms of their absolute and relative growth and the population density. In relation to the spatialdemographic<br />

polarization, the urban population and the level of urbanization are observed separately.<br />

In the period between 1994 and 2002, the population dynamics in Macedonia was characterized<br />

by sizeable regional differences. At a regional level (NUTS 3), there is a growth of the population<br />

in all regions except in the Pelagonia one, where the number of inhabitants decreased by 4,478<br />

(more than 1.8 percent), and the average annual growth rate is a negative 0.23 percent. The Polog<br />

region stands out for its highest population increase (in this region, the indicators are 23,948 individuals,<br />

8.5 percent, and 1.02 percent, respectively), whereas the East one has the lowest population<br />

growth (1,688 individuals, 0.8 percent, and 0.10 percent, respectively).<br />

These demographic differences are in essence a result of the considerably differentiated<br />

directions of the natural and migration component of the total population. The impact of the natural<br />

movement was identified on the basis of several indicators of the birth rates, mortality, natural<br />

population increase, and fertility of the female population. These indicators point to the different<br />

stages of transition of the demographic development of the regions and municipalities. In 2002, the<br />

natural population growth rates varied between –39.0 percent (Staravina) and 24.2 percent (Centar<br />

Zupa); these rates are with a negative sign in almost one third (44) of the municipalities. In spite of<br />

the missing relevant data on the migration movements, particularly regarding the migrations out of<br />

1<br />

NUTS - Nomenclature of Units of Territory for Statistics<br />

7


the country, it may be concluded that they have a considerable impact on the growth of the population<br />

in individual municipalities.<br />

Regarding the population development, the analysis pays special attention to the changes<br />

in the population structure by gender and age. With the importance of the population age structure<br />

in mind, the study includes an in-depth analysis of the defined stages of demographic age, the more<br />

significant functional age-gender contingents and ratios of the population age dependency. The<br />

data from the 2002 population census indicate that there is a huge number of municipalities (76)<br />

that are undergoing a rather intensive process of demographic aging.<br />

The basic features and regional disparities related to households are observed through the<br />

indicators of the total number, size and family structure of the households, i.e. by types of families.<br />

Indicators of the inclusion of households of singles and single parent families are shown separately.<br />

In terms of the living conditions, the indicators related to the housing and facilities provide<br />

rather interesting findings. In the period between 1994 and 2002, the total number of apartments in<br />

Macedonia rose by 20.2 percent. At the regional level, the increase of the number of apartments was<br />

highest in the Polog region (33.8 percent), and lowest in the Pelagonia one (10.8 percent). The majority<br />

(95.6 percent) of the households in the country live in apartments equipped with water supply,<br />

sewer systems and electricity.<br />

The changes in the levels of social protection of the population and transfers on various<br />

grounds are observed on the basis of the data available on the number of users of social financial<br />

aid and other types of social protection, pension insurance users, and users of social transfers on the<br />

basis of unemployment. Although of a varying intensity, all regions are facing an evident increase of<br />

the number of households and individuals receiving social financial aid, as well as the number of<br />

pensioners and unemployed individuals using health insurance.<br />

In relation to the selected indicators for identifying the socio-economic disparities between<br />

the Macedonian municipalities in terms of population and households and living and working conditions<br />

(regarding the housing conditions), the conclusion is that there is a sufficient base of official<br />

data at a municipality level in most of them. Nevertheless, there are also a considerable number of<br />

indicators in the case of which the data available are only at a national level (household income) or<br />

include groups of municipalities (social protection).<br />

The analysis shows that the municipalities in Macedonia differ by the number of health institutions,<br />

staffing, health condition of the population and death rates.<br />

The analysis attempts to underline certain differences in the domain of health and health<br />

care of citizens in the municipalities, with the “health for all” message in mind, or the minimum level<br />

of health citizens should have in order to work in a more profitable manner and take active part in<br />

the social life of the community they live in.<br />

In 2002, a total of 145 public health institutions operated on the territory of Macedonia, of<br />

which 59 as part of the primary health protection, 38 within the secondary protection and 48 at the<br />

level of tertiary protection. Under such a network of health institutions, 226.10 physicians, 58.49<br />

dentists, 16.41 pharmacists, and 331.96 nurses provide healthcare services for the citizens<br />

(expressed in relation to 100,000 citizens).<br />

Municipalities in Macedonia differ drastically in terms of transport, mobility and infrastructure<br />

network. At a national level, the development varies by areas. The analysis showed that, in order<br />

to reduce the disparities between municipalities, measures need to be introduced to ensure further<br />

development of the transport and communication system, such as reconstruction and construction<br />

of transport and communication networks and a series of other measures aimed at improving the<br />

communication at a national level, as well as at adapting the traffic network of the main generators<br />

of future movements of passengers and transportation of goods.<br />

8


Education is of an extraordinary importance for the socio-economic development of any<br />

country, for the simple reason that it is the major path towards a qualified labor and higher productivity.<br />

At the same time, this is one of the main components of achieving sustainable development.<br />

In this context, the analysis also monitors the capacities of the municipalities to ensure a<br />

high-quality education within the competencies of the municipality, i.e. the local self-government.<br />

The analysis of the education indicators also points out the large differences in the infrastructure<br />

facilities existing in the school buildings, disparities in terms of staffing of schools, percentage<br />

of inclusion in the secondary education, as well as the rate of continuous education.<br />

There is an explicit difference between the municipalities in Macedonia in terms of the culture<br />

and cultural activity which, cinemas and cultural centers excluded, is currently realized in an<br />

institutional framework only in the urban areas, as may be concluded from the data and the analysis<br />

of the situation in the culture. The city of Skopje – more precisely, the municipality of Centar –<br />

stands out for its number of cultural institutions. This also points out the “cultural” domination of this<br />

municipality over the remaining ones.<br />

The cultural institutions, such as cultural centers, workers’ universities, centers for pioneers,<br />

culture centers and people’s universities, are almost always located in the municipal centers. The<br />

only cultural institutions in the rural municipalities are the cultural centers, and even those are located<br />

in only two of the municipalities – Pehcevo and Cucer Sandevo – while the others are all in the<br />

urban settlements.<br />

On the basis of data about the national accounts of the State Statistical Office, the gross<br />

domestic product per capita was assessed by the parity of the purchasing power at a municipal and<br />

regional level for the years 1998 and 2002. These data are the basis for an analysis of the level of economic<br />

activity on the territory of each municipality and the disparities between them. The features<br />

and potential of the local economy are analyzed by using the indicators of contribution of institutional<br />

sectors (non-financial, financial, state and household) in the creation of GDP. The calculated<br />

average annual rates of real GDP growth per capita in the period 1998-2002 indicate the pace of the<br />

economic activity, which is not always in correlation with the inherited level of economic development.<br />

Thus, this indicator reveals that certain municipalities – in spite of the low level of GDP per<br />

capita – have an exceptionally dynamic economic activity, which is a result of the growth of small<br />

businesses.<br />

The second aspect examined in the economic analysis of the Macedonian municipalities is<br />

the economic activity of the population. In addition to the general unemployment rate of all municipalities,<br />

the analysis also focuses on the unemployment rate by gender, rate of activity of the female<br />

population and the unemployment rate among young people. It also examines three groups of<br />

activities (agriculture, industry and services), which employ the largest portion of the population.<br />

The exceptional abundance of data for the first time allowed for an analysis of the rate of activity and<br />

the unemployment rate individually for the seven most represented ethnic communities in<br />

Macedonia.<br />

The data from the Civil Servants Agency show that there were a total of 8,587 employed civil<br />

servants in Macedonia in the year 2000. The disparities between municipalities are incomparable<br />

here as well. The variations move from municipalities with only one civil servant (13 municipalities<br />

or 9.23 percent of the total number) to municipalities in which there are over 600, with one municipality<br />

having as many as 1,134 civil servants. For these reasons, the average number of about seventy<br />

civil servants by municipality, for instance, does not tell much.<br />

The situation in the environmental protection is presented by the analysis of the data on air<br />

pollution, depletion of the ozone layer, climate changes, waste, biodiversity, noise and quality of the<br />

9


water. The major sources of air pollution in Macedonia are industrial capacities, traffic, power and<br />

heating plants, and the central heating of households. Municipalities with the highest level of air<br />

pollution are Skopje, Veles, Bitola, Tetovo, Jegunovce, Gostivar, Radovis, Demir Hisar, Debar,<br />

Makedonski Brod, Kocani i Kicevo.<br />

One of the key polluters in the Macedonian municipalities is waste, as the waste management<br />

techniques (mechanical sorting, composting, incineration and recycling) are still at the lowest<br />

levels. Almost all hard communal waste disposal sites near the cities are of insatisfactory sanitary<br />

and technical standards, with the exception of the site Drisla in Skopje. Surface waters in Macedonia<br />

are seriously jeopardized by various sources of physical, chemical and biological pollution, mainly<br />

from the heavy industry and the increase of population in urban areas, as well as from the communal<br />

and industrial waste waters.<br />

10


CHAPTER ONE<br />

DEMOGRAPHY<br />

1. POPULATION<br />

1.1. Total population in Macedonia – changes, territorial<br />

distribution and urbanization<br />

1.1.1. Total population scope and dynamics<br />

In demographic terms, Macedonia is an extremely heterogeneous area. The large demographic<br />

differences, especially if observed from higher down to lower regional levels in the country,<br />

are in essence a consequence of largely differentiated directions of the natural and migration component<br />

of the total population.<br />

According to the data of the population census in 2002, Macedonia has 2,022,547 citizens.<br />

The number of citizens increased by 76,615 or by 3.9 percent as compared to the previous census of<br />

1994. The average annual population growth rate in the period amounted to 0.48 percent.<br />

With regard to the population dynamics in Macedonia, there were sizeable regional differences<br />

in the observed period. At a regional level (NUTS 3), there is an increase of the population in<br />

all regions except in Pelagonia, where the number of inhabitants decreased by 4,478 (1.8 growth),<br />

and the average annual population growth rate is negative 0.23 percent (Table 1). Of the 19 municipalities<br />

in the region, only three have witnessed an increase of the population: Bitola, Zitose and<br />

Prilep (See Table 1, Publication II).<br />

Table 1.Some indicators of the scope and components of the total population increase,<br />

population density and urban population in Macedonia, 1994 and 2002<br />

Region<br />

Total population<br />

Change<br />

(increase) of<br />

population<br />

Popula<br />

tion<br />

growth<br />

rates<br />

Natural<br />

Population<br />

increase<br />

Migratory<br />

balance<br />

Population<br />

density<br />

Population<br />

concentration<br />

(Macedonia<br />

=100.0)<br />

Urban population<br />

(1994)<br />

No. percent<br />

1994 2002 1994- 1994- 1994- 1994-2002 1994- 1994 2002 2002 No. Percent*<br />

2002 2002 2002<br />

2002<br />

Macedonia 1945932 2022547 76615 3.94 0.48 107607 -30992 76.0 79.0 100.00 1163598 59.8<br />

Pelagonia 242614 238136 -4478 -1.85 -0.23 819 -5297 49.7 48.8 11.77 159803 65.9<br />

Vardar 131035 133180 2145 1.64 0.20 3815 -1670 40.7 41.4 6.58 92087 70.3<br />

Northeast 163841 172787 8946 5.46 0.66 10503 -1557 70.6 74.4 8.54 89500 54.6<br />

Southwest 211226 219741 8515 4.03 0.49 14706 -6191 64.2 66.8 10.86 96195 45.2<br />

Skopje 545228 578144 32916 6.04 0.73 32673 243 314.6 333.6 28.58 444299 81.5<br />

Southeast 168481 171416 2935 1.74 0.22 7678 -4743 64.8 66.0 8.48 68466 40.6<br />

Polog 281982 305930 23948 8.49 1.02 32420 -8472 116.8 126.7 15.13 91352 32.6<br />

East 201525 203213 1688 0.84 0.10 4993 -3305 48.3 48.7 10.05 121896 60.5<br />

* Percentage of the total population<br />

Source: Census of population, households and dwellings in Macedonia, 1994 and 2002, State Statistical Office<br />

11


Regarding the other regions, the population increase is marked with large deviations.<br />

Namely, in accordance with the population growth rate, it is lowest in the East, Vardar and Southeast<br />

region, equal with the average in the country in the Southwest region, somewhat higher in the<br />

Northeast and Skopje region, and highest in the Polog.<br />

Smaller or larger differences are also present between the municipalities within the regions.<br />

In the three mentioned regions (the East, Skopje and Southeast ones), with small absolute and relative<br />

increases, the population increase is in essence a result of the population increase in the former<br />

municipal centers. Thence, there are a considerably large number of municipalities in which the population<br />

growth is negative. Of the total number of 17 municipalities in the East region, there is a<br />

decrease of the population in 12; 6 of the 10 municipalities in the Vardar region are also facing<br />

decrease of their population, just as are 8 of the 14 municipalities in the Southeast region. These<br />

regions account for one third (41) of the total number of municipalities and the population<br />

increased by 6,788 persons in all of them together. This represents only 8.8 percent of the total population<br />

increase in the country in the period between 1994 and 2002.<br />

Large disparities in the population increase are typical for the municipalities in the<br />

Southwest and Northeast region, whose joint percentage of the total number of municipalities (22.9<br />

percent) corresponds to their individual participation in the total population increase in the analyzed<br />

period (22.8 percent). Of the 20 municipalities in the Southwest region, there is a population<br />

increase in 11, where the growth rates move from 0.16 percent (Makedonski Brod) to 2.30 percent<br />

(Delogozdi). The growth rate is also rather high in the municipality of Velesta (2.06 percent).<br />

Deviations are also large in municipalities in which the population decreased, since the growth rates<br />

are within an interval of -0.08 percent (Vevcani) to -3.51 percent (Samokov). There was also a sizeable<br />

decrease in Kosel, Lukovo and Vranesnica.<br />

In the Northeast region, the population increased in only three of the total of eight municipalities,<br />

being minimal in Kriva Palanka (growth rate of 0.02 percent), and quite large in Kumanovo<br />

and Lipkovo (1.09 percent and 1.32 percent, respectively). During this period, the population grew<br />

by 9.1 percent in Kumanovo and by 11.1 percent in Lipkovo. Klecovce, Orasac and Staro Nagoricane<br />

are municipalities with the most intensive decrease.<br />

The Skopje region stands out for its huge absolute population increase, as it accounts for as<br />

much as 43.0 percent of the total population increase in the country during the last inter-census<br />

period. Of the 16 municipalities in the region, there has been an increase in three, in which the<br />

growth rate moved from 0.20 percent (Petrovec) to 2.42 percent (Suto Orizari). There is also a considerably<br />

high increase of the population in: Aracinovo, Studenicani, Saraj, Kondovo, Ilinden and<br />

Gjorce Petrov. The population decreased in the municipalities of Zelenikovo, Centar and Sopiste.<br />

Unlike the Skopje region, Polog has the highest relative – as well as a large absolute – population<br />

growth, as it participates in the total population increase in the country by 31.3 percent. There<br />

has been an increase in the population in the largest number of the municipalities (16 out of of the<br />

total of 19). The increase is highest in Dolna Banjica (growth rate of 2.44 percent) and Kamenjane<br />

(2.17 percent). The following municipalities also have a population growth rate higher than 1.0 percent:<br />

Vrutok, Negotino Polosko, Bogovinje, Vratnica, Zelino, Tetovo, Dzepciste and Sipkovica. This<br />

means that a large population increase is typical not only for former municipal centers, but also for<br />

the majority of rural municipalities. During the period, the population decreased only in Mavrovi<br />

Anovi (growth rate of -3.94 percent), Rostusa (-1.16 percent) and Srbinovo (-0.79 percent).<br />

The analysis of the data from the population censuses in 1994 and 2002 and the chosen indicators<br />

lead to the conclusion that there have been significant changes in the population dynamics<br />

over the past decade. These are expressed through the further enlargement of the regional dispari-<br />

12


ties in relation to the population increase. The manifested processes in the regional development of<br />

the population in Macedonia are a result of the differences in the natural and migratory movement<br />

of the population.<br />

The data from the inter-census period – 1994-2002 – show that total natural population<br />

increase in Macedonia is 107,607 persons. 2 The largest portion of such increase is in the Skopje and<br />

Polog regions, which together account for three fifths (60.5 percent) of the total natural population<br />

increase in the country. The Southwest and Northeast regions are also ones with a large increase,<br />

and their common share reach 23.4 percent of the total increase. These four regions account for<br />

about 84 percent of the total natural population increase.<br />

Due to such regional disparities, natural population increase has a considerably large impact<br />

on the population increase in certain areas of the country. In the analyzed period, the natural population<br />

increase is negative in 35 (28.5 percent) of the total number of municipalities. The majority<br />

of them are in the Pelagonia, Southwest and Northeast regions (26 municipalities), and relatively<br />

smaller is the number (9) of such municipalities in the Vardar, Southeast and East region. The still<br />

high natural population increase in certain municipalities of the Skopje, Polog, Southwest and<br />

Northeast regions lies behind the relatively high population increase in these areas, although a part<br />

of them are emigratory areas.<br />

As for the migratory balance calculated on the basis of the vital-statistical method, it had a<br />

negative sign during the inter-census period and amounted to 30,992 persons at a national level.<br />

This implies a continuation of the emigratory movements from the country from the previous<br />

decades. Still, as regards the migratory balance, it should be born in mind that it would be even<br />

higher if the total natural population increase did not include the children born outside the country.<br />

This conclusion is a result of our knowledge for the number of children born abroad, which has<br />

a trend of a continuous increase.<br />

Regardless of that, the regions with high immigration rates may be identified on the basis of<br />

these migratory balance data as well as on the basis of the previous knowledge about emigratory<br />

movements from the country. Although it is very difficult to determine with higher precision the<br />

number of persons who have left the country temporarily or permanently, the doubtless fact<br />

remains that Macedonia was facing sizeable migration during the period, which had a significant<br />

impact on the population increase – both total and regional.<br />

The changes in the population increase over the last few years may be observed on the basis<br />

of the data from the population estimates. However it is important to have in mind that those estimates<br />

were primarily done on the basis of the natural population increase. Thence, it may be concluded<br />

that, under conditions of still considerable emigratory movements from the country- these<br />

data fail to provide a real picture of the population scope and dynamics.<br />

1.1.2. Changes in the Population Density and Distribution<br />

The population density is one of the most significant indicators of the quantitative and qualitative<br />

features of the established spatial-demographic relations. Also, it is a rather important indicator<br />

in terms of mapping the disparities in the socio-economic development. The increase of the total<br />

population and its distribution across the territory of Macedonia also affected the changes in the<br />

population density and the concentration of the population.<br />

The general population density in Macedonia increased from 76 to 79 inhabitants per<br />

square kilometer in the 1994 – 2002 period. These large regional differences in the population<br />

growth pace brought about a large spread between the points of growth of the value of the general<br />

density coefficient. At a national level, it was 3.9 percent, whereas in the seven regions in which<br />

2<br />

As regards these data, it should be born in mind that they also include children born abroad.<br />

13


there is an increase in the population density, this indicator ranges between 0.8 percent (East region)<br />

to 8.5 percent (the Polog region). According to this indicator, there has been an increase in less than<br />

half (60) of the total number of 123 municipalities.<br />

The Pelagonia region is the only one in which the density is on the downward line. Of the 19<br />

municipalities in this region, the density increased in only three – Bitola, Zitose and Prilep. In 2002,<br />

all municipalities had a density lower than the national average, with the exception of Bitola (377.3/<br />

km 2 ) and Prilep (137.1/ km 2 ).<br />

The population density increase is lowest in the East, the Vardar and the Southeast region,<br />

where it is 0.8 percent, 1.7 percent and 1.9 percent respectively. In the three regions with a total of<br />

41 municipalities, the population density grew in only 14. In the majority of the municipalities, it is<br />

of very low values. The values are higher than the country average in only seven municipalities:<br />

Kocani, Stip, Veles, Kavadarci, Bosilovo, Murtino and Strumica, where the numbers move from 80.8<br />

to 429.4 inhabitants per km 2 .<br />

In the Northeast region, only two municipalities – Kumanovo and Lipkovo - stand out for<br />

both their population increase and density; there, the density in 2002 was 344 and 100.2 inhabitants<br />

per km 2 , respectively. The region is characterized with large regional disparities, as the value of the<br />

indicator moves within an interval of 9.3 to 344.0 km 2 . The situation is similar in the Southwest<br />

region, where the indicator is of a lowest value in Kosel and Lukovo (76.0) and highest in Kicevo<br />

(615.1). Still, an increase in the population density is recorded in more than half (11) of the municipalities<br />

in the region. In addition to Kicevo, density is also high in Debar, Ohrid, Velesta, Delogozdi,<br />

Labunista and Struga.<br />

The Skopje region was and remains the area with the highest density in Macedonia, with an<br />

increase in all municipalities except in Zelenikovo, Sopiste and Centar. Regardless of that, Centar<br />

continues to be the municipality with the highest density in the country, with 4,589.1 inhabitants<br />

per km 2 , followed by: Kisela Voda (2,915.8); Suto Orizari (2,892.8); Karpos (2,848.1); Cair (1,290.5) and<br />

Gazi Baba (1,046.7).<br />

The population density also increased in all municipalities in the Polog region, except in the<br />

three municipalities of Mavrovi Anovi, Rostusa and Srbinovo. Municipalities with the highest density<br />

are Gostivar (990.9) and Tetovo (814.3). It is also considerable in Vrapciste, Negotino-Polosko,<br />

Cegrane, Bogovinje, Zelino, Kamenjane, Tearce and Dzepciste, where it moves between 122.6 and<br />

247.5 inhabitants per km 2 .<br />

As far as the population concentration – expressed as the participation of the population<br />

from individual areas in the total country population - is concerned, the conclusion is that the<br />

changes differ from those identified in terms of the population dynamics. At a regional level, these<br />

indicators show a decrease in the concentration in the Pelagonia, Vardar, Southeast and East regions,<br />

with the concentration being stagnant in the Northwest one. The joint participation of the population<br />

in the Northeast, Skopje and Polog regions in the total population of the country increased from<br />

50.9 percent (in 1994) to 52.3 percent (2002). This implies a huge concentration of the population on<br />

a relatively small space.<br />

On the basis of the population concentration on the territory of Macedonia, one could distinguish<br />

between six zones: a weak concentration zone (up to 50 inhabitants per km 2 ), medium concentration<br />

zone (51-100 inhabitants per km 2 ), overpopulated zone (101-150 inhabitants per km 2 ),<br />

significantly overpopulated zone (151-500 inhabitants per km 2 ), very significantly overpopulated<br />

zone (501 – 1,000 inhabitants per km 2 ), and massively overpopulated zone (more than 1,000 inhabitants<br />

per km 2 ). In 2002, almost half (61) of the municipalities belonged in the weak concentration<br />

zone, 26 municipalities had medium concentration, 7 were overpopulated, 19 were significantly<br />

14


overpopulated, 4 very significantly overpopulated, and 6 municipalities had more than 1,000 inhabitants<br />

per km 2 .<br />

The current situation regarding the population density and concentration may be defined<br />

as rather unfavorable due to the numerous consequences and implications in many domains of the<br />

complex economic and overall social development of the country. As a result of the established<br />

trends in the demographic development, it may be expected that the differences related to population<br />

density will further deepen. They will be manifested through higher density levels in municipalities<br />

presently characterized with a high density, on one hand, and through a decrease in the population<br />

density in an increasingly larger area and creation of completely uninhabited areas, on the<br />

other.<br />

1.1.3. Urban Population and Level of Urbanization<br />

The considerable changes in the distribution and re-distribution of the population contributed<br />

to high degrees of heterogeneity in its internal distribution and an increasing regional and<br />

demographic polarization. The unequal and polarized distribution of the population – expressed as<br />

high levels of concentration in urban areas and abandoned rural regions – is of undoubted adverse<br />

impact on the demographic and socio-economic development of the country.<br />

In the second half of the 20 th century, as a result of the intensive village-city migration<br />

movements, Macedonia faced a rather large increase of the urban population as a percentage of the<br />

total. In 1994, it accounted for 59.8 percent (Table 1) of the total population. At regional levels, the<br />

urban population made up from 32.6 percent (the Polog region) to 81.5 percent (the Skopje region)<br />

of the total population. 3 This indicator is also higher in the Vardar and Pelagonia regions and is at<br />

national level in the East. The Northeast and Southwest regions have a lower percentage of the<br />

urban population.<br />

The distribution of population in urban areas by size is such that, in 1994, there were 15 small<br />

towns (up to 20,000 inhabitants) in Macedonia, 8 middle-size ones (20,000 – 50,000), 4 large cities<br />

(50,001 – 100,000 inhabitants), and the city of Skopje was the only urban settlement with more than<br />

100,000 inhabitants. In terms of the distribution population in urban areas, it is interesting to<br />

observe its concentration in the cities by their size. Thus, the population in small towns accounted<br />

for 14 percent of the total urban population, the one in middle-size cities for 24.8 percent, and the<br />

one in large cities for 23 percent. In 1994, almost two fifths (38.2 percent) of the urban population<br />

lived in the city of Skopje.<br />

The changes introduced in the territorial organization (definition of municipal boundaries) in<br />

1996 did not specify which settlements had features of urban settlements. As a result, data in the<br />

2002 census of the population were not analyzed by type of settlement (city and village).<br />

1.2. Natural Migrations of the Population<br />

1.2.1. Birth Rate, Mortality and Natural Increase<br />

The differences in the intensity of the population increase, both as a total and by individual<br />

municipalities, were largely influenced by the different dynamics of the components of natural<br />

migrations and their participation in the replenishment of the population. Particularly in the case of<br />

small areas, these could be of key influence not only on the changes in the scope of the population,<br />

but also on its reproductive basis.<br />

The natural movement of the population in Macedonia, observed in terms of the number of<br />

newly born and deceased and of the natural increase of the population, as well as in terms of vitality<br />

2<br />

These indicators are presented in Table 2 - Publication II, at a level of groups of municipalities.<br />

15


ates, is characterized by extremely high levels of heterogeneity and huge regional deviations. In identifying<br />

these, not only relative indicators, but absolute values should be taken into account, as well.<br />

In the period 1998-2002, the number of newly born and birth rates in Macedonia went down<br />

from 29,244 (1998) to 27,761 (2002), i.e. from 14.6 down to 13.7 newly born per 1,000 citizens, in<br />

spite of the manifested oscillations in 1999, 2000 and 2001 4 (See Table 3 – Publication II).<br />

Observed regionally, the birth rate has the same trend in the larger part of the country. At<br />

the level of regions (NUTS 3), the decrease in the number of newly born and birth rates were typical<br />

of all regions, with the exception of the Skopje region, where the number of newly born increased<br />

and the birth rate remained at almost the same level. The Pelagonia, Vardar, Southeast and East<br />

regions are with a relatively small number of newly born and lower birth rates. In 2002, the number<br />

of newly born in the 60 municipalities of these four regions amounted to 8,418 (or 30.3 percent of<br />

the total number of newly born in the country), with the birth rate moving from 10.5 to 12.8 per<br />

mills. The Northeast, Southwest and Skopje regions have higher birth rates (14.7; 14.5; and 14.2 per<br />

mills, respectively), where the number of newly born totaled 13,896, i.e. half (50.1 percent) of the<br />

total number of newly born in the country. It is interesting to point out here that the number of<br />

newly born in the Skopje region is somewhat lower (8,181) than the number in the mentioned four<br />

regions, which have lower birth rates. In spite of the decreasing trend (from 20.1 in 1998 to 17.8 per<br />

mills in 2002), the birth rate remains the highest in the Polog region, which accounts for 19.6 percent<br />

of the total number of newly born in the country.<br />

There are huge regional disparities in the birth rates, which move from 1.8 (Vitoliste) to 30.0<br />

per mills (Centar Zupa). In 2002, 38 municipalities had birth rates lower than 10.0 per mills, more<br />

than half (71) of the total of 123 municipalities had between 10.0 and 20.0 per mills, and as many as<br />

14 municipalities had rates higher than 20.0 per mills.<br />

Unlike the birth rate, mortality in Macedonia is on the rise. The number of deceased went up from<br />

16,870 (1998) to 17,962 (2002), while the death rates increased from 8.4 to 8.9 per mills. This trend is the<br />

same in all the regions, except in the Northeast, where mortality decreased both in absolute and in relative<br />

terms. As for deviations at a national level, mortality is higher in the Pelagonia, Vardar, East and Northeast<br />

regions, where the death rates move from 12.5 (in the Pelagonia region) to 9.0 per mills (Northeast). The 54<br />

municipalities in these four regions account for 42.4 percent of the total number of deaths in the country.<br />

The Southeast, Southwest and Skopje regions have below average death rates, with the one in the Polog<br />

region being the lowest (7.6 per mills).<br />

The differences in mortality rates between municipalities are rather large and move from 4.1<br />

(Aracinovo and Lipkovo) to 41.8 per mills (Staravina). More than half (68) of the total of 123 municipalities<br />

had death rates lower than 10.0 per mills, more than one third (44) had rates between 10.0<br />

and 20.0 per mills, and as many as 11 municipalities had rates higher than 20.0 per mills. In the<br />

majority of municipalities, the increase in the death rate is a result of the age structure of the population.<br />

The vitality index is a synthetic indicator of the movements and regional disparities in terms<br />

of birth and death rates. While its values vary over the period observed, it still decreased at a national<br />

level from 173.3 (1998) to 154.6 (2002) newly born per 100 deaths. It had a downward trend in all<br />

eight regions and in the majority (88) of the municipalities. Still, as a reflection of the mentioned differentiations<br />

in the number of newly born and deceased, the regional disparities in terms of the<br />

vitality index values are enormous. They move from 4.8 newly born per 100 deaths in the municipality<br />

of Vitoliste to 602.1 newly born per 100 deaths in Aracinovo. This indicator has considerably high<br />

values in the high-birth rate municipalities in the Northeast, Southwest, Skopje, and Polog regions.<br />

4<br />

2000 should be observed as a special year, as this was an year when the number of new births (29,308) was highest. This was an exceptional<br />

year in all regions and almost all municipalities - with larger or smaller deviations - not only in terms of newly born, but also as<br />

regards the number of deaths and natural increase.<br />

16


The manifested changes in the birth and death rates added to the rise in differences in levels<br />

of natural increase, as well, which is still under a significant influence of the first component. In<br />

the period between 1998 and 2002, the natural increase of the population in Macedonia dropped<br />

from 12,374 down to 9,799 persons, and the natural increase rate went down from 6.2 to 4.9 per<br />

mills.<br />

The same trend of changes is typical for all regions, except for the Pelagonia one, where both<br />

the absolute and relative values of the natural increase are negative in all municipalities, with the<br />

exception of Zitose, Krusevo, Dolneni and Prilep. The following regions had a relatively small scope<br />

and low rates of natural increase in 2002: the East (1.8 per mills), the Vardar (2.1 per mills) and the<br />

Southeast region (4.0 per mills). These indicators are higher in the Northeast (5.7 per mills),<br />

Southwest and Skopje (6.1 per mills) regions, and highest in the Polog one (10.2 per mills).<br />

Figure 1. Rates of birth, mortality and natural increase in<br />

Macedonia (regions), 2002<br />

There are sharp inter-regional differences in the values of natural increase rates. In 2002,<br />

these values moved from -39 per mills (Staravina) to 24.2 per mills (Centar Zupa). The unfavorable<br />

situation regarding the natural increase is also confirmed by the fact that it has a negative value in<br />

almost one third (44) of the total number of municipalities, and very low values (from 0.0 to 0.9 per<br />

mills) in 6 municipalities. The number of municipalities (51) in which the natural increase rates move<br />

between 1.0 and 10.0 per mills are dominant, with the number of municipalities (21) in which these<br />

rates are within 10.0 and 20.0 per mills being relatively large. Centar Zupa is the only municipality<br />

with a rate higher than 20.0 per mills. These indicators point to the different stage of transition of the<br />

demographic development of individual municipalities and regions, as well as to the intensity of<br />

transformations in the natural migrations of the population (per mills).<br />

1.2.2. Fertility among the Female Population<br />

Regarding the changes in the natural migration of the population, in addition to the birth<br />

rate, it is also important to take into account the differences in the fertility of the female population.<br />

These may be identified on the basis of several different indicators. Having in mind the goal of this<br />

project and the data available at municipality levels, the indicators that are relevant are the general<br />

fertility rate, total fertility rate and average age of birth giving women.<br />

The general fertility rate, as an indicator of the number of newly born children per 1,000<br />

women of fertile age, is a more precise indicator of the changes in the level of fertility in a population<br />

than is the general birth rate. The general fertility rate in Macedonia, while with certain oscilla-<br />

17


tions, has a trend of continuous decrease (See Table 3 – Publication II). In the period analyzed, it went<br />

down from 56.1 (1998) to 53.2 per mills (2002). This trend is typical for all regions except for the<br />

Skopje region, where the fertility rate slightly rose (from 53.4 to 54.0 per mills). The Polog, Northeast<br />

and Southwest regions have the largest decrease in the value of this indicator. Regardless of this,<br />

however, these areas continue to differ in terms of above average fertility of the population, as the<br />

2002 rates in the regions moved from 55.7 to 66.2 per mills. There was also a decrease in the fertility<br />

rates in the Pelagonia, Vardar and East regions (2002: 43.2; 44.1; and 43.3 per mills, respectively),<br />

while the rates in the Southeast region remained at the same level (49.9 per mills).<br />

In 2002, this indicator rose at municipal level in almost one third (42) of the municipalities, as<br />

compared to 1998. It is interesting to note that only 9 of those municipalities are in the mentioned<br />

three regions with higher fertility rates.<br />

The total fertility rate is deemed by the demographic statistics as the best indicator of the<br />

level of fertility and a very good approximation of the average number of children in a family. At the<br />

same time, it is a more favorable indicator for a comparative analysis of the fertility levels in different<br />

countries. The critical numerical value of the total fertility rate is 2.1 (number of children per a<br />

woman of a fertile age), which ensures the simple reproduction of the population in terms of generation<br />

renewal.<br />

In 2002, the total fertility rate in Macedonia was 1.6, meaning that simple reproduction was<br />

not achieved in the country as a whole. As the majority of municipalities – according to the existing<br />

territorial division – are very small areas, this indicator was computed for only half (63) of the municipalities,<br />

because it is difficult to obtain relevant indicators for small areas. The ones taken into<br />

account are former municipalities or larger municipal centers, and the data refers to 2002. According<br />

to these data, the total fertility rate has a value higher than 2.1 in only eight municipalities:<br />

Aracinovo, Kondovo, Saraj, Zelenikovo, Studenicani, Suto Orizari, Zelino and Staro Nagoricane. The<br />

municipality of Lipkovo is another municipality in which this indicator is of a value higher than 2.0,<br />

i.e. it is 2.04.<br />

In relation to the population fertility, other important changes are the ones in the average<br />

age of women giving birth. The value of this indicator at a national level is in a continuous upward<br />

trend and it increased from 26.2 to 26.6 years during the period 1998-2002. In spite of the oscillations,<br />

this age is on an increase in the majority of municipalities. It was in only 19 municipalities that<br />

the average age of women giving birth decreased in the period observed. Regarding the regional<br />

disparities related to this indicator, it is worth mentioning that 29 municipalities stand out for their<br />

average age of women giving birth that is above the national average; of them, less than half (13)<br />

are in the Skopje region (per mills).<br />

1.2.3. Life expectancy at birth<br />

Due to the fact that the general death rate is not the most precise indicator of the mortality<br />

level or of the health conditions and living standards in a country, international Publication IIs nowadays<br />

regularly make use of the life expectancy at birth in the analysis of the level of mortality. If the<br />

total fertility rate represents the fertility level, the life expectancy at birth represents the mortality<br />

level. The term refers to the average number of years of life, i.e. the average duration of the life of a<br />

population, which in the course of its life will be under the influence of specific mortality rates, in<br />

accordance with the age as from the year of birth.<br />

Data related to this indicator are only available at a national level. They show that life<br />

expectancy, expressed in years, was as follows in the period observed: 72.49 years (1997-1999), 72.68<br />

years (1998 – 2000), and 73.05 years (1999-2001), 73.12 (2000-2002). In the case of men, these indi-<br />

18


cators for the respective period are: 70.37 years; 70.48 years; and 70.68 years, 70.77 years, while in<br />

the case of women, they are: 74.68 years; 74.77 years; 75.21 years; and 75.56 years.<br />

1.3. Marital Status of the Population<br />

1.3.1. Changes in Marriage and Divorce rates<br />

The east-European sub-type of marriages is dominant in Macedonia; this type of marriage is<br />

considered as transitory between the traditional and modern types of marital structure. It includes<br />

an abundance of variations in the number of marriages entered into and divorces, which correspond<br />

to the major changes in the social relations. The available data on the number of marriages and marriage<br />

rates in the 1998-2002 period are of smaller or larger oscillations (See Table 4 – Publication II).<br />

At the national level, there is an obvious and continuous increase in the number of new marriages,<br />

which rose from 13,933 in 1998 to 14,552 in 2002 5 .<br />

The regional differences are to a larger or lesser extent also evident in relation to the marriage<br />

rate among the population. Observed at a regional level, the trend of new marriages and marriage<br />

rates during the period observed is decreasing in the Pelagonia and the Northeast regions,<br />

whereas it is on the rise in the Vardar, Southwest, Skopje, Southeast and Polog regions, and stagnant<br />

in the East. In 2002, the values of the indicators of new marriages per 1,000 inhabitants are at an<br />

almost equal level in the Pelagonia, Vardar, Northeast and East regions (about 6.0). They are somewhat<br />

higher in the Southeast and Skopje regions (6.5 and 7.0 respectively) and highest in the<br />

Southwest and Polog regions – 8.6 and 9.7 marriages per 1,000 inhabitants. This indicator has values<br />

higher than 10.0 in 19 municipalities: Bistrica, Centar Zupa, Oslomej, Plasnica, Vevcani, Labunista,<br />

Lukovo, Aracinovo, Kondovo, Saraj, Zelenikovo, Suto Orizari, Vrapciste, Vrutok, Mavrovi Anovi,<br />

Negotino-Polosko, Srbinovo, Bogovinje and Zelino.<br />

In parallel with the number of new marriages, there is also an increase in the number of<br />

divorces, which at a national level increased from 1,027 (1998) to 1,310 (2002). During the period, the<br />

intensity of change in the case of divorces is higher (an index of 127.6) than that of new marriages<br />

(index: 103.8).<br />

At a regional level, the number of divorces grew in the Pelagonia, Northeast, Skopje, Polog<br />

and East regions 6 . According to the values of indicators of the number of divorces per 1,000 citizens,<br />

it rose significantly in the East (from 0.24 up to 0.61), Pelagonia (from 0.33 to 0.61) and the Polog<br />

(from 1.06 to 1.37) regions. In 2002, this indicator had a value higher than 1.0 in almost all the municipalities<br />

of the Polog region, except in four (Dolna Banjica, Jegunovce, Dzepciste and Sipkovica), with<br />

the ones in Cegrane (2.84) and Zelino (2.09) being extremely high. In the other municipalities, it is<br />

higher than 1.0 in Resen, Suto Orizari, Kuklis, Zrnovci and Kocani.<br />

The indicator of the number of divorces per 1,000 inhabitants very clearly illustrates the trend<br />

of a considerable increase of the divorce rate. In the country as a whole, this indicator grew from 73.4<br />

(1998) to 90.2 (2002) divorces per 1,000 citizens, reaching its peak in 2001 (109.1). At a regional level,<br />

it went significantly up in the Pelagonia (from 53.6 to 104.7), the Northeast (from 29.0 to 42.6) and<br />

the Skopje (from 73.3 to 90.9) regions. The indicator’s values are highest in the Polog region, where<br />

it went from 115.4 (1998) up to 141.9 (2002). The number of divorced marriages per 1,000 inhabitants<br />

decreased in the mentioned three regions, characterized by a downward trend of divorce rate.<br />

5<br />

2001 is an exceptional year, when this number was considerably lower - 13,267. This may be explained by the fact that this was the<br />

year of the armed conflict, as this trend is particularly typical of the regions involved in the conflict.<br />

6<br />

The number of divorces per 1,000 inhabitants had a downward trend in the Vardar (from 0.44 down to 0.26) and Southeast (from 0.57<br />

to 0.36) regions.<br />

19


1.3.2. Co-habitation<br />

Co-habitation, as a phenomenon, is still relatively less present in Macedonia in comparison<br />

with the developed countries. This is a result of the tradition and established norms related to unregistered<br />

married couples. In 2002, the number of such couples totaled 8,539, which is only 1.5 percent<br />

of the total number of families. The number of unwed per 1,000 wedded couples is 1.7 (See Table 4<br />

– Publication II).<br />

According to these indicators, there are relatively large disparities at regional and particularly<br />

at municipal levels. In 2002, unwed couples constituted the lowest percentage of the total number<br />

of families in the Southeast, Vardar, East, Pelagonia and Southeast regions (where it moved<br />

between 0.8 and 1.3 percent), while it was relatively higher in the Skopje and Northeast ones (1.6<br />

and 1.8, respectively). It is highest in the Polog region (2.5 percent), which accounts for slightly less<br />

than one fourth (24.3 percent) of the total number of unregistered couples in the country.<br />

At a municipal level, the deviations in the values of this indicator go between 0.0 (Bac) to 9.5<br />

(Suto Orizari). In the majority of municipalities (88), the percentage of unwed couples is lower, and<br />

in 7 municipalities it is at the same level as the national percentage. Thus, there are 28 municipalities<br />

with higher numerical values of this indicator. Of them, the following ones have significantly high<br />

percentages of unwed couples: Cegrane (3.2 percent), Rankovce (3.5 percent), Kamenjane (3.6 percent),<br />

Vratnica (3.8 percent), Kondovo (5.5 percent), Tearce (6.7 percent), Zelino (8.7 percent) and<br />

the already mentioned Suto Orizari (9.5 percent).<br />

1.4. Mechanical Movement of the Population<br />

On the basis of the known data on the migration movements of the population – with no<br />

intention to disagree with the importance of the large number of analysis in this field – the conclusion<br />

is that there is still a lack of a comprehensive in-depth research, such that would enable complete<br />

examination of this spatial-time phenomenon. This is to a large extent a result of the lack of relevant<br />

data on such movements, with the data related to outward-bound migrations being particularly<br />

poor.<br />

The basic sources of information for the analysis of the migrations are the population censuses<br />

and the joint research of the Ministry of Interior and the State Statistical Office on emigrants<br />

and immigrants. In studying the migrations on the basis of the mentioned sources, it has to be born<br />

in mind that these sources are insufficient for complete identification of the scope and directions of<br />

the mobility of the population, both as total numbers and at regional levels.<br />

1.4.1. Total Population Mobility<br />

With regard to the total mobility of the population, the percentage of the autochthonous of<br />

the total population may be taken as a relevant indicator, based on the available census documentation.<br />

This shows the portion of the population living in one area since birth. According to the 2002<br />

census data, approximately two thirds (65.8 percent) of the population in Macedonia lived in the<br />

same place since birth and with no interruptions, while 34.2 percent migrated to their place of usual<br />

residence (See Table 5 – Publication II).<br />

There are significant regional deviations as to the percentage of the autochthonous in the<br />

total population. At the level of regions, this indicator is of a lower numerical value than the average<br />

in the East region and higher in the Polog (73.4 percent), Southeast (69.8 percent) and Southwest<br />

(69.2 percent) regions. As regards the municipalities, the percentage of the autochthonous in the<br />

total population is higher than 70.0 percent in 49 municipalities, with 18 of them having an indica-<br />

20


tor higher than 80.0 percent. This percentage is lower than 60.0 percent in 29 municipalities, with<br />

four of them of a percentage lower than 50.0 percent (Lozovo, Probistip, Demir Hisar and<br />

Makedonski Brod). This implies high mobility of the population in the majority of municipalities.<br />

The most relevant indicators of the total population mobility are certainly the general rates<br />

of gross- and net-migration, as well as the general rates of emigration and immigration. At a municipal<br />

level, these indicators may be calculated only on the basis of the mentioned regular statistical<br />

research on emigrants and immigrants. Due to the very low scope of emigration, particularly of persons<br />

who left the country and thus the number of persons who emigrated and immigrated, these<br />

indicators calculated for 1998 and 2002 fail to reflect the real situation in terms of the total mobility<br />

of the population. In support of this, it is worth mentioning that, according to these data, 3,073 persons<br />

settled in the country between 1994 and 2002, while only 926 persons emigrated. These data<br />

do not correspond at all to the negative migratory balance in the 1994-2002 period between two<br />

censuses and to the real situation as regards the outward-bound migration movements.<br />

1.4.2. Internal Migrations<br />

The data available on internal migrations since the population census in 2002 and those<br />

contained in the regular statistical research may be regarded relevant. Those data indicate that the<br />

inter-municipal migrations are dominant in the internal population movements in the country over<br />

the last decade, while migrations between settlements within a municipality are relatively less frequent.<br />

According to the structure of internal immigrants identified in the 2002 census, those who<br />

moved to another municipality accounted for 66.5 percent of the total number, while those who<br />

moved within the borders of the same municipality constitute 22.0 percent of the overall number of<br />

internal immigrants 7 . These regional indicators show that the inter-municipal migrations were most<br />

numerous in the Skopje (73.4 percent) and Pelagonia (70.4 percent) regions; they were of relatively<br />

smaller numbers in the Vardar, Southwest, Southeast and Polog regions (between 64.9 percent and<br />

67.7 percent), and least frequent in the Northeast (51.1 percent) and the East (56.3 percent) region.<br />

The number of persons who migrated within municipal borders is lowest in the Skopje region (6.9<br />

percent), highest in the East (39.1 percent) and Northeast (36.2 percent) ones, and moving between<br />

21 percent (Pelagonia) and 28.4 percent (Southwest) in the remaining regions.<br />

Indicators at municipal levels reveal that the absolute scope and relative percentage participation<br />

of inter-municipal migrations are highest in large municipalities, which coincide with the<br />

municipal centers according to the territorial organization before 1996. Immigrants from other<br />

municipalities, as a percentage of the total number of immigrants, appear in smallest numbers in<br />

Centar Zupa (14.9 percent) and Kriva Palanka (15.3 percent) and in highest in Blatec (89.6 percent)<br />

and Vevcani (90.0 percent). When it comes to the number of immigrants within municipality borders,<br />

there have been no such movements in the municipalities of Vevcani, Centar and Suto Orizari. In the<br />

other municipalities, the percentage of such movements is between 0.1 percent (Karpos) and 82.9<br />

percent (Centar Zupa).<br />

Similar concluding remarks regarding the internal migrations are drawn from the absolute<br />

values and relative indicators, calculated on the basis of data in the regular statistical research on<br />

internally migrated persons.<br />

1.4.3. External Migrations<br />

As mentioned earlier, the available data on external migrations from administrative<br />

and statistical sources, i.e. the number emigrants and immigrants, are rather poor and unreliable.<br />

7<br />

The difference up to 100.0 percent includes persons moved into the country from abroad.<br />

21


There are no relevant official data related to the emigration, in spite of the fact that such migrations<br />

were huge in scope and intensity over the past decade.<br />

With regard to the scope, demographic and socio-economic characteristics of persons who<br />

left the country until 1994 – as a total number and per region – findings could be arrived at only on<br />

the basis of the data from the population censuses. Pursuant to the amendments in the Law on<br />

