19.06.2015 Views

Psych 1010 Chapter 13 Social Psych - PUNK ROCK PSYCHOLOGY

Psych 1010 Chapter 13 Social Psych - PUNK ROCK PSYCHOLOGY

Psych 1010 Chapter 13 Social Psych - PUNK ROCK PSYCHOLOGY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Social</strong> <strong>Psych</strong>ology<br />

• <strong>Social</strong> psychology<br />

– scientific study of ways in which thoughts,<br />

feelings, and behaviors of one individual are<br />

influenced by real, imagined, or inferred behavior<br />

or characteristics of other people


SOCIAL COGNITION<br />

• <strong>Social</strong> cognition<br />

– collecting and assessing of information about<br />

other people<br />

– being influenced by other people<br />

– organizing and interpreting information about<br />

them to form first impressions<br />

– understanding their behavior<br />

– determining levels of attraction


Forming Impressions<br />

• schemata<br />

• stereotypes<br />

• primacy effect<br />

• Impression Formation


Forming Impressions<br />

• Schema<br />

– organized set of beliefs and expectations based on<br />

past experience<br />

– presumed to apply to all members of that<br />

category<br />

– influential in information noticed and<br />

remembered


Forming Impressions<br />

• Primacy effect<br />

– earliest impressions<br />

– early information about someone weighs more<br />

heavily than later information in influencing<br />

impression of that person


Self-fulfilling Prophecy<br />

• Self-fulfilling prophecy<br />

– schemata helps create behavior expected from<br />

other people<br />

– process in which person’s expectation about<br />

another elicits behavior from second person that<br />

confirms expectation


Stereotypes<br />

• Stereotype<br />

– set of characteristics presumed to be shared by all<br />

members of a social category<br />

– shapes impressions of others


Attribution<br />

• Attribution theory<br />

– observations about how people go about<br />

attributing causes to behavior


Attribution<br />

• <strong>Social</strong> interaction is filled with occasions that<br />

invite people to make judgments about causes<br />

of behavior<br />

• When something unexpected or unpleasant<br />

occurs, people wonder about it and try to<br />

understand it


Forming Impressions<br />

• Fritz<br />

Heider<br />

– behavior attributed to either internal or external<br />

causes, but not both


Forming Impressions<br />

• Harold<br />

Kelley<br />

– three kinds of information about the behavior:<br />

distinctiveness, consistency, and consensus


Forming Impressions<br />

•Fundamental attribution error<br />

•tendency to attribute others’ behavior to causes within<br />

themselves<br />

•part of actor-observer bias<br />

•Actor-observer bias<br />

•tendency to explain behavior of others as caused by<br />

internal factors, while attributing one’s own behavior to<br />

external forces


Forming Impressions<br />

• Defensive attribution<br />

– tendency to attribute successes to own efforts or<br />

qualities and failures to external factors<br />

• Just-world hypothesis<br />

– people get what they deserve<br />

– bad things happen to bad people, and good things<br />

happen to good people<br />

– Some confirmed cultural differences


Interpersonal Attraction<br />

• Attraction and tendency to like someone else<br />

closely linked to<br />

– proximity<br />

– physical attractiveness<br />

– similarity<br />

– exchange<br />

– intimacy


Interpersonal Attraction<br />

• Proximity<br />

– most important factor in determining attraction<br />

– more likely and more frequent interaction<br />

– cross-cultural, cross-ethnic agreement suggests<br />

possibility of universal standard of beauty


Interpersonal Attraction<br />

• Physical attractiveness<br />

– influences conclusions reached about person’s<br />

character<br />

– influences presumptions about being intelligent,<br />

interesting, happy, kind, sensitive, moral, and<br />

successful<br />

– influences presumptions about being better<br />

spouses and sexually responsive


Interpersonal Attraction<br />

• Attraction children and parents<br />

• mothers of more attractive infants show<br />

children more affection and to play with them<br />

more


Interpersonal Attraction<br />

• Do you agree?<br />

• Attractive children<br />

– better adjusted<br />

– display greater intelligence<br />

– treated more leniently by teachers<br />

• Attractive adults<br />

– better health<br />

– slightly more intelligent<br />

– self-confident<br />

– more hirable and productive by employers


Interpersonal Attraction<br />

• People usually choose friends and partners<br />

who are<br />

– close to their own level of attractiveness<br />

– Similar in attitudes, interests, values, backgrounds,<br />

