25.05.2015 Views

Uric Acid (Liquid) Reagent Set - BrandSD

Uric Acid (Liquid) Reagent Set - BrandSD

Uric Acid (Liquid) Reagent Set - BrandSD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Uric</strong> <strong>Acid</strong> (<strong>Liquid</strong>)<br />

<strong>Reagent</strong> <strong>Set</strong><br />

Intended Use<br />

For the quantitative determination of <strong>Uric</strong> <strong>Acid</strong> in serum. For in vitro<br />

diagnostic use only.<br />

Clinical Significance<br />

The determination of uric acid in serum is most commonly performed for the<br />

diagnosis of gout. Increased uric acid levels are also found in leukemia,<br />

polycythemia, familial idiopathic hyperuricemia, and conditions associated<br />

with decreased renal function.<br />

Test Summary<br />

<strong>Uric</strong> <strong>Acid</strong> has been determined by phosphotungstate methods, 1 variations of<br />

the phosphotungstate method 2 and iron reduction methods. 3,4 The above<br />

methodologies are influenced by many substances in their procedures as<br />

well as many contaminating substances on glassware, etc. 5 The enzyme<br />

<strong>Uric</strong>ase has been widely used for <strong>Uric</strong> <strong>Acid</strong> determinations because of its<br />

improved specificity. 6,7 Recently, hydrogen peroxide, a by-product of the<br />

<strong>Uric</strong>ase-<strong>Uric</strong> <strong>Acid</strong> reaction, has been coupled to other enzymatic reactions to<br />

yield a colorimetric end product. The present procedure uses the coupling of<br />

4-aminoantipyrine (4-AAP), 2-Hydroxy-3,5-Dichloro-benzenesulfonate<br />

(HDCBS), and hydrogen peroxide in the presence of peroxidase to yield a<br />

chromagen measured at 520nm.<br />

Principle<br />

<strong>Uric</strong>ase<br />

<strong>Uric</strong> <strong>Acid</strong> + O2 + 2H2O --------------------------‣ Allantoin + CO2 + H2O2<br />

POD<br />

2H2O2 + 4-AAP + HDCBS ------------------‣ Chromagen + 4H2O<br />

<strong>Uric</strong> <strong>Acid</strong> is oxidized by <strong>Uric</strong>ase to allantoin and hydrogen peroxide. HDCBS<br />

+ 4-AAP + hydrogen peroxide, in the presence of peroxidase, produces a red<br />

chromagen that is measured at 520nm. The absorbance at 520nm is<br />

proportional to the concentration of <strong>Uric</strong> <strong>Acid</strong> in the sample.<br />

<strong>Reagent</strong> Composition<br />

<strong>Uric</strong> <strong>Acid</strong> reagent: 4-AAP >0.2mM, HDCBS 2mM, <strong>Uric</strong>ase (Microbial) >150<br />

U/L, Peroxidase (horseradish) >2,500 U/L, Buffer, pH 8.1 ± 0.1, Non-reactive<br />

stabilizers.<br />

<strong>Reagent</strong> Preparation<br />

The reagent is ready to use.<br />

<strong>Reagent</strong> Storage and Stability<br />

The reagent set is stored at 2-8°C. Under proper storage the reagent will<br />

remain stable until the indicated expiration date.<br />

Precautions<br />

1. This reagent set is for in vitro diagnostic use only.<br />

2. The reagent should not be used if: The reagent is turbid or contains<br />

obvious microbial growth. The reagent blank has an absorbance of<br />

0.500 or greater at 520nm. A pink color is normal for this reagent.<br />

3. All specimens and controls should be handled as potentially infectious,<br />

using safe laboratory procedures. (NCCLS M29-T2) 8<br />

Specimen Collection and Storage<br />

1. Unhemolyzed serum is recommended.<br />

2.<br />

<strong>Uric</strong> <strong>Acid</strong> in serum is stable for three days at 2-8°C and up to six months<br />

when frozen. 9<br />

3. Collect specimens per NCCLS document H4-A3. 10<br />

Interferences<br />

1. Elevated ascorbic acid levels can result in falsely depressed <strong>Uric</strong> <strong>Acid</strong><br />

values.<br />

2. Lipemic samples may cause falsely elevated <strong>Uric</strong> <strong>Acid</strong> levels.<br />

3. Hemoglobin to 100 mg/dl has been demonstrated to have a negligible effect<br />

(


<strong>Uric</strong> <strong>Acid</strong> (<strong>Liquid</strong>)<br />

<strong>Reagent</strong> <strong>Set</strong><br />

3. Lipemic samples will give falsely elevated results and a serum blank<br />

must be run. Serum Blank: Add 0.025ml (25ul) of sample to 1.0ml<br />

water. Zero spectrophotometer with water. Read and record<br />

absorbance and subtract reading from test absorbance. Calculate as<br />

usual.<br />

Calibration<br />

Use an NIST-traceable <strong>Uric</strong> <strong>Acid</strong> standard (5.0 mg/dl) or serum calibrator.<br />