Census in 2002, the census included only citizens staying abroad up to one year.<br />

Data from the 1994 census indicate that, according to the number of persons who left the<br />

country as a percentage of the total population in Macedonia, two groups of emigration areas could<br />

be distinguished. The first group consists of the municipalities 8 of Resen (26.3 percent) and Bitola<br />

(25.4 percent), and the second of Demir Hisar, Ohrid, Struga, Tetovo, Gostivar and Kicevo, where this<br />

percentage was between 10.6 percent and 19.6 percent.<br />

The conclusion that may be drawn on the basis of migration figures - calculated in accordance<br />

with the vital statistical method - regarding the Polog (8,472 emigrants) and Southwest (6,191<br />

emigrants) regions is that the emigrations from the country following 1994 in the majority of the<br />

municipalities in these regions continued with a relatively large intensity. This conclusion also<br />

applies to a part of the municipalities in the Skopje and Northeast regions.<br />

Regarding the immigrants who moved into the country from other countries, it is important<br />

to take into account the data from the last population census. These show that the number of such<br />

immigrants in Macedonia is 79,167, which is 3.9 percent of the total population in 2002. At a regional<br />

level, this indicator is the highest in the Skopje (7.2 percent) and the Northeast (4.7 percent)<br />

regions. In the other regions, the indicator is within the interval of 1.8 percent (in the Southeast and<br />

East ones) and 3.9 percent (in the Vardar region). The majority of immigrants who moved into the<br />

country are concentrated in the Northwest part of the country. Namely, more than half of those<br />

immigrants moved into the Skopje region (41,391 immigrants or 52.3 percent), whereas somewhat<br />

less than a fifth (10.1 percent) moved into the Northeast and the Polog (7.8 percent) regions.<br />

1.5. Population by Gender and Age<br />

1.5.1. Population Structure by Gender<br />

The impact of the population structure in terms of gender on the economic and social development<br />

of a country is reflected in several segments. This is manifested through the impact on the<br />

size of the labor, on the burden imposed by the supported population on the economically active<br />

part of the population, as well as on the location of certain industrial branches, companies and their<br />

plants. The gender structure also has a large impact on the social organization of the life in an area.<br />

The changes in the population structure in terms of gender may be observed through the<br />

percentage of men and women in the total population and in the general and specific coefficients<br />

of masculinity and femininity. As these are attributive statistical features with alternative forms, the<br />

analysis focused on the percentage of men and coefficients of masculinity.<br />

In the period between the censuses in 1994 and 2002, there was an insignificant increase of<br />

the percentage of men in the total population in Macedonia (from 50.1 percent to 50.2 percent). At<br />

a regional level, there was an increase in the Vardar, Northeast, Southwest, Southeast and Polog<br />

regions, a decrease in the Pelagonia and Skopje regions, and a status quo in the East region (See<br />

Table 6 – Publication II). In 2002, the percentage of men was higher than that of women in all<br />

regions, with the exception of the Skopje region (49.6 percent).<br />

In 2002, the percentage of men in the total population was higher in 103 or 83.7 percent of<br />

the total number of municipalities in the country. By regions, these indicators are as follows:<br />

8<br />

These are municipalities as per the territorial division before 1996.<br />

22


Pelagonia (18 or 94.7 percent), Vardar (9 or 90.0 percent), Northeast (8 or 100.0 percent), Southwest<br />

(15 or 75.0 percent), Skopje (10 or 76.9 percent), Southeast (12 or 85.7 percent), Polog (14 or 73.7 percent)<br />

and East region (17 or 100.0 percent). The relatively smaller number of municipalities with a<br />

dominant percentage of men in the total population in the Polog, Southwest and Skopje regions is<br />

a result of the intensive emigration movements from these regions, where women account for a<br />

smaller percentage of the total population.<br />

The values of the general and specific coefficients of masculinity, both at national and<br />

regional levels, correspond with the population structure according to gender. The municipality of<br />

Labunista has the lowest percentage of men in the total population (47.4 percent) and, therefore,<br />

lowest coefficient of masculinity (901); the municipality of Konopiste, on the other hand, is the one<br />

with the highest percentage of men (53.7 percent) and masculinity ratio (1,160). Regarding the specific<br />

masculinity indicators, in addition to the masculinity ratio of the population at the age of 65 and<br />

above, the percentage participation of men at the age of 65 and above in the total population also<br />

merits attention. The value of this indicator nationwide was 4.8 percent in 2002, moving within the<br />

interval of 2.1 percent (Suto Orizari) and 30.4 percent (Staravina) at municipal levels.<br />

1.5.2. Population Age Structure<br />

Population Distribution by Five-year Age Groups<br />

The age structure of the population is not only one of the indicators of the achieved level of<br />

development of any population, but also an instrument for learning about the demographic past<br />

and predicting the demographic future of an area. The first level of analysis of the age structure of a<br />

population is the usual distribution of the population by five-year age groups and by large age<br />

groups (0-19, 20-39, 40-59, and 60 and above). As the number of municipalities is rather large, there<br />

is no need to go into a more detailed observation of the data (the absolute values and relative percentages)<br />

on the five-year age groups, both as a total and by gender.<br />

The first and most illustrative picture of the regional disparities in terms of the age structure<br />

of the population in Macedonia may be obtained from the shape of the age pyramids of the<br />

population at regional level (Figure 2). The shape of the age pyramids, and particularly the width of<br />

their bases, is a very illustrative indicator of the percentage of the young and older population in the<br />

eight regions, as well as their similarity/difference with the total population in the country.<br />

Figure 2. Age Pyramids of the Total Population in Macedonia and by Regions, 2002<br />

Macedonia<br />

23


Pelagonia region<br />

Vardar region<br />

Northeast region<br />

Southwest region<br />

Skopje region<br />

Southeast region<br />

24


Polog region<br />

East region<br />

Source: Census of population, households, and dwellings in Macedonia, 2002, State Statistical Office<br />

Stages of Demographic Age<br />

The identification of the changes in the age structure, as well as of the achieved level of<br />

demographic age – both as a total and at regional levels – usually includes a classification of the<br />

population into various types of age structure. There are several methods of classifying by type<br />

when identifying the various stages of demographic age 9 .<br />

In our opinion, it is necessary to take into account the values of several indicators, for the purpose<br />

of more precise determination of the demographic aging stage. In this sense, when identifying<br />

the regional disparities in the process of demographic aging in Macedonia, the most adequate<br />

method of classification would be the one on the stages of demographic age and the criteria for<br />

their identification, applied by the Center for Demographic Research with the Institute of Social<br />

Science in Belgrade, FR Yugoslavia. It is based on a combination of the values of five different indicators<br />

of the demographic age of the population: average age, percentage of the population below<br />

20 years of age, percentage of the population below 40 years of age, percentage of the population<br />

over 60 years of age, and the aging index, as the relation between the old people (60 and over) and<br />

the percentage of young people below the age of 20. In accordance with the identified threshold<br />

values of the stated indicators, this classification distinguishes between seven stages of the demographic<br />

age (Table 2). This eliminates the danger of arriving at wrong Concluding remarks about the<br />

demographic age of a population, particularly in cases of very significant regional disparities and<br />

severely distorted age structures.<br />

9<br />

One of those methods, used by the UN experts, starts with the percentage of the population at the age of 65 and over and distinguishes<br />

between three types of population: young - where the old population accounts for less than 4 percent, mature - with old population<br />

between 4 percent and 7 percent of the total, and old population, where the old account for more than 7 percent of the total population<br />

(UN: "The Aging of Populations and its Economic and Social Implications", United Nations Population Study, No. 26., 1956, p. 7, cited by<br />

Prof. Dr. Alica Wertheimer - Baletic, Demographics - Population and Demographic Development, "Informator", Zagreb, 1982, p. 248).<br />

The renowned Polish demographer Edward Rosset takes into account the percentage of people at the age of 60 and over. In this, he distinguishes<br />

between four stages of the aging process: demographic youth - with old people accounting for less than 8 percent; at the edge<br />

of aging - old people constituting between 8 and 10 percent; in the process of aging- between 10 and 12 percent and demographic oldage<br />

- where old people account for more than 12 percent of the total population ( E.Rosset, The Population Aging Process - Demographic<br />

Research, Statistika, Moscow, 1968).<br />

25


Table 2. Stages of Demographic Age and Criteria for their Identification<br />

Source: "Population and Households in FR Yugoslavia, According to the 1991 Census", Federal Republic of<br />

Yugoslavia. Federal Statistical Office and Center for Demographic Research with the Institute of Social Science, Population<br />

47, p. 131.<br />

As far as the situation in Macedonia in the last two census years is concerned, the values of<br />

the stated indicators and the results of rating in accordance with the accepted threshold values<br />

reveal that the population in the country crossed the demographic old-age threshold and passed<br />

into the stage of a demographic old-age. This passing from a lower to a higher stage of a demographic<br />

aging in a relatively short period of only eight years in the case of Macedonia is yet another<br />

confirmation of the theoretical knowledge and experiences of other countries embodied in the fact<br />

that, once the demographic old-age threshold is arrived at, the process of aging of the population<br />

progresses with a considerably faster pace.<br />

On the basis of the indicators for 1994 and 2002, rather substantial changes may be identified<br />

at a regional level, which also implies deepening of the regional disparities (See Table 7 –<br />

Publication II). Observed at a NUTS 3 level, these changes indicate that, according to the situation in<br />

the two observed years, the population in the Northeast, Southwest and the Skopje region are in<br />

stage four – demographic old-age threshold. The rank of the Skopje region in 2002 may not be precisely<br />

defined, as it is in its fourth stage as classified by two indicators, but in its fifth stage as classified<br />

by another two indicators. The Vardar, Southeast and East regions are faced with a more intensive<br />

aging process; in these regions, the population has passed from the demographic old-age threshold<br />

into the stage of demographic old-age. The Pelagonia region remained in the same stage as<br />

before, i.e. in the demographic old-age. While the Polog region is a high-birth rate area with a relatively<br />

young population, it is also undergoing a process of demographic aging and has passed from<br />

stage three – demographic maturity – into stage four, i.e. into demographic old-age threshold.<br />

At a NUTS 4 level (municipalities as per the old territorial division), the population in 1994 was<br />

in its third stage – demographic maturity – in four municipalities (Gostivar, Debar, Struga and Tetovo),<br />

in the stage of a demographic old-age threshold in 20 municipalities, in a demographic old-age in five<br />

municipalities (Berovo, Bitola, Kratovo, Prilep, Resen), with Demir Hisar being the only municipality<br />

in the stage of a deep demographic old-age. The territory of the city of Skopje is treated as one municipality<br />

and its population was at the demographic old-age threshold.<br />

The analysis of the changes in the age structure of the population, of the individual indicators<br />

and of the rating of municipalities shows that the demographic aging process began in the<br />

majority of municipalities in the period between 1994 and 2002. In 2002, the municipality of Debar<br />

26


was the only one in the stage of a demographic old-age, while Gostivar is between stages three and<br />

four. Seven municipalities (Kicevo, Kumanovo, Radovis, Struga and Tetovo) are at the demographic<br />

old-age threshold, whereas the population in Makedonski Brod and Strumica is between stages four<br />

and five.<br />

18 municipalities are in the stage of a demographic old-age, one (Bitola) is between demographic<br />

old-age and deep demographic old-age, and two in the stages of deep demographic old-age<br />

(Resen) and deepest demographic old-age (Demir Hisar). Thence, it may be concluded that, while two<br />

thirds of these municipalities were at the demographic old-age threshold eight years ago, today the<br />

population in more than twenty municipalities is at the stage of demographic old-age.<br />

The rating of the municipalities indicates that there were significant changes at the level of<br />

all 123 municipalities (NUTS 5) during the period observed, due to which today’s regional disparities<br />

are even more acute. Thus, the population in two municipalities (Aracinovo and Centar Zupa) was in<br />

the stage of a demographic youth, while 24 municipalities were in the demographic maturity stage. In<br />

2002, no municipality is in the second stage, while 20 municipalities were at the demographic oldage<br />

threshold. The number of municipalities that were at the demographic old-age threshold<br />

decreased from 51 to 27, while the number of those in demographic old-age went up from 30 to 47.<br />

What is particularly indicative is the increase of the municipalities in higher stages of demographic<br />

old-age (stages six and seven) – the number of those in deep demographic old-age rose from 4 to 14,<br />

whereas the number of those in the deepest demographic old-age increased from 12 to 15. This<br />

means that, according to the situation in 200, there are a huge number of municipalities (76) that are<br />

in a very intensive process of demographic aging.<br />

Changes in the More Significant Functional Age-Gender Contingents<br />

In the context of the process of aging of the population, its distribution by individual functional<br />

contingents is rather important. The distribution is done in accordance with the age and gender<br />

and determined by the function that the population has – carrying out activities, exercising certain<br />

rights, fulfilling obligations, etc. What should be taken into account in terms of the current and<br />

future socio-economic development are the changes in the pre-school and mandatory school contingent,<br />

working population, female fertile population, women at an optimal reproductive age, the<br />

elderly (above 60 and 65 years of age) and the aging contingent. The differentiations in terms of<br />

these contingents are observed at regional and municipality levels (See Tables 8 – Publication II).<br />

In the period between 1994 and 2002, the pre-school contingent (0 – 6 years) in the country<br />

as a whole decreased in both absolute and relative terms. The number of children at pre-school age<br />

declined from 11.2 to 8.8 percent (Table 3). In 2002, this contingent constituted a lower percentage<br />

of the total population in the Pelagonia, East, Vardar and Southeast regions. Together, they accounted<br />

for 32 percent of the total number of pre-school children. The Skopje, Northeast and Polog<br />

regions had a higher percentage of pre-school children. According to the absolute scope and individual<br />

percentages, the Skopje and Polog regions stand out, as they constitute 28.9 percent and 18.1<br />

percent respectively, which is somewhat less than half of the total number of pre-school children in<br />

the country.<br />

27


Region<br />

Total<br />

popula<br />

tion<br />

Macedonia<br />

Number 202254<br />

7<br />

Table 3. Number and percentage of basic functional<br />

age-gender contingents – Macedonia, 2002<br />

Children at<br />

pre-school<br />

age (0-6)<br />

School<br />

age<br />

children<br />

(7-14)<br />

Percentage of total population ( percent)<br />

Working-age<br />

population<br />

(15-64 for men<br />

and 15-59 for<br />

women)<br />

Fertile<br />

populat<br />

ion (15-<br />

49)<br />

Women<br />

at the<br />

optimal<br />

reprodu<br />

ctive<br />

age<br />

(20-34)<br />

60<br />

and<br />

over<br />

At the<br />

age of<br />

65<br />

and<br />

over<br />

At the<br />

age of<br />

80<br />

and<br />

over<br />

177050 249230 1334738 522355 226597 29559 21371 26916<br />

3 2<br />

percent 100.0 8.8 12.3 66.0 25.8 11.2 14.6 10.6 1.3<br />

Pelagonia region<br />

Number 238136 17289 25159 153353 57761 23716 46777 35828 4750<br />

percent 100.0 7.3 10.6 64.4 24.3 10.0 19.6 15.0 2.0<br />

Vardar region<br />

Number 133180 10420 14699 89495 33891 14142 21210 15006 1702<br />

percent 100.0 7.8 11.0 67.2 25.4 10.6 15.9 11.3 1.3<br />

Northeast region<br />

Number 172787 16595 22482 112206 43863 19192 24221 17588 2291<br />

percent 100.0 9.6 13.0 64.9 25.4 11.1 14.0 10.2 1.3<br />

Southwest<br />

Number 219741 20405 30772 141537 57108 24863 30153 22330 2954<br />

percent 100.0 9.3 14.0 64.4 26.0 11.3 13.7 10.2 1.3<br />

Skopje region<br />

Number 578144 51251 66154 388664 151885 68101 82838 58023 7095<br />

percent 100.0 8.9 11.4 67.2 26.3 11.8 14.3 10.0 1.2<br />

Southeast region<br />

Number 171416 14001 19982 115041 43751 18316 25427 18281 2286<br />

percent 100.0 8.2 11.7 67.1 25.5 10.7 14.8 10.7 1.3<br />

Polog region<br />

Number 305930 32078 47741 196505 82505 37051 33443 23735 2787<br />

percent 100.0 10.5 15.6 64.2 27.0 12.1 10.9 7.8 0.9<br />

East region<br />

Number 203213 15011 22241 137937 51591 21216 31524 22921 3051<br />

percent 100.0 7.4 10.9 67.9 25.4 10.4 15.5 11.3 1.5<br />

Office<br />

Source: Census of the population, households and dwellings in Macedonia, 1994 and 2002, State Statistical<br />

The mandatory school contingent (7 – 14) also shows considerable changes of the absolute<br />

and relative values. At a national level, these changes are manifested in the decline of the number<br />

(from 266,390 down to 249,230) and the percentage of the total population (from 13.7 to 12.3 percent).<br />

At regional levels, the movement directions and percentage of this contingent of the total<br />

population correspond with those of the pre-school one. Namely, these percentages are lower in the<br />

regions with smaller numbers of pre-school children, particularly in the Pelagonia, East, and Vardar<br />

regions and higher in the Skopje, Southeast, Northeast and Southwest regions. The Polog region<br />

also stands out for the value of this indicator, as it accounts for as much as 19.2 percent of the total<br />

number of children at the age at which school is mandatory.<br />

The working population contingent - which includes men at the age between 15 and 64 and<br />

women at the age of 15-59 – is a demographic frame for identifying the total supply of labor. In the<br />

period 1994-2002, this segment of the population increased both in absolute terms (from 1,247,481<br />

to 1,334,733 persons) and as a percentage of the total population (from 64.1 percent to 66.0 per-<br />

28


cent). At the level of regions, its values are between 64.2 percent (in the Polog region) and 67.9 percent<br />

(in the East one). In addition to the Polog region, the other regions with lower percentage participation<br />

in the total population are the Pelagonia, Southwest, and Northeast regions. The relatively<br />

smaller percentage of working population in the municipalities of the Pelagonia region is a consequence<br />

of the intensive process of demographic aging, while in the Polog, Southwest and<br />

Northeast region it is a result of the higher percentage of children. Thence, these are two qualitatively<br />

different situations, as the working population in the Pelagonia region municipalities may be<br />

expected to decline further in both absolute and relative terms, while it may be expected to rise in<br />

the three mentioned regions.<br />

The regional differences at municipal level are considerably large. Thus, the case of the Pelagonia<br />

region is an indicative one, as there the working population is smallest in the municipality of Staravina (27.8<br />

percent) and largest in Prilep (66.6 percent). Municipalities with the highest values of this indicator are<br />

Kisela Voda (70.9 percent), Makedonska Kamenica (70.1 percent), and Probistip (70.0 percent). In addition<br />

to Staravina, the following municipalities also have a working population constituting less than 50 percent:<br />

Vitoliste, Konopiste, Bogomila, Orasac and Klecovce. The indicator is between 50 and 60 percent in 20<br />

municipalities and between 60 and 70 percent in 94.<br />

As regards the female fertile population (15-49 years of age), it should be pointed out that this<br />

contingent rose over the observed period by 24,138 persons, and its percentage of the total population<br />

increased from 25.6 to 25.8 percent. In the two census years, the values of the indicator were<br />

higher than the national average in the Southwest, Skopje and Polog regions. According to the 2002<br />

data, the indicator was lowest in the Pelagonia region, and highest in the Polog one. Unlike in the<br />

regions, the disparities between municipalities are huge and move from 4.7 percent (Vitoliste) to<br />

28.6 percent (Labunista). In addition to Vitoliste, other municipalities with a low index are Staravina<br />

(5.4 percent) and Konopiste (6.9 percent), while Cegrane and Negotino-Polosko have high indicators.<br />

The female population at a fertile age accounts for 10.0-20.0 percent of the total population in<br />

only 15 municipalities, while it is higher than 20.0 percent in 105 ones.<br />

The absolute increase of the female population at an optimal reproductive age (20-34 years of<br />

age) is significantly lower. In the time interval between 1994 and 2002, their number rose by 3,632.<br />

Unlike its absolute increase, this contingent’s percentage of the total population decreased from<br />

11.5 percent to 11.2 percent.<br />

The regional differences are similar to the ones of the female fertile population. The indicator<br />

in the mentioned three regions has higher values, with the disparities between the municipalities<br />

again being large. The percentage of females at an optimal reproductive age is lowest in the<br />

same municipalities – Konopiste, Staravina and Vitoliste (1.7 percent, 2.2 percent, and 2.6 percent,<br />

respectively). In the majority of municipalities (89), this index is higher than the national level, with<br />

its values being particularly high in the following eight: Studenicani, Dolna Banjica, Saraj, Zelino,<br />

Negotino Polosko, Sipkovica, Labunista, and Centar Zupa.<br />

As a result of the intensified process of demographic aging at a national level, the number of<br />

persons older than 60 increased by 41,967, and its percentage of the total population went up from<br />

13.0 percent to 14.6 percent. In 2002, this percentage was highest in the Pelagonia and lowest in the<br />

Polog region. The regional differences indicate that the value of this indicator is lowest in Aracinovo<br />

(6.5 percent) and highest in Staravina (68.5 percent). The percentage of persons older than 60 is<br />

lower than the national level in 49 municipalities and higher than 20.0 percent in 35, of which it is<br />

higher than 30.0 percent in as many as 15 municipalities. (See Table 7, Publication II)<br />

The situation with the population older than 65 is similar: during the period observed, this<br />

number increased by 49,034 and its percentage of the total population grew from 8.5 percent to<br />

29


10.6 percent. At a regional level, the Pelagonia region is again the one with the highest and the<br />

Polog one with the lowest percentage of such population. The situation is again identical in terms of<br />

the municipalities – Aracinovo is with the lowest (4.3 percent) and Staravina with the highest (61.4<br />

percent) value of this indicator. The latter is lower than the national average in 52 municipalities and<br />

higher than 20.0 percent in 20 municipalities.<br />

The contingent of elderly, including persons at the age of 80 and above, indicates that the<br />

population is in a process of aging. Thus, in 1994 this contingent included 25,369 persons, while in<br />

2002 this number was 26,916. As a percentage of the total population, this group remained at the<br />

same level (1.3 percent) 10 . In 2002, this contingent’s percentage of the total population is at the highest<br />

level in the Pelagonia region and at the lowest in the Polog one. At a municipal level, it is lower<br />

than 1 percent in 24 municipalities, with the one in Suto Orizari (0.4 percent) being the lowest. In the<br />

majority of municipalities (59), the percentage is between 1 and 2 percent; it is higher than 2 percent<br />

in 40 – almost one third of the municipalities – among which Staravina (8.2 percent) and<br />

Vitoliste (8.3 percent) stand out.<br />

The changes in absolute values and percentage of the total population in the analyzed<br />

age-gender functional contingents, among other things, also point to the size of the required total<br />

and social transfer of funds for the various needs of the separate segments of the population.<br />

Population Age Dependency Ratio<br />

In relation to the burden imposed on the working contingent of the population, the size of<br />

the pre-working and post-working contingents have to be taken into account. It is indicated by the<br />

total age dependency ratio, age dependency of young population and age dependency of the old<br />

population (See table 9 – Publication II). The first indicator – total age dependency – shows the burden<br />

on the population at a working age imposed by the contingents of young and old population.<br />

During the observed period, the numerical values of this indicator in Macedonia decreased from<br />

52.0 (1994) to 47.9 (2002). This trend is typical for all of the regions, but most intensive in the Polog<br />

(from 62.2 down to 52.7) and the Southwest (from 60.1 down to 51.9) ones.<br />

Figure 3. Age dependency ratio of the total population, the young and old people<br />

in Macedonia, and on level of regions, 2002<br />

10<br />

The projections envisage a more intensive increase after 2000 and the expectations are that their number will mount to 65,592 persons<br />

in 2020, which is an increase of more than 2.5 times (and index of 258.6). In other words, their percentage of the total population is<br />

expected to rise from 1.3 percent to 3.2 percent.<br />

30


The total age dependency ratio at a municipal level shows considerable disparities. These are<br />

a result of the changes occurred during the movements of the total population and its distribution<br />

by age groups. In 2002, they were lowest in Kisela Voda (37.3), Gevgelija (39.4) and Makedonska<br />

Kamenica (39.9). The following municipalities stand out for their higher coefficients: Konopiste<br />

(101.9); Orasac (105.1); Bogomila (108.9); Vitoliste (174.9) and Staravina (240.9). The situation is a consequence<br />

of the different intensity in the age dependency ratio decrease among young population,<br />

on one hand, and the increase of the ratio among the old population, on the other.<br />

The age dependency ratio of young population at national level underwent a significant change,<br />

as it went down from 38.8 to 31.9. The value of the indicator also decreased in all regions, the trend being<br />

particularly intensive in the Southwest (from 45.7 to 36.2) and the Polog (from 51.2 to 40.6) ones. The<br />

highest age dependency ratio of young population in 2002 is most typical for the regions and municipalities<br />

with younger population. Thence, it has the highest numerical value (between 50.1 and 54.6) in<br />

the municipalities of Zitose, Sipkovica, Studenicani, Zelino, Labunista, Delogozdi, Centar Zupa,<br />

Aracinovo, Velesta and Lipkovo, where the population is in the stage of demographic maturity. In the<br />

municipalities of Konopiste and Vitoliste, on the other hand, it is of lowest values (6.9 and 8.8, respectively),<br />

as there the population is at the stage of deepest demographic old-age. In more than a half of the<br />

municipalities, the age dependency ratio of young population is within the interval of 20.5 and 29.8.<br />

Unlike the previously analyzed ratios, there are movements in the opposite direction of the<br />

old people age dependency ratio– 60 and above, in relation to the working contingent. At a national<br />

level, it increased from 13.2 (1994) to 16.0 (2002). This change coincides with the intensification of<br />

the process of demographic aging. The trend is present in the majority of regions and municipalities.<br />

The Pelagonia, Vardar, Skopje, East and Southeast regions had a larger increase of the coefficient. It<br />

is relatively smaller in the Northeast region and the smallest in the Southwest and the Polog ones.<br />

In 2002, the values of the age dependency ratio of old population are rather high in the<br />

regions and municipalities with a negative or small population increase. They are the highest in the<br />

municipalities of Vitoliste (166.1) and Staravina (220.5) and higher than 50 percent in: Staro<br />

Nagoricane, Capari, Sopotnica, Bac, Samokov, Belcista, Klecovce, Bogomila, Orasac and Konopiste. At<br />

a municipal level, this indicator is the lowest in Aracinovo and Suto Orizari (6.9). In addition to these<br />

two municipalities, the ones with a relatively young population have an indicator lower than 10.0:<br />

Centar Zupa, Studenicani, Saraj, Kondovo, Lipkovo, Cegrane, Zelino and Negotino Polosko.<br />

The manifested huge regional differences at a municipal level suggest various consequences<br />

and implications resulting from the burden imposed on the working contingent. These are very<br />

important both in terms of the formation of the active contingent – the labor force, and in terms of<br />

the need to ensure funds for the various types of transfers for the young and old people.<br />

1.6. Population Structure by Declared Ethnicity<br />

Due to the multi-national structure of the population in the country, the population structure in<br />

terms of declared nationality is one of its significant structural features. The regional disparities in the<br />

scope, dynamics and population structure by nationality are analyzed on the basis of the ethno-statistical<br />

documentation of the population censuses (See Tables 10, 11 and 12 – Publication II).<br />

The 1994-2002 period is characterized by very large differences in the increase of the population<br />

by nationality. Namely, the number of Macedonians increased only by 2,017 persons (0.2 percent)<br />

and the average annual increase rate is 0.02 percent. The highest increase is that of the<br />

Albanians (67,979 persons or 15.4 percent), who have an annual increase rate of 1.79 percent.<br />

Thence, as much as 88.7 percent of the total population increase in Macedonia comes from persons<br />

who declared themselves as of Albanian nationality.<br />

31


The Romas (10,172 persons or 23.3 percent) and the Bosniaks (10,189 persons or 149.2 percent)<br />

stand out for their high absolute and relative population increase, while the increase is significantly<br />

lower among the Vlachs (1,094 persons or 12.7 percent). In the case of Turks and Serbs, the<br />

increase is a negative value, decreasing annually in average by 0.01 percent and 1.41 percent,<br />

respectively.<br />

This dynamics brought about large changes in the population structure by ethnicity in a relatively<br />

short time interval. At a national level, the Macedonians continue to dominate, although<br />

their percentage of the total population decreased from 66.6 percent (1994) down to 64.2 percent<br />

(2002). Of the other nationalities, the Albanians continue to account for the highest percentage<br />

(22.7 percent and 25.2 percent for the respective years). The percentage of the other nationalities is<br />

relatively lower. It is on the decrease in the case of Turks (4.0 percent to 3.9 percent) and Serbs (2.1<br />

percent to 1.8 percent), while on the increase among Romas (2.2 percent to 2.7 percent), Bosniaks<br />

(0.4 percent to 0.9 percent) and Vlachs (0.4 percent to 0.5 percent). The displayed changes in the<br />

increase and the ethnic structure of the population are in essence determined by the natural and<br />

mechanical movement of the population, but also by the changes in the declared ethnicity.<br />

The territorial distribution of the population by ethnicity at a regional and municipal level<br />

indicates that certain areas in the country are ethnically very heterogeneous, while others are more<br />

or less homogeneous. In this sense, the regions are rather favorable geo-demographic entities for<br />

observing the changes and the current situation in terms of the regional disparities in the national<br />

structure of the population in Macedonia.<br />

As regards the dynamics of the population by ethnicity, the following may be concluded: in<br />

the period between the two censuses in 1994 and 2002, the number of Macedonians grew in 37 and<br />

went down in 85 municipalities, with Velesta being the only municipality with no Macedonian population.<br />

The increase rates move between –16.69 percent (Bogovinje) and 25.99 percent (Negotino-<br />

Polosko). The situation among the Albanians is opposite, as their number increased in 57 and<br />

decreased in 22 municipalities. The average annual rates of increase are within the interval of –22.4<br />

percent (Strumica) to 19.1 percent (Demir Kapija), with Bogomila, Labunista, Dobrusevo and Novaci<br />

having rates of increase higher than 10.0 percent. In 2002, there was no Albanian population in 44<br />

municipalities. The number of municipalities in which the Turkish population is reduced is large (49);<br />

this ethnicity is on the rise in 35 municipalities, and there are 39 municipalities in which there are no<br />

Turks. The last census identified no Romas in 63 municipalities, increase of their number in 46 and<br />

decrease in 14 municipalities (the increase rates move between –12.26 percent in Rosoman to 32.06<br />

in Gevgelija). Vlachs live in one third (41) of the municipalities, while their number grew in 24 and<br />

went down in 17 municipalities. There are also large changes regarding the Serbs, who are present<br />

in 105 municipalities. In the majority (66) of those municipalities, their number decreased.<br />

In accordance with the ethnic structure of the population, the Pelagonia region was and still<br />

is a relatively homogeneous area, dominated by Macedonians, who constitute 85.9 percent of the<br />

population. In 2002, the percentage of other ethnic groups– Albanians, Romas, Vlachs, Turks and<br />

Serbs are: 4.9 percent; 3.1 percent; 0.5 percent; 3.2 percent and 1.8 percent, respectively. In all 19<br />

municipalities in the region, except in Zitose and Dolneni, the Macedonians are the dominant population.<br />

In addition to these two municipalities, a significant increase of the Albanian population is<br />

also typical for Krusevo and Capari.<br />

The Vardar region is also an ethnically homogeneous area, as the structure of the total population<br />

is predominantly consisted of Macedonians (87.9 percent), with 3.9 percent Albanians, 2.2<br />

percent Turks, 1.6 percent Romas, 1.5 percent Serbs and 0.3 percent Vlachs. The percentage of<br />

Macedonians is dominant in all municipalities of the region, being the highest in Izvor (99.2 percent)<br />

32


and the lowest in Caska (73.9 percent), where Turks (13.4 percent) and Albanians (7.5 percent)<br />

account for a higher percentage.<br />

Larger differences in the national structure of the population are typical for the Northeast<br />

region, where the Macedonians accounted for 59.1 percent of the population in 2002, the Albanians<br />

were 31.1 percent and where the percentage of Serbs (6.1 percent) is relatively high. Of the eight<br />

municipalities in the region, the Macedonians dominate in seven, who constitute from 59.6 percent<br />

(in Kumanovo) to 99.3 percent (in Orasac). Lipkovo is the only municipality where the Albanian population<br />

dominates (97.4 percent).<br />

The Southwestern region is of a rather heterogeneous ethnic structure of the population, in<br />

which the Macedonians account for 48.2 percent, Albanians for 37.3 percent, Turks for 9.6 percent,<br />

Romas for 1.3 percent, Vlachs for 0.5 percent, and Serbs for 0.3 percent. The Macedonian population<br />

dominates in Vranestica, Drugovo, Kicevo, Makedonski Brod, Samokov, Belcista, Kosel, Meseista,<br />

Ohrid, Vevcani, and in Lukovo, which is in 11 of the 20 municipalities in the region. Albanians dominate<br />

in Debar, Zajas, Oslomej, Velesta, Delogozdi and Labunista, while Turks constitute the highest<br />

percentage in Plasnica and Centar Zupa. The ethnic structure of the municipality of Struga is interesting:<br />

there, Macedonians account for 47.9 percent and the Albanians 41.5 percent of the population.<br />

Heterogeneous ethnic structure of the population is typical for municipalities in the Skopje<br />

region. Namely, Macedonians are dominant in 9 of the 16 municipalities, Albanians in four<br />

(Aracinovo, Kondovo, Saraj, and Studenicani) and Romas in one (Suto Orizari). The ethnic structure<br />

of the population is heterogeneous in Cair (48.6 percent Macedonians and 38.4 percent Albanians)<br />

and in Cucer-Sandevo (47.3 percent Macedonians, 22.9 percent Albanians and 28.6 percent Serbs).<br />

The municipalities in the Southeast and East regions are of a homogeneous ethnic structure,<br />

with the Macedonian population being dominant. Macedonians constitutes from 77.1 percent (Star<br />

Dojran) to 99.5 percent (Novo Selo and Podares) in the Southeast region, and from 79.8 percent<br />

(Karbinci) to 99.8 percent (Orizari) in the East one. Of the other ethnic groups, the Turks are the ones<br />

with higher representation. Their percentage is relatively high in the municipalities of Valandovo,<br />

Star Dojran, Konce, Radovis, Vasilevo, Murtino and Karbinci.<br />

The population is of a homogeneous ethnic structure in the Polog region, as well, but here<br />

with the Albanian population as dominant. The percentage of Albanians is higher than 50 percent<br />

in 16 (84.2 percent) of the total number of municipalities in the region. At the regional level, the<br />

Albanians constitute from 50.1 percent (Dona Banjica) to 99.4 percent (Negotino-Polosko). In 2002,<br />

the Macedonian population dominates in only three municipalities – Mavrovi Anovi, Rostusa and<br />

Jegunovce, where they account for 58.0 percent, 55.1 percent and 64.0 percent, respectively. Of the<br />

other municipalities, Turks are of a relatively high percentage, living in larger numbers in Vrapciste<br />

(36.5 percent), Rostusa (32.2 percent) and Dolna Banjica (29.2 percent).<br />

This ethnic structure of the population in certain regions in the country is also the reason<br />

behind the concentration of the two nationalities standing out for their dominant percentage of the<br />

total population. Namely, 70.5 percent of the Macedonians live in the Skopje, Pelagonia, East and<br />

Southwest regions. Almost all Albanians (96.6 percent) are concentrated in four regions: the Polog,<br />

Skopje, Southwest and Northeast ones.<br />

33


2. HOUSEHOLDS AND FAMILIES<br />

2.1. Basic Household Features<br />

2.1.1. Changes in the Total Number and Size of Households<br />

In 2002, there were 564,237 households in Macedonia, or 12.4 percent more than in 1994. As<br />

for the changes in the total number of households at regional levels, it may be concluded that this<br />

number had its largest increase (32.1 percent) in the Polog region. Above average increase is also<br />

typical for the Southwest (15.1 percent), Northeast and Skopje (12.7 percent) regions (See Table 13<br />

– Publication II). In the other regions, the number is lower in the Southeast, East and Vardar regions<br />

(10.6 percent, 7.8 percent, and 6.3 percent, respectively) and the lowest in the Pelagonia one (3.5<br />

percent).<br />

The household concentration, with certain small deviations, coincides with the population<br />

concentration. Namely, the percentage of households is lower than the percentage of population in<br />

the Northeast, Southwest and Polog region; it is almost at an equal level in the East rand higher in<br />

all other regions. In 2002, 29.0 percent of the total number of households was in the Skopje region,<br />

12.9 percent in the Pelagonia one, 12.3 percent in the Polog region, 11.4 percent in the East and 10.2<br />

percent in the Southwest region. The percentage of households in the other three regions –<br />

Southeast, Northeast and Vardar – is somewhat lower: 8.8 percent, 8.2 percent and 7.2 percent,<br />

respectively.<br />

The increase of the number of households is followed by a process of reduction of the average<br />

number of households, expressed in terms of average number of household members. In the<br />

period under observation, the average household members at a national level dropped from 3.9<br />

down to 3.6 members. In 2002, this indicator was of a bellow-average value in regions characterized<br />

by a decrease (the Pelagonia region) or a very small increase of the population (the Vardar, Southeast<br />

and East regions), where it is between 3.2 and 3.4 members. The average number of household<br />

members is also somewhat below the average in the Skopje region (3.5), while it is higher than the<br />

average in the Northeast(3.7) and Southwest (3.8) ones, being higher than 4 members only in the<br />

Polog region (4.4).<br />

At a municipal level, the average household size moves within a significant spread – from<br />

two (Konopiste) to six members (Dzepciste). In addition to Konopiste, other municipalities with an<br />

average number of household members are: Staravina, Vitoliste, Bogomila, Belcista, Orasac,<br />

Klecevce, Samokov, Sopotnica, Pehcevo, Vranestica, Izvor, Kosel, Drugovo, Bac and Staro Nagoricane.<br />

All of these municipalities are undergoing an intensive process of demographic aging. Unlike in<br />

those municipalities, the average number of household members is five and above in municipalities<br />

standing out for their higher natural population growth and younger population (Debar, Negotino-<br />

Polosko, Aracinovo, Lipkovo, Srbinovo, Velesta).<br />

The distribution of households by size indicates that the average number of members per<br />

household is up to 3.0 members in 23 (18.7 percent) of the municipalities, with an identical situation<br />

in municipalities where the number is between 4.1 and 5.0 members. In the majority of municipalities<br />

(73 or 59.3 percent), this indicator is between 3.1 and 4.0 members, while it is 5.1 and higher in<br />

only 4 (3.3 percent) of the municipalities.<br />

The displayed changes in the number of households and the current situation regarding<br />

their size – as a total and particularly at a regional level – are a result of the trend of households<br />

being brought down to the closest family members, decreasing number of children in a family (i.e.<br />

changes in the levels of births), as well as the intensive process of demographic aging. The values of<br />

34


the indicator are also under the influence of changes in matrimony, primarily the increase in number<br />

of divorced marriages. On the basis of several indications, it is our conclusion that the model of<br />

leaving the parent household is of a relatively lower significance.<br />

2.1.2. Household Family Structure Specifics<br />

In addition to size, another important feature of households is their family structure,<br />

expressed through the percentage of family and non-family households. The trend of a decrease of<br />

the percentage of family households in the total number of households is a result of the increase in<br />

the number of households of singles and cohabitation communities. Under Macedonian conditions,<br />

the changes manifested are of a lower intensity and primarily determined by the increase of the<br />

number of households of old-age singles.<br />

According to the data from the 2002 census, the percentage of family households (89.5 percent)<br />

remains dominant in the household structure in the country. This situation is typical for all<br />

regions, and the value of the indicator is between 86.8 percent (in the Pelagonia region) to 95.4 percent<br />

(in the Polog one) (See Table 14 – Publication II). At a municipal level, the regional disparities are<br />

considerably larger. Thus, the percentage of family households of the total number of households in<br />

the lowest in Konopiste (64.0 percent) and the highest in Dzepciste (98.7 percent). Due to the identified<br />

large regional differences, the family- and non-family households are observed in more details.<br />

2.1.3. Family Households<br />

Single-family households were and still are the dominant structure of households. In 2002,<br />

their percentage of the total number of households was 87.5 percent, somewhat higher than in 1994<br />

(83.8 percent). Although the percentage of single-family households prevails in all regions and<br />

municipalities, there are still evident regional differences.<br />

At a regional level, the percentage of single-family households in 2002 was lowest in the<br />

Polog, Southwest and Northeast regions (78.3 percent, 84.4 percent and 85.9 percent, respectively),<br />

while considerably higher in all other regions, where it is between 88.9 percent and 93.0 percent.<br />

Municipal disparities are considerably larger and the percentages of single-family households of the<br />

total number of households move within the interval of 57.2 percent (Dzepciste) and 98.3 percent<br />

(Vitoliste) and 98.2 percent (Konopiste).<br />

As the number of multi-family households in certain parts of the country is still large, it is<br />

interesting to look at the distribution of municipalities by their percentage of the total number of<br />

family households. In 2002, the percentage of multi-family households was lower than 10.0 percent<br />

in the majority of municipalities (51 or 41.5 percent), while moving between 10.0 percent and 20.0<br />

percent in 45 (36.6 percent) of the municipalities. Still, the number of municipalities (27 or 17.1 percent)<br />

in which the indicator is within the interval of 20.0 percent and 30.0 percent remains relatively<br />

large, while it is higher than 30.0 percent in as many as 6 municipalities.<br />

2.1.4. Non-family Households<br />

In terms of the family structure of households, the structure of non-family households is particularly<br />

interesting, both because of their scope and because of the regional differences related to<br />

this type of households. The number of households of singles dominates in the structure of nonfamily<br />

households without exception. At a national level, this type of households accounted for 91.1<br />

percent of the non-family households and is somewhat lower than in 1994 (92.1 percent).<br />

Observed by regions, the percentage of households of singles is higher than 90.0 percent<br />

in the Pelagonia, Vardar, Northeast, Southwest, Southeast and East regions, while it is lower in the<br />

35


Skopje (88.7 percent) and Polog (83.9 percent) ones. Regarding the municipalities, the percentage<br />

of households of singles of the total number of non-family households is between 67.9 percent<br />

(Negotino-Polosko) and 99.1 percent (Mogila). The distribution of municipalities by the numerical<br />

value of this indicator shows that it is higher than 90.0 percent in 83 (two thirds) of the municipalities,<br />

between 80.0 and 90.0 percent in 32 municipalities and lower than 80.0 percent in 9 ones. The<br />

percentage of households of singles is considerably high in municipalities characterized by intensive<br />

processes of demographic aging, i.e. municipalities whose population is in the higher stages of<br />

demographic age.<br />

Because of these situations, it is interesting to see the indicator of the percentage of households<br />

of singles of the total number of households. In 2002, it was 9.5 percent at a national level,<br />

whereas at regional levels it was: highest in the Pelagonia (12.3 percent), East (12.0 percent), Vardar<br />

(11.1 percent), Northeast (10.0 percent) and the Skopje (9.9 percent) regions, relatively lower and<br />

equal in the Southwest and Southeast ones (8.6 percent), and lowest in the Polog region (3.8 percent).<br />

According to the data in the last census, 5.0 – 10.0 percent of the population in 13 municipalities<br />

lives in households of singles. More than one tenth of the population lives in households of singles<br />

in the municipalities of Samokov (10.2 percent), Orasac (10.5 percent), Klecovce and Vitoliste<br />

(11.5 percent), Belcista (12.2 percent), Staravina (12.7 percent), Bogomila (13.3 percent) and<br />

Konopiste (18.0 percent). The population in all of these eight municipalities is in the stage of deepest<br />

demographic age.<br />

Regarding the non-family households with more than one member, it would be interesting<br />

to point to their relatively high percentage in certain areas of the country. Thus, according to the situation<br />

in 2002, their percentage of the total number of non-family households is relatively high<br />

(more than 20 percent) in Negotino-Polosko, Kondovo, Bogovinje, Delogozdi, Sipkovica, Vrapciste,<br />

Suto Orizari, Saraj and Lipkovo.<br />

2.2. Basic Family Features<br />

In relation to the changes in the total number of families in Macedonia, it may be concluded<br />

that this number rose from 539,555 to 574,159 in the period between 1994 and 2002, which is an<br />

increase of 6.4 percent. In 2002, the average number of family members was 3.3, while at a regional<br />

level it was lowest in the Pelagonia and East regions (3.1) and highest in the Polog one (3.5) (See<br />

Table 15 – Publication II). Unlike in the case of households, the differences between municipalities in<br />

terms of this indicator are not as significant. Its values are between 2.3 (Vitoliste) and 4.3 (Aracinovo).<br />

In terms of the family structure, the analysis focuses on the registered marriages, as the<br />

changes in the scope and dynamics of unregistered marriages were analyzed in the section on<br />

cohabitation. By type, families may in essence be divided into three categories: childless married<br />

couples, married couples with children and single parent families (mother or father with children).<br />

In 2002, one fourth (25.3 percent) of the total number of families in the country were childless<br />

married couples 11 . At a regional level, there are extremely large differences in the values of this<br />

indicator: from 23.1 percent and 23.3 percent (in the Skopje and Polog regions) to 29.3 percent (in<br />

the Pelagonia one). The percentage of childless married couples is particularly high in regions and<br />

municipalities undergoing a more intensive process of demographic aging and with a relatively high<br />

percentage of households of singles. Their percentage of the total number of families is higher than<br />

30 in 46 municipalities, being the highest in Vitoliste and Staravina, reaching about three quarters of<br />

the families. In all of these municipalities, the population is in the stage of deep or deepest demo-<br />

11<br />

According to the data, this indicator had a lower numerical value in 1994 (24.5 percent).<br />

36


graphic age. The percentage of such families is considerably lower in areas with younger population,<br />

especially in those in the stage of a demographic maturity.<br />

The structure of families was and still is dominated by the percentage of married couples<br />

with children: in 2002, this percentage totaled 64.5 percent and was insignificantly lower than that<br />

in 1994 (65.9 percent). At regional levels, the differences are smaller than the ones related to the percentage<br />

of childless married couples, as the values of this indicator moves within the interval of 61.7<br />

percent (in the Pelagonia region) to 65.3 percent (the Skopje region). The regional differences at<br />

municipal levels are rather large and correspond to the identified disparities with regard to the childless<br />

married couples. In the majority of municipalities (75 or 61.0 percent), the percentage of married<br />

couples with children is either lower than or equal to the one at the national level. In almost one<br />

third of the municipalities (40), their percentage is between 64.5 percent and 70.0 percent. This percentage<br />

is higher than 70.0 percent in eight municipalities: Lipkovo, Debar, Sipkovica, Kondovo,<br />

Zitose, Saraj, Studenicani and Aracinovo.<br />

Regarding the family structure, the indicator of the percentage of single parent families is of<br />

great significance. 8.7 percent of the families in Macedonia belong to this category, of which 6.9 percent<br />

are single mothers. In 1994, these indicators were 9.6 percent and 7.7 percent, respectively. The<br />

dominance of single mothers is typical for all regions and municipalities.<br />

According to the data on regional differences, the percentage of single-parent families is<br />

lower in the Vardar, Southeast and East regions, where it is 7.0 percent; it is higher in the Pelagonia<br />

region (7.8 percent) and the highest in the Polog, Southwest, Northeast and Skopje regions, where<br />

its values are 9.0 percent, 9.1 percent, 9.2 percent, and 10.1 percent, respectively.<br />