and beliefs


Interpersonal Attraction<br />

• Reward theory of attraction<br />

– people tend to like others who make them feel<br />

rewarded and appreciated<br />

– based on the concept of exchange


Interpersonal Attraction<br />

• Exchanges<br />

– work only when fair or equitable<br />

– equitable when individuals receive equally from<br />

each other<br />

– this type of accounting may harm relationship<br />

– relationship is likely to continue when everyone<br />

finds interactions more rewarding than costly


Interpersonal Attraction<br />

• Intimacy<br />

– genuine closeness to and trust in another person<br />

– Intimate communication based on process of<br />

gradual self-disclosure<br />

– pacing of disclosure important


The Nature of Attitudes<br />

• Attitude<br />

– relatively stable organization of beliefs, feelings,<br />

and tendencies toward something or someone<br />

– important because they often influence behavior


The Nature of Attitudes<br />

• Major components<br />

– evaluative beliefs<br />

– feelings about object<br />

– behavior tendencies toward object


The Nature of Attitudes<br />

• Self-monitoring<br />

– tendency for individual to observe situation for<br />

cues about how to react<br />

• Attitudes – behavior relationship not always<br />

straightforward<br />

– high self-monitoring override their attitudes to<br />

behave with others‘expectations


The Nature of Attitudes<br />

• Children<br />

– rewarded when they please parents, and<br />

punished when they displease<br />

– create enduring attitudes through early<br />

experiences<br />

– mimic the behavior of their parents and peers<br />

– shaped by teachers, friends, and even famous<br />

people<br />

– influenced by mass media


Prejudice and Discrimination<br />

• Prejudice<br />

– attitude or unfair, intolerant, or unfavorable view<br />

of group of people<br />

• Discrimination<br />

– behavior or unfair act or series of acts directed<br />

against entire group of people or individual<br />

members of that group


Prejudice and Discrimination<br />

• Prejudice and discrimination do not always<br />

occur together!


The Nature of Attitudes<br />

• Ultimate attribution error<br />

– tendency for person with stereotyped beliefs<br />

about particular group of people to make internal<br />

attributions for shortcomings and external<br />

attributions for successes<br />

• Stereotyped beliefs and prejudiced attitudes<br />

– strong emotions, such as dislike, fear, hatred, or<br />

loathing and corresponding negative behavioral<br />

tendencies such as avoidance, hostility, and<br />

criticism


Source of Prejudice<br />

• Frustration-aggression theory<br />

– prejudice result of frustrations<br />

– hostility displace onto those “lower” on social<br />

scale<br />

– prejudice and discrimination result<br />

– victims of displaced aggression blamed for<br />

problems of times


Source of Prejudice<br />

• Authoritarian personality<br />

– source of prejudice in bigots<br />

– cognitive misers<br />

– oversimplification<br />

– association with prejudiced people


Source of Prejudice<br />

• Racism<br />

– belief that members of certain racial or ethnic<br />

groups are innately inferior


Source of Prejudice<br />

• Strategies for reducing prejudice and<br />

discrimination:<br />

– recategorization<br />

– controlled processing<br />

– improving contact between groups


Changing Attitudes<br />

• To be persuaded, person must:<br />

– pay attention to message<br />

– comprehend it<br />

– accept it as convincing


Changing Attitudes<br />

• Comprehending and accepting the message<br />

– influenced by message itself and way in which it is<br />

presented


Changing Attitudes<br />

• Communication model of persuasion<br />

spotlights four key elements to achieve these<br />

goals:<br />

– source<br />

– message itself<br />

– medium of communication<br />

– characteristics of the audience


Changing Attitudes<br />

• Cognitive dissonance<br />

– perceived inconsistency between two cognitions<br />

– creates unpleasant psychological tension, which<br />

motivates attempt to resolve dissonance<br />

– sometimes changing attitude is easiest way to<br />

reduce discomfort


Changing Attitudes<br />

• Other ways to reduce cognitive dissonance<br />

– increase number of consonant elements<br />

– increase thoughts consistent with one another


SOCIAL INFLUENCE<br />

• <strong>Social</strong> influence<br />

• process by which others affect perceptions,<br />

attitudes, and actions


Cultural Influences<br />

• Culture exerts an enormous influence on<br />

attitudes and behavior, and culture is itself a<br />

creation of people.<br />

• Can you name any of these influences on<br />

attitudes?


