13.06.2015 Views

Quantum Field Theory and Gravity: Conceptual and Mathematical ...

Quantum Field Theory and Gravity: Conceptual and Mathematical ...

Quantum Field Theory and Gravity: Conceptual and Mathematical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

340 S. Holl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

In the case where Σ is the spatial section of a black hole spacetime, there<br />

are further constraints coming from Einstein’s equations <strong>and</strong> the orientability<br />

of the spacetime. The topological censorship theorem [12, 7] is seen to imply<br />

[23] that the 2-dimensional orbit space ˆΣ =Σ/U(1) D−3 can neither have<br />

any conifold points, nor holes, nor h<strong>and</strong>les, <strong>and</strong> therefore has to be diffeomorphic<br />

to an upper half-plane ˆΣ ∼ = {(r, z) | r>0}. The boundary segments<br />

correspond to intervals on the boundary (r = 0) of this upper half-plane<br />

<strong>and</strong> are places (“axes”) in the manifold M where a linear combination of the<br />

rotational Killing fields vanishes, or to a horizon. Here the Killing fields do<br />

not vanish except where an “axis” meets a horizon. Furthermore, with each<br />

boundary segment, one can associate its length l i ≥ 0 in an invariant way. It<br />

can be shown (see e.g. [6]) that the metric of a black hole spacetime with the<br />

indicated symmetries globally takes the Weyl–Papapetrou form<br />

g = − r2 dt 2<br />

det f +e−ν (dr 2 +dz 2 )+f ij (dφ i + w i dt)(dφ j + w j dt) , (2)<br />

where the metric coefficients only depend on r, z,<strong>and</strong>whereφ i are 2π-periodic<br />

coordinates. The vacuum Einstein equations lead to two sets of differential<br />

equations. One set can be written [27] as a sigma-model field equation for a<br />

matrix field Φ defined by<br />

( )<br />

(det f)<br />

−1<br />

−(det f)<br />

Φ=<br />

−1 χ i<br />

−(det f) −1 χ i f ij +(detf) −1 , (3)<br />

χ i χ j<br />

where χ i are certain potentials that are defined in terms of the metric coefficients.<br />

The other set can be viewed as determining the conformal factor<br />

ν from Φ. The matrix field Φ obeys certain boundary conditions at r =0<br />

related to the winding numbers <strong>and</strong> moduli l i ∈ R + labeling the i-th boundary<br />

interval. Hence, it is evident 4 that any uniqueness theorem for the black<br />

holes under consideration would have to involve these data in addition to the<br />

usual invariants, such as mass <strong>and</strong> angular momentum.<br />

In fact, what one can prove is the following theorem in D =5(modulo<br />

technical assumptions about analyticity <strong>and</strong> certain global causal constraints)<br />

[22]:<br />

Theorem 1. Given are two asymptotically flat, vacuum black hole solutions,<br />

each with a single non-extremal horizon. If the angular momenta J 1 ,J 2 coincide,<br />

<strong>and</strong> if all the integers (“winding numbers”) 〈(p 1 ,q 1 ),...,(p N ,q N )〉 <strong>and</strong><br />

real numbers 〈l 1 ,...,l N 〉 (“moduli”) coincide, then the solutions are isometric.<br />

The theorem has a generalization to higher dimensions D (with our<br />

symmetry assumption) [23]; here the asymptotically flat condition must be<br />

4 This observation seems to have been made first in [15]. In this paper, the importance of<br />

the quantities l i , (p i ,q i ), <strong>and</strong> similarly in higher dimensions D>5, was emphasized, but<br />

their properties <strong>and</strong> relation to the topology <strong>and</strong> global properties of M were not yet fully<br />

understood.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!