Psych 1010 Chapter 13 Social Psych - PUNK ROCK PSYCHOLOGY
Psych 1010 Chapter 13 Social Psych - PUNK ROCK PSYCHOLOGY
Psych 1010 Chapter 13 Social Psych - PUNK ROCK PSYCHOLOGY
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Social</strong> <strong>Psych</strong>ology<br />
• <strong>Social</strong> psychology<br />
– scientific study of ways in which thoughts,<br />
feelings, and behaviors of one individual are<br />
influenced by real, imagined, or inferred behavior<br />
or characteristics of other people
SOCIAL COGNITION<br />
• <strong>Social</strong> cognition<br />
– collecting and assessing of information about<br />
other people<br />
– being influenced by other people<br />
– organizing and interpreting information about<br />
them to form first impressions<br />
– understanding their behavior<br />
– determining levels of attraction
Forming Impressions<br />
• schemata<br />
• stereotypes<br />
• primacy effect<br />
• Impression Formation
Forming Impressions<br />
• Schema<br />
– organized set of beliefs and expectations based on<br />
past experience<br />
– presumed to apply to all members of that<br />
category<br />
– influential in information noticed and<br />
remembered
Forming Impressions<br />
• Primacy effect<br />
– earliest impressions<br />
– early information about someone weighs more<br />
heavily than later information in influencing<br />
impression of that person
Self-fulfilling Prophecy<br />
• Self-fulfilling prophecy<br />
– schemata helps create behavior expected from<br />
other people<br />
– process in which person’s expectation about<br />
another elicits behavior from second person that<br />
confirms expectation
Stereotypes<br />
• Stereotype<br />
– set of characteristics presumed to be shared by all<br />
members of a social category<br />
– shapes impressions of others
Attribution<br />
• Attribution theory<br />
– observations about how people go about<br />
attributing causes to behavior
Attribution<br />
• <strong>Social</strong> interaction is filled with occasions that<br />
invite people to make judgments about causes<br />
of behavior<br />
• When something unexpected or unpleasant<br />
occurs, people wonder about it and try to<br />
understand it
Forming Impressions<br />
• Fritz<br />
Heider<br />
– behavior attributed to either internal or external<br />
causes, but not both
Forming Impressions<br />
• Harold<br />
Kelley<br />
– three kinds of information about the behavior:<br />
distinctiveness, consistency, and consensus
Forming Impressions<br />
•Fundamental attribution error<br />
•tendency to attribute others’ behavior to causes within<br />
themselves<br />
•part of actor-observer bias<br />
•Actor-observer bias<br />
•tendency to explain behavior of others as caused by<br />
internal factors, while attributing one’s own behavior to<br />
external forces
Forming Impressions<br />
• Defensive attribution<br />
– tendency to attribute successes to own efforts or<br />
qualities and failures to external factors<br />
• Just-world hypothesis<br />
– people get what they deserve<br />
– bad things happen to bad people, and good things<br />
happen to good people<br />
– Some confirmed cultural differences
Interpersonal Attraction<br />
• Attraction and tendency to like someone else<br />
closely linked to<br />
– proximity<br />
– physical attractiveness<br />
– similarity<br />
– exchange<br />
– intimacy
Interpersonal Attraction<br />
• Proximity<br />
– most important factor in determining attraction<br />
– more likely and more frequent interaction<br />
– cross-cultural, cross-ethnic agreement suggests<br />
possibility of universal standard of beauty
Interpersonal Attraction<br />
• Physical attractiveness<br />
– influences conclusions reached about person’s<br />
character<br />
– influences presumptions about being intelligent,<br />
interesting, happy, kind, sensitive, moral, and<br />
successful<br />
– influences presumptions about being better<br />
spouses and sexually responsive
Interpersonal Attraction<br />
• Attraction children and parents<br />
• mothers of more attractive infants show<br />
children more affection and to play with them<br />
more
Interpersonal Attraction<br />
• Do you agree?<br />
• Attractive children<br />
– better adjusted<br />
– display greater intelligence<br />
– treated more leniently by teachers<br />
• Attractive adults<br />
– better health<br />
– slightly more intelligent<br />
– self-confident<br />
– more hirable and productive by employers
Interpersonal Attraction<br />
• People usually choose friends and partners<br />
who are<br />
– close to their own level of attractiveness<br />
– Similar in attitudes, interests, values, backgrounds,<br />
and beliefs
Interpersonal Attraction<br />
• Reward theory of attraction<br />
– people tend to like others who make them feel<br />
rewarded and appreciated<br />
– based on the concept of exchange
Interpersonal Attraction<br />
