11.06.2015 Views

MIC Process Book

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

to them for the answer to “save the industry.”<br />

However, the band members didn’t feel<br />

they did anything especially innovative. They<br />

stated they were just aware of the trends,<br />

YouTube at the time, and capitalized on it.<br />

Their advice for success in the ever- changing<br />

digital music landscape was to be aware<br />

of trends and jump on them before they are<br />

played out. 4<br />

Death, on the other hand, experienced success<br />

due to word of mouth through fans<br />

on message boards. The band started in<br />

the ‘70s but didn’t have success because<br />

the record executives did not find them<br />

marketable. The band fell off of the radar for<br />

decades after that until someone discovered,<br />

somewhat miraculously, their demo at<br />

a record store. The demo gained enough<br />

traction through the web that the band was<br />

contacted and now play sold out shows 40<br />

years later. 5<br />

None of this would have been possible without<br />

the music industry becoming digitalized,<br />

which begs the question, who exactly is<br />

being harmed with these changes? Music<br />

producer and musician Steve Albini<br />

speculates that the only ones being harmed<br />

are the crooked record executives of old,<br />

who were harmful to the industry in the first<br />

place. He paints a picture where executives<br />

put up cash to finance a record deal, but then<br />

artists were actually paid little to nothing due<br />

to “recoup.” Recoup is where artists were<br />

held financially responsible for all expenses<br />

including recording time, materials, promotional<br />

collateral, and outside employment<br />

such as lawyers or promoters. The result of<br />

this old model of the industry is that most<br />

artists hardly ever made a cent. Only artists<br />

as big as Michael Jackson could ever hope<br />

to be successful. Albini states the only<br />

ones throwing a fit about this new business<br />

model in the digital era are these executives,<br />

who aren’t making as much money (and he<br />

doesn’t think they deserve to). He expresses<br />

excitement in the new realm of digital music<br />

stating that, “I don’t want to conclude without<br />

reiterating how terrific the current music<br />

environment is. I see more bands and I hear<br />

more music than ever before in my life. There<br />

are more gigs, more songs available than<br />

ever before, bands are being treated with<br />

more respect, and are more in control of their<br />

careers and destinies. I see them continuing<br />

as a constellation of enterprises: some big,<br />

some small – most small but all of them<br />

with a more immediate response from their<br />

audience and a greater chance to succeed. It<br />

is genuinely exciting.” 6<br />

“There are more gigs, more songs available than ever before, bands<br />

are being treated with more respect, and are more in control of their<br />

careers and destinies. I see them continuing as a constellation of<br />

enterprises: some big, some small – most small but all of them with a<br />

more immediate response from their audience and a greater chance to<br />

succeed. It is genuinely exciting.”<br />

-Steve Albini<br />

While Albini’s disdain for the industry<br />

professionals may be overzealous, it is not<br />

unfounded. The purpose of music is for the<br />

artist to connect with the listener, and the<br />

digital age has made that much easier. While<br />

it is not at all unreasonable for label executives<br />

to want to turn as much of a profit as<br />

possible, it is unreasonable for them<br />

to impede the value of the art solely for<br />

money.<br />

RISING FROM THE ASHES<br />

There has been more than one response to<br />

the shifting climate of the music industry. For<br />

bands, there is much more revenue in advertising<br />

and live events than there were in previous<br />

decades. Pomplamoose for example<br />

made many deals with advertisers, and as<br />

they were an independent band, they were<br />

able to pocket the proceeds. Live shows<br />

have also exploded, in more than one way.<br />

Firstly, more artists are playing at venues. It<br />

is a simple fact that more artists are getting<br />

noticed, and there is more of a demand from<br />

the public to see them perform. Secondly,<br />

live shows have become much more pricey<br />

than in previous decades. A cheap show at a<br />

reputable venue will most likely cost at least<br />

$20 for a ticket. People are willing to play<br />

much more than that, however, proven by the<br />

festival tickets that cost at least $200 that<br />

sell like wildfire.<br />

While this is good news for artists, what<br />

about the industry as a whole? The two main<br />

sources of new revenue that have begun<br />

to help the industry recoup from piracy<br />

and dropping album sales are iTunes and<br />

streaming sites. Apple released the iPod and<br />

iTunes in 2001, just after Napster shut down,<br />

with some success. What really launched the<br />

popularity of iTunes was the iTunes store.<br />

<strong>MIC</strong> // Research // Thesis Paper

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!