The percentages of single-parent families in the majority of municipalities are either equal to<br />

or lower than the national average. Still, it is worth pointing to the relatively large number of municipalities<br />

(19) in which this percentage is higher than 10.0 percent, i.e. between 10.2 percent and 18.9<br />

percent. These municipalities are: Staro Nagoricane, Plasnica, Cegrane, Kisela Voda, Cair, Srbinovo,<br />

Vranesnica, Rostusa, Lipkovo, Mavrovi Anovi, Lukovo, Samokov, Karpos, Vratnica, Vrapciste, Centar,<br />

Zajas (18.6 percent) and Labunista (18.9 percent).<br />

Concluding remarks and Recommendations<br />

The indicators related to the changes in the total population, the influence that the natural<br />

and migration movement have on its increase, then structural specifics of the population, as well as<br />

the size, dynamics, and percentages of individual types of households and families, in a very realistic<br />

way are illustrating the regional disparities in terms of the demographic development in<br />

Macedonia. The only serious lack of data is the one regarding emigration, particularly in the part<br />

related to migration movements from the country to foreign ones. Regarding the significance of the<br />

indicators related to life expectancy needed for Human Development Index estimation, as well for<br />

the following of the millennium development goals on a local level, the State Statistical Office<br />

should make effort to calculate these indicators on a lower level, i.e. on a level of regions.<br />

Certain findings about the trends of such movements at a municipal level may be found in<br />

the calculated migration figures in accordance with the vital-statistical method. For the purpose of<br />

identifying such trends more realistically, the recommendation is not to include the children born<br />

abroad in the number of newly born, because of the continuous increase in their size and number<br />

as a percentage of the total birth rate in the country.<br />

37


As there are a large number of indications of the rather high intensity of migrations out of<br />

the country over the last decade, there is an increasing need to provide relevant data about such<br />

migration movements. To this goal, a working group was set up in the State Statistical Office, which<br />

is developing a proposal on the possible ways of alleviating the problem related to the availability<br />

of such data on a longer-term basis. As this will require a longer period of time, the existing data<br />

base could be enhanced in the short-term by using foreign sources of data from countries of destination<br />

of Macedonian immigrants or from international organizations. Yet, those data would still not<br />

include information at municipal levels.<br />

38


CHAPTER TWO<br />

LIV<strong>IN</strong>G AND WORK<strong>IN</strong>G CONDITIONS<br />

1. HOUS<strong>IN</strong>G AND HOUS<strong>IN</strong>G FACILITIES<br />

1.1. Changes in the Total Number of Residences and Dwellings<br />

A rather significant indicator in the analysis of housing conditions is the percentage of residences<br />

that may not be treated as living premises according to the definition of an apartment, as defined under<br />

the methodology for census of the population. In this context, a ratio that is indicative is the one of the relation<br />

between the total number of residences, excluding the dwellings according to the mentioned definition<br />

and the number of dwellings.<br />

The data from the census of the population indicate that, regardless of the manifested changes,<br />

the percentage of residences in Macedonia that fail to meet the requirements for being treated as<br />

dwellings was and still is very low. Namely, their number in 1994 was 28 and in 2002 is 614. Thence, the<br />

indicators for the relation between the number of residences (excluding the dwellings) and the total number<br />

of dwellings are of very low values (0.0 percent and 0.09 percent). While there are certain small differences,<br />

this conclusion also applies to the indicators at the level of regions, groups of municipalities and<br />

municipalities.<br />

What should also be taken into account are the regional specifics in terms of the increase of the<br />

total number of residences in certain areas. In the period between the two censuses in 1994 and 2002, the<br />

total number of dwellings in Macedonia increased by 20.2 percent (Table 4). Typical for this indicator are<br />

the large regional differences. At a regional level, the increase of the number of dwellings is highest in the<br />

Polog region (33.8 percent) and lowest in the Pelagonia region(10.8 percent). The increase in the Skopje<br />

and East regions is smaller than the one at a national level, it is at the same level with the national in the<br />

Vardar region, and higher in the other three regions (Northeast, Southwest and Southeast).<br />

Table 4. Certain Indicators of Dwellings in Macedonia, 1994 and 2002<br />

Region<br />

Total number of<br />

dwellings<br />

Change<br />

(increase)<br />

in percent<br />

Percentage<br />

of<br />

dwellings<br />

built after<br />

1990<br />

Percentage of households with<br />

installations for:<br />

Water<br />

supply,<br />

sewage<br />

system,<br />

electricity<br />

and<br />

central<br />

heating<br />

Water<br />

supply,<br />

sewage<br />

system,<br />

and<br />

electricity<br />

Electricity<br />

only<br />

Percentage of households with<br />

installations for:<br />

Kitchen,<br />

bathroom<br />

and toilet<br />

Bathroom<br />

and toilet<br />

Kitchen<br />

only<br />

1994 2002 2002/1994 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002<br />

Macedonia 580342 697529 20.2 17.0 14.6 81.0 4.2 73.5 0.5 15.2<br />

Pelagonia region 84712 93857 10.8 12.8 11.1 84.6 3.9 68.5 0.3 19.3<br />

Vardar region 44247 53101 20.0 14.5 5.9 90.7 3.3 70.1 0.5 21.7<br />

Northeast region 47504 59430 25.1 17.2 3.6 84.0 12.1 52.6 0.3 25.6<br />

Southwest region 67253 84044 25.0 19.8 6.4 90.5 3.0 86.9 0.3 8.8<br />

Skopje region 161010 188196 16.9 15.2 35.4 61.8 2.6 85.1 0.7 6.8<br />

Southeast region 48128 59436 23.5 16.8 3.4 90.7 5.7 55.8 0.3 27.5<br />

Polog region 59099 79075 33.8 27.3 6.4 90.9 2.6 78.0 0.4 7.3<br />

East region 68389 80390 17.5 14.9 3.7 90.7 5.3 63.2 0.5 25.2<br />

Source: Census of the population, households and dwellings in Macedonia, 1994 and 2002, State Statistical Office<br />

39


During the period under analysis, the number of dwellings decreased in 11 municipalities,<br />

remained at the same level in one (Karbinci), and increased relatively slightly (less than 10 percent) in 19<br />

municipalities (See Table 16, Publication II). The total number of dwellings grew by more than one third<br />

in 29 municipalities, where the increase is within the interval of 33.9 percent (Oslomej) and 124.2 percent<br />

(Debar). The majority of these municipalities is in the Northwest part of the country. It should be<br />

born in mind, however, that a significant portion of these municipalities are typical emigration areas.<br />

1.2. Structures of Dwellings by Year of Construction<br />

The age of the available dwellings is an important indicator in the identification of regional<br />

differences regarding the living conditions. According to the data from the last census of the population,<br />

there are 697,529 dwellings in Macedonia, 35 percent of which built before 1971. This means<br />

that almost two thirds of the dwellings were built after this year, with 17 percent of the dwellings<br />

built after 1990.<br />

At a regional level, there are smaller or larger deviations (See Table 17 – Publication II). The<br />

percentage of dwellings constructed prior to 1971 indicates that the number of dwellings is older in<br />

the Pelagonia (44.4 percent), Vardar (42.9 percent), East (39.2 percent) and the Southeast (36.5 percent)<br />

regions; this percentage is at the level of a national average in the Northeast and Skopje<br />

regions. Due to the lower numerical values of the indicator in the Southwest and Polog regions (29.3<br />

percent and 21.2 percent, respectively), the conclusion is that the percentage of newer dwellings in<br />

these regions is rather high.<br />

The differences in the age of dwellings at a municipal level are considerable and correspond<br />

to a large extent to the increase of the population and the changes in its age structure. In this sense,<br />

the case of the Pelagonia region is rather indicative: there, the dwellings are oldest in the municipalities<br />

of Vitoliste and Staravina (the percentage of dwellings built before 1971 is 89.9 percent and 87.7<br />

percent, respectively), while they are relatively newer in the municipality of Zitose (25.3 percent). In<br />

the municipalities of the other three regions standing out for their older dwellings, these disparities<br />

are relatively smaller 12 . In the mentioned four regions, the percentage of old dwellings is relatively<br />

lower than in the majority of the municipal centers according to the old territorial division.<br />

Deviations in terms of this indicator are between 67.7 percent (Orasac) and 17.3 percent<br />

(Lipkovo). In the Skopje region, they vary between 50.2 percent (Suto Orizari) and 13.4 percent<br />

(Kondovo). In addition to Kondovo, the following municipalities also have a lower percentage of<br />

dwellings built before 1971: Aracinovo, Studenicani, Saraj, Ilinden, Zelenikovo, Petrovec, and Sopiste.<br />

Of the municipalities in the Skopje region, besides Suto Orizari, the municipalities of Centar (48.8<br />

percent) and Karpos (46.9 percent) also have relatively older dwellings.<br />

The inter-municipal disparities in the Southwest region are extremely large, in spite of the fact that<br />

this region, as a whole, has a lower percentage of dwellings built before 1971. Namely, of the twenty<br />

municipalities in the region, nine have a percentage of old dwellings higher than the national average:<br />

Vranesnica, Drugovo, Makedonski Brod, Samokov, Belcista, Kosel, Meseista, Vevcani and Lukovo. Velesta<br />

has the lowest percentage of old dwellings (9.6 percent), while this percentage is lower than 20.0 percent<br />

in the municipalities of Centar Zupa, Zajas, Plasnica, Delogozdi and Labunista.<br />

In the case of the Polog region, there is a large degree of homogeneity of the percentage of<br />

old dwellings. This percentage is rather low in 17 of the total of 19 municipalities in the region, with<br />

its value being between 8.5 percent (Cegrane) and 25.6 percent (Vrutok). Older dwellings are relatively<br />

more numerous only in Vratnica (38.7 percent) and Jegunovce (45.0 percent).<br />

12<br />

In the Vardar region, the percentage of old dwellings is between 68.5 percent (Bogomila) and 36.7 percent (Caska); in the Southeast<br />

region, it is between 58.5 percent (Miravci) and 24.4 percent (Star Dojran), and in the East one between 55.8 percent (Karbinci) and 28.3<br />

percent (Makedonska Kamenica).<br />

40


The number of dwellings built in the period following 1990 is 118,740, of which more than a<br />

half (56.2 percent) in the Southwest, Polog and Skopje regions. In terms of the number of these<br />

dwellings as a percentage of the total number of dwellings, it is highest in the Polog region (27.3<br />

percent).<br />

1.3. Specifics of Dwellings According to Use<br />

In terms of the use of the available dwellings, the most significant indicators are the percentage<br />

of occupied and unoccupied (vacant) dwellings, as well as the indicator of the percentage of<br />

dwellings occupied by their owners.<br />

In the period between the two censuses, the percentage of occupied in the total number of<br />

dwellings in Macedonia went down from 89.3 percent to 83.7 percent (See Table 16 – Publication II).<br />

The same trend is also typical for all regions, with the decrease being of varying intensity. It is the<br />

largest in the Vardar, Northeast, East and Pelagonia regions, relatively smaller in the Southeast and<br />

Southwest ones, and the smallest in the Skopje and Polog regions. At a municipal level, the percentage<br />

of occupied dwellings in 2002 was lowest in Mavrovi Anovi (20.1 percent), Konopiste (25.0 percent)<br />

and Vitoliste (29.7 percent), and lower than 50 percent in 9 other municipalities. The indicator<br />

is of the highest numerical value in Kamenjane (99.0 percent) and Bogovinje (99.4 percent).<br />

The percentage of unoccupied dwellings is increasing considerably. At a national level, their<br />

percentage in the total number of dwellings grew from 5.2 percent in 1994 to 9.3 percent in 2002.<br />

In 2002, this percentage was highest in the Pelagonia (13.6 percent) and Southwest (13.4 percent)<br />

regions, relatively high in the Vardar (11.6 percent), Northeast (11.2 percent) and East (9.0 percent)<br />

regions, lower in the Southeast (7.8 percent) and Skopje (6.8 percent) ones, and lowest in the Polog<br />

region (4.5 percent). Municipal disparities vary between 0.6 percent (Bogovinje) and 65.8 percent<br />

(Vitoliste). In 10 municipalities, the percentage of unoccupied dwellings is higher than 20 percent.<br />

In terms of the use of available dwellings, international comparative analyses usually make<br />

use of the indicator of percentage of dwellings occupied by their owners. In Macedonia, this indicator<br />

was 82.9 percent in 2002. At a regional level, this percentage varies between 76.3 percent (in the<br />

Southeast region) and 92.2 percent (in the Polog one). Observed at a municipal level, the disparities<br />

vary from 60.5 percent (Meseista) to 98.3 percent (Sipkovica). The percentage of dwellings occupied<br />

by their owners is lower than 70 percent in the municipalities of Zletovo and Konopiste, as well. In<br />

35 municipalities, it is between 70 percent and 80 percent, in 53 between 80 and 90 percent, and in<br />

32 higher than 90 percent.<br />

1.4. Household Structure According to Available Installations<br />

Another essential indicator of the living standard of a population in an area are also the available<br />

installations in the dwellings. On the basis of the data from the 2002 census, an analysis may be<br />

conducted of the regional disparities in terms of the number of households living in dwellings with<br />

central heating; water supply, sewer system and electricity; electricity only; and those living in<br />

dwellings with no installations at all.<br />

In 2002, 82,133 Macedonian households (14.6 percent of the total number) lived in dwellings<br />

with central heating (See Table 18 – Publication II). The percentage of this category of households is<br />

highest in the Skopje region (35.4 percent), and relatively high in the Pelagonia one (11.1 percent),<br />

as well. In the other regions, it is between 3.4 percent (in the Southeast region) and 6.4 percent (in<br />

the Southwest and Polog regions). Approximately 70.0 percent of the total number of households<br />

41


with central heating in the country is in the Skopje region, 9.8 percent in the Pelagonia one, and 9.7<br />

percent in the Southwest and Polog regions.<br />

In the majority of municipalities, households have no central heating in their homes. There<br />

are several municipalities with higher values of this indicator: Kondovo, Zajas, Makedonska<br />

Kamenica, Gostivar and Vrutok; in these municipalities, the number of households with central heating<br />

as a percentage of the total number of households is between 9.5 percent and 12.9 percent. In<br />

Gjorce Petrov, Gazi Baba, Cair and Bitola, this indicator is between 20.1 percent and 22.9 percent,<br />

whereas in Centar, Kisela Voda and Karpos, it is between 50.0 percent and 65.7 percent.<br />

The largest portion (95.6 percent) of the households in Macedonia live in dwellings with<br />

water supply, sewer system and electricity. At a regional level, this indicator is within the interval of<br />

87.6 percent (the Northeast region) and 97.3 percent (the Polog one). Unlike in the case of households<br />

with central heating, municipal differences in terms of this indicator are smaller. Namely, the<br />

percentage of households with such installation is lower than 50 percent in only three of the municipalities:<br />

Klecovce (35.2 percent), Orasac (41.7 percent) and Staro Nagoricane (44.3 percent).<br />

In Macedonia there are 23,833 households which have only electricity in their homes. Their percentage<br />

of the total number of households is highest in the Northeast region (12.1 percent). In the other<br />

regions, this percentage is lowest in the Southwest and Polog ones (2.6 percent) and highest in the<br />

Southeast (5.7 percent). Municipalities with a highest percentage of households with electricity only are<br />

Vitoliste and Rankovce (40.8 percent), Samokov (47.2 percent) and the three mentioned ones – Orasac,<br />

Staro Nagoricane and Klecovce, where the percentage is higher than 50.0 percent.<br />

The total number of households (510) with no installations at all in the dwellings is relatively<br />

small. The majority of such households are in the East (105 or 38.4 percent) and the Pelagonia (90)<br />

regions.<br />

1.5. Indicators of Existence of Auxiliary Facilities in Household Dwellings<br />

The data from the last census of the population show that almost three quarters of the<br />

households in Macedonia live in relatively well-equipped dwellings. Namely, 74 percent of the total<br />

number of households have a bathroom and a toilet in their dwellings, while 73.5 percent have a<br />

kitchen, bathroom and a toilet 13 . A small portion of the households (15.2 percent) have only kitchens<br />

in their dwellings, while 1.1 percent have no auxiliary rooms.<br />

The regional differences in terms of the existence of auxiliary facilities in dwellings are rather<br />

large (See Table 19 – Publication II). The percentage of households living in dwellings with bathrooms<br />

and toilets (78.4 percent - 87.2 percent), or kitchens, bathrooms and toilets (78.0 percent -<br />

86.9 percent), is the highest in municipalities in the Southwest, Skopje and Polog regions. These indicators<br />

are of a relatively lower numerical value in the Vardar, Pelagonia and East regions (63.7 percent-70.6<br />

percent and 63.2 percent-70.1 percent) and lowest in the Southeast and Northeast ones<br />

(55.8 percent-52.9 percent and 56.1 percent-52.6 percent).<br />

In 2002, Vitoliste was the only municipality in which no household had a bathroom and a toilet<br />

in the apartment. In the other municipalities, the percentage of households with bathrooms and<br />

toilets was from 1.3 percent (Staravina) to 98 percent (Karpos, Labunista and Velesta). In 48 municipalities,<br />

less than half of the households lived in dwellings with a bathroom and a toilet; this indicator<br />

has a value higher than the national average in 35 municipalities. The largest portion of those is<br />

in the Northwest part of the country, where the percentage of dwellings built after 1990 is also the<br />

highest.<br />

13<br />

Thence, the proportion of households that live in dwellings with bathrooms and toilets almost coincide with those with kitchen, bathroom<br />

and toilet. This regards all regions and all municipalities.<br />

42


The 2002 census registered 106,709 households (18.9 percent of the total number) with auxiliary<br />

rooms outside the apartment. The majority of them (80,890) had only their toilets outside the<br />

apartment, while 24,073 households had both their bathrooms and toilets detached from the apartment.<br />

The existence of such facilities in the dwellings is highest in the municipalities that were identified<br />

as areas with a relatively small percentage of auxiliary rooms in the dwellings.<br />

43


2. HOUSEHOLDS <strong>IN</strong>COME<br />

The data on the available income and expenditure of households are very important in the<br />

identification of the regional differences in the levels of living standard and poverty of the population.<br />

On the basis of these data, a large number of indicators could be computed to identify the<br />

mentioned differences.<br />

For the needs of mapping the socio-economic development of the municipalities, the following<br />

indicators are particularly relevant for the income: medium income per household; disparity<br />

of income among households (percentages of income or expenditures of the poorest 10 and 20 percent<br />

and the richest 10 and 20 percent of the households); the subjective opinion of the households<br />

on their financial situation; inequality of income expressed by the Gini index, as well as the inequality<br />

intensity (relation between the richest 20 percent and the poorest 20 percent of the households).<br />

As regards poverty, the key indicators would be the standard ones: the main aggregated index,<br />

poverty depth index and poverty severity index. As of recently, the human poverty index (HPI-2) is<br />

a poverty indicator of growing importance. Due to the problem of identifying one of the required<br />

components (adults at the age of 16-65 with no functional education), we believe that it will be difficult<br />

to arrive at HPI-2-relevant indicators at lower levels (regions, groups of municipalities, municipalities)<br />

in the near future.<br />

Currently, there are official data in Macedonia that are necessary for the calculation of the<br />

mentioned indicators of inequality and poverty only at a national level. Those are the data from the<br />

Household Budget Survey. The subjective opinion of households on whether their monthly income<br />

is sufficient to meet their needs indicates unfavorable changes. Namely, there is a decrease in the<br />

percentage of those who believe that their income meets their needs in full (from 3.7 percent in<br />

1998 to 2.1 percent in 2000), meets their needs for the most part (from 26.8 percent to 25.8 percent),<br />

and does not meet their needs for the most part (from 42.6 percent to 39.7 percent), whereas there<br />

is an increase in the percentage of those according to whom their income completely fails to meet<br />

their needs (from 27.0 percent to 32.3 percent). The Gini index values (for households) are: 0.258<br />

(1998); 0.286 (1999); 0,301 (2000), showing an increase of the inequality. The main aggregated index<br />

(calculated as a 70 percent of the medium equivalent costs) in the period 1998 – 2002 is: 20.7 percent,<br />

20.1 percent, 22.3 percent, 22.7 percent, and 30.2 percent for the respective years. It indicates<br />

that the poverty in Macedonia is in a trend of a continuous increase. The values of the poverty depth<br />

index by years are: 5.1 percent, 5.7 percent, 6.0 percent, 5.4 percent, and 9.3 percent, while the<br />

poverty severity index was 1.9 percent in 1998, 2.4 percent in 1999 and 2.4 percent in 2000.<br />

44


3. SOCIAL WELFARE<br />

When it comes to social welfare in the identification of regional disparities, the contemporary<br />

literature points to the so-called composite indices as relevant ones. They usually refer to the<br />

social benefit expenditures for various categories of population as a percentage of the total amount<br />

of social protection funds. Such are, for instance, the indicators for social benefit (in money and<br />

goods) for old-age, inability or survivor’s situations; illness – health care; family and children; unemployment;<br />

housing; social exclusion, etc. As there are no complete data on the amount of the various<br />

types of social compensation at municipal level, such or similar indicators may not be calculated.<br />

The data available usually refer to only one of the several categories of social compensations<br />

required for the calculation of some of the mentioned indicators, primarily at a national level or at<br />

the level of groups of municipalities (NUTS-4). Thence, the analysis applies only on the number of<br />

users of the various types of social welfare and only for the country as a whole, the regions and the<br />

groups of municipalities.<br />

3.1. Social financial aid and other forms of social welfare<br />

3.1.1. Social Financial Aid<br />

In Macedonia, citizens with no or with extremely low income are entitled to a social financial<br />

aid. It may be granted to households with a monthly income lower than the amount of the defined<br />

social financial aid, calculated as the difference between the total average income of all household<br />

members on all basis and the amount of the social financial aid.<br />

The data on the social financial aid refer to the number of households and number of<br />

household members. These data show that the number of households and citizens using this<br />

financial aid in Macedonia continually grew in the period 1998 – 2002 (Table 5). Over the period<br />

observed, the number of individual users of financial aid as a percentage of the total population in<br />

the country rose from 12.2 percent to 14.3 percent. In 2002, 14.7 percent of the total number of<br />

households used social financial aid.<br />

Table 5. Scope and Dynamics of Users of Social Financial Aid in Macedonia,<br />

1998 and 2002<br />

Regions<br />

Number of<br />

household<br />

heads (number<br />

of households)<br />

Number of<br />

household<br />

members (along<br />

with the head of<br />

the household)<br />

Increase<br />

(percent)<br />

of the<br />

number of<br />

household<br />

heads<br />

Increase<br />

(percent)<br />

of the<br />

number of<br />

household<br />

members<br />

Percentage of the<br />

number of<br />

household heads<br />

(Macedonia=100.0)<br />

Percentage of the<br />

number of<br />

household<br />

members<br />

(Macedonia=100.0)<br />

Individual<br />

financial aid<br />

users as a<br />

percentage<br />

of the total<br />

population<br />

Households<br />

users of<br />

financial<br />

aid as a<br />

percentage<br />

of the total<br />

number of<br />

households<br />

1998 2002 1998 2002 2002/1998 2002/1998 1998 2002 1998 2002 1998 2002 2002<br />

Macedonia 64160 82670 244356 288994 28.8 18.3 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 12.2 14.3 14.7<br />

Pelagonia region 9497 12639 33278 43281 33.1 30.1 14.8 15.3 13.6 15.0 13.6 18.2 17.4<br />

Vardar region 4781 5499 18491 19782 15.0 7.0 7.5 6.7 7.6 6.8 13.9 14.9 13.5<br />

Northeast region 6212 9461 22365 33736 52.3 50.8 9.7 11.4 9.2 11.7 13.2 19.5 20.4<br />

Southwest region 7363 8455 28349 29948 14.8 5.6 11.5 10.2 11.6 10.4 12.9 13.6 14.8<br />

Skopje region 15198 19222 63466 67659 26.5 6.6 23.7 23.3 26.0 23.4 11.2 11.7 11.7<br />

Skopje 15198 19222 63466 67659 26.5 6.6 23.7 23.3 26.0 23.4 11.2 11.7 11.7<br />

Southeast region 4178 5747 17465 21397 37.6 22.5 6.5 7.0 7.1 7.4 10.1 12.5 11.6<br />

Polog region 10023 14477 37372 49735 44.4 33.1 15.6 17.5 15.3 17.2 12.5 16.3 20.9<br />

East region 6908 7170 23570 23456 3.8 -0.5 10.8 8.7 9.6 8.1 11.5 11.5 11.1<br />

Source: State Statistical Office<br />

45


There was an increase in the number of households and individual users of social financial<br />

aid in all regions, with evident disparities in their intensity. In terms of the number of households,<br />

the increase is highest in the Northeast, Polog, Southeast, Pelagonia and Skopje regions, while it is<br />

relatively lower in the Vardar, Southwest and East ones. According to the indicators of the increase<br />

of number of household members, on the other hand, there is an insignificant decrease only in the<br />

East region (0.5 percent).<br />

The changes in the concentration of the mentioned two categories correspond to the intensity<br />

of their increase. In 2002, more than two thirds of the households (67.5 percent) and individual<br />

users of social financial aid (67.3 percent) were in the Skopje, Polog, Pelagonia and Northeast region.<br />

The most relevant indicators for the regional discrepancies in terms of the users of this type<br />

of aid, however, are their percentages of the total population and total number of households. In<br />

2002, the values of the indicators of the number of users as a percentage of the total population<br />

were highest in the Northeast, Pelagonia, Polog and Vardar regions. A relatively smaller portion of<br />

the population received financial aid in the Southwest, Southeast, Skopje and East regions. The second<br />

indicator shows that one fifth of the households in the Northeast and Polog regions were users<br />

of social financial aid. This percentage is lower in the Pelagonia, Southwest and Vardar regions, and<br />

lowest in the Skopje, Southeast and East ones.<br />

At the level of groups of municipalities, the disparities are even more severe (See Table 20–<br />

Publication II). Namely, in the period 998 – 2002, the number of households receiving social financial<br />

aid declined only in Sveti Nikole and Gevgelija; of those in which this number grew, Debar had<br />

the lowest increase (2.7 percent), whereas Strumica had the highest one (61.9 percent). The number<br />

is decreasing in seven municipalities: Sveti Nikole, Gevgelija, Berovo, Valandovo, Struga, Veles and<br />

Debar.<br />

The number of individual users of financial aid as a percentage of the total population is rather<br />

high in Probistip, Valandovo and Kumanovo, where it is about one fifth (19.9 percent, 20.1 percent<br />

and 20.6 percent, respectively), followed by Prilep (24.8 percent) and Debar (26.8 percent), while it is<br />

highest in Krusevo (30.3 percent). According to the numerical values of the indicators of the number<br />

of household users as a percentage of the total number of households, the following municipalities<br />

stand out: Debar (31.4 percent), Krusevo (29.9 percent), Prilep (25.1 percent), Kumanovo (22.0 percent),<br />

Tetovo (21.1 percent), Gostivar (20.4 percent), and Valandovo (20.2 percent).<br />

3.1.2. Recipients of Child Care Supplements<br />

Social benefits for children are special types of child protection. Currently, there are three<br />

types of benefits: children benefit, special children benefit and newly born aid.<br />

The children benefit is a one-month financial aid to low-income families. It is granted depending<br />

on the number of children in the family, the child’s age and the financial standing of the family.<br />

The data available in the State Statistical Office show that, in the period 1998 – 2002, the number of<br />

children and number of families who received this type of aid continually decreased. In 2002, the<br />

number of children users was lower by 17,380 than the number in 1998, and the number of families<br />

using the benefit went down by 7,628. This implies a somewhat greater reduction of the number of<br />

children users (24/2 percent) as compared to the number of families as users (20.6 percent).<br />

This trend is typical for all regions (See Table 21 – Publication II). The decrease is particularly<br />

high in the Skopje, Pelagonia, Vardar and Southwest regions (where the number of children and<br />

families using children benefits decreased by 25 percent and more), and lowest in the Polog region.<br />

Thence, the number of beneficiaries in the Polog region as a percentage of the total number of beneficiaries<br />

grew from 11.2 percent (1998) to 14.4 percent (2002) in the case of children and from 10.6<br />

percent to 12.8 percent in the case of families.<br />

46


At the level of groups of municipalities, there is an increase in the number of children beneficiaries<br />

only in Resen, Kratovo, Valandovo and Stip, while the number of families using benefits grew<br />

in Resen, Kratovo, Gostivar and Stip. In 2002, more than a third (34.0 percent) of the children and 29.2<br />

percent of the families using children benefits were in the municipality of Tetovo and the city of<br />

Skopje.<br />

The ones entitled to the right to a special children benefit are children with heavy, heavier and<br />

heaviest impediments in their psychological and physical development. In the period 1998-2002,<br />

the number of users continually grew and was 24.5 percent in the case of children and 29.7 percent<br />

in the case of families (See Table 22 – Publication II). At regional levels, the increase of the number of<br />

children using special children benefit is exceptionally high in the Southeast (44.8 percent), Vardar<br />

(33.1 percent), East (31.1 percent) and Skopje (28.0 percent) regions. The numerical value of this indicator<br />

of the number of families using benefits in these regions is 45.8 percent, 33.6 percent, 33.0 percent,<br />

and 35.0 percent, respectively.<br />

The number of users of special children benefit increased in all municipalities, except in<br />

Resen, Demir Hisar and Negotino. The regional differences in terms of the increase of the number of<br />

beneficiaries are rather large. In the case of children, they are between 6.1 percent (Struga) and 92.7<br />

percent and 100 percent (Kocani and Krusevo). In the case of families, they are between 4.7 percent<br />

(Delcevo) and 92.3 percent and 97.5 percent (Krusevo and Kocani).<br />

The newly born aid is granted to all first newly born and is mainly in the form of clothes. The<br />

data for this type of benefit show that the number of users was 20.7 percent higher in 2002 than in<br />

1998. Greater or smaller oscillations are typical for all regions and there was an increase of this category<br />

of users in all of them, except in the Southwest (See Table 23 – Publication II). It is relatively<br />

lower in the Vardar (3.3 percent), Northeast (5.0 percent) and East (6.2 percent) regions, while rather<br />

high in the Southeast (59.6 percent) and Skopje (49.1 percent) ones. At a municipal level, there was<br />

a reduction in the number of users in one third of them (11 municipalities). Of those in which this<br />

number increased, Probistip, Resen, Gostivar and Strumica are the ones with a higher increase.<br />

3.1.3. Underaged recipients of social welfare<br />

The total number of underaged recipients of social welfare in Macedonia grew throughout<br />

the period observed, except in 2000. In 2002, this number was 19,382 – 5.9 percent higher than in<br />

1998 (See Table 24 – Publication II).<br />

The regional disparities in terms of this category of social welfare recipients are rather large.<br />

The number of users declined in three of the regions (the Vardar, Skopje and Polog ones), being<br />

highest in the Pelagonia region (31.7 percent) and lowest in the Southwest one (8.5 percent). The<br />

number of underaged recipients of social welfare decreased in almost half of the municipalities (14).<br />

The Pelagonia region was and remained the one with the highest number of recipients as a percentage<br />

of the total number of recipients in the country (24.2 percent in 1998 and 30.1 percent in 2002).<br />

It is interesting to note that, according to the 2002 data, this percentage in the municipality of Bitola<br />

(17.2 percent) almost reached the percentage in the city of Skopje (17.7 percent).<br />

There are several categories of underaged recipients of social welfare, with the following<br />

being the most frequent ones: minors living in disturbed family conditions, minors with distorted<br />

behavior and personality, minors with impediments in their psychological and physical development,<br />

etc. At a national level, the largest increase in the number of recipients during the period<br />

observed was that of minors with impediments in their physical development (34.2 percent); the<br />

increase in the number of those living in disturbed families (10.5 percent) and those with impediments<br />

in the psychological development (6.3 percent) was relatively lower, whereas the number of<br />

47


ecipients with distorted behavior and personality is decreasing. Regardless of this dynamics in the<br />

structure of the total number of underaged recipients social welfare, the percentage of recipients<br />

coming from disturbed families (48.0 percent) was the highest in 2002, that of the ones with obstacles<br />

in their psychological development (20.5 percent) and of those with distorted behavior and personality<br />

(18.8 percent) was relatively lower, and the percentage of minors with impediments in their<br />

physical development (10.0 percent) was the lowest.<br />

During the period under observation, the number of recipients from disturbed families<br />

increased in all regions, except in the Vardar one, the increase being the lowest in the Northeast<br />

region (18.8 percent) and highest in the Pelagonia one (63.3 percent). The number of this category<br />

of recipients as a percentage of the total number of underaged recipients social welfare in 2002 was<br />

exceptionally high in the Southeast (61.1 percent), Pelagonia (59.9 percent), Polog (49.0 percent)<br />

and Skopje (47.5 percent) regions.<br />

Unlike them, the number of underaged recipients social welfare and with distorted behavior<br />

and personality is decreasing in all regions, except in the Skopje one, where it grew by 10.0 percent.<br />

In the structure of the total number of underaged recipients, this category constitutes the highest<br />

percentage in the Northeast region (2002: 44.5 percent) and between 1.6 percent in the Polog<br />

region and 23.7 percent in the Vardar one.<br />

In the Pelagonia, Northeast, Southwest, Polog and East regions, the number of underaged<br />

recipients social welfare increased. In the total number of under age recipients, this category constitutes<br />

a relatively high percentage in the Vardar (36.1 percent) and the Polog (35.7 percent) regions.<br />

The number of persons with impediments in the physical development, on the other hand,<br />

increased in all the regions, with the exception of the Northeast one. It is highest in the East, Polog,<br />

Southeast and Pelagonia region (where it is between 64.5 percent and 36.7 percent). In all regions,<br />

this category accounts for a small percentage of the total number of under age recipients of social<br />

protection.<br />

3.1.4. Adult Recipients of Social Welfare<br />

Unlike the underaged recipients social welfare, the number of adult recipients of social welfare<br />

had a continuous and a rather high absolute and relative increase over the period observed<br />

(18,431 persons or 64.1 percent). Half of the increase was in the Skopje region (9,079 persons), where<br />

the number of adult social welfare recipients increased more than three times (See Table 25 –<br />

Publication II). The increase in the other regions is characterized by large deviations – from 3.7 percent<br />

in the Southwest region to 91.3 percent in the Southeast one. Two thirds (65.9 percent) of the<br />

total number of adult beneficiaries in the country are from the Skopje, Pelagonia and East regions.<br />

In the case of adult recipients of social welfare, there are also four main categories: adults<br />

with behavior and personality disorders, adults with psychological and physical disabilities, materially<br />

unsecured persons, and materially and socially vulnerable old persons. In the period between<br />

1998 and 2002, the increase was highest among materially unsecured recipients (148.2 percent) and<br />

persons with psychological and physical disabilities (77.9 percent), while it was relatively lower<br />

among the materially and socially vulnerable old persons (38.3 percent). There was a decrease only<br />

in the number of persons with behavior and personality disorders. In 2002, the materially unsecured<br />

recipients (36.8 percent) and persons with psychological and physical disabilities (30.6 percent)<br />

accounted for the highest percentage of the total number of adult recipients of social welfare; the<br />

materially and socially vulnerable old persons constituted a relatively lower percentage (17.4 percent)<br />

and the ones with behavior and personality disorders the lowest (3.2 percent).<br />

48


On the basis of data available on the individual categories of adult recipients of social welfare<br />

at a regional level, it may be concluded that the changes and their percentage of the total number<br />

of recipients in essence correspond to those in the country as a whole. Namely, the number of<br />

recipients with behavior disorders and personality disorders is on the decrease in all regions, except<br />

in the East and Pelagonia ones (where the increase is 25.3 percent and 6.6 percent, respectively). In<br />

the structure of the total number of adult recipients, the percentage of this category is very low and<br />

varies between 0.3 percent in the Northeast and 8.5 percent in the Pelagonia regions.<br />

As for changes in the number of psychologically and physically disabled, the regional disparities<br />

are quite large. In the period 1998 – 2002, the Skopje region stood out for its huge increase of<br />

the number of this category of recipients – here, their number increased by more than ten times. In<br />

the Pelagonia, Vardar, Southeast and East regions, it is between 3.8 percent and 46.8 percent; it<br />

remained at the same level in the Polog region, and decreased only in the Southwest one. This category<br />

accounts for a relatively high percentage of the total number of adult recipients in the<br />

Southwest, Vardar, Skopje and Northeast regions, where it varied between 32.7 percent and 41.2<br />

percent.<br />

The materially unsecured adult recipients of social welfare increased in the Skopje region<br />

both in absolute and relative terms: their number in this region grew by approximately thirteen<br />

times. Thence, this region accounts for somewhat less then half (4,849 persons) of the total increase<br />

(10,359 persons) in this category. In the other regions, the increase was higher in the Pelagonia (82.5<br />

percent), Polog (65.6 percent) and East (65.0 percent) ones, relatively lower in the Vardar region (33.8<br />

percent) and lowest in the Northeast and Southwest ones (9.7 percent and 5.6 percent, respectively).<br />

The category of materially unsecured recipients dominates in the overall structure of the adult<br />

recipients in the Pelagonia, East, Skopje and Southeast regions.<br />

At regional levels, there are significant disparities in the changes in the number of materially<br />

and socially vulnerable old persons. This category had a lowest increase in the Southwest (3.0 percent)<br />

and Skopje (9.8 percent) regions, relatively higher one in the Polog, Vardar, Pelagonia, East and<br />

Southeast regions (varying between 36.1 percent to 79.8 percent), and the highest in the Northeast<br />

one (95.0 percent). This category of recipients is prevailing in the total number of adult recipients of<br />

social welfare only in the Vardar region.<br />

3.1.5. Recipients of Supplementary for Assistance Care<br />

The benefit granted on the basis of caring for others is one of the forms of social protection<br />

in Macedonia. The number of recipients of this type of supplementary is in a continuous and exceptionally<br />

large increase. Its number grew from 10,120 persons in 1998 to 21,423 persons in 2002, i.e.<br />

it more than doubled. It is worth noting here that the increase was considerably large between 2002<br />

and 2001 (from 13,895 to 19,197 persons).<br />

The regional differences regarding the changes in the number of social welfare recipients<br />

from this category are considerable. There is an increase in all regions and it was highest in the<br />

Northeast, Pelagonia and Skopje regions (See Table 26 – Publication II). Due to such dynamics, there<br />

were smaller or larger changes in the percentages that the regions constitute of the total number of<br />

recipients of benefits on the grounds of caring for others. In 2002, more than half (54.1 percent) of<br />

the total number of recipients were in the Skopje, Pelagonia and East regions.<br />

The number of recipients of supplementary for assistance care increased in all municipalities,<br />

mounting twice or several times in 12 of the 30 municipalities. Of those, Berovo, Kratovo,<br />

Kavadarci, Krusevo, Prilep and Kumanovo are the ones with the highest absolute and relative<br />

increase.<br />

49


3.2. Pension Insurance<br />

3.2.1. Total Number and Types of Pension Insurance Recipients<br />

The number of pension recipients in Macedonia continually increased over the past years. In<br />

2003, the total number of pensioners was by 22,051 persons or by 9.5 percent higher than that in<br />

1998. This increase was a result of the intensification of the process of aging of the active portion of<br />

the labor force. This conclusion is confirmed by the scope and dynamics of the recipients of various<br />

types of pensions. Categories with a relatively higher increase are recipients of old-age pension (11.6<br />

percent) and family pensions (11.7 percent), while those using pensions on the grounds of disability<br />

increased by a significantly lower percentage (2.0 percent). Irrespectively of these indicators, the<br />

absolute increase of the mentioned types of pensions was 13,814, 7,208 and 1,029 persons, respectively.<br />

Thence, the recipients of old-age pensions accounted and still account (2003) for the highest<br />

percentage (52.4 percent) of the total number of pensioners, the family pension recipients constitute<br />

a relatively lower percentage (27.1 percent), and the recipients of pensions on grounds of disability<br />

the lowest – 20.5 percent.<br />

In terms of regional differences in the increase of the number of pensioners, the analysis<br />

included only the total number of recipients of pension insurance (See Table 27 – Publication II), as<br />

those were the only data available. The data show that, at a regional level, this number was the highest<br />

in the Skopje (13.6 percent), Southeast (10.6 percent) and East (10.4 percent) regions and relatively<br />

lower in the other regions, where it varies between 8.8 percent in the Vardar region and 6.1<br />

percent in the Pelagonia one. The situation regarding the number of pensioners in individual<br />

regions as a percentage of the total number of pensioners is rather interesting. Namely, in the period<br />

under observation, it remained at the same level in the Vardar region; it was insignificantly<br />

reduced in the Northeast, Southwest and Polog regions, and slightly more so in the Pelagonia one<br />

(from 15.3 percent down to 14.8 percent). The number of pension recipients in the Southeast and<br />

East regions increased by 0.1 percentage points, and the increase was highest in the Skopje region,<br />

where it grew from 30.6 percent to 31.7 percent.<br />

The groups of municipalities are characterized by larger deviations in the increase of the<br />

number of pension recipients. Makedonski Brod was the only municipality in which this number<br />

decreased (-0.2 percent), whereas it varied between 0.5 percent (Kratovo) and 16.2 percent<br />

(Negotino). In three fifths (18) of the municipalities, the intensity of the increase in the number of<br />

pensioners is smaller than the one at a national level. The city of Skopje, Valandovo, Gevgelija,<br />

Delcevo, Vinica and the already mentioned municipality of Negotino are among the ones with a<br />

higher increase.<br />

3.2.2. Changes in the Average Pension<br />

In Macedonia, there is a continuous increase of not only the recipients of pension insurance,<br />

but of the amount of the average pension, as well. It went up from MKD 5,413 in 1998 to MKD 7,372<br />

in 2003, an increase of 28.2 percent. Regardless of this increase, it may be concluded that the average<br />

pension in Macedonia is rather low.<br />

In relation to the changes in the amount of pension at a regional and municipal level, it is<br />

worth noting certain differences (See Table 28 – Publication II). The increase of the average pension<br />

is lowest in the Polog (24.3 percent) and highest in the Skopje region (29.1 percent). In 2003, the<br />

average pension was highest in the Skopje region (MKD 8,893), while in the other regions it is relatively<br />

equal and between MKD 6,234 in the Polog region and MKD 6,978 in the Vardar one.<br />

50


At a municipal level, there are larger regional differences both in the number of pensioners<br />

and the amount of pensions. The increase of the average pensions is lower than that in the country<br />

as a whole in two thirds (20) of the municipalities, being at the lowest level in Krusevo (22.5 percent).<br />

Among those with a higher increase, it is considerably high in Delcevo (31.0 percent) and Kratovo<br />

(32.2 percent). The situation regarding the amount of average pensions is interesting. In 2003, it was<br />

lower than the national average in all municipalities, with the exception of Probistip (MKD 8,905) and<br />

the city of Skopje (MKD 8,893). Thence, it may be concluded that, due to the concentration of pensioners<br />

and higher pension amounts, the Skopje region, i.e. the territory of the city of Skopje to a<br />

large extent determines the amount of the average pension in Macedonia.<br />

3.2.3. Relation between the Number of Holders of Pension<br />

Insurance and the Number of Pensioners<br />

One of the most important indicators in terms of the mapping of the socio-economic development<br />

of the municipalities is the relation between the number of holders of pension insurance<br />

and that of pensioners 14 . Unfortunately, the only data available regarding this indicator are those at<br />

a national level. And those indicate rather unfavorable changes and situation: the number of<br />

employees per pension user is continuously decreasing. Namely, the values of this indicator went<br />

down from 1.6 in 1998 and 1999 to 1.5 in 2000, 1.4 in 2001 and 1.3 in 2002. These changes are<br />

brought about by the considerable decrease of the number of employees and the mentioned<br />

increase of the number of recipients of pensions during the period of observation.<br />

3.2.4. Pension Insurance Expenditure as Percentage of GDP<br />

Under the current condition of unfavorable economic situation in Macedonia, on one hand,<br />

and the trend of increase of the number of recipients of pensions and decrease of the number of<br />

employees, on the other, the percentage that the pension insurance expenditure constitutes in the<br />

gross domestic product is an important indicator. Again, the data available regarding this indicator<br />

refer only to the country as a whole. Its values show certain oscillations. Thus, in 1998 and 1999 the<br />

value was 10.6 percent, in 2000 and 2001 it went down to 10.4 percent, reaching its peak in 2002<br />

(10.8 percent) and the lowest point in 2003 (10.2 percent).<br />

3.3. Social Transfers for Unemployment<br />

3.3.1. Scope and Dynamics of Users of Financial Compensation<br />

A portion of the job seekers are also users of financial compensation. Under the Macedonian<br />

legislation, this right may be exercised on various grounds and thence the various categories of<br />

unemployed receiving financial compensation; these categories underwent certain changes 14 in the<br />

period 1998 – 2003. They remained the same in the last three observed years (2001, 2002, and 2003),<br />

when the right to financial compensation applied to unemployed on the basis of: bankruptcy, seasonal<br />

work, technological surplus in active companies, technological surplus in 25 loss-making<br />

enterprises, technological surplus in 12 loss-making enterprises, and reforms in the public administration.<br />

In the other years, there were certain deviations 15 . Due to the changes in the grounds on<br />

which the unemployed received this compensation in the period under observation, the analysis<br />

focuses on the scope and dynamics of the total number of such users.<br />

14<br />

It is calculated as a relation between the number of employees (holders of pension insurance) and the number of pension recipients.<br />

The indicators commented include data on the number of employees obtained from the State Statistical Office and those on the number<br />

of natural persons and individual farmers are obtained from the Pension and Disability Insurance Fund.<br />

15<br />

In the case of recipients of financial compensation, it should be taken into account that both the grounds on which it is received and<br />

the period during which it is received are different. This is primarily determined by the number of years of service.<br />

51


The data in the Employment Agency of Macedonia indicate that the number of users of<br />

financial compensation in 1998 totaled 40,173, decreased to 32,362 persons in 1999, and started<br />

increasing continually in the subsequent years, reaching 47,324 users in 2003. In the last year of<br />

observation, there was an increase of 16.2 percent as compared to the first one.<br />

There was a decrease in this category of unemployed only in the Pelagonia and Southeast<br />

regions (12.9 percent and 29.8 percent, respectively) (See Table 29 – Publication II). The decrease was<br />

lowest in the Skopje region (8.8 percent) and highest in the Polog one (59.9 percent). The East and<br />

Northeast regions also had a decrease higher than 50 percent. As a result of the different dynamics<br />

of the changes in the number of unemployed receiving financial compensation, there were also<br />

changes in the percentages that the eight regions constituted in the total number of users in the<br />

country. Thus, the percentage of the Pelagonia, Skopje and the Southeast regions declined, the one<br />

in the Vardar and Southwest regions increased insignificantly, the one in the Northeast (2.7 percentage<br />

points) and Polog (1.1 percentage points) regions was somewhat higher, while the percentage<br />

of the East region (6.0 percentage points) was the highest. Thence, according to the data available<br />

for 2003, the percentage that the East region (22.5 percent) constituted in the total number of users<br />

of financial compensation is coming close to the one in the Skopje region (23.8 percent).<br />

