13.06.2015 Views

Quantum Field Theory and Gravity: Conceptual and Mathematical ...

Quantum Field Theory and Gravity: Conceptual and Mathematical ...

Quantum Field Theory and Gravity: Conceptual and Mathematical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

On the Motion of Point Defects in Relativistic <strong>Field</strong>s 307<br />

electrodynamics, the self-interaction of a point charge with its own Liénard–<br />

Wiechert field, simply does not exist!<br />

In the Fokker–Schwarzschild–Tetrode theory, the law of motion of an<br />

electron is given by equations (2.17), (2.18), though with E <strong>and</strong> B now st<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

for the arithmetic means 1 ret<br />

2<br />

(E lw + E adv<br />

lw )<strong>and</strong> 1 2 (Bret lw + Badv lw )oftheretarded<br />

<strong>and</strong> advanced Liénard–Wiechert fields summed over all the other point<br />

electrons. Nontrivial motions can occur only in the many-particle Fokker–<br />

Schwarzschild–Tetrode theory.<br />

While the Fokker–Schwarzschild–Tetrode electrodynamics does not suffer<br />

from the infinities of formal Lorentz electrodynamics, it raises another<br />

formidable problem: its second-order equations of motion for the system of<br />

point charges do not pose a Cauchy problem for the traditional classical state<br />

variables Q(t) <strong>and</strong> ˙Q(t) of these point charges. Instead, given the classical<br />

state variables Q(t 0 )<strong>and</strong> ˙Q(t 0 )ofeachelectronattimet 0 , the computation<br />

of their accelerations at time t 0 requires the knowledge of the states of<br />

motion of all point electrons at infinitely many instances in the past <strong>and</strong> in<br />

the future. While it would be conceivable in principle, though certainly not<br />

possible in practice, to find some historical records of all those past events,<br />

how could we anticipate the future without computing it from knowing the<br />

present <strong>and</strong> the past?<br />

Interestingly enough, though, Wheeler <strong>and</strong> Feynman showed that the<br />

Fokker–Schwarzschild–Tetrode equations of motion can be recast as Abraham–Lorentz–Dirac<br />

equations of motion for each point charge, though with<br />

the external Maxwell–Maxwell fields replaced by the retarded Liénard–Wiechert<br />

fields of all the other point charges, provided the Wheeler–Feynman<br />

absorber identity is valid. While this is still not a Cauchy problem for the<br />

classical state variables Q(t) <strong>and</strong> ˙Q(t) of each electron, at least one does not<br />

need to anticipate the future anymore.<br />

The Fokker–Schwarzschild–Tetrode <strong>and</strong> Wheeler–Feynman theories are<br />

mathematically fascinating in their own right, but pose very difficult problems.<br />

Rigorous studies [Bau1998], [BDD2010], [Dec2010] have only recently<br />

begun.<br />

4. Nonlinear electromagnetic field equations<br />

Gustav Mie [Mie1912/13] worked out the special-relativistic framework for<br />

fundamentally nonlinear electromagnetic field equations without point charges<br />

(for a modern treatment, see [Chri2000]). Twenty years later Mie’s work<br />

became the basis for Max Born’s assault on the infinite self-energy problem<br />

of a point charge.<br />

4.1. Nonlinear self-regularization<br />

Born [Bor1933] argued that the dilemma of the infinite electromagnetic selfenergy<br />

of a point charge in formal Lorentz electrodynamics is caused by

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!