• Exchanges<br />
– work only when fair or equitable<br />
– equitable when individuals receive equally from<br />
each other<br />
– this type of accounting may harm relationship<br />
– relationship is likely to continue when everyone<br />
finds interactions more rewarding than costly
Interpersonal Attraction<br />
• Intimacy<br />
– genuine closeness to and trust in another person<br />
– Intimate communication based on process of<br />
gradual self-disclosure<br />
– pacing of disclosure important
The Nature of Attitudes<br />
• Attitude<br />
– relatively stable organization of beliefs, feelings,<br />
and tendencies toward something or someone<br />
– important because they often influence behavior
The Nature of Attitudes<br />
• Major components<br />
– evaluative beliefs<br />
– feelings about object<br />
– behavior tendencies toward object
The Nature of Attitudes<br />
• Self-monitoring<br />
– tendency for individual to observe situation for<br />
cues about how to react<br />
• Attitudes – behavior relationship not always<br />
straightforward<br />
– high self-monitoring override their attitudes to<br />
behave with others‘expectations
The Nature of Attitudes<br />
• Children<br />
– rewarded when they please parents, and<br />
punished when they displease<br />
– create enduring attitudes through early<br />
experiences<br />
– mimic the behavior of their parents and peers<br />
– shaped by teachers, friends, and even famous<br />
people<br />
– influenced by mass media
Prejudice and Discrimination<br />
• Prejudice<br />
– attitude or unfair, intolerant, or unfavorable view<br />
of group of people<br />
• Discrimination<br />
– behavior or unfair act or series of acts directed<br />
against entire group of people or individual<br />
members of that group
Prejudice and Discrimination<br />
• Prejudice and discrimination do not always<br />
occur together!
The Nature of Attitudes<br />
• Ultimate attribution error<br />
– tendency for person with stereotyped beliefs<br />
about particular group of people to make internal<br />
attributions for shortcomings and external<br />
attributions for successes<br />
• Stereotyped beliefs and prejudiced attitudes<br />
– strong emotions, such as dislike, fear, hatred, or<br />
loathing and corresponding negative behavioral<br />
tendencies such as avoidance, hostility, and<br />
criticism
Source of Prejudice<br />
• Frustration-aggression theory<br />
– prejudice result of frustrations<br />
– hostility displace onto those “lower” on social<br />
scale<br />
– prejudice and discrimination result<br />
– victims of displaced aggression blamed for<br />
problems of times
Source of Prejudice<br />
• Authoritarian personality<br />
– source of prejudice in bigots<br />
– cognitive misers<br />
– oversimplification<br />
– association with prejudiced people
Source of Prejudice<br />
• Racism<br />
– belief that members of certain racial or ethnic<br />
groups are innately inferior
Source of Prejudice<br />
• Strategies for reducing prejudice and<br />
discrimination:<br />
– recategorization<br />
– controlled processing<br />
– improving contact between groups
Changing Attitudes<br />
• To be persuaded, person must:<br />
– pay attention to message<br />
– comprehend it<br />
– accept it as convincing
Changing Attitudes<br />
• Comprehending and accepting the message<br />
– influenced by message itself and way in which it is<br />
presented
Changing Attitudes<br />
• Communication model of persuasion<br />
spotlights four key elements to achieve these<br />
goals:<br />
– source<br />
– message itself<br />
– medium of communication<br />
– characteristics of the audience
Changing Attitudes<br />
• Cognitive dissonance<br />
– perceived inconsistency between two cognitions<br />
– creates unpleasant psychological tension, which<br />
motivates attempt to resolve dissonance<br />
– sometimes changing attitude is easiest way to<br />
reduce discomfort
Changing Attitudes<br />
• Other ways to reduce cognitive dissonance<br />
– increase number of consonant elements<br />
– increase thoughts consistent with one another
SOCIAL INFLUENCE<br />
• <strong>Social</strong> influence<br />
• process by which others affect perceptions,<br />
attitudes, and actions
Cultural Influences<br />
• Culture exerts an enormous influence on<br />
attitudes and behavior, and culture is itself a<br />
creation of people.<br />
• Can you name any of these influences on<br />
attitudes?
Cultural Influences<br />
•Culture influences<br />
•formal instruction<br />
•modeling and imitation<br />
•acceptance of cultural truisms<br />
•norms
Cultural Influences<br />
• Cultural assimilator<br />
– strategy for perceiving the norms and values of<br />
another group<br />
– technique for understanding other cultures
Conformity<br />
• Something to consider.<br />
– Accepting cultural norms should not be confused with<br />
conformity.