Disparities on the level of groups of municipalities are even more severe. In 11 municipalities,<br />

there was a decrease of the number of unemployed from this category and their percentage<br />

was between 2.3 percent (Kicevo) and 57.4 percent (Strumica). Of the municipalities in which the<br />

number increased, this increase was the lowest in Skopje (8.8 percent) and the highest in Kratovo<br />

(183.6 percent). In addition to Kratovo, there was also a rather significant increase in the municipalities<br />

of Vinica, Probistip, Veles, and Kocani.<br />

3.3.2. Changes in the Number of Users of Health Insurance<br />

Among the social transfers on the grounds of unemployment, the health insurance is the<br />

one with the largest number of users. As the previously analyzed category, the users of financial<br />

compensation, are also health insurance beneficiaries, we believe that the analysis should include<br />

the total number, instead of only persons using only health insurance.<br />

The number of unemployed using health insurance continually increases in significantly<br />

large absolute and relative terms. In the period between 1998 and 2003, their number grew by<br />

46,653 persons or 24.4 percent, reaching 238,123 persons in December 2003. Today, it is widely<br />

accepted that there is a great number of those registering as unemployed only for the purpose of<br />

obtaining the right to health insurance.<br />

At a regional level, there is an increase in all regions, but this increase is of various intensities.<br />

The increase is lower than the national average in the Southwest, Skopje, Pelagonia and Vardar<br />

region (11.8 percent, 14.0 percent, 15.2 percent and 20.7 percent, respectively); it is almost the same<br />

as the national average in the Southeast one (24.3 percent) and higher in the East (28.5 percent) and<br />

the Northeast (32.4 percent) regions. The increase is rather large in the Polog region – 62.1 percent<br />

(See Table 30 – Publication II). Due to this dynamics, the number of users from this category as a percentage<br />

of the total number of users in the country decreased in the Pelagonia, Vardar, Southwest<br />

and Skopje regions, remaining at the same level in the Southeast one. The increase was highest in<br />

the municipalities in the Polog region and relatively lower in the Northeast and East ones.<br />

As regards municipalities, there was an increase in all of them, except in Debar, where the number<br />

of unemployed users of health insurance declined by 25.6 percent. The increase is exceptionally high in<br />

Resen (55.9 percent), Kratovo (73.4 percent), Gostivar (88.5 percent) and Probistip (91.3 percent). There was<br />

a very small increase in Gevgelija (0.1 percent), Sveti Nikole (3.2 percent) and Radovis (6.7 percent).<br />

52


3.3.3. Other transfers on the basis of unemployment<br />

One of the rights to insurance in case of unemployment is also the right to undergo programs<br />

aimed at preparing unemployed persons for employment, which is secured and defined in<br />

the Law on Employment and Insurance in Unemployment as well as in the Rulebook on Training, Re-<br />

Qualification and Further Qualification. Due to the changes in the manner of exercising this right<br />

and the manner of presenting data, it would be difficult to conduct and in-depth analysis of this category<br />

of unemployed at a regional level in the period observed. Namely, the data refer to the number<br />

of approved programs for preparing the unemployed for employment by activity of the employer<br />

and by employment agencies. The data available for the past few years show that 295 such programs<br />

were approved in 2000, 266 programs were implemented in 2001 and additional 91 programs<br />

in 2002. The number of persons included in the programs is 6,542 (2000), 4,098 (2001), and 1,806<br />

(2002).<br />

There were two occasions in Macedonia (in 1998 and 2003) when the Law on Stimulating<br />

Employment by means of exempting employers from the obligation to pay social and pension contributions<br />

was enacted and implemented; this exemption applied only on certain categories of<br />

unemployed. In this way, 35,128 persons were employed in 1998 and14,480 in 2003.<br />

Concluding remarks and Recommendations<br />

The available information data base for identification of regional disparities in the living and<br />

working conditions in the area of housing and housing facilities may also be regarded as solid. The<br />

significant missing data would be those related to households’ possession of: telephones, mobile<br />

telephones, one or more TV sets, personal computers and Internet. These data could be used to<br />

compute several significant indicators (number of Internet connections per 1,000 citizens, main telephone<br />

lines per 1,000 citizens, etc.), which are increasingly used in international analysis.<br />

In terms of identifying the regional differences in the living and working conditions, the<br />

availability of official data on the income and expenditures of households is rather unfavorable, as<br />

those data are available only at a national level. The situation will soon be improved by redesigning<br />

the sample questionnaire on household expenditures, which is underway. Under the existing conditions<br />

of considerable inequality and poverty increase, this will provide relevant and quite useful<br />

indicators at a regional level (NUTS 3).<br />

The redesign of the questionnaire will also ensure data for all eight regions regarding the<br />

previously mentioned indicators of facilities available in households. Namely, the data available at a<br />

national level related to households in possession of telephones, cellular telephones, TV sets, personal<br />

computers and so on, will be obtained from the part of the Questionnaire on expenditures of<br />

households dealing with households’ possession of lasting consumer goods.<br />

Regarding the data on social protection of the population, as a result of the heterogeneity of<br />

the issue, it is our recommendation to design a data base and to introduce regular statistical<br />

research (similar to the one on migrants to and from the country). This would enable collection and<br />

processing of all data in this area in a single place, instead of maintaining them in various institutions,<br />

as is the case currently. At the same time, this would contribute to eliminating the existing<br />

practice of having different data about the same category of users. The data should refer to both the<br />

number of users and the financial means spent for specific purposes. The Ministry of Labor and<br />

Social Policy and the State Statistical Office should be the institutions in charge of such a project.<br />

53


4. HEALTH CARE<br />

4.1. Basic Healthcare Features of the Community<br />

The healthcare system in the country is organized in the form of health institutions, both in<br />

public and private ownership. There are three levels of health care: primary, secondary and tertiary.<br />

The primary level of health care is carried out in primary health centers, both in rural and urban<br />

areas, by services for: children of up to 6 years of age; school children and adolescents; women; and<br />

industrial medicine. The secondary level of health care is realized in hospitals and polyclinics, whereas<br />

the tertiary level is fully carried out in the university institutions in Skopje.<br />

In 2002, there were a total of 145 16 publicly owned health institutions at the disposal of all<br />

citizens in the Macedonia. Of those, 59 percent are primary healthcare institutions or outpatient<br />

units, 38 provide secondary health care, and 48 institutions are engaged in tertiary healthcare.<br />

Comparatively, this number was higher in 1999 and 2000 by one health institution (at the primary<br />

level) and by two institutions (one at each of the primary and secondary level), whereas in 1998 and<br />

2001, the number was lower by one health institution in total. The number of pharmacies in the<br />

mentioned period was almost constant – 40 – except in the year 1999, when there were a total of 41<br />

publicly owned pharmacies.<br />

In 2002, there were a total of 335 dentists practices, remarkably less than in 1999 (359<br />

practices) and in 1998 (344), but 7 more than in 2000. In spite of the small fluctuations in the number<br />

of health institutions at the primary level, according to the criteria defined by the healthcare<br />

organizations 17 , all citizens have access to health institutions for primary care.<br />

Table 6. Separate Health Indicators<br />

Number per 100,000<br />

citizens<br />

Health centers<br />

Primary level 59<br />

Secondary level 38<br />

Tertiary Level 48<br />

Total 145<br />

Pharmacies (autonomous) 40<br />

Dentist practices 335<br />

Doctors of medicine 4.573 226,10<br />

Dentists 1.183 58,49<br />

Holders of B.A. in pharmaceutics 322 16,41<br />

Specialists 2.954 146,05<br />

Nurses 6.714 331,96<br />

The data related to the number of staff indicate that there are 226.10 doctors, 58.49 dentists,<br />

16.41 pharmacists, 331.96 nurses, and 483.05 beds per 100,000 citizens. (See Table 6)<br />

4.2. Primary Level Health care<br />

This is the first level of health care provided in outpatient units, while hospitals are in charge<br />

of secondary and tertiary protection. In the Macedonia, the primary level health care is carried out<br />

in: 6 health stations (5 in Skopje and one in Tetovo); 18 health centers (2 in Skopje and Berovo<br />

16<br />

Due to data availability, our analysis will only refer to publicly owned health organizations, despite the fact that there is also healthcare<br />

in private ownership in the country.<br />

17<br />

The population with access to healthcare institutions is the population that may arrive at a healthcare organization or receive services<br />

of a doctor in their home within a timeframe shorter than 30 minutes.<br />

54


each, and 1 in each of the municipalities of Makedonski Brod, Valandovo, Vinica, Gostivar, Delcevo,<br />

Demir Hisar, Kratovo, Krusevo, Negotino, Probistip, Radovis, Resen, Sveti Nikole and Struga); 16 medical<br />

centers (one in each of: Bitola, Gevgelija, Gostivar, Debar, Kavadarci, Kicevo, Kocani, Kriva<br />

Palanka, Kumanovo, Ohrid, Prilep, Struga, Strumica, Tetovo, Veles and Stip); and 11 outpatient units<br />

(one in each of Makedonski Brod, Valandovo, Vinica, Delcevo, Kratovo, Negotino, Probistip, Radovis,<br />

Sveti Nikole, Struga, and Strumica).<br />

As it may be noticed, all activities of the primary health care are included in each healthcare<br />

center, which correspond to the distribution at a level of 30 municipalities. Primary health care is<br />

provided in 293 villages.<br />

Of the total number of general practice units (462), the largest portion – 94 – are in Skopje,<br />

33 are in Bitola, Kumanovo and Tetovo have 24 each, 22 are in Strumica, and Prilep, Gostivar and<br />

Veles have 20 such units each. The remaining units are allocated in such a way that they vary<br />

between 17 in Struga and 2 in Probistip and Krusevo. Within the mentioned healthcare centers,<br />

there are special medical units in the villages, with a total of 152 permanent and 121 with temporary<br />

physicians available. The majority of medical units in the villages have a permanent physician on site,<br />

with the exception of the municipalities of Valandovo, Kratovo and Krusevo, which have medical<br />

units with temporary physicians. At a municipal level, all medical units in the villages are with a permanent<br />

physician: there are a total of 23 such units in Skopje, 15 in Strumica, 6 in Debar, 4 in Kocani,<br />

5 in Ohrid, 2 in Makedonski Brod, and 1 in Demir Hisar and Probistip each. In the other municipalities,<br />

the structure is mixed. Of the total of 77 labor medicine units, 22 are in Skopje, 7 in Bitola, and<br />

6 in Ohrid. The remaining municipalities have between 1 and 3 units, with the exception of Kratovo<br />

and Demir Hisar, which have no such units. There are health care units for children of up to 6 years<br />

of age in all municipalities: of the total of 84 such units, 20 are in Skopje, 9 in Struga, 5 in Bitola and<br />

between 1 and 5 in the other municipalities. Out of the total 63 units for health care of school children<br />

and adolescents, 16 are in Skopje, 13 in Bitola, and between 1 and 2 in the other municipalities.<br />

Health care for women is provided at a total of 50 units, of which 16 are in Skopje and 1 – 2 in the<br />

other municipalities. (Table 31, Publication II)<br />

Citizens also have at their disposal 555 privately owned medical practices, with the largest<br />

number of them being in Skopje (134), Tetovo (34), Kumanovo (26), Strumica (20), Veles (15), Gostivar<br />

and Struga (14), Bitola and Ohrid (13), and Stip (10). As opposed to this, there is only one such practice<br />

in each of the municipalities of Delcevo, Demir Hisar, Kratovo, Kriva Palanka and Resen.<br />

Out of the total number of 335 dental practices, 100 (30 percent) are in Skopje, 43 in Bitola,<br />

28 in Prilep, 21 in Tetovo, 19 in Veles, 14 in Kumanovo, 12 in Gostivar and 11 in Ohrid. In the other<br />

cities, there are less than 10 dental practices. In parallel, there are a total of 449 dentists’ offices, of<br />

which the majority (236) is in Skopje, 27 are in Strumica, 25 in Bitola, and 24 in Tetovo. (Table 31,<br />

Publication II)<br />

Out of the total of 40 pharmacies in public ownership in the country, 3 are in Skopje, and<br />

2 in Kocani, Kicevo, Kavadarci, Gevgelija, Gostivar, Veles, Bitola, and Berovo. The remaining health<br />

centers have one pharmacy each. There are a total of 392 privately held pharmacies, of which 169<br />

in Skopje, and one in Valandovo, Kratovo and Probistip each. In the other municipalities, the number<br />

of privately owned pharmacies varies: there are 29 in Kumanovo, 21 in Gostivar, 20 in Bitola, and<br />

as little as up to two in Berovo, Kriva Palanka and Sveti Nikole. (Table 31, Publication II)<br />

The allocation of general practitioners at the primary level health care is illustrated in Table<br />

32, Publication II.<br />

At the national level, 47 general practitioners per 100,000 citizens provided primary health<br />

care. This number is the lowest (19) in Tetovo (the Polog region), Kumanovo (Northeast region – 23),<br />

55


Struga (Southwest region – 27), Kriva Palanka (Northeast region – 28), Makedonski Brod (Southwest<br />

region – 77), and Bitola (72) and Resen (71), both in the Pelagonia region.<br />

At the level of primary health care, there were a total of 3.8 registered specialists per<br />

100,000 citizens. Of those, the lowest number of specialists per 100,000 citizens is located in the following<br />

municipalities, i.e. health regions: 16 in Gostivar (the Polog region), 17 in Kumanovo<br />

(Northeast region), 19 in Kocani (East region), 19 in Strumica (Southeast region), 19 in Tetovo (the<br />

Polog region), 26 in Makedonski Brod (Southwestern region) and 28 in Prilep (Pelagonia region).<br />

Contrary to this, the highest number of specialists is located in: Resen – 83 (Pelagonia region), Bitola<br />

(Pelagonia region) and Berovo (east region) - 82, Ohrid – 72 (the Southwest region), Valandovo – 59<br />

(Southeast region) Sveti Nikole – 56 (East region), Gevgelija – 54 (Southeast region), Demir Hisar – 53<br />

(Pelagonia region), and in Probistip – 49 (East region). (Table 32, Publication II)<br />

There were 1.6 holders of B.A. in pharmaceutics per 100,000 citizens. The discrepancy<br />

varies between no pharmacists in Debar (Southwest region) to 42 ones in Resen (Pelagonia region).<br />

The following health regions have less than 10 pharmacists: Gostivar and Tetovo – Polog region (3 in<br />

each), Radovis – Southeast region (3), Kicevo – Southwest region (4), Probistip – East region (6), Kriva<br />

Palanka – Northeast region (8), Makedonski Brod - Southwest region (9), and Sveti Nikole - East<br />

region (9). The largest number of pharmacists is registered in Resen (42), Bitola – Pelagonia region<br />

(38), Veles – Vardar region (29), Berovo – East region (26), Ohrid – Southwest region (26), and Krusevo<br />

– Pelagonia region (25). (Table 32, Publication II)<br />

At a national level, there are 5.0 registered dentists per 100,000 citizens. The majority of<br />

them (136) are registered in Bitola (Pelagonia region), and the smallest number (12) is in Debar<br />

(Southwest region). The following municipalities have a number of dentists significantly below the<br />

national average: Gostivar (western region) – 28, Kriva Palanka (Northeast region) – 28, Radovis<br />

(Southeast region) – 28, Struga (Southwest region) – 29, Tetovo (Polog region) – 29, and Kumanovo<br />

(Northeast region) – 30. Their number is considerably above the national average in Demir Hisar (95),<br />

Resen (95), and Prilep (82), all in the Pelagonia region. (Table 32, Publication II)<br />

At a national level, there are 23.6 nurses per 100,000 citizens in the primary healthcare.<br />

They are lowest in numbers in Tetovo (Polog region) and Debar (Southwest region) – 161 nurses, and<br />

Kumanovo (Northeast region) and Kocani (East region) – 178. The largest number of nurses is located<br />

in Berovo (East region)- 473, Valandovo (Southeast region) and Resen (Pelagonia region) – 416,<br />

Demir Hisar (Pelagonia region) – 411, Negotino (Vardar region) – 379, Gevgelija (Southeast region) –<br />

367, and Sveti Nikole (East region) – 347. (Table 32, Publication II)<br />

According to the analysis conducted by the State Public Health Institute, such a structure of<br />

the general practice staff is insufficient 18 . In addition to the discrepancies registered at municipal<br />

levels in the previous analysis, the mentioned report also states a notable disparity in terms of the<br />

staff available in urban and rural areas, as well as a situation in the villages characterized by insufficient<br />

staff according to the adopted norms regarding staff in the general practice services 19 .<br />

In 2002, there were 31,658 registered consultations per 100,000 citizens, less than in<br />

2000 (32,493) and 1999 (32,558), and more than in 2001 (30,224) and 1998 (30,302). The smallest<br />

number of visits was recorded in Kumanovo (Northeast region) – 175,260 and Tetovo (Polog region)<br />

– 180,121 visits, while their number was highest in Resen (Pelagonia region) – 439,834, Valandovo<br />

(Southeast region) – 437,721, Bitola (Pelagonia region) – 427,055, Prilep (Pelagonia region) –<br />

415,566, and Delcevo (East region) – 410,876. (Table 32, Publication II).<br />

18<br />

See for more details: Report on the Health Condition and Health care of the Population in Macedonia in 2002 (2004), Public Health<br />

Institute, pp. 55-56.<br />

19<br />

Ibid.<br />

56


The number of visits by dentists per 100,000 citizens in 2002 was 52,464. In terms of their<br />

distribution by health regions, they are smallest in number in Debar (Southwest region) – 12,482,<br />

Delcevo (East region) – 18,755, Stip (East region) – 22,587, Tetovo (Polog region) – 25,543, and<br />

Gostivar (Polog region) – 39,996. Contrary to this, the number of such visits was above the average<br />

in Berovo (East region) – 117,592, Valandovo (Southeast region) – 95,660, Radovis (Southeast region)<br />

– 75,623, and Bitola (Pelagonia region) – 74,176. (Table 32, Publication II)<br />

The health of children at the age of up to 6 years is protected and taken care of at health centers,<br />

particularly at health centers for pre-school (at the age of 0 – 6) and school children (between<br />

7 and 14 years of age). The data regarding this part of the health care are presented in Table 34,<br />

Publication II.<br />

In 2002, there were 84 counseling centers for pre-school children, which is two more than in<br />

2000 and one less than in 1998. By health regions, the allocation is as follows: out of the total of 84<br />

counseling centers, 20 are registered in Skopje, 9 in Struga, 8 in Bitola, 5 in Kumanovo and Prilep<br />

each, 4 in Veles and Gostivar, and 1 – 2 in all other health centers. While the number of offices and<br />

counseling centers for pre-school children in Skopje is reduced from 26 in 1998 and 1999 to 20 in<br />

2000, 2001, and 2002, it tripled in Struga (there were 3 in 1998 and 1999, and 9 in 2000, 2001, and<br />

2002). (Table 34, Publication II)<br />

In 2002, there were 165 pediatricians in Macedonia; their number was constantly rising over<br />

the past four years (135 in 1998, 158 in 2000). There is an increase of the number of pediatricians in<br />

all regions individually. Out of the total of 165 pediatricians, 47 are in Skopje, 22 in Bitola, 13 in Ohrid,<br />

and 10 in Tetovo. Makedonski Brod, Demir Hisar, Kocani, Kratovo, Kriva Palanka, and Probistip are<br />

municipalities in which there is only one registered pediatrician. (Table 33, Publication II)<br />

In 2002, out of the total of 435 nurses in the health care of pre-school children, 24 percent (106<br />

nurses) were in Skopje, 10 percent (45) in Tetovo, and 6 percent in Bitola. Kratovo and Demir Hisar<br />

are regions with the smallest number of nurses. While Gostivar may be an example of fluctuations in<br />

the number of nurses over the past four-year period (39 in 1998, 54 in 2000, and 28 in 2002), Skopje<br />

is an example of a region with a small, but constant decrease of this number (125 in 1998 and 106 in<br />

2002). (Table 33, Publication II)<br />

There is also a constant decline in the number of general practitioners in the health care of children.<br />

And again, it is happening in the capital: the number of general practitioners in Skopje<br />

decreased from 95 in 1998 to 63 in 2002, which at the same time accounts for 60 percent of the total<br />

number of registered general practitioners in the health care of children in 2002 in the country. In<br />

the 14 regions in the country, there are no general practitioners for health care of pre-school children.<br />

(Table 33, Publication II)<br />

The number of visits for the purpose of systematic checks of children was 11,313, while the<br />

number of visits per 100,000 sick pre-school children was 61,197. According to the information in<br />

the reports of the Office for Health care of Mothers and Children, the staff structure is sufficient to<br />

fully cover for the needs of the population in terms of carrying out preventive measures for health<br />

care of both the newly born and small children. Of the total number of visits in counseling centers for<br />

children at the age of up to 6 years (200,291 visits), 43 percent took place in Skopje, 145 in Bitola, 4 percent<br />

in Veles, and 3 percent in Prilep, Strumica and Tetovo each. No such visits were registered in<br />

Debar. As regards the number of visits at the GP’s office, 33 percent (of the total of 1,083,487) of such<br />

visits took place in Skopje, almost 8 percent in Prilep, and 6 percent in Bitola. The number of such visits<br />

is smallest in Kratovo – 329, or 0.03 percent of the total number. (Table 34, Publication II)<br />

In 2002, there were 63 health centers for school children (at the age of 7 – 19) in the country.<br />

Compared to all three previous years, this number was lower: there were 80 such centers in 1998,<br />

57


76 in 1999, 78 in 2000, and 71 in 2001. Skopje and Bitola are cities with 46 percent (25 percent and<br />

21 percent, respectively) of the total of 63 health centers for school children and adolescents. All<br />

other regions have one or two such centers. (See Table 8)<br />

As regards the number of general practitioners, school children physicians and nurses in the<br />

primary protection of school children and adolescents, the fact is that the highest percentage of the<br />

total number of registered physicians is in Skopje, followed by Bitola and Prilep. In 22 regions there<br />

are no general practitioners in the health care of school children and adolescents. Makedonski Brod,<br />

Valandovo, Demir Hisar, Kratovo, Kriva Palanka and Probistip are examples of regions with particularly<br />

small numbers of staff – with no general practitioners, one school children physician and one<br />

or two nurses. (Table 35, Publication II)<br />

Planned programs for systematic examinations of school children and adolescents are realized<br />

in percentages of 96.0 percent in 2001, 97.9 percent in 1999, 97.5 percent in 1998, and 97.3 percent<br />

in 2000. The plan for 2002 was to conduct a total of 92,906 systematic checks, and 96.6 percent<br />

(89,706) of the plan was realized. The same range of percentages is also kept in terms of the planned<br />

and realized systematic checks in the elementary schools by regions, with the exception of 7 regions:<br />

Veles, Vinica, Gevgelija, Demir Hisar, Negotino, Sveti Nikole and Struga, where the planned health<br />

checks were realized in full (100 percent realization). (Table 36, Publication II)<br />

The situation is similar with the planned and carried out systematic health checks in the secondary<br />

schools: in 2002, 94 percent of the planned health examinations were carried out, with a 100<br />

percent realization in 9 of the regions. Tetovo might be regarded an exception, as this is the region<br />

where the percentage of realized health checks was the lowest – 87 percent. (Table 36, Publication II)<br />

The ratio between the physicians and the number of children at the age between 7 and 14<br />

indicates that the number of specialist physicians and nurses is unchanged, while the number of<br />

general practitioners decreased. Namely, this ratio in 2002 was one physician, three school medicine<br />

specialists and five nurses, while in 1998 there were two physicians and the same number of specialists<br />

and nurses as in 2002. The total number of visits of sick children was 669,564, or 16.148 visits per<br />

10,000 children at the age between 7 and 19. Of the total number of 669,564 visits of a school physician,<br />

almost 36 percent took place in Skopje, 6 percent in Gostivar, 6 percent in Bitola and 5 percent<br />

in Tetovo. Kratovo is an example of a region with the lowest number of visits to the physician: 2,294<br />

visits or 0.3 percent of the total number. (Table 37, Publication II)<br />

There are a total of 25 family planning counseling centers in the country. A year-to-year comparison<br />

shows that this number is higher by three than in 1998, lower by one than in 1999 and lower<br />

by two than in 2000. Of the 25 counseling centers, 2 are located in Berovo and Gostivar each, none<br />

in Vinica, Gevgelija, Debar, Demir Hisar, Kocani, Kratovo and Ohrid, and one in all other regions,<br />

including Skopje. (Table 38, Publication II)<br />

In 2002, the total number of visits per 1,000 women in the reproductive period was 480,<br />

which is comparatively less than in 1998 (730 visits). In the period between 1998 and 2002, there<br />

were no registered visits of the family planning counseling centers in Kratovo, Demir Hisar, Vinica,<br />

Gevgelija, and Ohrid, whereas of the total 22,385 visits in 2002, 42 percent were in Skopje, almost 24<br />

percent in Tetovo and 1 percent in Struga.<br />

According to the data, more than half of the total number of visits was first-ever ones: it varied<br />

between 58 percent in 1999 and 68 percent in 2000 – 2002. With regard to the age, the majority<br />

of users of these services were women between 20 and 29, who accounted for 49 percent in 2000<br />

and 48 percent in 2002. Women at the age between 30 and 39 constituted 34 percent in 2002 and<br />

37 percent in 1998. The group of women at the age between 20 and 29 are the largest group of users<br />

of such services in all health regions, except in Kicevo and Prilep, where the majority of users were<br />

at the age between 30 and 39. (Table 39, Publication II)<br />

58


The highest percentage (60 percent) of the registered visits aimed at health care of women in<br />

2002 was in Skopje, Kumanovo, Tetovo, and Prilep (44 percent, 8 percent, 4 percent, and 4 percent,<br />

respectively). The percentage is the lowest in Demir Hisar and Krusevo, while there are no data available<br />

for Kratovo. (Table 38, Publication II).<br />

Out of the 50 centers for health care of women in 2002 (this number remained unchanged in<br />

the period between 1998 and 2002), 16 (32 percent) were in Skopje, with one or two such centers in<br />

all other health regions. (Table 38, Publication II)<br />

According to the data obtained, the number of pregnant women who visited the counseling<br />

centers for pregnant women was barely one-third throughout the entire period. This percentage<br />

was the lowest in 2000 (28 percent) and the highest in 2002 (34 percent). In terms of the first-ever<br />

visits to counseling centers for pregnant women by age groups in 2002, the women at the age<br />

between 20 and 29 were again the most frequent group of users of such services, with the exception<br />

of the regions of Kumanovo and Radovis, where the age group of up to 19 was the one using<br />

the services most frequently. (Table 40, Publication II)<br />

4.3. Secondary Level of Health care<br />

The secondary health care is a more specialized form of health care than the primary one. It<br />

requires trained personnel. The secondary protection in the state is organized in the medical centers<br />

– polyclinics and general hospitals – mainly located in the urban centers.<br />

In 2002, there were a total of 16 general hospitals in the country, 7 rehabilitation centers and<br />

spas, and 10 health care centers. The distribution by health regions is as follows: there is one general<br />

hospital in each of Bitola, Veles, Gevgelija, Gostivar, Debar, Kavadarci, Kicevo, Kocani, Kriva<br />

Palanka, Kumanovo, Ohrid, Prilep, Struga, Strumica, Tetovo and Stip; Veles, Gevgelija, Demir Hisar,<br />

Skopje and Tetovo each have one special hospitals; there is one health care center in all of Bitola,<br />

Veles, Kocani, Kumanovo, Ohrid, Prilep, Skopje, Strumica, Tetovo and Stip; and one rehabilitation<br />

center in Bitola, Resen, and Struga, and two in Ohrid and Skopje.<br />

The number of staff at the secondary health care level is presented in Table 40 Publication II.<br />

At this level, there are 324 registered general practitioners (37 in Bitola, 31 in Strumica and Tetovo, 4<br />

in Kocani and Kriva Palanka, 5 in Demir Hisar and Resen, and 6 in Debar and Kicevo); the number of<br />

specialists totals 12,805 (starting from 187 in Bitola, 178 in Skopje, 128 in Ohrid, to 11 in Kriva<br />

Palanka, 16 in Demir Hisar, 18 in Debar and 19 in Resen); 3,627 nurses (their number varying<br />

between 403 in Bitola and 354 in Skopje and 30 in Resen, 35 in Kriva Palanka, and 43 in Debar). (Table<br />

41, Publication II)<br />

In 2002, all 27 hospitals had a total of 6,200 beds used for the treatment of 56.9 individuals<br />

per 1,000 citizens, while the total number of hospital days amounted to 1,291,786.<br />

The disparities in terms of the capacities and utilization of hospitals are presented in Table 42<br />

Publication II. There were at least 48 hospital beds in Kriva Palanka, 70 in Debar, and 71 in Resen. As<br />

opposed to this group, Ohrid had the largest number of beds – 798 ones allocated in four hospitals,<br />

Bitola had 630 and Stip had 511 beds. The number of treated patients was the lowest in Skopje – 2.4<br />

per 1,000 citizens, with this number being 45.9 in Resen, 49.4 in Demir Hisar and (the highest) in Stip<br />

– 204.2, Ohrid – 155.7, Veles – 135.6, and Bitola – 126.2. (Table 42, Publication II)<br />

In general, the average duration of a stay in hospitals lasted 13.4 days, whereas the level of<br />

utilization of hospital capacities was 68.5 percent.<br />

59


4.4. Tertiary Level of Health care<br />

This type of health care requires highly specialized health workers and highly specialized<br />

institutions. At a national level, this type of protection is located in Skopje and, in addition to providing<br />

health care, also carries out both education and research activities. Access to such institutions is<br />

by means of special referrals obtained from physicians at the lower levels of health care.<br />

There are a total of 48 health institutions in the country – clinics and institutes. The data presented<br />

in Table 7 helps in the analysis of the number of staff and utilization of these services per<br />

10,000 citizens.<br />

Table 7. Number of health workers and visits to health institutions<br />

at the tertiary level of health care per 10,000 citizens<br />

Year Beds Physicians Specialists Dentists Nurses No. of patients treated<br />

per 1,000 citizens<br />

Treated<br />

patients<br />

Hospital days<br />

2002 187.88 16.22 42.08 8.50 127.61 34.9 70.695 854.141<br />

2001 194.36 13.16 40.17 7.76 115.35 33.2 67.542 864.130<br />

2000 196.95 11.37 40.67 7.68 110.39 34.8 70.770 933.412<br />

1999 195.46 10.81 40.00 7.60 111.36 42.5 85.967 963.891<br />

1998 199.00 10.01 40.19 7.57 113.89 34.5 69.285 1.011.111<br />

As it may be seen from the table above, the indicator of number of beds per 1,000 citizens,<br />

points to a slight decrease of 199 to 187.88 beds per 100,000 citizens. The number of general practitioners<br />

in this health sector is on the increase: from 10.01 in 1998 to 16.22 in 2002. The number of<br />

specialists was 40.19 per 100,000 citizens in 1998, rising to 16.22 in 2002. The number of specialists<br />

was 40.19 per 100,000 citizens in 1998 and 42.08 in 2002. The number of dentists slightly increased<br />

from 7.57 in 1998 to 8.50 in 2002; the number of nurses is rising: it grew from 113.89 to 127.61. The<br />

average number of hospital days in the clinics was 12.6, and the bed utilization was 74.5 percent,<br />

below the established standards. In the other institutions at this level, the number of days spent at<br />

the clinics varies between 4.3 days at the Gynecology Clinic in Cair, to 128 days at the Psychiatric<br />

Hospital in Bardovci 20 .<br />

The level of utilization of beds for children is declining: it was 83.1 percent in 1998, 58.7 percent<br />

in 2002, and 56 percent in 2001. Consequently, the number of days spent in children hospitals<br />

is also decreasing: from 11.8 days in 1998 down to 8.9 days in 2002.<br />

4.5. Health Condition 21 of the Population (2002)<br />

This type of indicators refers to the process of mapping the health condition of the population.<br />

The low weight infants indicator shows the quality of nutrition of the community or inadequate<br />

nutrition. The total number of newly born children with a body weight lower than 2.5 kg was<br />

1,493 children in 2002, or 5.38 percent of the total number of newly born in that year. Expressed in<br />

absolute numbers, the largest number was in Skopje – 359, which is 5.98 percent of the total number<br />

of newly born in 2002. Suto Orizari with 8.5 percent is a municipality with the largest number of<br />

infants of a low weight, with Kisela Voda being the municipality in which this percentage is the lowest<br />

– 3.9 percent. Expressed as a percentage, the number of children with low weight in 2002 varied<br />

between 20.0 percent in the municipality of Samokov and 0.34 percent in Drugovo. The following<br />

municipalities are high above the average: Makedonski Brod, Pehcevo, Staro Nagoricani (all with<br />

20<br />

WHO (2004) The Public Health Report of the Republic of Macedonia<br />

21<br />

A general term for the condition of the health of individuals, groups or population, measured by defined standards. See for details:<br />

Roberts, J.L. (1996) Terminology for the WHO Conference on European Health Care Reform, Copenhagen, WHO Regional Office for Europe.<br />

60


11.9 percent), Mavrovi Anovi (11.1 percent), Caska (9.7 percent), Plasnica (9.3 percent), and Berovo (9<br />

percent) (Table 43, Publication II).<br />

The indicator most widely used for the assessment and identifying the nutrition condition of<br />

a community is the level of alimentation of children younger than 5. The average of children of short<br />

height suggests insufficient nutrition and certain infections at birth, and is even an indicator of infections<br />

during pregnancy. In addition, the indicator is relevant in that it points out poverty or low<br />

nutrition at the earliest age. The goal is to have at least 90 percent of the children with the weight<br />

corresponding to the age, which is a standard measure defined by the World Health Organization.<br />

In the Macedonia, children at the pre-school age of 2 – 6 are subjected to checks aimed at<br />

identifying their nutrition levels 22 .<br />

The 2003 data yielded the following results: within the framework of the height standards,<br />

77.9 percent were of normal height (76.2 percent of the boys and 79.8 percent of the girls); 15.6 percent<br />

were tall (16.5 percent boys and 14.8 percent girls); and 6.4 percent were short (7.4 percent<br />

boys and 5.4 percent girls).<br />

In comparison with 2001, there was a 7.9 percent increase of the percentage of children with<br />

normal growth, and a 2.6 percent decrease of children of short and 6 percent of tall height (See<br />

Figure 4).<br />

Figure 4. Assessment of the growth of pre-school children at the age of 2 – 6<br />

On the basis of the nutrition status in 2003, 73.7 percent of the children at this age were<br />

normally fed; 11.7 percent were moderately overweight (10.6 percent boys and 12.8 percent girls);<br />

8.8 percent are overweight (8.3 percent boys and 9.4 percent girls); 5.2 percent are moderately fed<br />

(5 percent boys and 5.45 percent girls), and 0.5 percent of the children are poorly fed (0.5 percent<br />

boys and 0.5 percent girls).<br />

In comparison with 2001, there are differences in the category of “moderately overweight”:<br />

in 2001, 9.3 percent of the children were assessed as moderately overweight, and 11.0 percent as<br />

overweight children.<br />

According to the same source, 57.5 percent of the children in Skopje are normally fed, 20 percent<br />

are of above average weight and 17 percent are overweight; 4.5 percent are moderately underfed<br />

and 0.35 percent are underfed. In comparison with the other cities, there are a higher percentage<br />

of overweight children in Skopje.<br />

22<br />

The nutrition status is examined by means of anthropometrical measurements in the health protection centers in accordance with the<br />

standards on monitoring the growth process, development and nutrition status as a whole. The 2003 data were obtained from a sample<br />

of a total of 1,130 children, of whom 576 were boys and 554 were girls.<br />

61


The system of immunization of the population includes preventive programs, aimed at controlling<br />

contagious diseases and protection against various diseases of the more vulnerable groups<br />

of the population. Information regarding the immunization of the population to a large extent also<br />

gives indications of the implementation of preventive protection of the health of the population.<br />

Analyzed in a comparative fashion, the period between 1998 and 2002 may be characterized<br />

as one with a satisfactory level of scope of the immunizations carried out in the Macedonia.<br />

Figure 5. Immunization of children in the Macedonia: 1998-2002<br />

According to the data, 95.6 percent of the children at a national level received shots against<br />

d-t-per, and 96.7 percent received shots against polio. At the age of up to one year, 90.8 percent of<br />

the children were vaccinated against tuberculosis and 97.8 percent against measles. (See Figure 5)<br />

This trend of an almost total immunization of the population with the d-t-per vaccine continued<br />

in 2003, as well, when it amounted to 95.8 percent of the total population. According to the<br />

Annual report of the State Health care Office in Skopje, the percentage of immunized children was<br />

lower than the average on the territory of the Health care Office in Veles – 83.4 percent (90.7 percent<br />

in the city and 72.1 percent in the surrounding villages0 and in Kocani – 89 percent. (Table 44,<br />

Publication II)<br />

In regard to the polio vaccine given orally, Kocani and Veles are again the regions in which<br />

this immunization was carried out in a lower percentage. The total immunization percentage at a<br />

national level was 95.9 percent, while it was 87.4 percent in Veles and 89.0 percent in Kocani. Belowaverage<br />

percentage of immunization against polio was also registered in the following cities:<br />

Kumanovo (90.7 percent), Ohrid and Debar (93.2 percent), and Stip and Radovis (92.1 percent).<br />

(Table 44, Publication II)<br />

In terms of health regions, there are disparities in the percentage of children immunized<br />

against tuberculosis. Thus, in Resen, the percentage is 162.8 percent, 113.6 percent in Prilep, 110.3<br />

percent in Skopje, 102.3 percent in Debar, 10.2 percent in Resen, 53.6 percent in Kicevo, 58.3 percent<br />

in Gostivar, 68.35 in Struga, 73.1 percent in Tetovo, 74.6 percent in Makedonski Brod. (Table 44,<br />

Publication II)<br />

Almost all newly born (98.2 percent) in 2002 were delivered with the assistance of experts.<br />

In terms of this indicator, the more critical municipalities are Sipkovica, where the percentage of chil-<br />

62


dren born with the help of experts is lower than the average – 83.9 percent, Studenicani – 86.2 percent,<br />

Izvor – 87.5 percent, Zelenikovo – 88.5 percent, Aracinovo – 88.6 percent, Cucer Sandevo – 88.7<br />

percent, Brvenica – 89.9 percent, Klecovce and Samokov – 90 percent, Zelino – 90.4 percent, and<br />

Veles – 90.5 percent. This trend seems constant throughout the entire period between 1998 and<br />

2002. (Table 45, Publication II)<br />

4.6. Health-related Behavior<br />

This group of indicators is aimed at identifying certain segments of the way of life affecting<br />

the health of people. This sphere is largely connected with and, in a way, preconditioned by the<br />

social environment.<br />

One of the main preconditions for health is clean drinking water; in 2002, 93 percent of the<br />

population had clean drinking water. In the health region of Struga, 100 percent of the population<br />

had access to clean drinking water; this percentage was 99 percent in Berovo, Valandovo, Gevgelija,<br />

Krusevo, Kumanovo, Negotino and Ohrid; and it was 98 percent in Vinica, Kavadarci, Kriva Palanka,<br />

Resen, and Stip. Contrary to these regions, the percentage is 71 percent in Kratovo, 73 percent in<br />

Kicevo and Strumica, 76 percent in Delcevo, 85 percent in Gostivar, and 89 percent in Kocani and in<br />

Prilep. (Table 47, Publication II)<br />

According to the data available, the number of cases of tuberculosis is declining from 1,547 in<br />

1998 to 1,086 cases in 2002. Comparatively, there is one cases in each of the municipalities of Delcevo,<br />

Kratovo, Kriva Palanka, and Sveti Nikole, two in Debar, four in Probistip, five in Berovo, with the largest<br />

number of cases in Skopje – 377, Tetovo – 315, and Gostivar – 118. (Table 47, Publication II)<br />

The total number of registered cases of individuals suffering from AIDS in 2002 was 5, of<br />

whom two men and three women, whereas there are two adults living with the virus. This number<br />

was higher by four in 2000 and lower in comparison to the other years in the period. Of the five<br />

cases, four were registered in Skopje and one in Tetovo. In 2002, there were no registered children at<br />

the age between 0 and 14 infected neither by the HIV virus, nor among women at the age between<br />

15 and 49, as opposed to one such case in 2001.<br />

In the total number of four institutions registered for rehabilitation of drug addicts, 767 addicts<br />

(678 men and 89 women) were registered in 2002. In comparison with all other previous years, this is<br />

almost a double increase of the number of registered drug addicts. (Table 48, Publication II)<br />

According to the data available for 2001, there were 5,585 registered patients suffering from<br />

cancer, of whom 53,66 percent were men and the remainder (46.37 percent) women. In 2002, there<br />

were a total of 5,436 cancer patients. A comparative historical analysis of the number of cancer<br />

patients per 100,000 citizens shows a decrease from 306 (1998) to 263.38 in 2000 and a slight<br />

increase to 274,46 in 2001. Analyzed by health regions, the largest number of such patients was registered<br />

in Skopje – 1,817, and the smallest in Valandovo and Demir Hisar – 25 in each region. In the<br />

other health regions, the number varies between 27 in Krusevo and 363 in Prilep. (Table 49,<br />

Publication II)<br />

The reproductive behavior is an exceptionally significant factor in the assessment of the<br />

reproductive health of the mother, but also of the child. Among other things, the use of contraception<br />

and abortions are relevant indicators of the reproductive behavior of women. In 2002, a total of<br />

12,044 means of contraception were prescribed in the family planning centers. According to this, 19<br />

of 1,000 women at the reproductive age used contraceptive means. (Table 50, Publication II)<br />

In 2002, there were 12 registered abortions per 1,000 women at a reproductive age, or 284<br />

abortions per 1,000 newly born children that year. In absolute numbers, the largest number of abor-<br />

63


tions took place in Skopje and Tetovo – 1,098, and the smallest in Radovis – 2 and Delcevo – 6. (Table<br />

50, Publication II)<br />

4.7. Mortality<br />

The general mortality rate 23 in 2002 was 8.9 per 1,000 citizens. In comparison with the previous<br />

years, there is a slight increase of the number of deceases: it was 8.3 in 2001, 8.5 in 2000, 8.3 in<br />

1999, and 8.4 in 1998. By municipalities, Dolna Banjica had the lowest death rate of 3.3, and<br />

Staravina had the highest one of 47.5 individuals per 1,000 citizens. The following municipalities also<br />

had a relatively higher mortality rate: Demir Hisar – 31.3, Petrovec – 29.9, Vevcani – 28.6, Drugovo –<br />

27.0, Studenicani – 24.2, Sopiste – 21.5, Saraj – 20.4, Murtino – 18.3, Kriva Palanka – 18.1, Veles – 17.5,<br />

Konce – 16.9, Tetovo – 16.5, Kuklis – 16.4, Gazi Baba – 16.2, Centar – 15.9, Vasilevo – 15.8, Resen –15.6,<br />

Dolneni – 15.5, and Rostusa – 15.2. Contrary to those, the following are characterized by a lower<br />

death rate: Karpos – 1.6, Lipkovo – 1.9, Debar – 3.5, Ilinden – 4.0, Kamenjane – 4.2, Vinica – 4.3, Kisela<br />

Voda – 5.3, Stip – 5.5, Gostivar – 5.6, Negotino-Polosko – 5.9, and Bosilovo – 6.0 deceased per 1,000<br />

citizens. (Table 51, Publication II)<br />

In terms of the cause of death, the leading causes are diseases of the circular system: 57 percent<br />

of the total number of deaths was a result of such diseases. The percentages vary from 32.7 percent<br />

in Sipkovica to 100.0 percent in Konopiste. Those suffering from the neoplasm group of diseases<br />

account for 17.4 percent of the total number of deaths (from 2.9 percent in Srbinovo to 27.4 percent<br />

in Krusevo and 27.3 percent in Zitose). The deceased due to an unidentified cause constitute 8 percent<br />

of the total number. The percentage of deceased due to such cause is the lowest in Bosilevo,<br />

Kratovo and Probistip (0.8 percent) and the highest in Karbinci (38,5 percent), Sipkovica (34.7 percent),<br />

Staravina (3.5 percent), and Stip (32.3 percent). Injuries and poisoning are registered as causes<br />

for death in 4.2 percent per 1,000 citizens. The lowest percentage is again in Bosilevo – 0.8 percent,<br />

the highest is in Mavrovi Anovi – 13.3 percent, followed by 12.5 percent in Aracinovo and 10.9<br />

percent in Makedonska Kamenica. Those who died from diseases of the respiratory organs account<br />

for 3.3 percent of the total number of death cases. Bitola has the lowest such percentage – 0.8 percent,<br />

Krusevo has 0.9 percent, while Orizari the highest one – 21.6 percent. The endocrine diseases as<br />

the cause of death constitute 3.1 percent of the total. This percentage is lowest in Vinica – 0.7 percent<br />

and highest in Lukovo – 10.5 percent. (Table 52, Publication II)<br />

The death rate among newly born (infants) shows a decrease from 16.3 in 1998 to 10.2 per<br />

1,000 newly born in 2002. This rate is much higher in the municipality of Meseista, where it was calculated<br />

at 96.8 percent, and Kukurecani – 41.7 percent. The rate was lowest in the municipality of<br />

Karpos – 1.6 deceased per 1,000 newly born. (Table 53, Publication II)<br />

The mortality rate of children younger than 5 (0 to 4) is 11.7 percent. This percentage is higher<br />

than the average in the municipality of Meseista – 111.1. (Table 53, Publication II)<br />

There were a total of 153 cases of suicide registered in 1998. In 1999, this number grew to<br />

170, to go down to 152 registered suicides in 2001 and 149 in 2002. Analyzed at a municipal level,<br />

this number was highest in Skopje or 12 in the municipality of Kumanovo, whereas there was one<br />

suicide case in each of the following municipalities: Suto Orizari, Berovo, Bistrica, Bogomila, Brvenica,<br />

Vranesnica, Delcevo, Demir Hisar, Zletovo, Kamenjane, Karbinci, Kondovo, Konce, Krusevo,<br />

Negotino-Polosko, Oblesevo, Orizari, Ohrid, Probistip, Rosoman, Sopotnica, Studenicani, Topolcani<br />

and Cesinovo.<br />

Mortality among mothers, expressed in absolute numbers is very low: there were 3 cases<br />

altogether in 2002 (in Debar, Kumanovo and Ohrid) and 4 cases in 2001 and 200 (Skopje, Suto<br />

23<br />

The data on specific mortality rates by gender and age were not available.<br />

64


Orizari, Veles, Kriva Palanka, and Saraj), 2 cases in 1999 (Kumanovo and Lipkovo), and only one in<br />

1998 (Negotino – Polosko).<br />

Concluding remarks and Recommendations<br />

Although the purpose of the analysis was to illustrate the disparities between the municipalities<br />

in Macedonia, it was conducted only at the national level due to the unavailability of data; the<br />

analysis was also the basis for the proposal to establish a database for recording the activities in this<br />

area at a local level. It showed that there are disparities in the facilities in the health institutions in<br />

different municipalities, as well as differences in terms of staff, health condition of the population<br />

measured by weight of the newly born, health condition measured by the nutrition status of children,<br />

health condition indicated by the number of deliveries with the assistance of experts, in the mortality<br />

of the population by the death rate of the newly born, which is in a declining trend (this fact, like the<br />

previous one, imposes the need of more detailed analyses aimed at identification of the social factors<br />

of influence that are mostly related to the features of the local community), as well as in terms<br />

of the most frequent causes of death.<br />

An attempt was made to identify the existing disparities between the municipalities regarding<br />

health issues and which, by their nature, are useful in terms of achieving more efficient prevention,<br />

detection and treatment of certain diseases or certain aspects of the health behavior of the<br />

population. The proposal regarding the next required step is to expand the database and to complete<br />

the list of indicators in the area of the health behavior of the population.<br />