The procedure should be calibrated according to the instrument<br />

manufacturer’s calibration instructions. If control results are found to be out<br />

of range, the procedure should be re-calibrated.<br />

Calculations<br />

A = Absorbance<br />

A (Unk) x Conc. of Std (mg/dl). = <strong>Uric</strong> <strong>Acid</strong> (mg/dl)<br />

A (Std)<br />

Example: A (Unk) =0.126, A (Std) = 0.100, Conc. of Std = 5 mg/dl.<br />

Then: 0.126 x 5 = 6.3 mg/dl<br />

0.100<br />

SI Units (mM/L)<br />

To convert to mM/L, multiply the result (mg/dl) by 10 to convert dl to L and<br />

divide by 168 (the molecular weight of <strong>Uric</strong> <strong>Acid</strong>).<br />

Mg/dl x 10 = mM/L<br />

168<br />

Example: 6.3mg/dl x .0595 = 0.374mM/L<br />

mg/dl x .0595 = mM/L<br />

Quality Control<br />

Serum controls with known normal and abnormal uric acid values should be<br />

run routinely to monitor the validity of the reaction. These controls should be<br />

run at least with every working shift in which uric acid determinations are<br />

performed. It is strongly recommended that each laboratory establish their<br />

own frequency of control determination.<br />

Expected Values<br />

2.5 - 7.7mg/dl 9<br />

It is strongly recommended that each laboratory establish its own normal<br />

range.<br />

Performance<br />

1. Assay Range: 0 - 20 mg/dl<br />

2. Comparison: Results obtained with this reagent (y), in 132 samples<br />

ranging in <strong>Uric</strong> <strong>Acid</strong> from 1.9-10.5 mg/dl, were compared with those<br />

obtained in the same samples using a dry-powder reagent (x) based on<br />

the same methodology. The correlation coefficient was 0.999 and the<br />

regression equation was y=1.00x-0.02. (Sy.x=19.66).<br />

3. Precision: Precision studies were performed following the guidelines<br />

contained in NCCLS document EP5-T2. 12<br />

Within Day (n=20)<br />

Day to Day (n=20)<br />

Mean S.D. C.V.% Mean S.D. C.V.%<br />

6.0 0.06 1.0 6.1 0.16 2.63<br />

6.9 0.04 0.58 7.2 0.16 2.24<br />

9.9 0.06 0.60 10.2 0.31 3.05<br />

4. Sensitivity: The sensitivity of this reagent was investigated by reading the<br />

change in absorbance at 520nm for a saline sample, and two serum samples<br />

with known concentrations. Ten replicates of each sample were performed.<br />

The results of this investigation indicated that, on the analyzer used, the <strong>Uric</strong><br />

<strong>Acid</strong> (<strong>Liquid</strong>) reagent showed little or no reagent drift on a zero sample.<br />

Also, that an absorbance change of 0.015 was approximately equivalent to 1<br />

mg/dl of <strong>Uric</strong> <strong>Acid</strong>.<br />

References<br />

1. Folin, D., Dennis, W., J. Biol. Chem. 13:469 (1913).<br />

2. Caraway, W.T., Clin. Chem. 4:239 (1963).<br />

3. Morin, L.G., J. Clin. Path. 60:691 (1973).<br />

4. Morin, L.G., Clin. Chem. 20:51 (1974).<br />

5. Brochner-Mortenson, K., Medicine 19:161 (1940).<br />

6. Klackar, H.M., J. Biol. Chem. 167:429 (1947).<br />

7. Praetorius, E., Poulson, H., Scand. J. Clin. Invest 5:273 (1953).<br />

8. NCCLS document “Protection of Laboratory Workers form Infectious Disease<br />

Transmitted by Blood, Body Fluids, and Tissue”, 2 nd Ed. (1991).<br />

9. Henry, R.J., Clinical Chemistry: Principles and Technics, 2 nd Ed.,<br />

Hagerstown (MD), Harper & Row, pp. 531 & 541 (1974).<br />

10. NCCLS document “Procedures for the Collection of Diagnostic Blood<br />

Specimens by Skin Puncture”, 3 rd Ed. (1991).<br />

11. Young, D.S., et al. Clin. Chem. 21:1D (1975).<br />

12. NCCLS document “Evaluation of Precision Performance of Clinical<br />

Chemistry Devices”, 2 nd Ed. (1992).<br />

Manufactured by Pointe Scientific, Inc.<br />

5449 Research Drive, Canton, MI 48188<br />

European Authorized Representative:<br />

Obelis s.a.<br />

Boulevard Général Wahis 53<br />

1030 Brussels, BELGIUM<br />

Tel: (32)2.732.59.54 Fax: (32)2.732.60.03 email: mail@obelis.net<br />

Rev. 12/09 P803-U7581-01

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!