Conformity<br />
• Conformity<br />
– conflict between individual and group that is<br />
resolved when individual preferences or beliefs<br />
yield to norms or expectations of larger group
Conformity<br />
• Asch<br />
– conducted the first systematic study of conformity<br />
– demonstrated that under some circumstances,<br />
people will conform to group pressures even if this<br />
action forces them to deny obvious physical<br />
evidence
Asch’s Experiment on Conformity
Conformity<br />
• Factors influencing likelihood that person will<br />
conform<br />
– characteristics of the situation<br />
– characteristics of the person<br />
• Situational factors include<br />
– size of the group<br />
– degree of unanimity<br />
– the nature of the task<br />
• Personal characteristics<br />
– influence conforming behavior
Conformity<br />
•The more a person is:<br />
•attracted to group<br />
•expects future interaction with its members<br />
•holds a position of relatively low status<br />
•does not feel completely accepted<br />
•the more that person tends to conform
Compliance<br />
• Compliance<br />
– change of behavior in response to explicitly stated<br />
request<br />
– foot-in-the-door effect<br />
– lowball procedure<br />
– door-in-the-face effect
Obedience<br />
• Obedience<br />
– compliance with direct order, generally from<br />
person in authority, such as police officer,<br />
principal, or parent
Obedience<br />
• When ordered to do something and left alone<br />
– less likely to obey than if watched<br />
– see self as agent of another person’s wishes and<br />
not responsible for obedient actions or their<br />
consequences
Deindividuation<br />
• Deindividuation<br />
– people respond as anonymous parts of larger<br />
group, not as individuals<br />
• Contributing factors<br />
– anonymity<br />
– mob behavior<br />
– snowball effect
Altruistic Behavior<br />
• Altruistic behavior<br />
– helping behavior not linked to personal gain<br />
• Helping behavior influenced by two sets of<br />
factor<br />
– those in situation<br />
– those in individual
Altruism<br />
•Bystander effect<br />
•likelihood person will help someone else in<br />
trouble decreases as number of bystanders<br />
present increases<br />
•Ambiguity<br />
•any factors that make it harder for others to<br />
recognize genuine emergency reduce probability<br />
of altruistic actions
Groups and Decision Making<br />
• There is a tendency in American society to<br />
turn important decisions over to groups
Groups and Decision Making<br />
• Many people trust group decisions more than<br />
decisions made by individuals<br />
– Dynamics of social interaction within groups<br />
sometimes conspire to make group decisions less<br />
sound than those made by individuals
Groups and Decision Making<br />
• Polarization<br />
– tendency for people to become more extreme in<br />
their attitudes as a result of group discussion<br />
• Risky shift<br />
– one aspect of polarization
Groups and Decision Making<br />
• Factors that influence group effectiveness<br />
– fit between requirements of task and skills of<br />
group members<br />
– the ways in which group members interact<br />
– group size<br />
– cohesiveness of the group
Groups and Decision Making<br />
• High cohesiveness<br />
– people in a group like one another and feel<br />
committed to goals of group,<br />
– can undermine quality of group decision making
Groups and Decision Making<br />
•Groupthink − a process that occurs when members of a group:<br />
•like one another<br />
•have similar goals<br />
•are isolated, leading them to ignore alternatives and not<br />
criticize group consensus
Leadership<br />
• Leaders are important to the effectiveness of a<br />
group or organization<br />
– great-person theory<br />
– right person in right place at right time theory
Leadership<br />
• Fred Fiedler<br />
– contingency theory of leader effectiveness<br />
– transactional view of leadership
Leadership<br />
• Fiedler’s theory and personal characteristics of<br />
leaders<br />
– task oriented<br />
– relationship oriented<br />
– contingency view of leadership<br />
– no such thing as ideal leader for all situations
Leadership<br />
• Most effective leadership style depends on<br />
three sets of situational factors:<br />
– nature of task (clearly structured or ambiguous)<br />
– relationship between leader and group (good or<br />
bad personal relations with group members)<br />
– leader’s ability to exercise great or little power<br />
over group
Leadership<br />
• Sternberg<br />
– systems approach to understanding leadership<br />
– certain essential traits necessary for effective<br />
leadership: wisdom, intelligence, and creativity,<br />
synthesized (WICS)
Leadership<br />
Across Cultures<br />
• Emphasis on the importance of individual<br />
leaders applies in individualistic cultures like<br />
U.S.<br />
• In collectivist cultures cooperation and<br />
interdependence among group members<br />
valued
Leadership<br />
• Women in leadership positions<br />
– Leadership styles of men and women can vary<br />
considerably<br />
– Women tend to have a more democratic,<br />
collaborative, and interpersonally oriented style of<br />
managing