65


5. TRANSPORTATION AND MOBILITY<br />

This part of the analysis presents the data related to the analysis of the infrastructure and its<br />

users in the traffic, i.e. the transport and mobility. The analysis is comparative and includes a period<br />

of five years – from 1998 to 2002 – for which there are available data, stressing the major disparities<br />

between municipalities.<br />

5.1. Road Transportation 24<br />

5.1.1. Road Network Length, Excluding Highways<br />

Table 8. Categorization of roads in Macedonia<br />

ROADS AND CATEGORIZATION OF ROADS<br />

In kilometers<br />

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002<br />

TOTAL 11.657 12.309 12.666 13.072 13.182<br />

Excluding highways 11.513 12.165 12.522 12.927 12.974<br />

BY ROAD CATEGORY<br />

Motorways 909 909 909 937 957<br />

Regional 3.461 3.461 3.542 3.643 3.623<br />

Local 7.143 7.795 8.071 8.347 8.394<br />

Highways 144 144 144 145 208<br />

Macedonia has a total of 13,182 km of categorized road network (2002 data), of which 957<br />

km are motorways, 3,623 km regional, and 8,394 km are local (Table 8). The majority of the motorways<br />

(548 km) are included in the system of the European road network of “E”-roads, whereas only<br />

208 km of these may be included in the TEM-roads system (Trans-Europe Motorway), as follows:<br />

Kumanovo-Petrovec-Veles-Gradsko; Skopje-Petrovec; Hipodrom-Miladinovci; Skopje-Tetovo-<br />

Gostivar.<br />

Table 9: Length of the Road Network of Macedonia, Excluding Highways<br />

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002<br />

Road length in km 11.513 12.165 12.522 12.927 12.974<br />

Area in km 2 27.513 27.513 27.513 27.513 27.513<br />

Indicator<br />

km/km 2 0.418457 0.442155 0.45513 0.469851 0.471559<br />

According to Table 9, the indicator of the length of the road network excluding the highways<br />

in relation to the area of Macedonia increases from 0.418 in 1998 to 0.4649in 2001 and then<br />

declines in 2002.<br />

24<br />

The categories subjected to analysis are explained in more details in Annex 2<br />

66


Figure 6. Indicator of Road Length Excluding Highways<br />

5.1.2. Length of Total Road Network Including Highways<br />

According to Table 10the indicator of the length of the road network in relation to the area<br />

of Macedonia varies from 0.423 in 1998 to 0.479 in 2002.<br />

Table 10. Length of the Road Network of Macedonia, Including Highways<br />

Road length in km<br />

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002<br />

11.657 12.309 12.666 13.072 13.182<br />

Area in km<br />

27.513 27.513 27.513 27.513 27.513<br />

Indicator<br />

km/km 2 0.423691 0.447389 0.460364 0.475121 0.479119<br />

Figure 7. Indicator of Road Length in Macedonia<br />

The Figure shows the curve of the increase of the length of the total road network in<br />

Macedonia and the period of stagnation in 2001.<br />

5.1.3.Length of Roads Made of Stone Blocks<br />

Table 11: Roads Made of Stone Blocks in Macedonia<br />

in kilometers<br />

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002<br />

Total in Macedonia 62 65 68 85 97<br />

From the table above, it may be seen that the roads made of stone blocks had a trend of<br />

increase in the period between 1998 and 2002. This is mainly due to the needs of the rural – but also<br />

67


partially of the urban – areas, where the asphalt is increasingly being avoided as the material for construction<br />

of boardwalks and pedestrian streets. The trend is going back to the nature and communicating<br />

on areas constructed with natural materials.<br />

5.1.4. Length of Macadam Roads<br />

Table 12: Macadam Roads in Macedonia<br />

in kilometers<br />

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002<br />

Total in Macedonia 1.123 1.152 651 1.176 1.214<br />

The macadam roads are most frequently used in the rural areas, in newly established settlements<br />

as parts of urban centers, and in tourist resorts with no urbanized communications.<br />

According to the data of the State Statistical Office, the length of such roads at a national level slightly<br />

increased over the period 1998 – 2002. At the municipal level, the data only refer to the situation<br />

of up to December 31, 2002 and there is no way to assess the trend or to identify the disparities<br />

between municipalities if this is the only type of roads analyzed.<br />

5.1.5. Length of Unpaved Roads<br />

Total in<br />

Macedonia<br />

Table 13: Unpaved Roads in Macedonia<br />

in kilometers<br />

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002<br />

1.123 1.152 651 1.176 1.214<br />

5.1.6. Length of Roads Maintained by the Local Self-government<br />

The roads maintained by the local self-governments in Macedonia are included in the category<br />

of local ones. Their length increased in the period between 1998 and 2002, and the trend is<br />

mainly due to the new territorial division into 132 municipalities. It may be seen from Table 1,<br />

Publication II that the increase is particularly high in the newly formed municipalities, which may in<br />

this way more easily draw the attention of the central government to the problems, as the central<br />

budget is the main source of funds for the maintenance of existing and construction of new roads.<br />

The former municipalities have an obligation to maintain the already constructed roads. The disparity<br />

is larger between the newly formed municipalities and the old ones. The construction and maintenance<br />

of roads is simplified in the newly formed municipalities, which in part inherited structures<br />

from the former ones (example: Bogdanci).<br />

5.1.7. Length of Roads Supported by the Central Government<br />

The central government maintains the motorways, regional roads and E-category roads, i.e.<br />

highways.<br />

Table 14. Length of Roads under the Competence of the Central Government<br />

Year<br />

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002<br />

14.209 km 14.861 km 15.299 km 15.778 km 15.848 km<br />

68


The increase in the length of the motorways and regional roads is a result of the rise in the<br />

need of communication between the cities, i.e. municipalities.<br />

5.1.8. Length of Roads in Urban Areas<br />

The length of roads in urban areas, i.e. city roads, has not been classified separately within<br />

the data of the State Statistical Office. In Table 54, Publication II, one may only note the length of the<br />

roads in the entire municipality, which is irrelevant for the formation of this type of indicator of<br />

assessing the disparity at a municipal level.<br />

5.1.9. Length of Roads in Rural Areas<br />

The length of the road network in rural areas is not classified separately within the data of<br />

the State Statistical Office. In Table 54, Publication II, one may only note the length of the roads in<br />

the entire municipality, which again is irrelevant for the formation of this type of indicator of assessing<br />

the disparity at a municipal level.<br />

5.1.10. Use of Public Transportation<br />

In 11 cities in Macedonia, the city transportation, as a part of the public one, is in fact transportation<br />

of passengers with buses. An indicator of the public city transportation used as a measure<br />

of the disparity between municipalities is the density of city transportation lines. (See Table 55,<br />

Publication II)<br />

According to the data analyzed and presented in Table 15, the public transportation indicator<br />

in 1998 varied from 0.42 in Kriva Palanka (where it is least developed) to 3.37 in Bitola,(where it<br />

is most used). There was an evident decline of the indicator in 2002: in Kriva Palanka, it was 0.33, in<br />

Bitola 0.53, and it was highest in Tetovo – 12.87.<br />

Table 15: Indicator of Density of Public City Transportation Lines<br />

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002<br />

Kriva Palanka 0,42 0,42 0,42 0,33 0,33<br />

Bitola 3,37 3,37 0,62 0,38 0,53<br />

Tetovo 3,22 10,11 12,87 12,87 12,87<br />

Skopje 0,61 0,61 0,71 0,74 0,78<br />

Figure 8. Density of Public Transportation Lines<br />

69


The Table and Figure above clearly show the disparity in the development of the public city<br />

transportation, i.e. the density of the bus lines in the four urban areas analyzed.<br />

5.1.11. Utilization of Public Transportation by Pupils and Students<br />

There is no sufficient information for this part of the analysis that would enable identification<br />

of the indicators. In principle, this type of analysis should be conducted at a national level in terms<br />

of the students and the location of universities in Macedonia, whereas at a municipal level it is only<br />

possible to conduct such an analysis for pupils. The next problem is the lack of information on the<br />

number of pupils using public transportation, as the elementary schools are mainly located at a 10-<br />

minute walk from their homes. The secondary schools are a subject of a separate analysis, as the<br />

number of students there includes a daily migration from rural to the urban areas in which these<br />

schools are located.<br />

5.1.12. Utilization of Motor Vehicles<br />

This indicator refers to the overall utilization of motor vehicles in the country. The table<br />

below indicates the number of registered vehicles.<br />

Table 16. Registered Road Motor Vehicles and Trailers<br />

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 No. of vehicles /<br />

No. of citizens in<br />

2002<br />

Number of citizens 2.022.547<br />

Total number of motor vehicles: 330.155 330.831 342.468 355.776 350.384 0,1732<br />

Motorcycles 3.566 3.506 3.729 4.483 2.918 0,0014<br />

Private 3.354 3.298 3.512 4.180 2.751 0,0014<br />

Passenger cars 288.678 289.860 299.588 309.562 307.581 0,1521<br />

Private 274.664 275.514 285.081 294.328 292.443 0,1446<br />

Buses 2.478 2.479 2.498 2.620 2.497 0,0012<br />

Private 410 433 476 530 557 0,0003<br />

Load-carrying vehicles 20.075 20.011 20.763 21.727 20.213 0,0100<br />

Private 11.761 11.879 12.526 13.278 12.356 0,0061<br />

Special vehicles 4.027 4.151 4.687 5.385 6.187 0,0031<br />

Private 1.849 1.948 2.245 2.509 2.931 0,0014<br />

Towing vehicles 3.365 3.459 3.865 4.169 4.105 0,0020<br />

Private 280 356 497 564 593 0,0003<br />

Tractors 1.954 1.526 1.067 1.170 538 0,0003<br />

Private 1.573 1.292 886 968 378 0,0002<br />

Working vehicles 238 251 350 390 380 0,0002<br />

Private 23 28 69 83 77 0,0000<br />

Side-vehicles 5.774 5.588 5.921 6.270 5.965 0,0029<br />

Private 892 895 1.069 1.183 1.114 0,0006<br />

No. of vehicles /<br />

0,16 0,16 0,17 0,18 0,17<br />

No. of citizens<br />

In the period between 1998 and 2002, there was a considerable increase of the number of<br />

motor vehicles at a national level; during the same period, there are also intervals of decline in this<br />

number.<br />

70


Figure 9. Indicator of Utilization of Motor Vehicles in Macedonia<br />

According to the data obtained from the Ministry of Interior (Table 56, Publication II II), it would<br />

be possible to identify the disparity between the urban areas, but not between the municipalities, as the<br />

Ministry has not processed the data by municipalities, but according to the regional units where the<br />

records of vehicle registration are kept. In this case, the analysis of the indicators of disparities between<br />

municipalities will be conducted at a regional level. It is illustrated by the Figure below.<br />

Figure 10. Disparities in the level of utilization of motor vehicles in Macedonia<br />

Use of Motorcycles<br />

According to the 2002 data (Table 16), there were 2,918 registered motorbikes in Macedonia,<br />

of which 1,388 in Skopje, i.e. the municipalities in the Skopje region; 2,751 motorbikes are privately<br />

owned and 1,275 of those are in the Skopje region, 205 in Bitola, 205 in Kumanovo, and only 2 in<br />

Brod and Krusevo each.<br />

71


Lines<br />

Buses<br />

5.1.13. Transportation of Passengers by Buses<br />

Transported<br />

passengers,<br />

in thousands<br />

Table 17. Number of Lines, Buses and Transported Passengers<br />

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002<br />

Number 230 233 208 205 213<br />

Length in km 4.016 4.531 4.273 4.180 4.270<br />

Number 837 821 894 915 889<br />

Seats and standing<br />

places<br />

99.349 96.729 105.008 106.214 100.960<br />

Average number of vehicles in<br />

the car park at year end<br />

604 820 893 915 889<br />

Average number of vehicles in<br />

the traffic at year end<br />

428 417 600 681 475<br />

Average number of annually<br />

transported passengers per 1<br />

bus, in thousands<br />

Income from transportation of passengers, in<br />

thousands<br />

135.254 136.231 111.408 98.474 101.709<br />

224 166 125 108 114<br />

1.505.756 1.671.876 1.765.990 1.522.891 1.508.557<br />

The number of transported passengers is an indicator which shows the mobility of citizens<br />

by public transportation.<br />

Table 18. Mobility of Citizens with Public City Transportation<br />

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2002 population<br />

passengers/ number,<br />

citizens/ 2002 2001 1998<br />

Struga 1.520 1.062 834 751 791 61.256 0,01 0,01226 0,024814<br />

Bitola 2.390 1.764 1.100 805 1.081 105.644 0,01 0,00762 0,022623<br />

Tetovo 3.321 3.404 3.166 2.098 1.490 189.066 0,01 0,011097 0,017565<br />

Veles 440 584 566 533 491 38.391 0,01 0,013883 0,011461<br />

Kriva Palanka 217 197 281 285 266 24.964 0,01 0,011416 0,008693<br />

Kumanovo 3.017 3.143 2.981 2.494 2.006 137.382 0,01 0,018154 0,021961<br />

Skopje 122.293 124.341 100.633 89.058 93.393 495.540 0,19 0,179719 0,246787<br />

Kocani 666 693 666 617 445 48.846 0,01 0,012632 0,013635<br />

Stip 274 151 293 945 985 51.808 0,02 0,01824 0,005289<br />

Strumica 1.009 892 888 888 761 92.625 0,01 0,009587 0,010893<br />

The number of transported passengers is in a declining trend over the past two analyzed<br />

years. The trend is particularly strong in the city of Skopje, where the bus transportation is most<br />

used; Stip, on the other hand, has a trend of an increase: from 0,005 in 1998 to 0.02 in 2002.<br />

5.1.14. Number of Taxi Vehicles per Citizen<br />

The taxi transportation in Macedonia is a significant factor in the organization of the public<br />

transportation. According to the data available, obtained through research, the number of taxi vehicles<br />

varied between 2.346 in 1998 to 5.200 in 2002.<br />

72


Table 19. Selected Indicators Related to Taxi Transportation<br />

Number of<br />

passenger<br />

vehicles<br />

Population at mid year, in<br />

thousands<br />

Number of passenger<br />

vehicles/vehicles<br />

1998 2.346 2.008 1,17<br />

1999 2.477 2.017 1,23<br />

2000 2.020 2.026 1,00<br />

2001 1.746 2.035 0,86<br />

2002 2.501 2.042 1,22<br />

1998 3.167 2.008 1,58<br />

1999 3.220 2.017 1,60<br />

2000 3.440 2.026 1,70<br />

2001 3.600 2.035 1,77<br />

2002 5.200 2.042 2,55<br />

5.2. Railroad transportation 25 *<br />

The development concept of the railroad system is based on the need of modernization and<br />

expansion of the railroad as a whole, as well as the need to connect the railroad network in<br />

Macedonia with the corresponding networks in the Republic of Bulgaria and the Republic of<br />

Albania.<br />

The Railroad Plan until 2020, representing a stage towards the definite realization, foresees<br />

construction of approximately 120 km of new railroad lines.<br />

The density of the railroad network is planned to achieve 3.18 km per 100 km 2 of the territory<br />

of Macedonia in the target year 2002.<br />

The completion of the definite railroad network (after 2020) will occupy space of approximately<br />

1,350 ha required for the 1,100 km of railroad lines, which will ensure a railroad network coverage<br />

of about 4.3 km per 100 km 2 . The network is to be completed by additional 250 km of station<br />

rails and approximately 200 km railroad rails for industrial needs,<br />

5.2.1. Railroad Network<br />

The railroad network in Macedonia was of a total length of 697 kilometers in 1995 and in<br />

2002. The number of railroad stations increased from 106 in 1995 to 126 in 2002.<br />

5.2.2. Passengers, Goods and Cattle Transported by Railroad<br />

According to the data obtained from the State Statistical Office, the number of passengers<br />

transported in the country in 1995 totaled 1,075,000 and 930,000 in 2002, i.e. the railroad transportation<br />

of passengers is in a declining trend.<br />

The table below illustrates the transportation of cattle at a national level; it is also decreasing.<br />

Table 20. Railroad Transportation<br />

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002<br />

Transported cattle, in thousands 2,694 2,166 3,231 2,799 2,208<br />

25<br />

The data about the planned development are taken from the proposal Spatial Plan of Macedonia for the period until 2020.<br />

* The categories analyzed herein are explained in more detail in Annex 2<br />

73


5.2.3. Passenger Traffic at Railroad Stations in Major Municipalities<br />

In 1998, there were 102 railroad stations in Macedonia in which there was passenger traffic;<br />

in 2002, this number was 35.<br />

5.2.4. Passenger Traffic at Railroad Stations in Major Cities<br />

The cities of Bitola, Kumanovo, Prilep, Skopje, Stip, Tetovo, Veles and Gevgelija may be used<br />

in the analysis of the railroad traffic. According to the data from the State Statistical Office, the number<br />

of departed passengers decreased in all cities. In 1998, 79,029 passengers departed from Bitola,<br />

while their number in 2002 was 57,133; in the case of Skopje, the numbers are 486,069 (1998) and<br />

164,079 (2002).<br />

5.2.5. Transportation of Cattle at Railroad Stations in Major Cities<br />

According to the numerical data, the transportation of cattle may also be analyzed in several<br />

cities. In 1998, 419,616 t of cattle were loaded and 86,382 t were unloaded in Gevgelija. The<br />

respective figures in 2002 were 12,561 t (loaded) and 78,409 t (unloaded). This disparity is not so<br />

large in Bitola, but the situation in Skopje is such that the railroad transportation of goods declined<br />

as much as twice.<br />

5.3. Air Transportation 26<br />

The needs of transportation of passengers and goods by air are covered by the airports in<br />

Skopje and Ohrid.<br />

The existing sports airports in Skopje (Stenkovec), Kumanovo (Rezanovce), Bitola<br />

(Logovardi), Stip (Susevo) and Prilep (Malo Konjari), satisfy the current needs for the most part. The<br />

tracks only need certain improvements (all airports have grass tracks) and modernization of the airport<br />

equipment.<br />

There are a total of eight agricultural-commercial airports: Bitola (Logovardi and Dame<br />

Gruev), Prilep (Sarandinovo), Veles (Karatmanovo), Sveti Nikole (Pesirovo), Stip (Vrsakovo), Negotino<br />

(Crveni Bregovi) and Gradsko (Rosoman). The tracks on the airports are combined: a portion of 300<br />

h and 20 m is made of concrete, and the remainder 500 h and 50 m is grass. The number of such airports<br />

is insufficient for the current needs, particularly in the Polog and Ohrid-Prespa region, as well<br />

as in the surroundings of Kumanovo, Strumica, and Gevgelija.<br />

The table below is a numerical presentation of the total realized transportation of passengers<br />

and goods in the air traffic in Macedonia.<br />

26<br />

The categories analyzed herein are explained in more detail in Annex 2<br />

74


Table 21. Traffic of Aircrafts of Domestic and Foreign<br />

Companies at the Airports in Macedonia<br />

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002<br />

Airport - Skopje<br />

Number of departed passengers 253.293 534.054 493.034 234.082 251.414<br />

Regular flights 148.935 252.282 406.546 221.584 196.967<br />

Charter flights 104.358 281.772 86.488 12.498 54.447<br />

Number of transit passengers 13.167 9.205 5.395 3.641 8.174<br />

Tons of goods sent by air 2.715 695 802 663 513<br />

Regular flights 504 511 736 636 416<br />

Charter flights 2.211 184 66 27 97<br />

Tones of goods in transit 57 10 - 0 1<br />

Airport - Ohrid<br />

Number of departed passengers 27.903 40.47 33.781 26.533 31.45<br />

Regular flights 17.216 22.49 33.171 17.732 15.419<br />

Charter flights 10.687 17.98 610 8.801 16.031<br />

Number of transit passengers 2.745 2.784 2.77 3.217 2.307<br />

Tons of goods sent by air 14 55 14 8 9<br />

Regular flights 9 13 14 3 6<br />

Charter flights 5 42 - 5 3<br />

Tones of goods in transit 4 7 68 7 3<br />

5.4. Telecommunications 27<br />

The introduction of the new digital systems allowed for the use of integrated network of<br />

services in the telecommunications, through the so-called ISDN (Integrated Service Digital<br />

Network). The network is organized in three hierarchical levels: international, national, or transit, and<br />

primary and local.<br />

The hierarchical structure of the commutation systems are organized in a similar way.<br />

In 1998, the total number of installed telephone switchboards in Macedonia was 324; their<br />

number grew to 418 in 2002.<br />

In 2002, there were 793,132 telephone lines, i.e. 0.39 lines per citizen. The number of telephone<br />

lines rapidly grew in the period between 1995 and 1998 (according to the data taken from<br />

the proposal Spatial Plan of the Republic of Macedonia and the State Statistical Office).<br />

The mobile lines rose by more than six times at a national level, growing from 70,000 in 1998<br />

to 450,000.<br />

There is also an increase in the Internet lines: from 5,399 in 1998, they reached 36,639 in 2002.<br />

5.4.1. Number of Telephone Line Subscribers<br />

The number of telephone line subscribers by municipalities is also used in the analysis of the<br />

disparities between the municipalities. The report includes only several specific municipalities in its<br />

analysis and the table below is a presentation of the disparities at municipal level.<br />

The indicator of the number of telephone line subscribers to the total population indicates<br />

a disparity between Tetovo and Gostivar in relation to Stip, Kocani, Resen, and Veles.<br />

27<br />

The categories analyzed herein are explained in more detail in Annex 2<br />

75


Table 22. Number of Subscribers / Total Population<br />

Population<br />

2002<br />

Telephone<br />

subscribers<br />

No. of subscribers /<br />

total population<br />

Bitola 105.644 30.556 0,29<br />

Demir Hisar 9.497 2.209 0,23<br />

Krusevo 11.812 2.490 0,21<br />

Prilep 94.358 22.748 0,24<br />

Resen 16.825 6.376 0,38<br />

Veles 38.391 16.721 0,44<br />

Kavadarci 42.882 11.784 0,27<br />

Negotino 23.757 5.440 0,23<br />

Kratovo 10.441 2.678 0,26<br />

Kriva Palanka 24.964 5.262 0,21<br />

Kumanovo 137.382 27.561 0,20<br />

Debar 24.251 3.900 0,16<br />

Kicevo 56.739 8.163 0,14<br />

Makedonski Brod 11.686 1.742 0,15<br />

Ohrid 61.256 21.876 0,36<br />

Struga 61.256 10.524 0,17<br />

Skopje 495.540 176.645 0,36<br />

Valandovo 11.890 3.281 0,28<br />

Gevgelija 35.121 7.156 0,20<br />

Radovis 31.780 5.924 0,19<br />

Strumica 92.625 14.489 0,16<br />

Gostivar 116.864 9.989 0,09<br />

Tetovo 189.066 15.467 0,08<br />

Berovo 19.458 3.906 0,20<br />

Vinica 19.938 4.577 0,23<br />

Delcevo 25.615 4.680 0,18<br />

Kocani 48.846 9.609 0,20<br />

Probistip 16.193 3.698 0,23<br />

Sveti Nikole 21.355 5.208 0,24<br />

Stip 51.808 15.752 0,30<br />

5.4.2. Postal Services 28<br />

Up to and inclusive of December 2002, there were 310 registered postal units (post<br />

offices). The number of citizens served by a single postal unit was 6,756, meaning that the area covered<br />

by a single unit was 88.75 km 2 . In the same period, there were 496 registered post tellers, or a<br />

teller per 3,923 citizens.<br />

The internal postal traffic is organized mainly by means of road transportation, as is the<br />

international postal traffic to the Republic of Albania and the Republic of Bulgaria; to the Republic<br />

of Greece and FR Yugoslavia, post travels by railroad, while to the other destinations it is air borne.<br />

The analysis of the postal traffic in Macedonia has been conducted on the basis of the number<br />

of post offices by municipalities (Table 57, Publication II II). According to the State Statistical<br />

Office, the postal traffic is only registered at a national level and is no relevant indicator for the analysis<br />

required.<br />

28<br />

The categories analyzed herein are explained in more detail in Annex 2<br />

76


Concluding remarks and Recommendations<br />

According to the above presented analysis, the differences between the municipalities in<br />

Macedonia are explicit, with variations at a national level in certain areas. The analysis points out the<br />

need of setting the following goals aimed at development of the transportation and mobility at a<br />

national level, and at reducing the differences between the municipalities:<br />

Further development of the transportation-communication system in Macedonia, in a manner<br />

that will support equal distribution of the types of transportation and will meet the needs of<br />

transport and communication of the Macedonian citizens in the best possible manner;<br />

Development of a transportation system that will minimize the adverse impact of the traffic on<br />

the environment and will help raise the quality of living in the urban and rural areas in the country;<br />

Establishment of transport inter-modal centers as starting contact points between the different<br />

types of transport, as a precondition for the development of an efficient, flexible and economic<br />

transportation system;<br />

Reconstruction and construction of transportation and communication networks and provision<br />

of transportation means by applying state-of-the-art technology in the investment preparation,<br />

design, construction, maintenance and exploitation;<br />

Dynamic completion of the infrastructure, with priorities based on traffic and economic criteria,<br />

that is in accordance with the strategic goals of the state wherever the traffic is the initial factor<br />

of the overall development;<br />

Special attention to routes passing by or around larger city agglomerations;<br />

Increasing the permissibility of the Macedonian transportation and communication system,<br />

connecting the system with the neighboring countries and joint inclusion in the European systems<br />

and trends;<br />

Provision of a high level of mobility of the population and products, as well as a high level of<br />

telecommunication links on the territory of Macedonia;<br />

Provision of an adequate accessibility on the entire territory of the state, to create conditions<br />

for a more equal development in all parts of Macedonia;<br />

Development of a plan for a transportation system that will support and stimulate the economic<br />

development and international integration of Macedonia;<br />

Permanent control aimed at high levels of safety in the traffic and environment protection;<br />

Maximal utilization of the traditional roads to locate the major traffic corridors;<br />

Adaptation of the general direction of the routes to the natural terrain features;<br />

Adaptation of the traffic network of the major generators of future transportation of passengers<br />

and goods;<br />

Minimizing the traveling time and the transportation costs;<br />

Protection and preserving the space for future strategic transportation corridors, for which<br />

there is currently no traffic or economic justifiability.<br />

77


CHAPTER THREE<br />

EDUCATION, CULTURE AND CIVIL LIFE<br />

1. EDUCATION<br />

1.1. Municipal Educational Facilities<br />

There is a developed network of elementary and high schools in the country. Of the total<br />

1,292 school buildings in the Macedonia, elementary schools use 1,139, while 116 buildings are for<br />

use by the high schools. The largest part of the school buildings is located in the municipalities of<br />

Tetovo (the Polog region) (110 school buildings), whereas the smallest portion is in the municipalities<br />

of Centar (Skopje region) – 13 school buildings, Valandovo (Southeast region) – 13 school buildings,<br />

and Kratovo (Northeast region) – 12 buildings. In terms of the buildings used for implementation<br />

of the education at secondary level, there is a high-school building in almost all municipalities<br />

(by NUTS 4), except in Kriva Palanka. The largest number of buildings is located in the municipality<br />

of Centar (13 buildings). (Table 58, Publication II)<br />

The number of classrooms in the schools is, however, different. At a national level, 695 (61<br />

percent) of the buildings for elementary education have between 1 and 4 classrooms (the schools<br />

are such in all municipalities with the exception of the municipality of Centar - Skopje region); 188<br />

schools have between 5 and 8 classrooms; 88 have more between 9 and 12 classrooms; and there<br />

are 163 schools with 13 or more classrooms. The following municipalities have the smallest number<br />

of classrooms in comparison with the number of schools: Tetovo (60) – Polog region, Bitola (54) –<br />

Pelagonia region, Kumanovo (45) – Northeast region, Strumica (43) – Southeast region, Gostivar (43)<br />

– Polog region, Prilep (36) – Pelagonia region, Kisela Voda (30) – Skopje region. It should be noted<br />

here that these are municipalities with the largest number of school buildings in which elementary<br />

education is realized. It is an interesting fact that these are the same municipalities in which there<br />

are schools with the largest number of classrooms (13+), in addition to the municipalities of Karpos,<br />

Kisela Voda, Cair and Centar. As it may be noticed, these are among the biggest municipalities in the<br />

country. The majority of the other municipalities have between 5 and 8 classrooms. (Table 59,<br />

Publication II)<br />

The majority of the secondary schools (54) have 13 classrooms, 18 have between 9 and 12<br />

classrooms, 12 have between 5 and 8, whereas 10 schools have between 1 and 4 classrooms. The<br />

high schools with 1 to 4 classrooms are in the following municipalities: Prilep (4), Bitola (2), Gostivar<br />

(2) while Berovo, Valandovo, Sveti Nikole, and Tetovo have schools with one classroom each. (Table<br />

59, Publication II)<br />

Of the total of 1,289 buildings, 1,287 have central heating. Of them, 1,241 have their own<br />

heating, 46 use central heating (in the municipalities of Gazi Baba, Karpos and Centar – Skopje<br />

region), whereas the remaining ones have their own heating, of which the majority (839) are schools<br />

heated with movable heaters using solid fuels, and 380 have their own central heating. (Table 60,<br />

Publication II)<br />

Among others, one of the competencies of the municipalities is the provision of<br />

transport for elementary pupils who do not have a school in their place of residence and live<br />

in that municipality. In relation to the total number of pupils, this percentage in the school<br />

year 2002/03 varied between 50.0 percent in the municipality of Rankovce (Izvor and<br />

Karabinci have 39.2 percent each, Orasac 37.3 percent, Belciste 37.2 percent, Dolna Banjica<br />

78


and Capari 36.9 percent, Oblesevo 36.7 percent, Jegunovce 35.0 percent, Bogomila 33.0 percent,<br />

Demir Hisar 32.9 percent, Vasilevo 31.9 percent, Novo Selo 31.2 percent, Samokov and<br />

Cesinovo 30.9 percent) and 0.1 percent in Kicevo. (Table 61, Publication II) As it is a legal obligation<br />

of the municipalities to provide such transportation, the assumption is that the obligation<br />

is met in full.<br />

1.2. Input Education Indicators<br />

1.2.1. Pre-school Education 29<br />

The pre-school education is a particularly significant factor for development of childredn,<br />

their social integration and preparation for further levels of education.<br />

In 2002, there were a total of 435 preparatory schools in the elementary schools in the<br />

Macedonia, with 52 organizations within the pre-school institutions.<br />

The number of preparatory schools in the municipalities varies between 21 in the municipality<br />

of Kumanovo and 1 in each of the following ones: Velesta, Vrapcista, Vrutok, Demir Hisar,<br />

Drugovo, Zitose, Jegunovce, Klecevce, Kukurecani, Lukovo, Mogila, Novaci, Orizari, Pehcevo,<br />

Sopotnica, Staro Nagoricani, Cegrane, Djepciste and Sipkovica. It should be noted that there are no<br />

preparatory schools in the municipalities of Bogdanci, Bogomila, Kratovo, Kriva Palanka and<br />

Makedonski Brod. There are 59 preparatory schools in the city of Skopje, but their distribution<br />

among the municipalities in the city is different. Thus, there are 16 preparatory schools in the municipality<br />

of Kisela Voda, 10 in each of Gazi Baba and Centar, 8 in Karpos, 7 in Gjorce Petrov, 6 in Cair and<br />

2 in the municipality of Suto Orizari.<br />

In terms of the organizations (nurseries, kinder gardens and preparatory schools) within the<br />

pre-school institutions, which are institutions providing care for children, the largest number is in<br />

Skopje (17), of which 4 in each of Karpos, Kisela Voda and Centar, 2 in each of Gazi Baba, Cair, Bitola,<br />

Prilep and Stip, with one such organization in all the other urban municipalities, which include<br />

Tetovo and Kumanovo, as one of the large municipalities in the country, having the highest number<br />

of newly born as compared to the other municipalities. It should be noted that in municipalities in<br />

which there are no pre-primary schools, the work with pre-school children takes place in organizations<br />

within the pre-school institutions, with the exception of Bogomila, where there are no such<br />

institutions. (Table 62, Publication II)<br />

It is a fact that the inclusion of children in pre-school education positively impacts their success<br />

in the elementary education. The total number of children included in the two types of preschool<br />

care and education is 36,417 or 20.57 percent of the total number of children at the age of up<br />

to 6. The gender differences are such that there were 106 boys against 100 girls included in the<br />

process of pre-school education. With regard to the municipalities, the municipalities of Bistrica,<br />

Brvenica, Vrutok, Demir Kapija, Jegunovce, Klecevce, Krusevo, Novo Selo, Oblesevo, Sopotnica,<br />

Srbinovo, and Kriva Palanka stand out as a group with a considerably high level of masculinity.<br />

Municipalities in which the number of boys was relatively high include the municipalities of<br />

Cesinovo (42.9 boys per 100 girls) and Kukurecani and Rosoman (57 boys per 100 girls), while the<br />

level of masculinity is lower in Aracinovo, Berovo, Bogovinje, Velesta, Vratnica, Delgozdi, Delcevo,<br />

Dolneni, Zelino, Zelenikovo, Karbinci, Kondovo, Konce, Kocani, Kratovo, Krivogastani, Labunista,<br />

Lozovo, Ohrid, Pehcevo, Podares, Probistip, Studenicani, Topolcani, Cucer Sandevo and Dzepciste.<br />

(Table 63, Publication II)<br />

29<br />

This level of education is not mandatory. The latest regulations include the pre-school education as one of the mandatory education levels,<br />

as well.<br />

79


1.2.2. Elementary Education<br />

In the school year 2002/03, mandatory elementary education was carried out in a total of<br />

344 elementary schools, which included 10,062 classes between 1 st and 8 th grade. The average number<br />

of pupils per teacher at a national level was 17, with the municipality of Ilinden exceeding the<br />

average with 24 pupils per teacher. The municipalities of Suto Orizari and Aracinovo had an average<br />

of 23 pupils per teacher, Cegrane, Radovis and Lipkovo had 21, and the municipalities of Gjorce<br />

Petrov, Kisela Voda, Kocani and Stip had 20 pupils per teacher. Contrary to this, the following municipalities<br />

had a below-average – or the smallest - number of pupils per teacher: Staravina (4 pupils per<br />

teachers), Kosel (5 pupils), Lukovo, Mavrovi Anovi and Orasac (6 pupils), etc. (Table 64, Publication II)<br />

The average number of foreign languages per pupil in the elementary education is 1.2. This<br />

figure fluctuates as pupils go from lower to upper classes. Thus, 4 th grade pupils had an average of<br />

0.8 foreign languages, while those in 6 th grade had an average of 1.4; the average is declining in the<br />

following grades (1.3 in 7 th and 1.2 in 8 th grade). (See Table 9)<br />

The total percentage of inclusion of all pupils from 1 st to 8 th grade, regardless of their gender,<br />

amounts to 95.2 percent (95.6 percent for boys and 95.1 percent for girls) 30 . Such a percentage of<br />

inclusion is high for a country with low- to middle income. There is a below-average percentage of<br />

inclusion in the municipalities of Dolna Banjica – 33.7 percent (32 percent for boys and 35.0 percent<br />

for girls), Staravina – 36.4 percent (25.0 percent for boys and 42.9 percent for girls), Vratnica – 56.2<br />

percent (60.5 percent for boys and 52.0 percent for girls), Sopiste – 57.3 percent (55.2 percent for<br />

boys and 59.4 percent for girls), Sipkovica – 61.1 percent (56.4 percent for boys and 66.1 percent for<br />

girls), and so on. (Table 65, Publication II)<br />

The net rate of inclusion in the elementary education, i.e. the number of children of an<br />

adequate age (7 to 14 years of age) attending elementary education as a percentage of the total<br />

population at that age indicates a lower rate of inclusion of 92.5 percent (92.7 percent for boys and<br />

92.4 percent for girls). The municipalities with a lower gross rate of enrolled pupils, such as Staravina<br />

(27.3 percent), Vratnica (52.8 percent), Dolna Banjica (31.9 percent), Sopiste (56.0 percent), and<br />

Sipkovica (61.1 percent), have an even lower net rate of inclusion. (Table 65, Publication II). The same<br />

table shows the 28 municipalities with rates computed at below 90 percent. In addition to the<br />

municipalities of Struga, Radovis, Gjorce Petrov, Krusevo and Vinica, which belong to the urban parts<br />

of the country, the remaining 25 are municipalities in the rural areas.<br />

1.2.3. Special Elementary Schools<br />

Children with impediments in their development are educated in special elementary<br />

schools. There is a total of 45 such schools, with the largest number being located in Skopje (13), of<br />

which 5 in each of Gazi Baba and Kisela Voda, and one in each of Gjorce Petrov, Karpos and Cair;<br />

then, there are 5 in Bitola, and 2 in Gostivar, Ilinden, Ohrid, and Tetovo each. There are a total of 167<br />

classes (less than 7 as compared to the 2001/02 school year), which include 1,125 pupils. The largest<br />

number of classes is in the municipalities of Kisela Voda (26), Cair (22) and Bitola (19). The average<br />

number of pupils per teacher is 5. At a municipal level, the burden is largest in Gostivar and Negotino<br />

(13 pupils per teacher), Aracinovo, Medonska Kamenica and Tetovo (12 pupils per teacher), and<br />

Kavadarci (11 pupils per teacher). (Table 66, Publication II)<br />

1.2.4. Secondary Education<br />

In the same school year, the secondary education was carried out in 95 secondary schools<br />

(46 gymnasiums and 49 vocational secondary schools) with a total of 3,037 classes (844 gymnasiums<br />

30<br />

A large portion of the municipalities point to the fact that the number of enrolled children who attended elementary school exceeds<br />

the number of children at the adequate age; this in a way indicates that children from other municipalities also enroll in those municipalities.<br />

In this sense, the data regarding the gross rates exceeding 100 are commented herein<br />

80


and 2,193 in vocational schools). A little more than one third of the children (39 percent) continued<br />

their education in gymnasiums and the rest went to vocational secondary schools. The average<br />

number of children per teacher is 17. This average is lowest in the municipalities of Negotino-<br />

Polosko (7 children per teacher) and Rostuse (6 per teacher), and highest in Delcevo (22) and<br />

Negotino, Sveti Nikole and Strumica (21). (Table 67, Publication II)<br />

Of the total 95 secondary schools, 91 are state-owned and 4 are private schools.<br />

The gross rate of inclusion of children in the secondary education in the school year 2002/03<br />

at a national level is 71 percent, meaning that 72 percent of the children at the age between 15 and<br />

18 are included in the secondary education. In terms of gender, this rate is lower among girls (71.0<br />

percent) as compared to boys (73 percent).<br />

The net rate of inclusion in the secondary education in the 2002/03 school year at a national<br />

level is 63.5 percent, meaning that 63.5 percent of the total number of children at the age<br />

between 15 and 18 is included in the secondary education. In terms of gender, this rate is lower<br />

among girls (62.2 percent) than among boys (65.0 percent).<br />

Comparatively, the net rate of inclusion in the elementary education indicates that 27 percent<br />

of the children never proceed to secondary education.<br />

It is not possible to conduct a comparative gross-net analysis by municipalities, as the<br />

records of the number of enrolled secondary education students are not maintained in accordance<br />

with their place of residence.<br />

1.2.5. Higher Education 31<br />

The higher education is carried out at two universities: “St. Cyril and Methodius” and “St.<br />

Kliment of Ohrid”. The higher-education institutions are distributed in the following cities:<br />

Municipality<br />

Table 23. Distribution of high education institutions<br />

School year<br />

2002/03 2001/02<br />

Enrolled Masculinity Enrolled Masculinity<br />

Total<br />

Faculties<br />

Higher<br />

vocational<br />

schools<br />

Skopje 22 22 35.146 78,4 34.593 80,3<br />

Bitola 4 3 1 5.198 80,2 4.791 87,9<br />

Ohrid 1 1 2.525 86,3 2.441 92,1<br />

Prilep 1 1 1.663 79,4 1.666 87,2<br />

Stip 2 2 1.092 45,4 1.219 52,8<br />

Total 30 29 1 45.624* 78,1 44.710 81,1<br />

Of the total number of enrolled students (45,624) in the school year 2002/03, 45,478 were<br />

Macedonian citizens. In terms of gender, there were 78 male per 100 female enrolled students in the<br />

year. This proportion is also present in the other university centers, with the exception of the Faculty<br />

of Tourism and Hospitality in Ohrid, where there are 86 male per 100 female students. Unlike this,<br />

there were 45 male per 100 female enrolled students at the faculty in Stip (Mining-Geology and<br />

Faculty of Pedagogy).<br />

31<br />

The data refer only to higher-education institutions in public ownership. The indicators refer only to the national level.<br />

* This is the total number of enrolled students. Of those, 45,478 were citizens of the Republic of Macedonia. Different data are provided<br />

with regard to the total number of students. Thus, for instance, the data referring to higher education students by gender and age are<br />

based on a total number of 45,468 students. We note that this is also used in the calculation of the gross and net rate of students enrolled<br />

in the higher education institutions in the country.<br />

81


The average change of the number of students in the higher-education increased by 113.51<br />

percent in comparison with the previous year, while in regard with the masculinity percentage, the<br />

inclusion of male students in the higher education is on the downward line.<br />

The percentage of students included in the higher-education groups of science, mathematics<br />

and engineering is 42.1 percent. In comparison with the previous years, this number is lower (it<br />

was 45.4 percent in 2001/02 and 46.1 percent in 2000/01).<br />

The gross or total rate of inclusion in the higher education in the 2002/03 school year is illustrated<br />

in Figure 11 below.<br />

Figure11. Total (gross) rate of students enrolled in higher-education institutions (2002/03)<br />

Not surprisingly, the rate is highest at the age of 19, going gradually down as the age level<br />

increases. The rate of inclusion at the age between 19 and 29 – a level corresponding to the highest<br />

degree to the higher-education process in the country – is 11.8 percent (10.0 percent in the case of<br />

male and 13.6 percent in the case of female students), which is by 10 percent and more than in<br />

developed countries of the type of USA, Canada, Great Britain, Germany and others.<br />

The net or pure inclusion in the percentage of higher education in the 2002/03 school year<br />

is illustrated on Figure 12 below.<br />

Figure 12. Pure (net) rate of students enrolled in higher-education institutions (2002/03)<br />

82


At national level, 16.0 percent of the population at the age between 19 and 24 is included in<br />

the education process (13.3 percent of the male and 18.8 percent of the female population).<br />

1.2. Changes in the Education Process 32<br />

The transition from a lower to a higher grade is a considerably important factor and indicator<br />

in the monitoring of the efficiency of the school and the education system in ensuring literacy of<br />

the population. On the basis of the data by cohorts 33 , the calculated percentage of pupils who<br />

arrived at 5 th grade in the school year 2001/02 is 96.5 percent. Compared to the 2002/03 data (when<br />

the percentage is 94.9 percent), this percentage is somewhat higher, implying future increase of the<br />

number of individuals who have not completed their elementary education.<br />

1.3. Results from Education<br />

1.3.1. Illiteracy rate<br />

In 2002, 3.6 percent of the population at the age of 10 and above was illiterate. In comparison<br />

with 1994, this percentage is lower. Back in 1994, the illiteracy rate was 5.4 percent. Examined<br />

by gender, the illiteracy rate is higher among the female (5.5 percent) than among the male (1.7 percent)<br />

population. The illiteracy rate of the population significantly increases among the population<br />

at the age of 60 and above. This trend is noticeable among both genders. Thus, for instance, the percentage<br />

of the illiterate population at the age between 60 and 64 was 5.2 percent (2.0 percent<br />

among the male and 8,2 percent among the female population), while as soon as in the next age<br />

group it was 12.2 percent (4.7 percent among males and 18.9 percent among females). As the elementary<br />

education is mandatory, it is worth noting the fact that the illiteracy rate among the<br />

youngest is 1.0 percent (0.9 percent among boys and 1.1 percent among girls). The specific illiteracy<br />

rates of the population by age are illustrated in Figure 3 below.<br />

Figure 13. Illiteracy rate of the population by gender, Macedonia (2002)<br />

32<br />

The indicators related to this refer only to the national level. Due to a lack of data, the following relevant indicators were not calculated:<br />

number of students enrolled in 7th and 8th grade; changes in the rate of inclusion of students in the secondary education; changes in the<br />

rate of inclusion of students in the higher education; changes in the number of adults included in the higher education.<br />

33<br />

As understood by the statistics, a 'cohort' means an event for a group of people sharing a common demographic experience - a cohort<br />

- over a given period. The most frequently used is the cohort by birth, i.e. people born in the same year. Other examples include cohorts<br />

of people by marriage or by class. The latter is used in this text, to refer to individuals who started their education at the same time.<br />

83


In terms of the number of the illiterate population as a percentage of the total one, there are<br />

certain disparities at a municipal level. As it may be seen, the highest and lowest rates of illiterate<br />

individuals are found in the municipalities presented in the table below.<br />

Municipality<br />

Table 24. Illiteracy rates<br />

Total Female Male<br />

Highest<br />

Vitoliste 24,0 33,9 14,5<br />

Klecevce 15,9 28,2 4,8<br />

Staravina 15,1 24,8 5,8<br />

Orasac 13,7 23,6 4,9<br />

Karbinci 13,6 18,9 8,6<br />

Demir Kapija 12,5 14,6 10,5<br />

Kosel 12,5 19,7 5,5<br />

Rankovce 12,4 21,7 4,0<br />

Staro<br />

12,4 20,7 5,1<br />

Nagoricani<br />

Samokov 12,3 22,9 3,1<br />

Suto Orizari 12,0 19,2 4,7<br />

Sipkovica 11,3 15,7 7,1<br />

Zitose 11,1 17,6 4,7<br />

Konopiste 10,8 17,0 5,5<br />

Belciste 10,1 17,1 15.0<br />

Lowest<br />

Kisela Voda 1,0 1,5 0,4<br />

Gevgelija 0,9 1,3 0,5<br />

As noticed, the rate of illiteracy in municipalities varies between 0.9 percent (o.5 percent<br />

among males and 1.3 percent among females) in Gevgelija and 24.0 percent in Vitoliste (14.5 percent<br />

among males and 33.9 percent among females). The specifics of the impact of age on illiteracy<br />

in certain municipalities, such as in Suto Orizari, reveal a high percentage of the younger in the<br />

group of ‘illiterate’. Namely, for 35 years now, the number of illiterate is 10.0 percent and increases<br />

gradually as the age levels increase. Another specific of this municipality is that the percentage of<br />

illiteracy is 10.0 percent or higher among all age groups (Table 68, Publication II)<br />

1.3.2. Educational Structure<br />

The differences between municipalities may also be identified according to the achieved<br />

level of education.<br />

At national level, the 2002 data indicate that the total population at the age of 15 and above has<br />

been mapped in terms of the educational structure as follows: secondary education – 36.9 percent (with<br />

a maximum of 57.49 percent in Kisela Voda, and a minimum of 5.59 percent in Plasnica); elementary education<br />

35.5 percent (with a maximum of 74.04 percent in Negotino-Polosko and a minimum of 16.92 percent<br />

in Kisela Voda); uncompleted elementary education 13.8 percent (maximum 54.36 percent in<br />

Staravina and minimum 4.91 percent in Kisela Voda); university degree 6.5 percent (maximum 9.70 percent<br />

in Bitola, minimum 0.06 percent in Dobrusevo); 4.2 percent have no education (maximum 48.22 percent<br />

in Vitoliste and minimum 1.06 percent in Kisela Voda); 3.2 have a college degree (maximum 6.48 percent<br />

in Bitola, minimum 0.21 percent in Vitoliste); 0.2 percent are still in the process of obtaining elementary<br />

education (maximum0.88 percent in Srbinovo, minimum 0.02 percent in Bistrica); 0.2 percent have<br />

an MA degree maximum 0.74 percent in Centar, minimum 0.01 percent in Bosilevo, Valandovo, Vasilevo,<br />

84


Kondovo, Kratovo and Rostusa), and 0.1 percent have a Ph.D. (maximum 0.92 percent in Centar, minimum<br />

of 0.01 percent in Suto Orizari, Bosilovo, Kondovo, Kriva Palanka, Lipkovo, Negotino, Negotino-<br />

Polosko, Sveti Nikole and Tearce). (Table 69, Publication II)<br />

An analysis of the educational structure of the population as a whole in each municipality<br />

individually shows that the population with elementary education only dominates in 86 of the 123<br />

municipalities in Macedonia. These are mainly rural municipalities, with the exception of Suto<br />

Orizari, Gostivar, Debar, Krusevo and Tetovo. (See Table 19) There is a group of municipalities where,<br />

in addition to the mild domination of the population with only an elementary education, one fourth<br />

and more have a secondary education. Those are: Belcista, Bistrica, Blatec, Brvenica, Vranesnica,<br />

Vratnica, Gostivar, Gradsko, Debar, Zelenikovo, Jegunovce, Kosel, Krivogastani, Krusevo, Lozovo,<br />

Lukovo, Mavrovi Anovi, Makedonska Kamenica, Meseista, Miravci, Novaci, Oblesevo, Orizari,<br />

Petrovec, Pehcevo, Rosoman, Sopiste, Struga, Cesinovo. (Table 69, Publication II)<br />

Concluding remarks and Recommendations<br />

It is expected that the analysis of the indicators will be of an adequate influence in the<br />

process of decision making, as well as in providing higher levels of visibility in the process of designing<br />

and constructing facilities.<br />

The concluding remarks imply the following: there are discrepancies in the infrastructural<br />

equipping of schools with classrooms, including heating as well, which points to the need of<br />

evening out the differences in terms of existential needs of realizing educational activities; there are<br />

disparities in terms of the number of school staff, which affects the quality of teaching; the disparity<br />

in terms of the rates of inclusion in the elementary education is a problem that will have a considerable<br />

impact on the educational structure; the low rates of inclusion in the secondary education<br />

indirectly implies differences in the level of accessibility of schools in different parts of the country,<br />

not excluding the factor of culture and domination of tradition in some areas; there is a low rate of<br />

continuous education and the disparities in terms of the educational structure indicate differences<br />

in the human resources of the municipalities and their future sustainability and autonomy.<br />

It is necessary to expand the data base and to complete the list of indicators in areas already<br />

existing at a national level and it is more than necessary to establish a data base of records of such<br />

activities at a local level.<br />

85


2. CULTURE<br />

2.1. Cultural institution and their technical and human resources<br />

Data will be presented in this section pertaining to the analysis of the institutions which host<br />

the performance of cultural activities. The following are considered cultural institutions: museums,<br />

theatres, cinemas, libraries and people’s and workers’ universities, as well as culture centers, which<br />

are indirectly linked with culture (as a form of use of free time). It also includes sporting facilities and<br />

the public information media: radio and television.<br />

2.1.1. Museums 34<br />

There are a total of 21 museums in the country, 16 of which, according to the type of objects<br />

and collections which they host, are complex 35 , with the remaining 5 defined as specialized museums<br />

36 .<br />

Several large towns, which were municipal centers of the old municipalities, lack complex<br />

museums: Gostivar (Polog region with mixed ethnical composition); Kocani (east region); Radovis<br />

(Southeast region) and Debar (Southwest region with mixed ethnic composition). There are complex<br />

museums (one in each) in several minor towns which are also municipal centers such as: Gevgelija,<br />

Kratovo, Negotino and Sveti Nikole. There are three museums in Skopje, two of which are in the<br />

municipality Centar and one in the municipality Karpos. Each of the two municipalities also has a<br />

“special” museum “. The other two “special” museums are in the municipalities Kicevo and Krusevo.<br />

(see Table 70, Publication II)<br />

2.1.2. Theatres<br />

In 2002 there were a total of 19 theatres in the country, 11 of which are professional theatres<br />

37 , one is a professional theatre for children and youth 38 and seven theatres fall into the group of<br />

amateur theatres 39 .<br />

According to the data, there are no theatres in the Southwestern and Polog region, both of<br />

which are of mixed ethnic composition. The professional theatres are found in the “leading” municipalities<br />

of the other statistically determined regions. (NUTS 3): Skopje, Bitola, Veles, Kumanovo,<br />

Prilep, Strumica and Stip. The only professional theatre for children and youth is located in the<br />

municipality Centar. The amateur theatre life is active in Skopje with two theatres, and there is one<br />

in each of the flowing municipalities: Debar, Demir Kapija, Kavadarci, Kicevo, Kocani, Kumanovo and<br />

Negotino. (see Table 71, Publication II)<br />

2.1.3. Cinemas 40<br />

There were active cinemas in only 27 towns in 2002, to of which were open type, out door<br />

cinemas. Outside of the city of Skopje, there are cinemas in only 18, mainly urban, municipalities. The<br />

city of Skopje has a total of 9 cinemas, all in the municipality Centar. It is worth mentioning that<br />

34<br />

Museums and museum collections collect in a systematic fashion, make a scientific research, keep and exhibit objects of significance for<br />

the education, science and art. Art galleries fall under art museums category.<br />

35<br />

Complex museums - host several thematic collections which cover one or several regions<br />

36<br />

Special museums- collect one type of artefacts. They may be social historical, natural history museums, economical-technical and art<br />

museums (National office of Statistics of)<br />

37<br />

Professional theatres are autonomous organizations of culture and art with a permanent management and theatre crew..<br />

38<br />

Professional theatres for children and youth are autonomous organizations of culture and art with a permanent management and professional<br />

theatre crew, which give performances for children and youth..<br />

39<br />

Amateur theatres and organizations of culture and art which work with mainly actors-amateurs. There are either autonomous or are part<br />

of some other entity (State Statistical Office).<br />

40<br />

Cinema theatres, indoor or outdoor, are equipped with the necessary facilities for showing films to the public.<br />

In terms of organizational set-up, a cinema may be an autonomous entity or a unit of some other entity, such as the culture center, school<br />

etc. Types of cinema: permanent, summer open type outdoor or movable cinemas.<br />

86


etween 1998 and 2000, the other city of Skopje municipalities had facilities for showing works of<br />

the art of film. In the newly created municipalities, with the exception of Pehcevo, and in the regions<br />

with mixed ethnic composition there are no active cinemas. (see Table 72, Publication II)<br />

There are also notable differences in terms of the number of seats per capita in the municipalities.<br />

The number of seats per one thousand of population ranges between 45.4 in the municipality<br />

of Pehcevo and 41.0 in Centar to 2.7 in Prilep, and 2.5 in the municipality of Strumica. (see Table<br />

72, Publication II).<br />

2.1.4. People and workers’ universities, houses and centers of culture,<br />

pioneers’ homes 41<br />

In 2002, there were 31 houses of culture, 12 workers’ universities, 5 pioneers’ homes, 4 centers of<br />

culture and one people’s university. Almost as a rule, these institutions are located in the municipal<br />

centers, while as regards the rural municipalities, only Pehcevo and Cucer – Sandevo have houses of<br />

culture. All other institutions are located in the urban areas. The specific of City of Skopje, where<br />

almost one quarter of the population lives, is that only the municipality of Centar has institutions of<br />

this type, i.e. one house of culture, and one workers’ university (see Table 74, Publication II).<br />

According to the total data, it becomes evident that there is a trend of decreasing number<br />

(closure) of institutions of this type in all regions, with the exception of Vardar Region. The biggest<br />

number of institutions of this type is found in the Southeast and east region. Most of the workers’<br />

universities and houses of culture are found in the Southwest region (a region with mixed ethnic<br />

composition), as well as in the Skopje and Southeast region. Pioneers’ homes can be found in the<br />

Pleagonia region – municipality of Bitola, Vardar region – municipality of Veles, Northeast region –<br />

municipality of Kumanovo, Southeast – municipality of East region – Stip and Kocani.<br />

Almost all the institutions of this type are experiencing a decrease in the number of performances,<br />

with the exception of the houses of culture in Bitola, Kavadarci, Valandovo, Gevgelija and<br />

Vinica (see Table 74, Publication II)<br />

2.1.5. Libraries 42<br />

One of the forms through which culture is passed on from generation to generation are the<br />

libraries. In 2001 in Macedonia there were 208 libraries in total. One of them is the national library<br />

located in the municipality of Centar.; one is a general science library located in the same municipality;<br />

42 libraries are higher education libraries under the higher education institutions in the municipalities<br />

of Gazi Baba (9), Karpos (4), Centar (22), Bitola (3), Ohrid (1), Prilep (1) and Stip (2); 72 libraries<br />

are special 43 ; one is a general science library 44 and 92 se people’s libraries. (see Table 74, Publication II)<br />

In light of the specifics of this analysis, we provide a closer view of the people’s libraries.<br />

According to the data, out of 123 municipalities, in 1998, 72 municipalities had a minimum of one<br />

library, with a drop in 2001 to 60 municipalities. It can be seen that in 2001 the libraries in the following<br />

rural municipalities stopped the provision of services to the citizens:: Bogovinje, Vrapciste,<br />

Vratnica, Delogozdi, Zelino, Labunista, Lukovo, Negotino-Polosko, Orizari, Rostuse, Cucer-Sandevo i<br />

Dzepciste. According to the number of libraries, the municipality of Centar is the richest (6) with 5<br />

libraries in the municipalities of: Kisela Voda, Chair, Bitola; 3 libraries in the municipalities of Gazi<br />

Baba, Karpos, Vinica, Kratovo and Negotino; 2 libraries in Prilep, Kavadarci, Delcevo, Gjorce Petrov<br />

41<br />

These institutions conducts their activities in the areas of education and culture by way of seminars and courses, organizing public lectures,<br />

performances of art and culture, guest visits of other institutions engaged in the same or similar activities..<br />

42<br />

Library: Regardless of the name, any organized collection of published books and periodic journals or any other documents, including<br />

graphic and audio visual materials and services rendered by the staff to the users to make the use of the said materials easier for the purposes<br />

of obtaining information, scientific research, education or leisure,<br />

43<br />

Special libraries (;libraries under management of another entity - other than university libraries);<br />

44<br />

Other important non-specialized libraries (general science) - data on general science libraries is with reference to the library of the<br />

Macedonian Academy of Science and Arts - MANU<br />

87


and Bistrica. The remaining municipalities have one library each. The striking thing is that there are<br />

no libraries in the rural municipalities of the Polog and Southwestern part of the country (regions<br />

with mixed ethnic composition). Furthermore, there are only two libraries in the Polog region. In<br />

comparison, the Skopje region has 25 libraries, and the east region- 16. (see Table 74, Publication II)<br />

The level of stocks of the libraries is measured by the number of titles available in each<br />

library. In 2001 to total number of titles in the 92 libraries were 766,473, which on average means<br />

that there were 8,331 titles per library. The most distinct deviations from the norm are seen in the<br />

municipality of Valandovo, which has a bellow average number of 273 titles, with the municipality<br />

of Bitola with the highest number of 77,295. titles (see Table 75, Publication II)<br />

2.1.6. Sporting facilities<br />

According to the data obtained from the Agency for youth and sport, the number of sporting<br />

facilities is lowest in the newly formed, by and large rural municipalities. As regards the old<br />

municipalities, the number of sporting facilities is lowest (not more than 5) in municipalities:<br />

Gevgelija, Demir Hisar, Kratovo, Kumanovo, Negotino, Prilep, Radovis and Resen. (see Table 76,<br />

Publication II)<br />

2.2. Radio- and TV-enterprises 45<br />

There is one public broadcasting enterprise in the country which broadcasts radio<br />

rpogrammes and one public broadcasting enterprise which broadcasts TV-programms. In Macedonia<br />

there are 29 public radio broadcasting companies which operate at a local level, 11 of which also<br />

broadcast TV programmes. There are three national registered stations which broadcast programmes<br />

at a national level and 55 radio companies which broadcast programmes at a local level.<br />

(see Table 77, Publication II)<br />

The municipality of Centar has the highest number of radio stations, 8; Karpos and Tetovo<br />

have 5 each; Veles and Ohrid have 4 each; Bitola, Kumanovo and Prilep have three each; Kisela Voda<br />

and Struga have two each and the other 14 municipalities have one radio station each. The<br />

Northeast is the region with the lowest number of radio and television stations, with only three electronic<br />

media in the town Kumanovo. The Vardar and Pelagonia regions also have a small number of<br />

electronic media. The emergence of new electronic media in the rural newly created municipalities<br />

with a mixed ethnic composition in the Southwestern part of the country, as well as in the Polog<br />

region (Cegrane and Tearce). (see Table 78, Publication II)<br />

The data on the art, culture and humanitarian science radio programmes broadcast<br />

(hours/per year) shoe that the national radio channels broadcast annually at a national level a total<br />

of 750 hours (which is 5.9 percent of the total programmes broadcast) for this type of programmes.<br />

This radio broadcasting enterprise annually broadcasts 2,074 hours of programmes, which is 2.8 percent<br />

of the total hours of broadcasting in the country. Compared with the privately owned commercial<br />

radio channels which have a national coverage, this figure is much lower, standing at 640 hours<br />

(or 8.5% of the total hours of broadcasting), and at a local level, this type of programme has a total<br />

of 2.534 hours of broadcasting (or 1.5 percent of the total programmes broadcast).<br />

Radio art, culture and humanitarian science programme broadcast (hours/per year) – number<br />

of hours:<br />

Local privately owned radio stations – ranking 10 th in the programming schedule.<br />

National privately owned radio stations – ranking 6 th in the programming schedule:<br />

45<br />

Public broadcasting enterprise - Macedonian radio-television, level-national, owned by the government; Commercial broadcasting<br />

enterprises: level- local and national; privately owned<br />

88


Local government owned radio stations – ranking 9 th in the programming schedule.<br />

Macedonian national radio: ranking 5 th in the programming schedule.<br />

TV programmes broadcast (in hours/per year) dedicated to art, culture and humanitarian<br />

science by number of hours of programme broadcast:<br />

Local privately owned TV channels: ranking 12 th in the programming schedule (2.527<br />

hours).<br />

National privately owned TV-channels: ranking 5 th in the programming schedule(788<br />

hours).<br />

Local government owned TV channels: ranking 12 th in the programming schedule(135<br />

hours).<br />

Macedonian national television: ranking 10 th in the programming schedule(365 hours).<br />

What can be seen is that there is a visible trend of decreasing number of electronic media in<br />

the Vardar region, and all the other regions, with the exception of the Pelagonia region. Regarding<br />

the radio programme broadcast (in hours/per year) dedicated to art, culture and humanitarian science<br />

by the privately owned radio channels at a local level, the conclusion to be drawn is that the number<br />

of hours is decreasing. As to the government owned local radio channels, the opposite is true, i.e. the<br />

number of hours is increasing.<br />

2.3. Performances in the cultural institutions and attendances:<br />

The active relationship of the citizens to the institutions which stage activities linked with<br />

culture is measured through eh data on the number of visitors going through the gates to such institutions.<br />

The attendance to manifestations staged in such institutions is measured through the number<br />

of visitors during the year divided by the total population number.<br />

2.3.1. Museums<br />

A total of 191, 687 objects are stocked by the 16 complex museums, 20,279 of which are<br />

exhibited. The total number of objects stocked in the special museums is 127,419, and 8,624 have<br />

been exhibited.<br />

The total number of exhibitions staged in the exhibitions has been 154, with the complex<br />

museums hosting a total of 119 exhibitions, against the 35 exhibitions staged by the specialized<br />

museums. In 2000, the total number of museum collections registered in the specialized museums<br />

was 39, 403, of which 2,255 were exhibited. The total number of visitors was 20,683 or 10.2 visitors<br />

per 1,000 populations.<br />

During 2000, all the museums were visited by 85.4 visitors per 1,000 populations. The attendance<br />

at complex museums is higher (69.6 visitors per 1000 population) compared to the specialized<br />

museums (15.8 visitors per 1000 population).<br />

2.3.2. Theatres<br />

A total of 124 plays and operas were staged in the professional theatres, with a total of 1,047<br />

performances. 64 of the total number of pieces staged were premiers, 40 of which by foreign and 24<br />

by domestic authors. One half of the total number of pieces was staged in the city of Skopje. Bitola<br />

staged (22) pieces and Kumanovo (10), with the theatre in Prilep even less than that - 9 pieces<br />

staged, and Veles and Stip with 6 pieces staged, and Strumica 5.<br />

The theatre attendance in the period between 1998 and 2002 is rather stable. In 2002 there<br />

were 271,118 visitors to all the professional theatres in the country, which are 133.8 visitors per 1,000<br />

89


populations. Theatres in the city of Skopje account for 49 percent or 133,144. The lowest attendance<br />

rate was that in the theatres in the municipality of Strumica, 4,901 visitors.<br />

A total of 14 pieces were staged in the professional theatres for children and youth (4 premiers,<br />

of which three by foreign and one by a domestic author), with a total of 177 performances. During<br />

the same period the total number of visitors was 21,122 or 45.3 visitors per one thousand population.<br />

A total of 17 pieces were staged in the amateur theatres in 2002 (13 premiers, of which 9 foreign<br />

and 4 domestic). The performances staged were attended by 18,333 fans of the art of theatre.<br />

Nationally, the attendance to amateur theatres was 9 per one thousand people. Skopje accounts for<br />

44 percent and the theatre in the municipality Negotino for 24 percent of the total number.<br />

2.3.3. Cinemas<br />

In 2002, 937 films were shown, of which 925 foreign authors and 12 domestic authors. Of the<br />

total number of films, 375 were shown in the cinemas located in the municipality Centar (373 foreign<br />

and two domestic authors), and least, i.e. two films, were shown in the municipality Pehcevo.<br />

Municipality of Pehcevo has had only two film shows, which shown the extent to which this institution<br />

is under utilized. According to the number of films shown, the highest number was in the Centar<br />

municipality, 9,114, and the lowest (6), besides Pehcevo, in the municipality Berovo.<br />

The audience figures were highest in Centar, with 3,362.3 visitors per one thousand people.<br />

In terms of the other municipalities, the highest number of visitors was seen in the municipality of<br />

Veles, 417.3 per thousand population, with the lowest in Berovo (6,8), Kochani, (19,4) and Pehchevo<br />

(30.2). In absolute numbers, the cinemas in the municipality Centar and the most active, where for<br />

example, 298,286 or 69 percent of the total of 431,286 visitors watched the cinema show.<br />

2.3.4. Libraries<br />

With regard to issue of how much the people’s libraries are put into service, on a national<br />

level there are 335 registered visitors per thousand people who have used the libraries’ services.<br />

Compared with 1998, there was a decrease in the number of users of public libraries in 2001,<br />

from 759,767 to 682,084 users. In proportion to the total figure, that means that the drop was from<br />

378 to 335 visitors per thousand inhabitants. In terms of membership, there was an increase from<br />

68,613 members to 73,291 members.<br />

The biggest users of library services are the citizens of the municipality Bitola, 61,462, with<br />

the lowest number of users in the municipality Mogila - 36 users.<br />

With the opening of new higher education institutions in Tetovo, a need has arisen for a higher<br />

education library in Tetovo, as one of the centers of the Polog region (region with mixed ethnic<br />

composition).<br />

Conclusions and Recommendations<br />

The data and the analysis lead to the following recap and comments: the difference between<br />

the municipalities in Macedonia is explicit regarding culture. Performance of cultural activities in an<br />

institutionalized framework, with the exception of cinemas and houses of culture, is at present<br />

viable only in urban areas, with the city of Skopje, municipality Centar standing out amongst the<br />

others – in terms of the level of equipment of cultural institutions. This also shows the “cultural”domination<br />

of this municipality over the other municipalities in the country.<br />

90


The closing comment is in the proposal on the extension of the data base with supplements<br />

as to the list of indicators in the following areas which are already present at a national level, though<br />

it is an absolute necessity to set up a data base to register local level activities:<br />

Civil society and culture: the number of associations of citizens (NGOs) active in the field of<br />

culture, membership, the number of project activities carried out, music, the number of concerts and<br />

other events with performances of works by domestic authors by category, the audience number.<br />

Local cultural manifestations: the number of manifestations, the number of visitors.<br />

Cultural heritage: the number of monuments of culture, the number of visitors, the number<br />

of archaeological sites, the number of visitors.<br />

Art: the number of independent and group exhibitions, the number of attendants, the number<br />

of galleries, ( categorized) in private, government or state ownership, the number of art colonies, the<br />

number of participants, the number of independent projects.<br />

Manifestations of culture and art: the number of manifestations of culture and art, the<br />

number of participants, the number of attendants.<br />

Young talents support: the number of identified young talents, the number of supported<br />

young talents.<br />

The expectations are that the findings from this analysis will be used in the process of erasing<br />

the disparities between the municipalities in Macedonia, in order to achieve a more balanced<br />

local development, but also to promote the development of the regions in Macedonia which are less<br />

developed. Also, the sector culture indicators will allow for a more relevant formulation of the culture<br />

development policy, targeted programming and planning, crucial guidelines for decision making,<br />

opening of important issues as a constituent part of the political agenda, identification of the<br />

main trends, stimulation and promotion of dialogue between the parties concerned and measuring<br />

of the accomplishment of the main objectives.<br />

91


3. CIVIL LIFE <strong>IN</strong> <strong>MUNICIPALITIES</strong><br />

The data available allow for a partial analysis of three aspects of civic life: electorate changes<br />

and election turn-out, participation of women in the election process, and the situation regarding<br />

the citizens’ actions.<br />

The situation in the sphere of citizens’ actions in terms of citizens getting together to act<br />

through associations of citizens, foundations and neighborhood units may be analyzed on the basis<br />

of the partial data obtained.<br />

The quality of data gathered on the two aspects identified allows for making of an initial<br />

analysis, though it is not suitable for a more in-depth study of phenomena and their trends. The data<br />

on the elections and the participation of women in the election process are of higher quality compared<br />

to the others, and it is possible to add new data for the purposes of our analysis. However,<br />

when it comes to data on the associations of citizens and neighborhood units, they are only superficial.<br />

In this sphere, which is important from the development perspective, it is necessary to invest<br />

serious and systemic efforts to generate the genuine basic data, since the secondary data available<br />

have serious shortcomings, which renders them largely unusable.<br />

3.1. Elections, electorate and conduct of voters<br />

As regards the situation and developments in the electorate, partial data have been<br />

obtained only with respect to the local elections held in 1996 and 2000, and full data on the presidential<br />

elections held in 2004 (the latter were collected from the official web site of the State election<br />

commission).<br />

3.1.1. Local elections: candidates for council members and mayors<br />

The local election data are available by municipality, though there are data missing on the<br />

total number of voters, (without which it is impossible to gauge the percentage of enfranchised of<br />

the total population)) as well as they are missing on the number of citizens which cast their votes<br />

(without which it is impossible to come up with the indicator of the turn-out in 1996 and 2000). The<br />

data available are shown in the Table on the number of candidates for municipal council members<br />

and the number of candidates running for mayors, 1996, 2000 (Table 79, Publication II).<br />

The analysis of the available data allows for making the initial assumptions in terms of the<br />

changes taking place in this particular aspect of the civic and political life in the municipalities. The<br />

general conclusion is that in the second round (in 2000), the local election process was stabilized. In<br />

terms of the degree of participation at the local elections, measured by the number of council member<br />

candidates, we may say that there are four categories of municipalities: those with a high level<br />

of electoral activities, medium level, low level and extremely low level of electoral activities.<br />

In most cases, it is the old municipalities that fall into the first category, with the newly<br />

formed municipality of Suto Orizari joining them in 2000/. This category also lists the smaller of the<br />

older municipalities, though municipalities such as Brvenica and Ilinded joined them in 1996, while<br />

in 2000 the municipalities Dolneni, Saraj and Petrovec also joined this group.<br />

The second category lists municipalities with a medium level of intensity of electoral activities,<br />

mainly newly formed rural municipalities, former rural centers, such as Novo Selo, Studenicani,<br />

Tearce, Lipkovo, Belcista, Rostusa, Cegrane, Vrapciste, Zelenikovo, Sopiste and other. However, some<br />

of the old municipalities also fall into this category - Radovish, Valandovo, Negotino, Sveti Nikole,<br />

Vinica, Kriva Palanka, Resen, Demir Kapija and other. A total of 52 municipalities fell into category<br />

92


three and four in 1996, while in 2000 the number dropped to 38, by and large rural municipalities,<br />

such as Veleshta, Delgozdi, Zitose, Kondovo, Plasnica, Sopotnica Dzepciste, Sipkovica and other.<br />

We can see a similar situation regarding the candidates running for mayors. As to this particular<br />

aspect of local democracy, as a particularly important development factor, we can see that the<br />

number of candidates in 2000 was lower than that in 1996. This stabilization trend is expected to<br />

continue in future given the increased powers delegated to the local self management.<br />

3.1.2. Presidential elections: electorate and election turn out<br />

The presidential elections data by municipality are quality data, though they are not source.<br />

They have been generated from the data provided by the State Election Commission at the level of<br />

constituency, which is not equivalent to the administrative municipal borders as local self-government<br />

units. However, due to the absence of data on the total population in 2004, it is impossible to<br />

draw the indicators as to the percentage of enfranchised of the total population. With such constraints,<br />

we will analyze further the data provided in the electorate table, and voters conducts during<br />

the presidential elections in 2004, during the first round (Table 80, Publication II)<br />

The last presidential elections took place under rather peculiar circumstances. The extraordinary<br />

character of the elections had a certain impact on the turn out. However, presidential elections<br />

as such are not the most appropriate level to draw any conclusions as to the situation with the electorate<br />

and voters conduct. Parliamentary and local elections are much more appropriate in this<br />

respect. However, no municipal level data has been provided so far on the parliamentary elections.<br />

Such data would be possible to generate from the existing archive documentation of the SEC,<br />

though it warrants a special approach.<br />

At present, on the basis of the available data on the presidential elections we can say that<br />

there are enormous variations between the 123 municipalities in terms of the turn out (with the<br />

assumption that there are significant differences in terms of the percentage of enfranchised of the<br />

total population). The turn-out variations by municipality range between 89.36 percent Delgozdi to<br />

31.74 percent in Labunista. Four municipalities stand out within this range with an unusually high<br />

turn-out (in addition to Delgozdi, we also have Oslomej, Zajas and Lipkovo), all of them with more<br />

that 85.31 percent turn-out. They are followed by sixteen municipalities with a high turn out rate<br />

between 77.64 percent in Suto Orizari to 65.5 percent in Berovo), then by about eighty municipalities<br />

with plus or minus ten percent of the average turn out rate (56.38).<br />

3.2. Participation of women in the local election life<br />

Participation of women in the political life generally speaking is a significant indicator of the<br />

degree of social and economic development, but also of the cultural changes in the society, or<br />

rather, in the minor social segments. As many studies and examples of the development of the society<br />

to date have shown, changes in the social deployment of economic, social and political<br />

resources of women are an important precondition and an indicator of the broader development<br />

processes. The data obtained are shown in the table on the number of women candidates and elected<br />

council members-women, as well as the number of women candidates running for mayors, in<br />

1996 and 2000 (Table 81, Publication II)<br />

The analysis shows that the processes mentioned above are notable at a national level, but<br />

also in most municipalities in Macedonia. This data, in light of the negative economic processes in<br />

the country, may imply that the municipalities, or rather local government bodies, are becoming a<br />

factor of emancipation of women. That alone produces enormous development prospects.<br />

93


However, these are minor improvements, in particular, if the changes are seen against the backdrop<br />

of activities of the women lobby in Macedonia over the past period.<br />

On the whole, the total number of women-council member candidates grew in 2000 compared<br />

to 1996 by 3 percent. However, as a result of an action carried out by the Macedonian lobby<br />

of women – that is, moving women to higher positions on the lists of candidates, chances for<br />

women to be elected councilors greatly improved. This means that the mechanisms employed to<br />

deprive women of their rights in politics have deep roots, but also, that a conscious development<br />

intervention is possible, and when it happens, rather effective. Politics, in particular local politics, is<br />

an important mechanism for unleashing the emancipating potential and development prospects of<br />

women.<br />

Nevertheless, this general picture at a national level is significantly different when brought<br />

down to a municipal level. Namely, the highest percentage of participation of women in local politics<br />

by way of council membership (running for candidates and being elected) is found in the old<br />

municipalities, with a small number of the newly formed larger rural municipalities. Unlike those<br />

municipalities, in a significant number of rural municipalities (71 in 1996 and 50 in 2000) there is no<br />

single women-council member.<br />

3.3. Associations of citizens and Red Cross organizations<br />

The data on the civic sector in Macedonia are not systematic. There are no official statistical<br />

data covering this segment of life in our society. The basic source of data is data gathered through<br />

the basic courts. However, the data hosted by the basic courts are rather limited in terms of the number<br />

of indicators and in terms of accessibility.<br />

The only systematic database for this sector is the one hosted by the Macedonia Center for<br />

International Cooperation (MCIC). This database has been built through surveys run by MCIC and on<br />

the bases of their collecting secondary data from the registries of associations of citizens in the basic<br />

courts in the country. To cover the needs of this project, MCIC made its database available, which<br />

allowed for a partial gaining of knowledge in this important sphere of social life.<br />

According to the data obtained from the basic courts, in 2003 there were 5,288 associations<br />

of citizens registered in the country over a period of five and a half years, following the enactment<br />

of the Law on associations of citizens and foundations (July 1998). Compared to the highest number<br />

of associations in the preceding period (6,526 registered associations since the enactment of the<br />

1991 law to the coming into force of the 1998 law) this figure is lower by 1,238. This makes room for<br />

further growth in the number of registered associations in the country.<br />

The data obtained from the MCIC data base provide a more detailed picture of the situation<br />

in this sphere. They are structured in two databases, though neither is exhaustive. The first one contains<br />

data on the 1512 registered associations (or 28.6 percent of the total number of registered<br />

associations). The second database is richer in terms of indicators, though it covers even a lower<br />

number of associations (562 or 10.63 percent of the total number of registered associations). The<br />

data in the two databases have been obtained on the basis of primary sources (surveys) conducted<br />

by MCIC. This means that they do not have an official character (they have not been verified and<br />

standardized).<br />

94


With all these constraints, the analysis shows that in this respect also there are significant differences<br />

between the municipalities. Namely, 43.87 percent of the total number of registered associations<br />

are concentrated in the municipalities falling under the Skopje region. There is no municipality<br />

in this region without a registered main office of an association. A comparatively small number<br />

of municipalities (1 to 3) without a registered main office of a municipality may be found in the<br />

Pelagonia region, in the East region, Northeast and Southeast regions. Compared to that, a significant<br />

number of municipalities without registered associations are found in the Southwest (11) and<br />

the Polog region (13). There are a total of 53 municipalities on the territory of which there are no<br />

associations with a registered main office. Most of the municipalities without an association are<br />

rural, though according to the data provided by MCIC, the municipalities of Resen, Demir Kapija and<br />

Makedonski Brod also fall into this category.<br />

The situation is similar regarding the membership number of the associations of citizens. The<br />

data available for this indicator are indeed impressive. According to such data, in a total of 1,512<br />

associations of citizens covered by the MCIC database, there is a total membership base of 1, 267,<br />

096 citizens. This would mean that every, on average 1.6 citizen in the country is a member of an<br />

association, or on average 838 members for each of the 1,512 associations included in the MCIC<br />

database. The data has to be taken with a huge theoretical reserve. The same can be said in terms of<br />

the number of active volunteers. Namely, according to the said database, all of the 1,512 associations<br />

covered operate with a total number of 548,060 active volunteers. The same reserves have to<br />

be maintained in terms of the number of employees.<br />

Namely, the real number of employees, as well as other data on the status of employees in<br />

this sector, is a real enigma. In this respect, the data base available provides a possibility for a conclusion<br />

that in this sector, according to the statements given by the respondents, a total of 823 people<br />

are fully employed. They work in only 12,785 of the total number of associations covered (1512)<br />

nearly half of them are employees and associations concentrated in the Skopje region.<br />

We can also include in this sphere of citizens’ actions the Red Cross organizations. They have<br />

a special status in this sector, as they also function by having relations with the government and<br />

public sector bodies. The data obtained show that there are a total of 34 municipal Red Cross organizations<br />

in the country, which means that they are found only in the old municipalities form before<br />

1996, and no changes have been made in this respect until the present day.<br />

95


CHAPTER FOUR<br />

ECONOMY<br />

1. GENERAL <strong>ECONOMIC</strong> SITUATION<br />

1.1. Introduction<br />

Economic indicators at a municipal and regional level are a prerequisite necessary for the<br />

conceptualization of an efficient regional development policy. We have made a selection of the<br />

available reliable indicators which may best illustrate the level of economic development and economic<br />

trends in the municipalities in Macedonia. The data presented cover three areas: national<br />

accounts, labor force and public finances. Each data group shed light to a specific aspect of the<br />

social-economic character of our municipalities.<br />

On the basis of data on national accounts generated by the State Statistical Office, estimates<br />

have been made of the Gross Domestic Product per capita according to the purchasing power parity<br />

(PPP) at a regional level for 1998 and 2002. Such data provide the basis for the analysis of the level<br />

of economic activity on a given territory of each region and the associated disparities.<br />

The second aspect covered in the economic analysis of Macedonian municipalities is the<br />

economic activity of the population. To that end, the data used were the data generated from census<br />

of population, households and dwellings carried out in 2002, which opened up opportunities for<br />

the first time since the beginning of transition for acquiring an enhanced level of knowledge about<br />

the labor force available at a municipal level.<br />

The analysis of economic disparities between the Macedonia municipalities would not be<br />

complete without addressing public finances. The analysis of public expenditure and revenues of<br />

municipal budgets, as well as the transfers from the central budget reveals some interesting details<br />

about the costs incurred by Macedonian municipalities for the services provided to the citizens. Any<br />

effort to examine thoroughly the structure of public expenditure, in particular in the health and education<br />

sectors, will invariably lead us to the analysis of the set up of the systems of education and<br />

health in Macedonia.<br />

1.2. Data<br />

We are using here three broad groups of economic indicators for the Macedonian municipalities:<br />

Gross domestic product, labor force and public finances.<br />

A combination of the said indicators with other social-demographic characteristics of municipalities<br />

and then the breakdown of indicators by various features have led to a table with a number<br />

of indicators, each describing a specific segment of the level of economic development of municipalities.<br />

When compounded, they present a clear picture of the economic power of each individual<br />

municipality.<br />

1.2.1. Gross Domestic Product<br />

The Gross domestic product is defined as the total production of goods and services indented<br />

for end use which are produced on the territory of Macedonia.<br />

The data on the Gross Domestic Product in Macedonia is available only on a national level.<br />

Hence the necessity to make a GDP estimate for levels NUTS 3, NUTS 4 and NUTS 5. However, in light<br />

96


of the fact that EU countries prepare and publish GDP data only on a regional, rather than municipal<br />

level, a decision has been made to attach only a working character to levels NUTS 4 and NUTS 5<br />

estimates. Therefore, all the analysis has been made only on the regional NUTS 3 level.<br />

The database hosted by the State Statistical Office (SSO) used in the estimate of national<br />

accounts and GDP in the country was the main source used in the estimate of regional GDP. The<br />

database contains financial data on all active legal entities registered in the trade registry organized<br />

in three dimensions relevant for the estimate of the regional GDP: according to the location of the<br />

economic entity, according to the institutional sector and according to the principal activity. Some<br />

of the data used in the national GDP estimate are external data, i.e. they are not data contained in<br />

the national accounts database. These are data pertaining to small farmers and small non-farming<br />

businesses which are not registered in the trade registry. The financial data on this type of activities<br />

is gathered by the SSO through indirect methods at a national level and according to the principal<br />

activity of the entities.<br />

This publication offers two types of regional GDP analysis: static, of 2002 data, and dynamic,<br />

by comparing the 2002 and 1998 data. The static analysis allows for ranking the regions according<br />

to the most recent data available (2002), production activities and the key economic sectors in each<br />

of the regions. On the other hand, the dynamic analysis offers a useful insight into the economic<br />

trends in each of the regions, which may be used as the basis to identify the growth, stagnation and<br />

decline by region.<br />

The regional GDP data was improved by using the DV-01 survey conducted by the SSO,<br />

which gathers financial data on large companies, which have local subsidiaries in several municipalities<br />

conducting more than one activity. This survey provided useful data on further distribution of<br />

the national value added on a regional level in several activities, in particular in trade and commerce<br />

and production of electricity.<br />

1.2.2. Labor force<br />

The estimate of the active segment of the population, labor force, and employment and<br />

unemployment levels is based on ILO definitions (International Labor Organization) which are consistent<br />

with ESA 95 in a broader context.<br />

The Labor force survey carried out by the SSO since 1996 was designed to generate data only<br />

at a national level. Hence the data used here are the data from the census of the population, households<br />

and dwellings (the 2002 census) carried out in 2002. The definitions of labor force used in the<br />

2002 census are consistent with the definitions used in the Labor force survey.<br />

We should bear in mind the methodological differences between unemployed as defined in<br />

the 2002 census and unemployed registered with the Employment Agency. According to the database<br />

of the Employment Agency, the number of unemployed is by 100 thousands higher that the<br />

figure obtained in the 2002 census. (See more about it in the methodological differences of definitions).<br />

Due to the fact that the Employment Agency provides health insurance of unemployed people,<br />

the data it hosts on the registered unemployed usually overestimate the factual situation.<br />

1.2.3. Public finances<br />

The local self government public revenues and expenditure data are provided by the<br />

Ministry of finance. In addition to the local government budgets, in several municipalities there are<br />

extra budgetary funds earmarked for local roads and communal (utility) services. However, the<br />

Ministry of Finance does not provide the data on a consolidated basis. Then again, we are not in a<br />

position to consolidate the data on our own accord due to the lack of information on the transfers<br />

97


etween the local government and the local extra budgetary funds. Therefore, the data presented<br />

pertain only to the local government budgets. By definition, they also contain transfers to the local<br />

extra budgetary funds.<br />

The local government generates little revenues on its own, mainly as an effect of the current<br />

tax system situation. Only the property tax is under the jurisdiction of the local self government. This<br />

is why most of the expenditure of the local self government is financed through central government<br />

transfers.<br />

The data on public expenditure in the areas of education and health care at a municipal level<br />

are obtained from the State Statistical Office database on national accounts. It includes all the services<br />

provided by the public sector, and it also contains data on the expenditure incurred by the government<br />

structures to provide services at a municipal level.<br />

1.3. Analysis of economic differences between municipalities<br />

1.3.1. GDP<br />

GDP per capita on a regional level reveals huge discrepancies as regards the level of economic<br />

activities between the Skopje region and the rest of the country. The Skopje region, with per capita<br />

GDP of USD 11,964 (PPP) is way above the national average (6,850). Also, the Skopje region has<br />

per capita GDP equivalent to 50 percent of the EU average, which is higher than in most of the new<br />

EU entrants.<br />

Account should be taken of the fact that the regional GDP values are with reference to production<br />

generated on the territory of the region, rather than on the average income of citizens in a<br />

given region. This means that many citizens from the other regions contribute to the generation of<br />

Skojpe region GDP, though they transfer their incomes to the regions in which they live.<br />

The Skopje and Pelagonia regions are the only regions with a GDP per capita higher than the<br />

average in the country (USD 6,850 $). The Polog region exhibits the lowest level of economic activity,<br />

with only USD 3,076 per capita.<br />

With the exception of the Northeast region, all other seven regions have generated an average<br />

real per capita GDP growth during the period 1998-2002, ranging between 1.4 percent in the<br />

Polog to 8.7 percent in the Skopje region. However, if we look at the value added in the non-financial<br />

sector, then it becomes clear that the growth of per capita GDP in other regions than Skopje<br />

region is a result of the households or small businesses sector. The value added in the non-financial<br />

sector is the most relevant indicator of the dynamics of the economic development in the regions.<br />

The logic behind this approach is in that: (1) the non-financial sector is the largest sector of the economy<br />

with approximately 60 percent of the total value added; (2) goods in this sector are manufactured<br />

exclusively for the market, against the public sector which provides non-market services, and<br />

the households sectors which produces goods for its own needs too; (3) the growth of the<br />

98


Macedonian economy has been generated by the non-financial sector; (4) the households sector is<br />

highly cyclical, i.e. it grows in recession times and is stagnant during expansion.<br />

The Skopje region is the only region with a positive average annual growth rate of 7,7 percent<br />

between 1998-2002. All the other seven regions have seen a decline in the average value added<br />

per capita over the five year period under observation. The reason for that may be found in the<br />

unsuccessful restructuring of large socially owned enterprises which failed to find its place in the<br />

market under changed economic and political conditions. It seems that the Skopje region, which<br />

covers the largest urban part of the country and is populated with people with higher incomes,<br />

offers better opportunities to set up and conduct business than the rest of the country. The large<br />

concentration of the population with high incomes gives a very conducive environment to the<br />

development of market based services which generate high economic growth rates in the Skopje<br />

region. On the other hand, the service sector in the other regions could not generate sufficient<br />

growth to make up for the closure of formerly large socialist enterprises.<br />

The lowest drop rates were seen in the Southeast (-0,2 percent) and Pelagonia (-0,7 percent)<br />

regions, while the most severe decline was experienced in the Polog (-7,0 percent) and Northeast (-<br />

6,6 percent) region.<br />

The common feature for all regions experiencing decline is that the rural municipalities produced<br />

much better results that the urban ones due to the disappearance of the old industrial capacities.<br />

This also is an indicator of the rapid growth of small businesses in several municipalities.<br />

1.3.2. Labor force<br />

The regional unemployment rate in 2002 varied between the range of the lowest of 30.4 percent<br />

in the Skopje region to 49.9 percent in the Polog region. Three regions: Skopje, Southeast (34.4<br />

percent) and East (34.5 percent) had a bellow national average unemployment rate (38.1 percent).<br />

It is peculiar that the three regions with the best results are specialized in one sector where<br />

the employment rate stands at its highest compared with the other regions. So in Skopje region the<br />

service industry is the most dominant, employing 66 percent of the total number of people in<br />

employment in that region. Also, this is one of the regions where the unemployment rate of women<br />

(28.4 percent) is lower that that of men (31.8 percent) due to the high presence of women in the<br />

service industries. The industrial sector is the most dominant in the East region, covering 49 percent<br />

of people in employment in the region, much more than any other region. This is also a region with<br />

equal rates of unemployment of men and women. The Southeast region is mainly an agricultural<br />

region with 36 percent of the total number of people in employment. Then again, the employment<br />

rate of men is very low, (31.9 percent) whereas the unemployment rate of women is significantly<br />

higher (38.2 percent).<br />

99


Table 25. Selected labor force indicators on a level of NUTS 3<br />

NUTS 3<br />

Unemployment<br />

rate<br />

Unemployment<br />

rate -<br />

men<br />

Unemployment<br />

rate -<br />

women<br />

Unemployment<br />

rate –<br />

young<br />

people<br />

Share of<br />

employment<br />

in<br />

farming<br />

Share of<br />

employment<br />

in<br />

industry<br />

Share of<br />

employment<br />

in<br />

services<br />

Long term<br />

unemployment<br />

in<br />

percent of the<br />

total<br />

unemployment<br />

Rate of activity<br />

of women<br />

(share of female<br />

labor in the<br />

total<br />

population of<br />

women at the<br />

age of 16+<br />

Pelagonia 39.9 36.2 45.0 75.0 18 % 41 % 41 % 85.7 55.6<br />

Vardar 43.9 38.8 51.4 80.6 13 % 40 % 47 % 80.0 50.3<br />

Northeast 48.6 45.6 54.0 80.3 8 % 40 % 47 % 83.1 38.6<br />

Southwest 42.4 41.5 44.0 75.4 4 % 40 % 52 % 82.4 35.0<br />

Skopje 30.4 31.8 28.4 67.6 1 % 40 % 66 % 81.4 45.3<br />

Southeast 34.4 31.9 38.2 67.2 36 % 40 % 36 % 83.8 53.2<br />

Polog 49.9 50.1 49.2 78.4 10 % 40 % 50 % 86.9 18.5<br />

East 34.5 34.5 34.6 65.4 12 % 40 % 38 % 75.6 50.3<br />

Source: Census of population, households and homes in 2002<br />

At a municipal level the lowest unemployment rate is seen in several small rural municipalities<br />

(Podares and Konce in the Radovis subregion and Capari and Kukurecani in the Bitola subregion)<br />

where labour is predominantly engaged in agriculture. Podares is the absolute champion with 11<br />

percent unemployment rate, 9.8 percent for men and 12.8 percent for women.<br />

Karposh is the municipality with the lowest unemployment rate (16.9 percent) amongst all<br />

urban municipalities. Labor is mainly employed in the services sector, which covers about 74 percent<br />

of the total number of employed in the municipality. We should bear in mind that most likely, most<br />

of the labor in Karpos works in the municipality of Centar and other municipalities in the city of<br />

Skopje.<br />

Thirty of the 123 municipalities have unemployment rate higher than 50 percent. Most of<br />

them are in the Polog region and the Southwest region, with only a few in the Skopje and Pelagonia<br />

regions. Zelino (79.4 percent) and Topolcani (76.7 percent) municipalities are the bottom of the table<br />

of unemployment rates. Most municipalities in the group of high unemployment rate are mountainous<br />

rural municipalities. It is peculiar that in the municipalities with predominantly Albanian ethnic<br />

background population, there are a high number of employees classified under unknown sector.<br />

The low unemployment rate of women is typical for the regions with majority or significant<br />

portion of the population with Albanian ethnic background. Hence the activity rate of women in the<br />

Polog region stands at only 18.5 percent, in the Southwest 35.0 percent and Northeast 38.6 percent.<br />

The regions with predominantly Macedonian ethnic background population, the activity rate of<br />

women is above 50 percent.<br />

This situation greatly contributes to the lowest aggregate rate of activity of the population<br />

with Albanian ethnic background (32.3 percent) compared with the other communities. Another<br />

factor in this context is the high number of Albanian men who work in foreign countries and are not<br />

part of the domestic labor force. The Turks are the second ethnic community with the lowest activity<br />

rate (42.4 percent), while Roma people have a surprisingly high activity rate of 50.4 percent. The<br />

Macedonian population has the highest activity rate of 63.2 percent.<br />

Unemployment rate of various ethnic groups range between the lowest - 25.3 percent of the<br />

Vlach population to the highest - 78.5 percent of the Roma people. These big differences are a consequence<br />

of several factors which need to be further studied. For example, the lower unemployment<br />

rate of the Vlach people may be a result of the fact that they are grouped in the main urban<br />

centers which offer better opportunities for employment than in the rural areas. On the other hand,<br />

the high unemployment rate of Albanians (61.2 percent) may be a result of the fact that they are<br />

100


concentrated in the rural mountainous regions with a low level of economic activities. The enormous<br />

unemployment rate of Roma is invariably linked with the level of education and the living conditions<br />

of the Roma population.<br />

Table 26. Selection of feature of labor according to the ethnic background<br />

Total Macedonian Albanian Turkish Roma Vlach Serbian Bosniac Other<br />

Activity rate 54.6 63.2 32.3 42.4 50.4 62.0 59.8 47.8 51.5<br />

Unemploym 38.1 32.0 61.2 58.2 78.5 25.3 30.9 60.3 40.8<br />

ent rate<br />

The extremely high long term unemployment (80 percent of all the unemployed registered<br />

with the Employment Agency) is a feature which can be found in all regions without an exception.<br />

It also shows an ascending line in the record of unemployed at the Employment Agency. However,<br />

even if we were to take out 100,000 unemployed who are registered in order to be entitled to health<br />

insurance, long term unemployment would still be very high, i.e. 75 percent of the total number of<br />

unemployed. This is a clear sign on the structural characteristics of the unemployment phenomenon<br />

and insufficient creation of new jobs.<br />

Civil Servants in the municipalities<br />

According to the data obtained from the Civil Servants Agency, there were 8.587 employed<br />

civil servants in 2000. Thereat, the differences among the municipalities are incomparable. The variations<br />

are running between municipalities with one civil servant (13 municipalities or 9.23 percent<br />

from the total number) and municipalities with more than 600, and in one municipality even 1,134<br />

civil servants. Thereupon the average number of about 70 civil servants is not telling us much. In<br />

about 62 percent of the municipalities (87 from 123) there are 26 civil servants. These municipalities<br />

are, with no exception, small, new rural municipalities and they reach only 5.72 percent of the total<br />

number of civil servants in the country. The rest 94 percents of the civil servants are working in about<br />

30 old urban municipalities (the ones that existed before the territorial organization from 1996).<br />

1.3.3. Public finances<br />

Local government expenditure per capita is between 362 denars in the Northeast region to<br />

548 in the Southwest region. There is a strong link between the average size of municipalities in the<br />

region (measured by the population) and average expenses per capita. Higher average size of<br />

municipality means lower expenses per capita.<br />

101


Public expenditure incurred in the education and health sectors at a municipal level give a picture<br />

of the availability of public services across the territory of the country. It is quite peculiar that educational<br />

services are equally distributed and available in nearly all the municipalities. On the other hand,<br />

the health expenditure is concentrated in urban centers. There are two reasons for this. Firstly, the secondary<br />

and tertiary health care services are very expensive and are organized regionally, i.e. at a NUTS 4<br />

level. Secondly, nearly all of the 123 municipalities have primary health care services on their territory,<br />

in most cases as branches of regional medical centers, however, for administrative reasons their expenditure<br />

is recorded in the municipality where the regional center is located.<br />

Concluding remarks and Recommendations<br />

Generally speaking, there is a solid base of economic data on a municipal level. The national<br />

accounts database in the State Statistical Office is a well organized warehouse of financial data on<br />

all active registered legal entities, which allows fast data compilation into tables of several variables<br />

by municipality, industry, institutional sector and size of legal entities. With certain adjustments of<br />

these databases they could be easily used in order to calculate the municipal and regional GDP.<br />

Anyway, the financial data of households and the so-called DV-01 survey are still outside this data<br />

warehouse.<br />

The data on households are only partially organized at a municipal level, which is why it is<br />

necessary to use some keys in order to distribute the values at a national level by municipality. DV-<br />

01 provides important data on large enterprises which have local subsidiaries in more than one<br />

municipality and operate in more than one industry. However, DV-01 is not processed in a way<br />

which allows for making an estimate of the regional and municipal GDP. Improvements are possible<br />

in two areas. In a situation when DV-01 survey is carried out regularly, on an annual basis, additional<br />

efforts must be made to integrate this survey in to the database on national accounts. This will<br />

lead to an improvement of the distribution of value added of the municipalities to the large enterprises<br />

producing goods and services in more than one municipality. The household data may benefit<br />

from the Farming Census planned for 2004. The Farming Census data on the farmers, arable land<br />

and livestock on a municipal level should be integrated in the regular method of estimate of production<br />

and value added to the farming households.<br />

In this publication we are largely using the 2002 Census of the population which provided<br />

valuable data on the active population, labor force, employment and unemployment levels, by various<br />

characteristics. However, we should bear in mind that this is only possible to do once in every<br />

ten years. In between, the only available comprehensive source of information on labor is the Labor<br />

force survey. At present, it provides authentic data only at a national NUTS 1 level. Efforts could be<br />

made to redesign the sample so that quality data may be obtained at a NUTS 3 i.e. the eight regions.<br />

Any additional efforts would be unrealistic.<br />

With the impending government decentralization in 2005 the municipalities will continue to<br />

see their budget grow. Hence the importance of the issue of transparency and authenticity of local<br />

budgets is increasing. The Ministry of Finance should work on raising the capacities of the local governments<br />

to produce consolidated budgets through a consistent and uniform approach. Also, in<br />

addition to the classification of costs by type, municipalities will also have to prepare their budgets<br />

by classification of costs by function, i.e., education, healthcare, social care etc/.<br />

102


CHAPTER FIVE<br />

ENVIRONMENT<br />

It is impossible to identify a single indicator that would present the quality of the environment<br />

and quality of life, as this requires - among other things - a multidisciplinary approach and<br />

process, as well as mutually connected activities expressed in the form of numerous indicators. The<br />

group of indicators should include the key issues related to the environment, as well as the challenges<br />

faced by the Macedonian municipalities.<br />

The environmental indicators will serve as an instrument for quantification and simplification<br />

of the assessment process and will inform of any changes.<br />

The environmental data obtained are a true measure of the indicators, while the indicators<br />

themselves represent a feature (quality, ownership, level, concentration) of the environmental system.<br />

1. AIR POLLUTION <strong>IN</strong>DICATORS<br />

The air pollution issue consists of two segments: the first one is the release of polluting substances,<br />

while the second is the quality of air (the existing qualitative condition of the air).<br />

Table 99 (Publication II) contains a representative indicator of the level of pollution in some<br />

of the major Macedonian municipalities that release polluting substances into the air. Of the municipalities<br />

stated, Skopje (the data include all municipalities in Skopje) is the region with the highest<br />

levels of air pollutants – SO2, CO and NOx; the annual quantity of SO2 is 105.6 thousands of tons, of<br />

CO is 25.8 thousands of tons, and of NOx is 15.2 thousands of tons. The pollution with SO2 is also high<br />

in Bitola – 78.7 thousands of tons, as well as in Kicevo – 9.2, Veles – 4.8, Jegunovce – 3.5, Tetovo – 3.8,<br />

with the pollution levels in Gostivar (0.2) and Kocani (1.7) being the lowest ones. Regarding the<br />

releases of CO, its quantity in Tetovo is 12.8 thousands of tons annually, whereas it is rather lower in<br />

the other stated municipalities, varying between 0.2 thousand tons (Kicevo) and 2.3 thousand tons<br />

(Kumanovo). In addition to Skopje, there is a higher level of NOx in the air in Bitola (10.8 thousand<br />

tons annually) in comparison with the other municipalities. In the other municipalities, the quantities<br />

of this substance vary between 0.1 (Kocani and Veles) and 1.2 (Kicevo). Jegunovce is the place<br />

with the largest quantity of dust in the air – 23.2 thousand tons per year, whereas this quantity fluctuates<br />

between 0.1 (Veles) and 1.5 thousand tons (Bitola).<br />

Table 100 (Table 100, Publication II) presents the data from various sectors, giving a clear picture<br />

of the degree of inclusion of the individual sectors in the overall release of air polluters.<br />

The combustion and transformation of energy are the main sources of SO2; the production<br />

processes are major sources of dust; CO is mostly produced by the traffic, while NO2 emissions are a<br />

result of the energy production and the mobile sources – vehicles.<br />

The industry, being a sector of a significant national and municipal value, is the major polluter<br />

with SO2, NOx and CO emissions; this is particularly true for the metallurgy sector. The reason is<br />

most often the obsolete technology and the lack of air filters.<br />

The Zinc and Lead Smelter in Veles is not only municipal, but also national core of pollution.<br />

As a result of its emissions and rose of winds, the pollution is transmitted into the city. On an annual<br />

basis, the plant releases 4,000 tons of SO2, 2.5 tons of zinc and 6.5 tons of lead. The other major<br />

polluters in Macedonia are the refinery Okta, Ohis – Skopje, Usje – Skopje, and the metal processing<br />

plant in Jegunovce.<br />

103


Energy production. The thermo-power plants, as polluting capacities, generate 80 percent<br />

of the total energy produced in Macedonia. The largest plant, producing 75 percent of the demand<br />

for electricity in the country, is located in the municipality of Bitola, at a distance of only 12 km from<br />

the city of Bitola. The SO2 emissions are constantly above the levels allowed, with the situation being<br />

the same regarding the NOx and dust releases. The three central heating energy plants in Skopje<br />

produce SO2 above the allowed limit, which largely contributes to the poor quality of the urban air.<br />

The mobile sources – vehicles, particularly in the larger municipal centers, play a huge role<br />

as a factor of air pollution. The reasons behind this are the poor road infrastructure, old vehicles with<br />

no catalysts, poor technical maintenance and low fuel quality.<br />

For the purpose of comparing the data on the air pollution in the selected Macedonian<br />

municipalities with the lowest air quality given in Table 101 (Table 101, Publication II), Table 27 presents<br />

the maximum allowed concentration of polluting substances, according to the Macedonian<br />

laws on protection of air against pollution and according to the EU directives.<br />

Table 27. Maximum and Average Daily Allowed Concentration of Polluting Substances<br />

Polluting substances Maximum allowed<br />

Average maximum allowed<br />

concentration<br />

daily concentration<br />

SO2 500 ì g/m3 150 ì g/m3<br />

Smoke 150 ì g/m3 50 ì g/m3<br />

NO2 85 ìg/m3 85 ìg/m3<br />

Suspended substance<br />

120 ì g/m3<br />

O3<br />

110 ì g/m3<br />

CO 3 mg/m3 1 mg/m3<br />

Dust<br />

300 mg/m3<br />

Lead<br />

0.0007 mg/m3<br />

Skopje, with its municipalities, is facing a huge problem regarding the air quality, due to the<br />

vehicles, but also due to the stationary sources of pollution, such as the smelters, cement -producing<br />

plant, chemical complex, and refinery. In terms of polluting the air, the city topography has a<br />

large impact, as a result of the favorable conditions for temperature inversions, particularly in the<br />

winter period.<br />

The largest percentage of the pollution in Skopje comes from the pollution with SO2 (44 percent),<br />

CO (30 percent) and NOx (24 percent), due to the large number of industrial processes, the<br />

smelters and the traffic.<br />

Figure 17. Quality of the air in Skopje<br />

Source: Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning<br />

Table 101 of the Publication II presents the quality of the air in individual municipalities by<br />

the level of concentration of air pollution indicators in 2003, measured at the permanent measuring<br />

points in each municipality. There are two measuring points in the municipality of Karpos and five<br />

in the municipality of Centar; in Kisela Voda, SO2 is measured at three, while smoke at four measur-<br />

104


ing points; Gazi Baba measures is SO2 concentration at one and the quantity of smoke at two points;<br />

the municipality of Cair has one measuring point for SO2 and smoke each. Gjorce Petrov, like the<br />

municipality of Cair, also has one measuring points for each of the SO2 and smoke quantities.<br />

The air polluting substances in Veles are mainly produced by DOO Investas and the zinc and<br />

lead smelter. The highest percentage of pollution in Veles is with CO (39 percent), SO2 (52 percent),<br />

while the air is also polluted by MHK – Zletovo, the households’ central heating systems and the traffic.<br />

(Table 101, Publication II)<br />

Figure 18. Quality of the Air in Veles<br />

Source: Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning<br />

It is obvious that the municipality of Bitola is mainly polluted with SO2 (84 percent), which<br />

is released by REK-Bitola (power plant). (Table 101, Publication II)<br />

Figure 19. Quality of the Air in Bitola<br />

Source: Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning<br />

The highest percentage of the pollution in Tetovo comes from the pollution with CO (75<br />

percent), produced by the textile industry and the households’ central heating.<br />

Figure 20. Quality of the Air in Tetovo<br />

Source: Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning<br />

105


The highest percentage of pollution in Jegunovce comes from dust (79 percent), produced<br />

by Silmak-Jegunovce.<br />

Figure 21. Quality of the Air in Jegunovce<br />

Source: Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning<br />

The quality of the air in Gevgelija is measured at one measuring point. (Table 101,<br />

Publication II)<br />

The quality of the air in the municipality of Ohrid, just like in Gevgelija, is only measured at<br />

one measuring point. (Table 101, Publication II)<br />

The highest percentage of the pollution in Gostivar is that with CO (84 percent), coming<br />

from the wooden and textile industries.<br />

Figure 22. Quality of the Air in Gostivar<br />

Source: Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning<br />

In Radovis, the major air polluter is the SO2 (72 percent), produced by the gold mine and<br />

the pharmacy.<br />

Figure 23. Quality of the Air in Radovis<br />

Source: Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning<br />

The highest percentage of the pollution in Demir Hisar comes from the pollution with SO2<br />

(69 percent), mainly produced by the households’ heating.<br />

106


Figure 24. Quality of the Air in Demir Hisar<br />

Source: Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning<br />

Debar is mainly polluted by emissions of CO (71 percent), coming from the wooden industry<br />

and the heating of households.<br />

Figure 25. Quality of the Air in Debar<br />

Source: Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning<br />

The highest percentage of pollution in Makedonski Brod comes from CO (81 percent),<br />

produced by the wooden industry and the heating of households.<br />

Figure 26. Quality of the Air in Makedonski Brod<br />

Source: Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning<br />

The highest percentage of the pollution in Kocani comes from the pollution with CO (55<br />

percent), produced by the paper industry and the heating of households.<br />

107


Figure 27. Quality of the Air in Kocani<br />

Source: Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning<br />

The highest percentage of pollution in Kicevo is that with SO2 (82 percent), coming from<br />

the TEC-Oslomej (power plant).<br />

Figure 28. Quality of the Air in Kicevo<br />

Source: Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning<br />

The quality of the air in Prilep is measured at one measuring point (Table 101, Publication II).<br />

The quality of the air in Stip is measured at one measuring point (Table 101, Publication II).<br />

The only data on emissions of heavy metals are the ones in the 2000 Report on the<br />

Environment Situation in Macedonia (Table 102, Publication II). The table shows that the major generators<br />

of heavy metals are the smelter Zletovo in Veles, which releases 2.93 tons of Pb and 1,143 tons<br />

of Cd per annum, and the cement producing plant Usje in Skopje, which releases 0.09 tons of Pb,<br />

0.024 tons of Cd and 0.048 tons of Hg annually.<br />

According to the Department for persistent organic polluters with the Ministry of<br />

Environment and Physical Planning, Macedonia has still not established a monitoring system for<br />

emissions of persistent organic polluters (POP).<br />

The quantity of polluting substances in the air is of key impact on the level of air pollution<br />

and, consequently, the health of the population, and is closely connected with the mortality caused<br />

by chronic respiratory diseases. In spite of the lack of information about the issue, it is more than evident<br />

that there is an essential link between the respiratory diseases and the pollution of the air with<br />

dust and SO2 in Skopje and in Veles. The number of acute diseases related to problems with polluted<br />

air is highest in the winter, due to the combination of two processes: the increased combustion<br />

of fossil fuels and the temperature inversions.<br />

In the winter of 1990, 20 percent of 36,000 children were suffering from serious respiratory<br />

diseases. In Veles, the population living near the smelter has a higher concentration of lead in the<br />

blood than the allowed levels; in addition, there are an increased number of cancer cases, respiratory<br />

diseases and congenital deficiencies.<br />

108


2. <strong>IN</strong>DICATORS OF THE STRATOSPHERIC OZONE LAYER<br />

The depletion of the stratospheric ozone enables the entry of harmful ultraviolet radiation,<br />

which affects the animals and plants.<br />

The control measures in accordance with the Montreal Protocol in the case of Macedonia are<br />

as follows:<br />

Annex A<br />

Group 1<br />

(CFC-11, CFC-12, CFC-115)<br />

Basic level Average 1995-97<br />

Frozen: July 1, 1999<br />

50 percent reduction: January 1, 2005<br />

85 percent reduction: January 1, 2007<br />

100 percent reduction: January 1, 2010<br />

Annex A<br />

Group 2<br />

(Haloni - 1211, 1301 and 2402)<br />

Basic level Average 1995-97<br />

Frozen: July 1, 1999<br />

50 percent reduction: January 1, 2005<br />

100 percent reduction: January 1, 2007<br />

Annex C<br />

Group 1<br />

Basic level:<br />

(HCFC-22, HCFC-141b)<br />

2015 consumption<br />

Frozen: January 1, 2016<br />

100 percent reduction: January 1, 2040<br />

Annex E<br />

(MeBr)<br />

Basic level: Average 1995-98<br />

Frozen: January 1, 2002<br />

85 percent reduction: January 1, 2005<br />

100 percent reduction: January 1, 2015<br />

109


The use of substances potentially depleting the ozone layer, as classified under the<br />

Montreal Protocol is as follows:<br />

Cooling<br />

Coolers, deep freezers, portable air conditioners (in cars, trucks, trains), stationary air conditioners<br />

Aerosols<br />

Cosmetics (deodorants, perfumes, gels, shaving foams)<br />

Pharmaceutical products (MDI-inhalators for patients suffering from asthma, antibiotic<br />

sprays for injuries)<br />

Colors<br />

Polishers<br />

Food industry (cake toppings)<br />

Foams<br />

Flexible (furniture and textile industry)<br />

Rigid (sandwich-panels used for isolation in the civil engineering)<br />

Dissolvents<br />

(computers, TV and VCR equipment, dry cleaning)<br />

Pesticides<br />

Methyl bromide<br />

On the basis of the data gathered on the indicator of the use of substances depleting the<br />

ozone layer (1998-2003) in the Macedonian municipalities, the ozone department with the Ministry<br />

of Environment and Physical Planning constructed a table (Table 103, Publication II).<br />

Table 7 presents the substances depleting the ozone layer and are used in Macedonia (Table<br />

104, Publication II) and their threshold values regarding the ozone depletion. A comparison of these<br />

values with the data in Table 103 (Publication II) on municipalities gives a clear picture of the situation<br />

in the stated municipalities and the changes in the generation of these substances in the period<br />

between 1998 and 2003.<br />

The data about the consumption of ozone depleting substances in Macedonia between<br />

1995 and 2000 show the effect of the activity of gradual release of ozone depleting substances<br />

(Table 105, Publication II).<br />

110


3. CLIMATE CHANGES <strong>IN</strong>DICATORS<br />

3.1. Emission of Greenhouse Gases<br />

The greenhouse effect is the process of heating up of the atmosphere as a result of the<br />

absorption of the sun energy captured by certain gases, such as carbon dioxide and the water condensation<br />

and its re-radiation from the ground surface. Emissions of large quantities of men-produced<br />

gases into the atmosphere by combustion of fossil fuels releasing CO2, increase of the number<br />

of agricultural products releasing CH4 and the use of industrial products emitting chloro-fluorocarbonates<br />

(CFC), all add to the greenhouse effect. This leads to a rise of the middle temperature of<br />

the ground surface. This process is called global warming and, as a global process, has various effects<br />

on the climate and the life on the surface of the Earth.<br />

It ought to be mentioned that the national emission of gases is nothing but a total sum of<br />

the emissions of gases in the Macedonian municipalities.<br />

The arsenical of gases released during the greenhouse effect is mainly consisted of the three<br />

major gases; carbon dioxide - CO2, methane - CH4, and azote-oxide – N2O. In order to produce a uniform<br />

measure of the emission of these gases, conversions of N2O and CH4 were introduced through<br />

an equivalent of CO2.<br />

The emissions of greenhouse gases appear as a result of the emissions in the energy sector,<br />

industrial processes, waste waters, agriculture, and changes in the land utilization and in the forestry<br />

sector.<br />

Due to the complexity of the energy sector and its contribution to the total emission of 70<br />

percent, the sector is divided into three sub-sectors: electricity, heating energy, and mechanical<br />

energy for transportation.<br />

The emissions of greenhouse gases by the industrial sector are divided into: emissions of<br />

greenhouse gases by the production of minerals, chemical processes and production of metals.<br />

The agricultural sector is divided into sub-sectors: GHG (Greenhouse Gases) emissions<br />

from internal fermentation, agricultural waste, emissions from greenhouse gases from flooded rice<br />

fields, agricultural areas.<br />

The emissions of greenhouse gases as a result of the changes in the use of land and wood<br />

sector are caused by two processes: changes in the biomass reserves and conversion of forests and<br />

grass areas.<br />

The greenhouse gases of the waste sector are mainly emissions of CH4 and N2O. The CH4<br />

emissions largely result from anaerobic combustion in the solid waste deposits, waste waters and<br />

sludge produced by households/companies, industrial waste waters and sludge. The N2O emissions<br />

are a product of the foul sewer waters in the urban areas.<br />

The integral results are composed of all emissions of greenhouse gases from all sectors.<br />

According to the table (Table 106, Publication II), the emissions of industrial processes are declining<br />

by 35 percent, while those generated by the agricultural sector are reduced by 22 percent, as a consequence<br />

of the reduction in the activities of the two sectors. There are no significant changes in the<br />

greenhouse emissions in the waste sector, while the emissions of greenhouse gases caused by<br />

changes in the use of land and forests fluctuate. The emissions produced by the energy sector have<br />

increased by 6 percent.<br />

Macedonia is only a minor contributor to the global emission of gases. In spite of that, the<br />

influence of the global climate changes is more than evident in Macedonia.<br />

111


3.2. Major Climate Elements – Air Temperature and Rainfalls<br />

The major elements of the climate – the air temperature and rainfalls – are also one of the<br />

key elements in the process of climate changes.<br />

Regarding the air temperature and parameters of rainfalls, the meteorology stations in<br />

Skopje and Bitola have the largest database, dating from 1926.<br />

The warmest years of the 20 th century were the years between 1926 and 1966, when the period<br />

of temperature decrease started to last until 1991. Since then, there has been an annual trend of<br />

temperature increase. The average temperature of the air was at the lowest level in 1975: 10.1 0 C in<br />

Bitola and 12.0 0 C in Skopje.<br />

In regard to the annual rainfalls, they have a trend of decline since 1984, which is most obvious<br />

in the East parts of Macedonia. The driest period took place between 1984 and 1994.<br />

3.3. Effects of the Climate Changes<br />

Adverse effects of the climate changes – especially those of the global warming – on the land<br />

and agricultural sector are the effects on land productivity, degradation, formation of wastelands<br />

and erosion, as the most adverse one.<br />

According to the spatial plan of Macedonia, 934,128 ha or 36.7 percent of the total land in<br />

the country is covered with forests, forestations and intensive plantations.<br />

While the country is relatively well covered by forests (29.0 percent), the fact remains that 71<br />

percent of the total area covered by forests is in fact covered by short dendriform and short trees<br />

Table 107, Publication II. In order to explain the plant situation in the country, it should be stressed<br />

that the air temperatures in the summer months have risen over the past 10 years and have dropped<br />

in the winter periods, thus increasing the annual amplitude.<br />

The lower level of rainfalls is yet another negative factor affecting the growth of forests. The<br />

effect of the factors of climate changes and of the global warming in the form of increased frequency<br />

of summer fires in the forests should also be taken in account.<br />

Macedonia is a country with a rich biological diversity, as a result of the various climate and<br />

geo-morphological features. The sensitive eco-systems will suffer to the greatest extent from the<br />

changes in the temperature regime, as well as from the changes in the number of rainfalls and annual<br />

changes in the distribution of rainfalls. These changes will adversely affect the biodiversity, structure<br />

and features of an eco-system. As a result of the changes in the climate, the expectations are<br />

that there will be considerable changes and redistribution of the vegetation zones, living organisms<br />

and eco-systems. The size of the loss of species or the damages of the eco-systems will depend on<br />

the intensity of the climate changes, as the change of biotopes of the species depends on their<br />

adaptation and mobility.<br />

It is difficult to isolate the anthropogenic effect of the water resources from the effect of the<br />

climate changes. The permanent water resources and the assessment of their change in the future<br />

are made by identifying their flow and the level of water in the lakes in the period between 1961 and<br />

2000. According to the analysis of all the rivers analyzed during the period of observation, the average<br />

outflow declined from 10 percent to 80 percent. The conclusion is, then, that the southern and<br />

Southeast regions are the most vulnerable ones in Macedonia.<br />

The weather changes related to the climate ones affect the human health, either as a direct<br />

impact on the human body or indirectly, through its impact on organisms causing or carrying diseases.<br />

People with chronic diseases, particularly older people, are susceptible to worsening of their<br />

112


condition during very hot or very cold weather. The increasing frequency or severity of the heat<br />

waves may lead to increases in the mortality rates. The changes in the seasonal and daily temperatures<br />

and in the humidity may affect the concentration of substances carried by air and thus affect<br />

the respiratory systems.<br />

4. WASTE <strong>IN</strong>DICATORS<br />

One of the major threats on the environment in the Macedonian municipalities is waste, as<br />

the waste management techniques (mechanical sorting, composting, inseneration, recycling) are<br />

still at the lowest levels.<br />

Officially, there are 40 waste deposits managed by the municipal public enterprises and<br />

1,000 illegal dumps and deposits. The only legal solid waste deposit in the country operating with<br />

a work permit is Drisla, in the vicinity of Skopje, having a capacity of 26 million m 3 and receiving<br />

150,000 tons annually. As for the industrial waste, it is worth noting that it is not mixed with the<br />

communal one and is mainly stored near or within the industrial capacities. The data regarding the<br />

potential pressure of the deposits on the environment are limited due to the lack of a comprehensive<br />

system of monitoring the pollution caused by the deposits themselves. The existing situation<br />

regarding the waste is clearly illustrated in Table 108, Publication II.<br />

Hard communal waste of the municipalities is waste produced in the everyday life of people<br />

and the work in homes, yards, business premises and other facilities, including: various types of<br />

household waste, foodstuff waste, garden waste, fruits and agricultural waste, paper, cardboard,<br />

wooden, metal, glass, china, leather, plastic, rubber and similar harmless waste. On average, the<br />

urban areas produce about 360 kg and rural ones 120 kg of waste per person per year.<br />

Table 28. Projected Collection of Municipal Waste - 1999-2025 (‘000 of tons)<br />

Year Total / collection Urban collection Rural collection<br />

1999 479 359 120<br />

2005 541 424 117<br />

2010 600 486 114<br />

2015 667 558 109<br />

2020 743 641 102<br />

2025 828 735 93<br />

Industrial waste is generated by work in the mines, metallurgy, fertilizers industry, chemical<br />

industry, and power plants using coals. According to the analysis conducted, the technological<br />

waste collected in the industrial capacities amounts to 65,000 tons annually, whereas the technological<br />

waste collected during the technological processes in the industry totals 130,000 tons per year;<br />

this waste is deposited within the industrial capacities. It should be noted that the legal entities<br />

engaged in this sector have no systems for collection and management of technological (industrial)<br />

waste.<br />

113


Table 29. Estimated Quantities of Collected Industrial Waste<br />

Industrial sector<br />

Primary process waste Other technological (industrial)<br />

(tons)<br />

waste (tons)<br />

Oil and chemical processing 1.000 5.000<br />

Secondary processing of metal ores 1.000 20.000<br />

Metal processing and general<br />

production<br />

5.000 60.000<br />

Textile production 1.750 12.500<br />

Processing of food and beverages 50.970 12.500<br />

Other industrial sectors 5.000 20.000<br />

TOTAL 65.000 130.000<br />

Source: Environmental Agency<br />

It is estimated that about 46,000 tons of hazardous waste 46 are generated in the course of one<br />

year. This quantity does not include the hazardous waste kept by the industries within their localities.<br />

The analyses of ten industrial capacities generating hazardous waste in the country show that<br />

4 million tons are dumped every year in the local deposits within the industrial yards. Ohis-Skopje<br />

alone generates 4 tons of hazardous waste on a daily basis.<br />

Deposits within the metallurgy companies are the facilities carrying the highest degree of<br />

risk in their processes of production and storing solid waste, followed by the copper, lead, zinc, and<br />

particularly antimony and arsenic mines; this category of waste producers also includes the oil refinery<br />

Okta, Ohis, Alkaloid, the fertilizer plants in Veles, leather producing companies, thermal power<br />

plants and medical centers.<br />

The quantity of generated medical waste 47 varies between 8,000 and 10,000 tons per year. Of<br />

this quantity, 15 percent is either toxic or infectious waste.<br />

Construction waste is waste generated during construction works, industrial, processing and<br />

craftworks, such that does not have the features of the communal solid waste and technological<br />

waste. It consists of: construction waste materials, earth, mire, sludge (inert and harmless), rocks,<br />

ceramic waste, sanitary accessories, etc.<br />

5. LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PLAN (LEAP)<br />

AS AN <strong>IN</strong>DICATOR<br />

Local environmental action plans (LEAPs) are among the most efficient and useful instruments<br />

for the attainment of a sustainable local development in the municipalities. The LEAPs are or<br />

should be developed by the municipalities, for the purpose of coping not only with environmental<br />

issues, but also with issues related to the sustainable use of resources, as well as with social and economic<br />

ones.<br />

The fundamental structure of LEAP should include: assessment of the existing environmental<br />

situation, setting priorities, identification of most appropriate strategies for resolving the key environmental<br />

issues, and implementation of activities aimed at improving the environment. The development<br />

and implementation of LEAPs should encourage the local authorities to take over responsibility and care<br />

for the environment, to ensure long-term sustainable use of the natural resources within the municipality,<br />

to set local priorities regarding the protection of the environment, and to link and relate the LEAP to<br />

the National Environmental Action Plan (Table 109, Publication II). Thus far, 29 municipalities have devel-<br />

46<br />

Hazardous waste is waste containing substances with one of the following features: explosiveness, reactiveness, inflammability, irritability,<br />

toxicality, infectiveness, cancerogenous effects, mutation, teratogenesis, ecotoxicality, and release of poisonous gases through chemical<br />

reactions or biological disintegration.<br />

47<br />

Special waste is the waste generated by: medical institutions (sanatoriums, hospitals, polyclinics and dispensary wards), scientific,<br />

research and development institutions (institutes), laboratories of treatment, research and control. This type of waste differs in quantity<br />

and features from the communal waste and is closer to hazardous waste due to its features.<br />

114


oped their LEAPs: Skopje, Berovo, Bogdanci, Veles, Debar, Dolneni, Gevgelija, Zrnovci, Jegunovce,<br />

Kavadarci, Karbinci, Kocani, Kratovo, Kriva Palanka, Kumanovo, Labunista, Lipkovo, Lozovo, Negotino,<br />

Pehcevo, Prilep, Probistip, Radovis, Resen, Sopiste, Struga, Sveti Nikole, and Stip. Of those, 19 have<br />

already been completed, while 10 are in the form of proposals.<br />

6. BIODIVERSITY <strong>IN</strong>DICATORS<br />

The biodiversity is the link between the variety of species, eco-systems and genes.<br />

The process of monitoring biodiversity consists of continuing gathering of valid data regarding<br />

the situation of certain species, communities, and eco-systems. In Macedonia and, consequently,<br />

in the Macedonian municipalities, there is a lack of a comprehensive monitoring of the biodiversity.<br />

This is the reason for the limitations of the attempts to conduct assessments and analysis of the<br />

impact that various factors, including the anthropogenic factors had and will have on the eco-systems,<br />

communities, and species.<br />

Macedonia is a country with an extraordinary abundance of relict and endemic variety of<br />

species and eco-systems. As a result, Macedonia is at the top of the list of countries referred to as<br />

European biodiversity hot places.<br />

6.1. Key Threats for Biodiversity in Macedonia<br />

The key threats for the biodiversity in Macedonia are: loss of habitats (due to change in the<br />

use of land), modification and fragmentation. These are followed by threats in the form of over utilization<br />

of biological reserves, pollution, introduction of new sorts of flora and fauna and invasive<br />

species.<br />

6.1.1. Changes in the Use of Land<br />

The loss of natural habitats as a result of changes in the use of land is most evident in the<br />

case of water habitats (swamps). In the course of the decades following World War II, almost all larger<br />

swamps were dried out for the purpose of acquiring new agricultural areas and fighting malaria.<br />

This presented a serious threat for the biocenosis of the swamps and some of them were fragmented<br />

and facing possible extinguishing. The process continues even at present (the Ohrid swamp<br />

Studencista is turned into a construction waste deposit).<br />

One of the existing ways of modification of habitats is their transformation, particularly by<br />

constructions of artificial water accumulations, which turns the land habitats into water ones. There<br />

are more than 20 larger accumulations in the case of which no attention was paid whether their construction<br />

will destroy valuable habitats.<br />

In terms of the agro- biodiversity, the most evident is the loss of highland meadows in the<br />

near-mountain and mountain areas and in the valley pastures. The variety and mosaic of the habitats<br />

typical for the rural areas (a frequent case in areas with traditional agriculture) are seriously jeopardized.<br />

As a result of this, it should be expected that this part of the landscape will dissapear or will<br />

be modified into bushes and small-trees forests in the next two to three decades.<br />

6.1.2. Land Degradation<br />

One of the most serious causes of loss of habitats is the inappropriate planning of the expansion<br />

of urban centers, weekend settlements, and tourist resources. The pressure of the tourist on the<br />

habitats is constantly increasing, and the measures proposed to reduce this pressure are the introduction<br />

and implementation of a sustainable tourism.<br />

115


6.1.3. Fragmentation of Habitats<br />

Habitats are mainly fragmented due to the construction of traffic infrastructure. The major<br />

road corridors in Macedonia cut through the habitats that serve as bio-corridors for the vertebrates<br />

(particularly the larger mammals). An example of this is the mounting crossing Gjavato, which is the<br />

only link of the mountain of Pelister with the Bigla, Plakenska and Ilinska mountain ridge and,<br />

through the latter, with the mountains of Osogovo and Bistra. The situation with the national park<br />

Mavrovo is similar.<br />

The fragmentation of water habitats is most evidently caused by constructions of dams,<br />

which occurs rather frequently. In parallel with this, there is a failure to follow the recommendations<br />

regarding biological minimum of the water flows and regarding the formation of routes of the fish<br />

near the dams. This has led to a discontinuity in the natural migration routes of the eel in lake Ohrid.<br />

Another typical example of fragmentation of the habitats is the long-distance power lines,<br />

of which some pass through the national parks.<br />

6.1.4. Over Utilization of Biological Resources<br />

Over-extensive Use of Grass Areas and Pastures<br />

There are approximately 650,000 ha of hill and mountain pastures in Macedonia. The pasture<br />

degradation issue is linked with the increased amount of low vegetation at the cost of grass areas<br />

due to their non-utilization, rather than due to their over-extensive use. The domination of low vegetation<br />

damages the biodiversity, as grass communities are more heterogeneous and richer in<br />

species.<br />

Over-extensive hunting/fishing<br />

Inappropriate activities of stocking the water accumulations with fish lead to drastic<br />

changes in the structure of the algal flora. This is the case in the artificial lakes of Strezevo, Turija and<br />

Mavrovica, where the mating of carps (Ciprinus carpio) brought about the appearance of blue-green<br />

algae of the types of Microcistis aeruginosa, Anabaena planctonica, and Aphanizomenon flosaquae.<br />

There are no sufficient data on hunting that could be used to analyze the situation regarding<br />

the exploitation of the biological resources.<br />

Exploitation of Waters<br />

Frequently, there is also a frequent lack of control over the exploitation of waters. Such is the<br />

situation with the rivers Petruska, Kovanska and Sermeniska, which for the most part of the year<br />

have no water in their downstream parts due to being used for irrigation.<br />

The case of the villagers from Podgorci (Jablanica), who built a channel at the ice lake in<br />

Podgorci, is a clear example of how a rare type of a habitat may be destroyed.<br />

Another drastic example is the idea to draw water from the river Bosava, in order to irrigate<br />

the Kavadarci field. This plan jeopardizes the existence of this significant water eco-system in its midand<br />

downstream and causes major changes in the hydrology of the wider region, as the river Bosava<br />

waters are shifted to another water flow (that of the river Luda Mara).<br />

116


6.2. Pollution<br />

6.2.1. Water Pollution<br />

The main polluters of the waters are the following industries: chemical, leather, food, metal,<br />

etc., as well as the pig farms and communal waste waters.<br />

The irresponsible releases of high concentration of organic and non-organic polluters for<br />

years in a row has led to a poor situation of the river eco-systems, as presented in Table 15.<br />

Table 30. Major River Systems in Macedonia; Pollution,<br />

Sources of Pollution, Legal and Registered Category<br />

River system Pollution Source of pollution<br />

Vardar<br />

- Vrutok<br />

- Jegunovce<br />

- Skopje-Saraj<br />

- Skopje- Juruml.<br />

- Veles<br />

- Chemic.indust. Veles<br />

- Demir Kapija<br />

- Gevgelija<br />

Organic<br />

Inorganic<br />

Organic-inorganic<br />

Organic-inorganic<br />

Organic-inorganic<br />

Non-organic<br />

Organic-inorganic<br />

Organic-inorganic<br />

Solid waste<br />

Chromium<br />

Agriculture, waste waters<br />

Industry, waste waters<br />

Industry, waste waters<br />

Chemical industry<br />

Waste waters, tributaries<br />

Waste waters, industry,<br />

agriculture<br />

Regulated<br />

category<br />

I<br />

II<br />

II<br />

II<br />

III<br />

III<br />

II<br />

II<br />

Category<br />

I-II<br />

III-IV<br />

III-IV<br />

Out of category<br />

Out of category<br />

Out of category<br />

IV- Out of categ.<br />

IV- Out of categ.<br />

Lepenec Inorganic Asphalt-base, industry II IV-III<br />

Treska Organic Waste waters II II-III<br />

Pcinja Organic-inorganic Industry, waste waters II IV- out of categ.<br />

Bregalnica Organic-inorganic Waste waters, mines II-III IV- out of categ.<br />

Crna Reka Organic-inorganic Waste waters, industry III-II IV- out of categ.<br />

Dragor Organic-inorganic Waste waters, industry III Out of category<br />

Source: Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning<br />

The situation with the stagnant water eco-systems is also alarming in terms of pollution. This<br />

is particularly so in the case of lake Dojran, which is rapidly losing its status of a lake eco-system,<br />

turning into a swamp. While there are evident efforts to protect lake Ohrid, little has been done to<br />

do the same for lake Prespa, which is the main source of water in this system. In addition, the large<br />

artificial lakes Tikves, Turija and Strezevo are under significant pressure.<br />

Generally speaking, there is no continuous monitoring of the situation with underground<br />

waters, while analyses are conducted only when necessary. One of the analyses conducted in the<br />

Skopje region indicates a presence of trichloroethylene and zinc in the vicinity of the industrial complex<br />

Ohis, as well as the increased radioactivity (approximately 1.3Bq/l) near the airport Petrovec.<br />

This situation regarding the quality of waters has a large impact on the biodiversity and stability<br />

of all water eco-systems. Only water eco-systems located high in the mountains are preserved,<br />

but the war activities on the mountain of Sar Planina will have an adverse effect on these eco-systems,<br />

as well.<br />

117


6.2.2. Soil Pollution<br />

The pollution of the soil in Macedonia is of high levels and presents a serious threat for the<br />

biodiversity. The most polluted areas in Macedonia have a considerable adverse impact on the biodiversity<br />

in the country. Those are regions in and around the large urban centers (mostly due to the<br />

traffic), industrial regions (due to emissions of polluters) - such as Veles, Skopje, and Bitola – and agricultural<br />

regions (as a result of the intensive agricultural activities) – the Strumica field, Polog,<br />

Pelagonia, Kocani field, etc.<br />

6.2.3. Air Pollution<br />

The impact of the atmospheric pollution of the biodiversity in Macedonia is significant in the<br />

urban areas and the areas surrounding valleys in the vicinity of urban centers. In this way, pollution<br />

jeopardizes the natural elements in areas modified by the anthropogenic factor. The rural areas at a<br />

greater distance from urban pollution of the air are not directly endangered.<br />

The phenomenon of acid rains in Macedonia is not very often, except in the large urban and<br />

industrial centers (Skopje, Veles). The incidental acid rains are a result of the cross border transportation<br />

of polluters. In addition, certain modifications have also been registered in the structure of silicon<br />

algae in certain glacier lakes (Pelister).<br />

In view of the above, the atmospheric pollution is not the key threat to the biodiversity in<br />

Macedonia.<br />

6.2.4. Introductory and Invasive Species<br />

The introduction of new types of flora and fauna adds to the enlargement of the overall biodiversity<br />

in the country (for instance, many crops used in the food, horticulture, special groups of<br />

domestic animals, etc.). Still, a large number of them become invasive, particularly if their expansion<br />

is uncontrolled. At the same time, they also invade the habitats of the autochthonous species,<br />

squeezing them out from the area.<br />

The majority of the invasive plant species may be found on uncultivated locations (by the<br />

roads, railroads, waste deposits, etc.), while some appear in the water eco-systems.<br />

A typical representative of the flora is the species Elodea Canadensis (water plague), introduced<br />

for the first time in lake Ohrid in 1957 through the channel Studencista. It is invasive specie,<br />

reproducing itself and expanding very quickly, driving the autochthonous species out of the area.<br />

The expansion of this specie is constantly monitored; it may also be found near the springs in Sveti<br />

Naum and the river Crn Drim.<br />

Ailanthus altissima is invasive specie, which usually occupies large area in the low regions<br />

and is characterized by an intensive reproductive activity.<br />

During the past few years, there was also a considerable presence of American neophytes,<br />

i.e. species of the class of Conyza, Solanum, Juncus, etc.<br />

In the area of forestry, analyses must take into account the unlimited forestations with the<br />

specie Pseudotsuga douglasii, which acts aggressively in beech trees regions and in regions with<br />

alochtonous conifers in low regions.<br />

As regards the fauna in Macedonia, the majority of the introduced species (including also<br />

invasive ones) belong to the classes of fish (Pisces) (11) and mammals (Mammalia) (8). Regarding the<br />

other species of vertebrae (Amphibia, Reptilia and Aves), no invasive species have been identified<br />

among the introduced species registered occasionally.<br />

With regard to the fish fauna in the natural water eco-systems, the following species of the<br />

group of introduced species are regarded as invasive: Oncorchynchus mykiss, Carasius carassius,<br />

118


Carassius auratus, Lepomis gibbosus, Ameiurus nebulosus, Rseudorasbora parva, and Acerina cemula.<br />

The size of the populations of these species constantly increases at the cost of inferior<br />

autochthonous types of fish. The eco-systems where invasive types exist are the lakes of Ohrid and<br />

Prespa, as well as the section of the water flow of the river Vardar.<br />

Among the mammals (Mammalia), the invasive species includes Ondatra ribethicus, which<br />

expands along the north-south line along the river Vardar and along the East part of its flow, and<br />

nutrias, which are for the time being limited to the area of the lake Prespa and the upper stream of<br />

the river Vardar. Thus far, however, these two types had no direct negative impact on the autochthonous<br />

fauna of the mammals.<br />

The natural pathogenic agents are plant diseases and pests in the forests, cultivations and<br />

capacities for production of seed material.<br />

6.4. Protected Areas<br />

In accordance with the relevant international criteria IUCN, the natural heritage of<br />

Macedonia has been valorized and placed under protection by certain regulations. The protected<br />

areas are divided into six classes; the total area under protection in Macedonia occupies 237,419 ha,<br />

which is 9.23 percent of the country’s entire territory. The largest portion of this area are national<br />

parks – 108,338 ha (45.63 percent); the national park Mavrovo occupies 73,088 ha, the Galicica one<br />

22,750 ha, and Pelister 12,500 ha.<br />

Category of protected<br />

area<br />

Rigorously protected<br />

natural reservations<br />

(category I IUCN)<br />

National parks<br />

(category II IUCN)<br />

Natural monuments<br />

(category III IUCN)<br />

Other protected areas<br />

(category IV-VI IUCN)<br />

Table 31. Biological diversity within the protected areas<br />

Area (ha)<br />

No. of protected<br />

species<br />

Note<br />

61 Water birds<br />

22 Birds of prey<br />

14 Other water animals<br />

12.730<br />

32 Hairy wild animals<br />

24 Bats<br />

13 Reptiles<br />

42 Types of fauna<br />

108.338<br />

Ramsar location 18.920<br />

Location of international<br />

significance<br />

38.000<br />

TOTAL 237.419<br />

Source: Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning<br />

134<br />

37<br />

45<br />

16<br />

27<br />

83<br />

57.093 -<br />

2.338 - “<br />

62<br />

17<br />

34<br />

24<br />

7<br />

42<br />

142<br />

19<br />

36<br />

Ornitofauna<br />

Hairy animals<br />

Fish and reptiles<br />

Reptiles<br />

Bats<br />

Types of flora<br />

Representatives of species given in<br />

the previous categories<br />

Water birds<br />

Birds of prey<br />

Other water animals<br />

Reptiles<br />

Types of flora<br />

Water fauna<br />

Water flora<br />

Coastal vegetation<br />

119


The representatives of mountain dendro-flora and the large hairy animals are dominant in<br />

the national parks. The rigorously protected natural reservations occupy 12,730 ha (5.36 percent):<br />

Ezerani near the lake Prespa – 2,080 ha and Tikves in the canyon of the river Crna Reka – 10,650 ha.<br />

The biological diversity at Ezerani is mainly in the form of swamps and grass vegetation and<br />

water birds, while the one in Tikves in the form of hill and mountain dendroflora, carnivorous birds<br />

and large hairy wild animals.<br />

The natural monuments occupy 57,093 ha (24.05 percent).<br />

• Lake Ohrid – 23,000 ha;<br />

• Demir Kapija - 200 ha;<br />

• Botanic garden Gazi Baba – 3.3 ha;<br />

• Lake Dojransko - 2.730 ha;<br />

• Gazi Baba - 13 ha;<br />

• Naked Man - 5 ha;<br />

• Lake Prespa - 17.680 ha;<br />

• Lake Matka gorge - 5443 ha;<br />

• Katlanovo area - 5442 ha;<br />

• Towers of Marko - 2300 ha;<br />

• Monospitovo marsh - 250 ha;<br />

• Drenacka gorge - 5 ha;<br />

• Karsi gardens - 10 ha;<br />

• Murite - 10 ha;<br />

• Konce – 0.7 ha;<br />

• Morodvis – 0.5 ha.<br />

The biological diversity of the natural monuments mainly includes water types of flora and<br />

fauna 9in the water eco-systems), grass, swamp, hill and mountain flora, fungi, and fauna.<br />

The other categories of protected areas occupy 2,338 ha (0.1 percent). Those are three areas<br />

of specific natural features: Leskoec with 300 ha, Vodno with 1,953 ha, and Kozle with 85 ha.<br />

In addition to the above, there are also natural habitats with various types of wild flora, fungi<br />

and fauna. They include 14 locations, covering a total area of 2,645 ha. They mainly include protected<br />

types of dendro-flora (mostly pine, silver fir, yew, juniper, oak, beech, birch, wild chestnut, etc.).<br />

Two water eco-systems in Macedonia have been nominated for international lists of the<br />

world natural heritage. Those are the locality Ezerani near the lake Prespa with an area of 18,920 ha<br />

(7.97 percent), included in the global Ramsar list in 1995, as well as the natural, cultural and historical<br />

area of Ohrid occupying 38,000 ha (16.01 percent), included in the list of world heritage in 1981.<br />

the two areas are exceptionally rich with endemic relic elements of flora and fauna, as well as with<br />

habitats.<br />

7. NOISE <strong>IN</strong>DICATORS<br />

Institutions conducting measurements of the level of noise in Macedonia are the Central laboratory<br />

with the Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning, the State Public Health Institute and<br />

the city offices in Skopje and Bitola.<br />

The measured level of noise caused by the industry in Skopje is higher than the maximum<br />

allowed level: 35dB(A), 40dB(A) and 45dB(A).<br />

Noise caused by hotels and restaurants is within the maximum allowed noise levels.<br />

Radovis (with 40dB(A)) and Veles (60 dB(A)) are other two cities with an industry-caused level<br />

of noise higher than the maximum allowed level.<br />

120


The noise in the Skopje municipalities is higher than the maximum allowed level at every<br />

measuring point. The highest levels of municipality noise in 2003 were registered at the measuring<br />

point bull. “Aleksandar Makedonski” and the “International Brigades” street (the noise at both points<br />

was 84.9dB(A), while the lowest level (56db(A)) was measured at the point located<br />

8. <strong>IN</strong>DICATORS RELATED TO TERRESTRIAL ECO-SYSTEM<br />

8.1. Land Degradation Processes<br />

Due to the large scope of the vital functions of land, the preservation of the condition of the<br />

land as one of the most important media in the nature is of essential significance for the protection<br />

of the environment. The land is under constant threat from a large number of activities that degrade<br />

its long-term availability and ability to endure.<br />

There is no constant monitoring of the level of degradation of the land in Macedonia, as<br />

there is no monitoring system of land degradation in the country.<br />

8.2. Erosion<br />

Erosion is a natural geological phenomenon occurring as a result of the process of tearing<br />

away the land particles by the water or wind and their re-allocation to other places. The erosion<br />

process, which is generally irretrievable, may be dramatically intensified by certain human activities.<br />

Erosion is caused by a combination of factors, such as steep slopes, climate (e.g., long dry periods<br />

followed by heavy rainfalls), inappropriate use of land, rare vegetation and ecological disasters (e.g.,<br />

forest fires). In addition, certain internal features of the land may make it more susceptible to erosion<br />

(e.g., a thin layer of surface earth, small-grained structures or a low content of organic substances). The<br />

results from the erosion of land are the loss of functions of the land and loss of land itself.<br />

According to the data from the “Erosion Map” (developed and showing the condition of land<br />

in 1992), the condition is as follows: 38 percent of the territory in the country has a high percentage<br />

of erosion. The total annual loss of land is about 17*106 m 3 . Of this number, 7,5*106 m 3 are transported<br />

out of the country as a result of the transportation force of the water (through the water flows),<br />

while about 3*106 m 3 are carried into natural and artificial accumulations.<br />

Figure 29. Distribution of Land Erosion<br />

Source: Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning<br />

121


8.3. Reduction of Organic Substance<br />

The organic substance plays a central role in the maintenance of the key functions of the<br />

land and is a fundamental pre-conditioner of the degree of erosion and fertility of the land. It<br />

ensures the cohesion and mitigating capacity of the land, thus contributing to the limitation of the<br />

expansion of the pollution from the land into the waters.<br />

The cattle breeding and forestry have a considerable impact on the organic substances in<br />

the land. In spite of the importance of maintaining the organic substances in the land structure,<br />

there is evidence that the organic substances dissolving in the land are frequently not replaced in<br />

sufficient quantities and in accordance with the cultivable land systems, which lead to higher levels<br />

of specialization and monoculture. The specialization in the cattle breeding led to separation of cattle<br />

from land cultivation, so that the rotation practices used to renew the organic substances in the<br />

land structure are increasingly not practices in the agriculture.<br />

The carbon is the main component of the organic substances in the land, playing a major role in<br />

the global carbon cycle. Studies show that the organic substances in the land produce about 2 gyga tons<br />

of carbon annually. A comparison of this quantity with the 8 gygatons of atrophic carbon emitted in the<br />

atmosphere on an annual basis stresses the importance of the organic substances in the land in relation to<br />

the climate changes. However, the quantity of organic substances and, consequently, of the carbon that<br />

may be stored in the land is limited. In addition to that, there is a need of a more serious approach in order<br />

to maintain or increase the content of organic substances in the land.<br />

8.4. Land Pollution<br />

8.4.1. Local Pollution of the Land<br />

The local pollution is generally connected with the mining, industrial capacities, waste<br />

deposits and other active and inactive capacities. These activities may bring about risk for both the<br />

land and the waters.<br />

The risk in the mining industry is linked with the storing or dumping of waste, acid ores<br />

channeling and use of certain chemical agents.<br />

The industrial capacities, both operating and closed ones, may also be a source of local pollution.<br />

8.4.2. Diffuse Land Pollution<br />

The diffuse land pollution is mainly a result of emissions of polluting substances in the air<br />

and their dry or wet sedimentation, of certain agricultural activities, and of inappropriate recycling<br />

and management of waste and waste waters.<br />

Emissions of polluting substances into the air and their sedimentation in the land appear as a<br />

result of industrial emissions, traffic and agriculture. The sedimentation of polluting substances in the air<br />

releases polluters that increase the level of acid in the land 48 (e.g., SO2, NOx), heavy metals (cadmium,<br />

lead arsenic, mercury) and some inorganic compound substances (e.g., dioxins, PCB, PAH).<br />

The ammonia and other nitrate compounds (resulting from emissions in the agriculture,<br />

traffic and industry) because undesired enrichment of the land and reduction of the biodiversity in<br />

the forests and high-quality pastures.<br />

A large number of agriculture activities may also be regarded as sources of diffuse pollution<br />

of land, although their effects on the water are more known than their effects on the land.<br />

48<br />

Polluters reducing the Ph factor in the land dissolution, i.e. increase the level of acid in the land, gradually reduce the mitigating capacity<br />

of the land and lead to crossing over the critical thresholds, which contributes to sudden and massive releases of aluminum and other<br />

toxic substances in the water systems. In addition, the polluters raising the acid levels in the land may lead to elimination of nutritional<br />

substances, which will in turn lead to loss of the fertility of the land and possible eutrofication in the waters and extreme quantities of<br />

nitrates in the drinking water, thus damaging the useful microorganisms in the land and slowing down the biological activity.<br />

122


The production systems with no balance between the agricultural inputs/yields and the<br />

availability of soil and cultivable land lead to misbalance of the nutritional substances in the soil,<br />

which often results in pollution of the underground and surface waters. The heavy metals (e.g., cadmium,<br />

copper) in the fertilizers and cattle food are an additional problem.<br />

The agriculture in Macedonia use about 25,000 tons of mineral fertilizers per year, 48,000<br />

tons of nitrate fertilizers, and 3 million tons of organic ones. Over the last 20 years, the consumption<br />

of pesticides constantly decreased from 2,706 tons (1983) to 659 tons (1993). The situation with the<br />

consumption of other protection means is similar. This is not a result of the environmental protection<br />

awareness among the farmers, but of the decreased standards. The trend is particularly noticeable<br />

among private farmers.<br />

There are a very small number of analyses of pollution of soils in Macedonia cause by heavy<br />

metals (lead, cadmium, chrome, nickel, zinc, copper, molybdenum, and arsenic). The table below<br />

presents the data obtained in those research and studies.<br />

Table 32. Concentrations of heavy metals in the soil<br />

Heavy Limit values of<br />

In comparison with Heavy metals content in<br />

metals concentrations of heavy<br />

Germany<br />

analyzed soil<br />

metals in the soil, according<br />

to European communities<br />

Mg/kg<br />

Pb 50 – 300 100 4220, river Zletovica<br />

54-6764, Veles<br />

273-519 Dracevo (Skopje region)<br />

Cd 1 – 3 1 - 1,5 4,1-16,6, Dracevo<br />

(Skopje region)<br />

5,6-7,6, river Kumanovska<br />

Zn 150 – 300 150 - 200 4083, river Zletovica<br />

92-2105, Veles<br />

652, Avtokomanda (Skopje<br />

region)<br />

Ni 30 – 75 50 63,11- 458,67, Trubarevo<br />

(Skopje region)<br />

29,24-260,29 in humus soil<br />

As - 20 - 40 30,83, river Kumanovska<br />

Cr - 100 131,95-208,14, Trubarevo<br />

(Skopje region)<br />

109,40-193,72 in humus soil<br />

Cu 50 – 140 60 395, river Zletovica<br />

Source: Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning<br />

The State Public Health Institute is the institution conducting measurements of the radioactive<br />

pollution of the soil. The measuring points are located in Skopje (Jurumleri) and Stip (railroad<br />

station).<br />

Table 33. Radioactive pollution of the soil<br />

Pollution<br />

Skopje[Bq/kg] Stip[Bq/kg]<br />

15cm<br />

15cm<br />

Sr-90 0,82 2,07<br />

Cs-137 67,68 15,60<br />

Total uranium 4,70 6,320<br />

Source: State Public Health Institute<br />

123


The damage incurred by diffuse pollution of the soil is not as evident in the soil itself, as it is<br />

in the consequences of the destroying the mitigating capacity of the soil. Although the costs have<br />

not yet been identified, the process of cleaning the water from organic substances, pesticides, vegetative<br />

nutritional substances and heavy metals is very expensive.<br />

8.7. Soil Sealing<br />

Covering the soil by construction of buildings, roads and by other activities is called sealing<br />

the soil. When the soil is sealed, the area over which the soil is to perform its function, including the<br />

absorbing of rain water for infiltration and filtration becomes smaller. In addition, sealed areas may<br />

have a significant impact on the surrounding soils, both in the form of changing the water flows and<br />

increasing the biodiversity fragmentation. The soil sealing is an irretrievable process. The degree of<br />

soil sealing mainly depends on the spatial strategies and plans that, unfortunately, often fail to<br />

include potential losses of soil.<br />

In terms of the level o utilization of the soil in Macedonia, the entire area is divided into<br />

4,255,091 parcels in 1,714 cadastre municipalities. The average size of a parcel is 0.6 ha.<br />

Figure 30. Soil utilization structure<br />

Source: Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning<br />

The total utilization of soil in Macedonia includes 663,257 ha (25 percent) of agricultural<br />

arable land, 634,209 ha (25 percent) of pastures, and 965,650 ha (38 percent) of forests. The largest<br />

portion of the agricultural land, by categories of utilization, consists of cultivated land (84 percent),<br />

meadows (8 percent), vineyards (5 percent), and orchards (3 percent).<br />

Figure 31. Agricultural land by utilization category<br />

Source: Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning<br />

124


8.8. Structure and Utilization of Agricultural Land<br />

The data on the agricultural land and its structure (by categories of utilization) show signs of<br />

considerable changes in the percentage of the arable agricultural land (cultivated land, gardens, and<br />

meadows) of the total agricultural land (cultivable land and pastures). In 77 municipalities, the percentage<br />

of the cultivable land is declining, in 7 it remained at the same level, and in 30 it increased.<br />

The situation is also similar with regard to the population per hectare of cultivable agricultural<br />

area. About two thirds of the municipalities have less population per hectare of arable land<br />

than the national average (3.58 citizens per hectare). This proportion reflects to a large extent the<br />

population density of the municipalities, but also speaks of the level of (non)utilization of cultivable<br />

agricultural land. Having in mind the low level of technical equipment in the form of agricultural<br />

machines, the small number of inhabitants per unit of arable land also reveals a low level of utilization<br />

of the land in some and high exploitation levels in other municipalities. In this sense, the Skopje<br />

municipalities are the ones with the highest levels of exploitation (average of 37.37 citizens per<br />

hectare), followed by Gostivar (29.52), Kicevo (21.47), Tetovo (20.42), Labunista, Rostusa, and Dolan<br />

Benicia (about 13-14 individuals per hectare), Ohrid (12.5), Strumica (8.7), etc. Municipalities with the<br />

lowest level utilization of arable land are the ones with less than one citizen per a hectare of arable<br />

land (Konopiste, Vitoliste, Orasac, Klecovce, Staravina, Staro Nagoricane, etc.).<br />

9. <strong>IN</strong>DICATORS OF WATER RESOURCES, WATER QUALITY AND<br />

AQUATIC ECO-SYSTEMS<br />

Just like dry periods, floods are also a serious threat in Macedonia. The destruction and poor<br />

maintenance of water habitats by channeling and construction of dams at rivers may lead to impoverishing<br />

of the plant and animal life. Problems with water accessibility appear when the water demand<br />

exceeds the quantities available for the period, particularly in areas with low quantities of rainfalls and<br />

high population density, as well as in areas of intensive agricultural and industrial activities.<br />

The process of eutrophication 49 , which includes massive blooming of algae (sessile and<br />

plankton ones), is of particular importance when it comes to the reduction of the water levels in<br />

Macedonia. Certain of the algae produce toxins that are toxic and harmful for both people and the<br />

environment. When disintegrating, the algae use up the oxygen in the water; the animals living at<br />

the bottom die out, and fish abandon the area or die out, as well. Increased concentrations of nutritional<br />

substances may also bring about changes in the water vegetation.<br />

In many tributaries, the outflow of water infiltrated from the agricultural areas is the primary<br />

sources of pollution by nitrate and phosphor, especially when the agricultural areas have excessive<br />

content of artificial and natural fertilizers.<br />

The major sources of pollution by phosphor are the households and the industry; however,<br />

in areas where the impact of households and industry is lower, infiltrates from agricultural areas are<br />

the main diffuse source of phosphor.<br />

Sources of organic substances are outflows from factories, industrial waste waters and the<br />

agriculture.<br />

Many of the waters in the country have been found to contain high concentration of hazardous<br />

substances 50 , such as pesticides in the surface waters and heavy metals in the rivers, especially<br />

near the sources of pollution.<br />

49<br />

Excessive quantities of nutritional substances (nitrate and phosphor) in the surface itself and in surface waters may cause a series of negative<br />

and adverse effects, known as eutrofication.<br />

50<br />

"Hazardous substances" are substances or groups of substances that are toxic and permanent. Examples are the compound substances<br />

containing heavy metals and certain organic substances.<br />

125


The population of plants and animals in the lakes and rivers react to changes in their environment<br />

caused by changes in the chemical and physical quality. There are also biological pressures<br />

on the population, such as the introduction of new species by stocking the rivers and lakes with fish<br />

for the purpose of recreational fishing.<br />

9.1. Water Resources in Macedonia<br />

Macedonia is a semi-aride region (the region of Ovce Pole is the driest one in the Balkans), so that<br />

the total quality of available waters in Macedonia are of particular importance. The western part of the<br />

country (the riverbed of the river Crn Drim) is richer with water than its central and East parts. The flow<br />

of surface waters is brought down to 250 water flows (riverbeds longer than 20 km 2 ), of which the largest<br />

surface water flow is the river Vardar. There are three natural lakes: Ohrid, Prespa, and Dojran. A considerable<br />

portion of the riverbeds of rivers and lakes belong to the neighboring countries.<br />

Water resources are a problem in the country whenever the water demand in the agriculture<br />

and households is not always met. When waters are available in sufficient quantities, the drinking<br />

water is of good quality, as the majority of the springs used for drinking waters are unpolluted<br />

mountain ones. Yet, there is pollution of the water in the rivers and the surface water systems.<br />

Rainfalls in the country are unequal, occasional and in relatively low quantities. The annual<br />

average rainfalls are about 733 mm (19 billion m 3 ). The lowest quantity of annual rainfalls is registered<br />

in central and East Macedonia: Gradsko (380 mm), Veles (470 mm), Kavadarci (489 mm), and<br />

Sveti Nikole (500 mm), whereas the largest quantities of rain fall in western Macedonia: Sar Planina<br />

and Baba (1,400 and 1,300 mm, respectively).<br />

The hydrology of water systems in the country has been studied in details by the State Hydro<br />

Meteorological Institute.<br />

Table 34. Maximal, minimal and average water flows at major hydrological stations<br />

Riverbed<br />

Station<br />

Max. Min. Average<br />

(m 3 /sec) (m 3 /sec) (m 3 /sec)<br />

Vardar Gevgelija 236,53 44,79 135,96<br />

Treska Sveta Bogorodica 46,31 7,89 23,34<br />

Pcinja Katlanovska Banja 23,57 2,48 11,89<br />

Bregalnica Stip 19,01 4,23 11,24<br />

Crna reka Rasimbegov Most 46,20 3,51 22,39<br />

Crn Drim Lozani 31,80 18,89 23,39<br />

Strumica Novo Selo 7,88 0,51 3,83<br />

Source: 7 th session on water economy in Macedonia, June 1-3, 2000<br />

126


Table 35. Length of major water flows<br />

Riverbed Area (km2) Average flow 106m3/year<br />

1. Vardar 22 301 4 289<br />

(136.0)<br />

2. Treska 1 880 735<br />

(23.3)<br />

3. Pcinja 2 794 375<br />

(11.9)<br />

4. Bregalnica 2 897 353<br />

(11.2)<br />

5. Crna Reka 4 526 706<br />

(22.4)<br />

6. Crn Drim 1 899 738<br />

(23.4)<br />

7. Strumica 1 401 120<br />

(3.8)<br />

Source: 7 th session on water economy in Macedonia, June 1-3, 2000<br />

The annual reserves and availability of water resources in Macedonia varies between 5.5 – 6.5<br />

billion m 3 , of which 0.4 – 0.6 billion come from the springs. The annual quantity of surface waters is<br />

from 0.3 to 0.5 billion m 3 , which is considered a low quality. According to 1995-1996 data, 1.7 billion<br />

m 3 of water is used, of which 84 percent surface waters and 16 percent underground waters and<br />

waters from natural springs, which is one third of the total water resources. This is a clear indicator<br />

of a country with insufficient water resources.<br />

9.2. Consumption and Drainage of Waters in Macedonia<br />

The annual water consumption in the country is about 1.72 million m 3 , of which 82 percent<br />

is used for irrigation, 11 percent for public use and 7 percent for industrial needs (Table 110 and 111,<br />

Publication II). Generally, the households and industrial waste waters are drained directly into the<br />

waters. Only 6 percent is subjected to treatment at cleaning stations.<br />

About 70 percent of the population in Macedonia is connected to the municipal water supply<br />

systems, which proved water for 1,440,000 citizens, with the remaining population being rural<br />

and having either local or individual water supply systems.<br />

In urban areas, the water supply capacities and the hygiene quality of the analyzed samples<br />

are satisfactory, with negative results due to the lack of chlore and certain quantities of organo-leptic<br />

parameters (Mn, Fe, and sediments).<br />

In rural areas, more than 5 percent of the samples of water fail to meet the quality criteria,<br />

which is a high percentage.<br />

Only a handful of cities (Ohrid, Struga, Resen, Makedonski Brod, Sveti Nikole and Dojran)<br />

have sewer systems with a waste waters cleaning station. Unfortunately, it is only the factories in<br />

Vranista, Struga and Makedonski Brod that are operating. The capacity of the first one is 120,000<br />

cleaning units, while the one in Makedonski Brod has a capacity of 5,000 cleaning units. The plant in<br />

Vranista has a capacity for mechanical, biological and chemical processing. The rate of cleaning<br />

waste waters meets the standards; these waters are drained into the river of Crn Drim.<br />

The factories in Sveti Nikole, Dojran and Ezerani (Prespa) were recently reconstructed, but<br />

their operation is still unsatisfactory (Table 112, Publication II). The additional efforts of the Ministry<br />

of Environment and Physical Planning include construction of 6 to 8 small cleaning stations, for the<br />

waste waters draining into the river Radika, as well as building a cleaning station in Gevgelija.<br />

127


Regarding the quality of water and the water flows in Macedonia, most comprehensive data<br />

may be obtained from the RIMSYS program of the Hydro Meteorological Institute 51 (Table 113,<br />

Publication II).<br />

The analysis of the concentration of iron shows highest levels at the measuring points Brod and river<br />

Eleska, Novo Selo and river Strumicka, and Skocivir at the river Crna, where the iron content is that of class 2.<br />

The analysis of the concentration of dissolved oxygen at the measuring point Skocivir at the<br />

river Crna indicates a high level of eutrification.<br />

The maximum value of the biological consumption of oxygen in five days was registered at<br />

Skocivir, Novo Selo, river Strumicka and Demir Kapija, Vardar, which falls under class 5.<br />

Other analyses include checks of the concentration of Ni, Cu, Cr6+ and Pb in the water flows,<br />

which categorizes the latter as waters of oligotrophic and mezotrophic nature.<br />

The measuring point Sveta Bogorodica on the river Treska was the point where the measurements<br />

revealed maximum concentrations of Zn in the waters: at this point, the Zn concentration<br />

exceeds the value of 0.05 mg/l.<br />

The analysis of the water flow of Vardar indicates that the highest concentration of suspended<br />

particles is 168 mg/l, measured in Demir Kapija. The hypertrophic nature of the river Vardar<br />

regarding the suspended particles is seen from the measuring point Taor all the way down to<br />

Gevgelija, where Vardar leaves the country. Class 5 features are also present at measuring points on<br />

the rivers Lepenec, Bregalnica, Crna, and at the point Sveta Bogorodica, where the river Treska flows<br />

into the river Vardar.<br />

Eutrophic or high-eutrophic waters in terms of the Mn concentration appear at the points<br />

Krupiste – river Bregalnica, Skocivir – river Crna, Novo Selo – river Strumicka, and Brod- river Eleska.<br />

The maximum concentration of Cd measured at the measuring point Nogaevci – river Vardar<br />

is 0.49x10-3mg/l.<br />

The highest quantity of KMnO4 used for chemical consumption of oxygen was registered at<br />

Skocivir – river Crna and Novo Selo – river Strumicka.<br />

The data on the quality of the lakes Ohrid and Dojran and their tributaries are provided by<br />

the Hydro-biological Institute in Ohrid 52 .<br />

According to the values of the biological consumption of oxygen for the lake Ohrid, the<br />

results indicate waters of olygotrophic nature. The rivers flowing into the lake Ohrid are full of organic<br />

substances. In certain periods, the quality of water in these rivers varies between that of moderately<br />

eutrophic and that of high-eutrophic waters. These results confirm the majority of unresolved<br />

issues regarding these rivers. In terms of pollution with phosphor, large quantities of phosphor flow<br />

into the lake Ohrid through the river Velgoska, but also through other tributaries.<br />

The average concentration of total phosphor in the lake Ohrid varies between 2.1mg/l and<br />

8.37 mg/l. The lake Ohrid is still olygotrophic, but there is a considerable danger coming from the<br />

tributaries. The collector of waste waters surrounding lake Ohrid shows good results, but certain<br />

measures are to be undertaken to resolve the problems with waters flowing into the lake. Nitrate<br />

also enters the lake through these rivers. In August 2002, the maximum average concentration of<br />

nitrate registered was 676 mg/l. Compared with the previous research periods, the total quantity of<br />

nitrate is increased.<br />

51<br />

Data on the hydrological condition of the water flows and the quality of water resources in the country may be obtained from the Hydro<br />

Meteorological Administration. The Hydro-biological Institute in Ohrid is responsible for the quality of the lakes Ohrid and Prespa. The central<br />

laboratory with the Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning provides results from the measurements of the quantity of the<br />

industrial waste waters. Data on the quality of industrial waste waters may only be obtained from the monitoring of industrial capacities<br />

("Okta", "Alkaloid", and "Vranista"). The State Health Institute provides data on the sanitary quality of the water.<br />

52<br />

Measurements are conducted on the largest rivers in the Ohrid and Prespa water flows: Velgoska, Koselska, Sateska, Cerava (flowing into<br />

the lake Ohrid) and Brajcinska, Kranska and Golema (flowing into the lake Prespa). Measurements are also carried out in the Pelagonia<br />

region on the lake Ohrid, with a vertical profile with 12 depth points, and on the lake Prespa, with a profile with 4 depth points. The water<br />

quality consists of the following parameters: temperature, transparency, Ph, total alcality, CO2, oxygen, biological consumption of oxygen,<br />

chemical consumption of oxygen, nitrates and total phosphor content.<br />

128


The olygotrophic nature of the lake Ohrid is not disturbed, but the inflow of harmful substances<br />

is in a trend of increase.<br />

In the lake Prespa, the concentration of oxygen suddenly dropped in the summer (0.6mg/l,<br />

August). Still, in the periods of stratification, the concentrations of dissolved oxygen drastically<br />

increased. A maximum concentration of 10.77mg/l was measured in April 2002. the values of the<br />

biological consumption of oxygen in the lake Prespa indicate that the water is of a mezotrophic<br />

nature in summer.<br />

The measurements revealed to high concentration of organic substances in the mid parts of<br />

the lake Prespa, which is normal, due to the small depth in those parts of the lake. The registered<br />

quantity of phosphor in the tributaries to lake Prespa show that 61 percent of the total quantity of<br />

phosphor comes from the river Golema Reka, and the remainder comes from the other two rivers.<br />

There are also large quantities of phosphor in the middle parts of the lake. In addition, the measurements<br />

showed high concentration of total nitrate. In general, the water in the lake Prespa is<br />

mezotrophic, except in certain periods, when it becomes olygotrophic. The condition of the water is<br />

worsened by the release of untreated waters into the lake.<br />

Concluding remarks and Recommendations<br />

In 1997, an office responsible for ozone was established within the Ministry of Environment,<br />

with the role of coordinating all activities related to the reduction, elimination and management of<br />

substances depleting the stratospheric ozone layer. It should be noted that over 80 percent of the<br />

total consumption of such substances has been eliminated; with this, the obligations under the<br />

Montreal Protocol (of which Macedonia is a signatory) have been met.<br />

Conclusions reached at on the basis of the models of global warming point to the fact that<br />

the increase of temperature of the air will also increase the quantity of water and water condensation<br />

in the atmosphere, which in turn will have an impact on the global hydrological cycle.<br />

Evaporations will also increase, thus leading to faster drying out of the land. The pluviometric regime<br />

will also undergo changes. The increased intensity of rainfalls will contribute to higher levels of land<br />

erosion and will adversely affect the overall life. It is more than obvious that the expected climate<br />

changes will have an adverse impact on the overall economic development in Macedonia and, consequently,<br />

on the economic development of Macedonian municipalities, as well.<br />

The National Solid Waste Management Plan project is underway at the Ministry of<br />

Environment and Physical Planning; it consists of a feasibility study on waste management in certain<br />

regions in Macedonia financed by the European Reconstruction Agency. The project is divided into<br />

two components: Component 1 – National Waste Management Plan, which will serve as the basis for<br />

all further activities related to waste management, with a period of validity of 6 years; and<br />

Component 2 – Regional Concept of Management of Waste in Northeast and Central east<br />

Macedonia (including 25 municipalities and 400,000 citizens). On the basis of the financial capacities<br />

of the citizens in the project region, a plan is developed to create a comprehensive and modern<br />

waste management system, including selection and recycling.<br />

The project and its success is of essential importance, as it is based on the new Waste<br />

Management Law and the new decentralization laws.<br />

According to the Waste Management Law, the local self-government units have the obligation<br />

to adopt a waste management program each year.<br />

The development and implementation of the Local Environmental Action Plan (LEAP) should<br />

encourage the local authorities to assume the responsibility and care for the environment, to create<br />

129


a long-term sustainable use of the natural resources within the municipal boundaries, to set the<br />

local priorities regarding the environmental protection, and to ensure a link with the National<br />

Environmental Action Plan. Thus far, only 29 municipalities have developed their LEAPs; this is a<br />

small number. This is why the development of a LEAP should be an imperative for every municipality<br />

that wants to have in place a plan of sustainability in all segments and environmental media.<br />

The noise issues are included in the provisions of the 1984 Law on Prevention of Harmful<br />

Noise; yet, there is a need of a new law that will be in harmony with the EU strategy, i.e. its directive<br />

on noise affecting the environment.<br />

The Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning is in the process of revising the project of<br />

a waste water cadastre, which is a step leading very close to resolving the negative anthropogenic<br />

influence of the waste waters on waters in the country; this will also create a document required for<br />

the assessment of the overall pollution by waste waters in the municipalities.<br />

The overall coordination of the water resources management in Macedonia, the monitoring<br />

and issuing of licenses should be under the competence of the Ministry of Environment and Physical<br />

Planning. The municipal communal enterprises and the public enterprises for water resources management<br />

do not have the financial capacity to maintain and improve the water supply and sewer<br />

infrastructure. The unpaid bills are the main reason for the situation, along with the lack of legal<br />

empowerment of the enterprises themselves to deal with the issue. The Law on Waters imposes an<br />

obligation on the polluters to clean the waste waters, but the administrative controlling measures<br />

are not sufficiently effective or implemented. It is particularly important to note that the competence<br />

of water management in Macedonia is too dispersed between various ministries, which make<br />

it difficult to have an integral approach to resolving the issue of pollution of waters and to manage<br />

the waters.<br />

The development of a national plan for reduction and elimination of persistent organic polluters<br />

(POPs) and the project entitled “Possible Activities Aimed at Facilitating the Early Influence on<br />

the Implementation of the Stockholm Convention on POPs” are a step forward to the establishment<br />

of grounds for action in dealing with these high-risk polluters.<br />

There are also several issues of key importance for the municipalities in terms of the protection<br />

of the biodiversity: an assessment should be made of the distribution of species, domination<br />

and jeopardizing, use of the biodiversity for commercial purposes, and the impacts leading to positive<br />

and negative modifications.<br />

For the purpose of protecting the natural heritage and, consequently, the biodiversity, the<br />

municipalities should introduce the following measures: conservation of the natural habitats, reproduction<br />

of plant and animal species and communities in order to preserve the biodiversity, regulation<br />

of the picking of, hunting and trading with protected species, promotion of natural sciences<br />

and understanding the nature through research and education, as well as establishing contacts and<br />

links with national and international organizations involved in biodiversity protection.<br />

In the course of 2002, the Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning initiated the development<br />

of lists of endangered wild types of fungi and plants (such lists of types of animals are also<br />

being developed). For the purpose of introducing records of the export of wild animals from<br />

Macedonia, these lists were submitted to the Plant Protection Administration with the Ministry of<br />

Agriculture, Forestry and Water Economy, for their inclusion in the lists of products that will be examined<br />

at border crossings. In such a way, Macedonia will introduce a system of monitoring the trade<br />

and particularly exports. Unfortunately, trading in wild sorts of flora and fauna in the country will<br />

remain with no appropriate legal regulation; this is an issue that needs to be dealt with as soon as<br />

possible.<br />

130


The following are other factors of potential adverse impact on the biodiversity of that may<br />

cause a chain of effects:<br />

- Lack or inadequate regulations related to the conservation of the biodiversity, unclear institutional<br />

competencies, overlapping duties and competencies;<br />

- Low levels of public and institutional awareness of the importance of biodiversity, underdeveloped<br />

awareness among non-governmental organizations;<br />

- Economic instability, low living standard, and unemployment, all with strong influence on<br />

the threats of this kind;<br />

- Inappropriate implementation of spatial plans;<br />

- Armed conflicts in the region and in the country are a serious and direct threat for the natural<br />

resources;<br />

- Erosion is a serious problem, caused by the past and current agricultural practices in the<br />

country;<br />

- Incomplete study of the various aspects of the biodiversity in Macedonia: no red lists and<br />

books, vegetation maps, pedological maps, maps of distribution of eco-systems and habitats,<br />

typical and endangered species, no information system, no databases, poor professional,<br />

institutional and staff resources in the area of biodiversity;<br />

- Lack of personnel in the system’s institutions: Ministry of Environment and Physical<br />

Planning, inspection offices, customs, Environmental Protection Fund, etc; poor inter-governmental<br />

cooperation;<br />

- Inappropriate biodiversity monitoring system (except a partial monitoring in three national<br />

parks).<br />

131


Appendix 1<br />

NUTS CLASSIFICATION OF REGIONS, GROUP OF MUNICPALITIES AND <strong>MUNICIPALITIES</strong><br />

NUTS1, 2<br />

Territory of<br />

the country<br />

Macedonia<br />

NUTS3<br />

Regions<br />

NUTS4<br />

Group of<br />

municipalities<br />

Pelagonia region<br />

Bitola<br />

Demir Hisar<br />

Krusevo<br />

Prilep<br />

Resen<br />

Vardar region<br />

Veles<br />

Kavadarci<br />

Negotino<br />

Negotino<br />

Northeast region<br />

NUTS5<br />

123<br />

municipalities<br />

Bac<br />

Bistrica<br />

Bitola<br />

Dobrusevo<br />

Kukurecani<br />

Mogila<br />

Novaci<br />

Staravina<br />

Capari<br />

Demir Hisar<br />

Sopotnica<br />

Zitose<br />

Krusevo<br />

Vitoliste<br />

Dolneni<br />

Krivogastani<br />

Prilep<br />

Topolcani<br />

Resen<br />

Bogomila<br />

Veles<br />

Gradsko<br />

Izvor<br />

Caska<br />

Kavadarci<br />

Konopiste<br />

Rosoman<br />

Demir Kapija<br />

132


Kratovo<br />

Kratovo<br />

Kriva Palanka<br />

Kriva Palanka<br />

Rankovce<br />

Kumanovo<br />

Klecevce<br />

Kumanovo<br />

Lipkovo<br />

Orasac<br />

Staro Nagoricane<br />

Southwest region<br />

Debar<br />

Debar<br />

Centar Zupa<br />

Kicevo<br />

Vranestica<br />

Drugovo<br />

Zajas<br />

Kicevo<br />

Oslomej<br />

Makedonski Brod<br />

Makedonski Brod<br />

Plasnica<br />

Samokov<br />

Ohrid<br />

Belcista<br />

Kosel<br />

Meseista<br />

Ohrid<br />

Struga<br />

Vevcani<br />

Velesta<br />

Delogozdi<br />

Labunista<br />

Lukovo<br />

Struga<br />

Skopje region<br />

Gazi Baba<br />

Aracinovo<br />

Gazi Baba<br />

Ilinden<br />

Petrovec<br />

133


Karpos<br />

Gjorce Petrov<br />

Karpos<br />

Kondovo<br />

Saraj<br />

Kisela Voda<br />

Zelenikovo<br />

Kisela Voda<br />

Sopiste<br />

Studenicani<br />

Centar<br />

Centar<br />

Cair<br />

Cair<br />

Cucer - Sandevo<br />

Suto Orizari<br />

Southeast region<br />

Valandovo<br />

Valandovo<br />

Gevgelija<br />

Bogdanci<br />

Gevgelija<br />

Miravci<br />

Star Dojran<br />

Radovis<br />

Konce<br />

Podares<br />

Radovis<br />

Strumica<br />

Bosilovo<br />

Vasilevo<br />

Kuklis<br />

Murtino<br />

Novo Selo<br />

Strumica<br />

Polog region<br />

Gostivar<br />

Vrapciste<br />

Vrutok<br />

Gostivar<br />

Dolna Banjica<br />

Mavrovi Anovi<br />

Negotino -<br />

Polosko<br />

134


Rostusa<br />

Srbinovo<br />

Cegrane<br />

Tetovo<br />

Bogovinje<br />

Brvenica<br />

Vratnica<br />

Zelino<br />

Jegunovce<br />

Kamenjane<br />

Tearce<br />

Tetovo<br />

Dzepciste<br />

Sipkovica<br />

East region<br />

Berovo<br />

Berovo<br />

Pehcevo<br />

Vinica<br />

Blatec<br />

Vinica<br />

Delcevo<br />

Delcevo<br />

Makedonska<br />

Kamenica<br />

Kocani<br />

Zrnovci<br />

Kocani<br />

Oble{evo<br />

Orizari<br />

Cesinovo<br />

Probistip<br />

Zletovo<br />

Probistip<br />

Sveti Nikole<br />

Lozovo<br />

Sveti Nikole<br />

Stip<br />

Karbinci<br />

Stip<br />

135


Appendix 2<br />

I. ROAD TRANSPORT<br />

Infrastructure<br />

A road is a communication line which uses a stable bases different than the one use by the<br />

railways or a runway open for public transport. It is primarily used by passenger motor vehicles on<br />

moving their own wheels. Bridges, tunnels, support structures, passageways and thoroughfares, as<br />

well as highways where toll is charged fall into this category. Ring roads for a specific use do not<br />

belong in this category.<br />

Road category<br />

We can classify the roads by their significance into motorways, regional and local roads. Of<br />

the total road network, motorways and “E” ways are given a special emphasis.<br />

The road network is the total length of all the roads in a given area.<br />

A course is the part of the rod on which the motor vehicles move.<br />

A lane is one of the longitudinal parts into which the road is divided, whether marked or not<br />

with longitudinal stripes along the road, which is wide enough to allow movement of passenger<br />

motor vehicles, which are not motorcycles, in a line.<br />

Transportation equipment<br />

A passenger vehicle is a vehicle moving on wheels intended for use on the roads..<br />

A national passenger vehicle is a vehicle registered in the reporting country, carrying license<br />

plates of the said country.<br />

A foreign passenger vehicle is a passenger vehicle registered in a country other than the<br />

reporting country with license plates of a foreign country.<br />

Passenger vehicles are vehicles constructed solely, or primarily, for transportation of one or<br />

more persons. This group of vehicles includes: bicycles, mopeds, motorcycles, passenger cars,<br />

busses and the mini-busses.<br />

Passenger vehicles with loading capacity are vehicles constructed solely, or primarily, for<br />

transportation of goods. This group of vehicles includes: trucks, trucks with trailers, lorries, lorries<br />

with trailers.<br />

Definition of features<br />

Transportation of passengers in the road transport is expressed through a number of passengers<br />

transported as well as the number of kilometers traveled with reference to both the domestic<br />

as well as the international transport<br />

A passenger is any individual which has purchased a ticket and boarded a buss to travel from<br />

one place to another.<br />

Passenger kilometer is a unit of measure which expresses the transport of a passenger over<br />

a one kilometer distance.<br />

Transportation of goods is expressed in tons and tons/kilometer.<br />

A ton of goods is the unit of measure which expressed the weight of the goods.<br />

Tons/kilometer is a unit of measure which expresses the transportation of a ton of goods<br />

over a one kilometer distance.<br />

Transportation per types of goods is shown according to the Standard transport classification<br />

of goods (EUROSTAT) NST/R.<br />

136


Regular trans-boundary traffic of motor vehicles and passengers occurs on the basis of regular<br />

international travel documents required for both the passengers and the vehicles without any<br />

limitation in terms of the choice of destination which the foreigner wants to reach.<br />

The cross border traffic of motor vehicles and passengers occurs on the basis of bilateral<br />

agreements with neighboring countries only in the zone which is specified in the agreements.<br />

Entry and departure of motor vehicles covers all vehicles which cross the boarder vie a road<br />

and enter or leave Macedonia with a minimum of one passenger. Vehicles crossing the boarder without<br />

a driver-passenger which are loaded on another means of transportation are not included in the<br />

statistics pertaining to the vehicle border traffic.<br />

Urban transport<br />

The source of statistical data on urban transport is the regular monthly and annual reports<br />

provided by business entities which, according to the national classification of activities, provide<br />

urban and suburban transport services.<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Urban and/or suburban line is a line the beginning and ending point of which is a city area,<br />

or one part is in a city area, while the other is in a suburban area.<br />

Length of a line is a distance expressed in kilometers between the beginning and the last<br />

stop. The length of a line is calculated in one direction only.<br />

Transportation equipment<br />

A bus is a passenger motor vehicle with seats for more than 9 passenger (including the driver),<br />

intended only for transport of passengers.<br />

A mini-buss is a passenger motor vehicle constructed to cater for more more than nine persons<br />

including the driver.<br />

Definition of features<br />

Transportation of passengers in the urban and suburban transport is expressed with the number<br />

of passengers transported and the kilometers traveled, relevant for both urban and suburban transport.<br />

Kilometers traveled are a unit of measure which expresses the movement of a passenger<br />

vehicle over a one kilometer distance. Kilometers traveled also include the movement of the empty<br />

vehicle (without passengers on board).<br />

Larger cities in Macedonia provide urban and suburban transport: Skopje, Bitola, Ohrid,<br />

Tetovo, Veles, Shtip, Strumica, Kochani, Struga, Kriva Palanka and Kumanovo.<br />

Data on passengers transported in urban transport are largely data referring to passengers<br />

transported in the city of Skopje.<br />

Transportation by taxi<br />

The source of data on taxi services are the regular annual reports furnished by business entities<br />

which provide taxi services as per the national classification of activities.<br />

In 1998 a research of transportation of passengers by taxi was carried out for the first time to<br />

be introduced as an annual research.<br />

The statistical research of taxi services and transportation of passengers by taxi covers taxi<br />

companies- (associations) in several cities in Macedonia. It also covers some of the taxi companies<br />

and individual taxi drivers (self employed).<br />

137


Infrastructure<br />

All roads of the road network in the urban, suburban and intercity areas.<br />

Transportation equipment<br />

Passenger vehicles and vans<br />

Definition of features<br />

The data on passengers transported and kilometers traveled ads regards the taxi transportation<br />

refer to the transportation services delivered in urban, suburban and inter city areas.<br />

When it comes to taxi services, passengers are transported in response to their telephone<br />

call placed to the taxi company.<br />

Kilometers traveled are with reference to the total number of kilometers in a given year (with<br />

or without passengers on board).<br />

II. RAILWAY TRANSPORT<br />

The source of statistical data on the railway transport are the regular monthly and annual<br />

reports furnished by business entities which under the national classification of activities, provide<br />

railway transportation services – The public railway enterprise “Macedonian railways”.<br />

Infrastructure<br />

A rail track is a line of communication made up of tracks intended only for movement of<br />

means of railway transportation. Railway network is the length of all rail roads in a given area. This<br />

excludes the data on road extensions used only for tourist purposes during a season, as well as rail<br />

tracks constructed only for the needs of mines, forests or other industrial or farming activities.<br />

Railway network<br />

The aggregate railroads along which the means of railway transportation move.<br />

Transportation equipment<br />

Means of railway transportation are movable equipment moving solely along rail tracks and<br />

uses own drive (power engine) or is pulled by another means of transportation (in this case, wagons,<br />

trailers, carriages).<br />

The statistical data includes only means of transportation at disposal of the enterprise for<br />

railway transportation.<br />

The engine is a railway carriage which is equipped with an engine used only to pull other railway<br />

carriages.<br />

Railway carriage is a carriage with an engine constructed for transportation of passengers<br />

or goods along railways. Such railway carriages are included in the statistical data as an inseparable<br />

whole and are counted as one. Passenger and cargo trains fall into this as well.<br />

Definition of features<br />

Passengers- are individuals traveling on a carriage to cross a distance.<br />

Passenger kilometers are a unit of measure of transport of a passenger along the railroad<br />

per kilometer.<br />

138


A goods transported is the total of loaded, unloaded, exported and transit goods expressed<br />

in tons.<br />

Loaded goods are goods loaded in the national and international transport.<br />

Unloaded goods are goods unloaded in the international and national transport.<br />

The total transport of goods includes all kinds of cargoes: by carriage, express and for all<br />

types of vehicles.<br />

Net-tons/kilometer is a unit of measure of movement of a load over a one kilometer distance.<br />

Data on the number of workers refers to the number of employees in the public transportation.<br />

III. AIR TRANSPORT<br />

Data on air transport is with reference to the operations of the Skopje and Ohrid Airports.<br />

Definition of features<br />

Regular transport covers flying of aircrafts on regular (scheduled) lines.<br />

“Charter transport” includes flights which are unscheduled, i.e. are not regular. AS a rule,<br />

there are users which book the aircraft on a given line.<br />

The number of passengers arriving and departing, or the volume of goods, includes the total<br />

nationals and international arrivals and departures.<br />

The number of passengers also includes children though they do not use a seat on the aircraft.<br />

Revenues and expenditure are shown in the annual accounts of business entities.<br />

IV. TELECOMMUNICATION TRAFFIC<br />

The source of statistical data on the telecommunication traffic are the regular monthly and<br />

annual reports provided by the business entities which under the national classification of activities<br />

are engaged in the provision of telecommunication services - AD “Makedonski telekomunikacii” and<br />

AD “Mobimak”.<br />

Definition of features<br />

Data on telephone conversations is with reference to inbound and outbound national and<br />

international telephone calls registered.<br />

Telegraphic services include telegrams in the national and international traffic, while telex<br />

impulses cover the inbound and outbound telex impulses in the national and international traffic.<br />

The data on telephone impulses covers impulses spent in the national and international<br />

traffic through land and mobile connections, internet and commercial telephones.<br />

The data on telephone calls made from public telephones refers to the national and international<br />

traffic.<br />

The data on mobile telephony contains impulses expressed in minutes, and telephone calls<br />

in numbers.<br />

The data on the number of employees is only with reference to AD “Makedonski telekomunikacii”.<br />

139


V. POSTAL TRAFFIC<br />

The source of statistical data on the telecommunication traffic are the regular monthly and<br />

annual reports provided by the business entity which under the national classification of activities is<br />

engaged in the provision of postal services – public enterprise “Makedonska Posta”<br />

Definition of features<br />

The data on letters in the national traffic refers only to the letters sent.<br />

The data on letters in the international traffic refers to letters sent and received.<br />

The data on letters refers to business documents, stamp printed documents, EMS-parcels<br />

and others. The data on newspapers covers the number of joint shipments sent, while newspapers<br />

addressed to individual subscribers are included in the printed documents sent.<br />

The data on parcels in the national traffic refers only to sent parcels.<br />

The data on parcels in the international traffic refers only to sent and received parcels.<br />

Payment transaction covers postal order payments, payments in and out with cheques<br />

from current and gyro accounts held with the saving Post Office saving house and commercial<br />

banks, as well as payments with international postal remittances and from foreign accounts.<br />

The data on revenues, expenditure and number of employees refers only to the public<br />

enterprise “Makedonska posta”.<br />

140


CONTENTS<br />

FOREWORD.................................................................................................................................3<br />

<strong>IN</strong>TRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................5<br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................7<br />

CHAPTER I - DEMOFIGUREY..............................................................................................11<br />

Population................................................................................................................................11<br />

Households and families.....................................................................................................34<br />

CHAPTER II - LIV<strong>IN</strong>G AND WORK<strong>IN</strong>G CONDITIONS..................................................39<br />

Housing and amenities........................................................................................................39<br />

Household income................................................................................................................44<br />

Social protection....................................................................................................................45<br />

Health.........................................................................................................................................54<br />

Transport and mobility........................................................................................................66<br />

CHAPTER III - EDUCATION, CULTURE AND CIVIL LIFE..............................................78<br />

Education..................................................................................................................................78<br />

Culture........................................................................................................................................86<br />

Civil life.......................................................................................................................................92<br />

CHAPTER IV - ECONOMY...................................................................................................96<br />

CHAPTER V - ENVIRONMENT..........................................................................................103<br />

141

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!