Cultural Influences<br />

•Culture influences<br />

•formal instruction<br />

•modeling and imitation<br />

•acceptance of cultural truisms<br />

•norms


Cultural Influences<br />

• Cultural assimilator<br />

– strategy for perceiving the norms and values of<br />

another group<br />

– technique for understanding other cultures


Conformity<br />

• Something to consider.<br />

– Accepting cultural norms should not be confused with<br />

conformity.


Conformity<br />

• Conformity<br />

– conflict between individual and group that is<br />

resolved when individual preferences or beliefs<br />

yield to norms or expectations of larger group


Conformity<br />

• Asch<br />

– conducted the first systematic study of conformity<br />

– demonstrated that under some circumstances,<br />

people will conform to group pressures even if this<br />

action forces them to deny obvious physical<br />

evidence


Asch’s Experiment on Conformity


Conformity<br />

• Factors influencing likelihood that person will<br />

conform<br />

– characteristics of the situation<br />

– characteristics of the person<br />

• Situational factors include<br />

– size of the group<br />

– degree of unanimity<br />

– the nature of the task<br />

• Personal characteristics<br />

– influence conforming behavior


Conformity<br />

•The more a person is:<br />

•attracted to group<br />

•expects future interaction with its members<br />

•holds a position of relatively low status<br />

•does not feel completely accepted<br />

•the more that person tends to conform


Compliance<br />

• Compliance<br />

– change of behavior in response to explicitly stated<br />

request<br />

– foot-in-the-door effect<br />

– lowball procedure<br />

– door-in-the-face effect


Obedience<br />

• Obedience<br />

– compliance with direct order, generally from<br />

person in authority, such as police officer,<br />

principal, or parent


Obedience<br />

• When ordered to do something and left alone<br />

– less likely to obey than if watched<br />

– see self as agent of another person’s wishes and<br />

not responsible for obedient actions or their<br />

consequences


Deindividuation<br />

• Deindividuation<br />

– people respond as anonymous parts of larger<br />

group, not as individuals<br />

• Contributing factors<br />

– anonymity<br />

– mob behavior<br />

– snowball effect


Altruistic Behavior<br />

• Altruistic behavior<br />

– helping behavior not linked to personal gain<br />

• Helping behavior influenced by two sets of<br />

factor<br />

– those in situation<br />

– those in individual


Altruism<br />

•Bystander effect<br />

•likelihood person will help someone else in<br />

trouble decreases as number of bystanders<br />

present increases<br />

•Ambiguity<br />

•any factors that make it harder for others to<br />

recognize genuine emergency reduce probability<br />

of altruistic actions


Groups and Decision Making<br />

• There is a tendency in American society to<br />

turn important decisions over to groups


Groups and Decision Making<br />

• Many people trust group decisions more than<br />

decisions made by individuals<br />

– Dynamics of social interaction within groups<br />

sometimes conspire to make group decisions less<br />

sound than those made by individuals


Groups and Decision Making<br />

• Polarization<br />

– tendency for people to become more extreme in<br />

their attitudes as a result of group discussion<br />

• Risky shift<br />

– one aspect of polarization


Groups and Decision Making<br />

• Factors that influence group effectiveness<br />

– fit between requirements of task and skills of<br />

group members<br />

– the ways in which group members interact<br />

– group size<br />

– cohesiveness of the group


Groups and Decision Making<br />

• High cohesiveness<br />

– people in a group like one another and feel<br />

committed to goals of group,<br />

– can undermine quality of group decision making


Groups and Decision Making<br />

•Groupthink − a process that occurs when members of a group:<br />

•like one another<br />

•have similar goals<br />

•are isolated, leading them to ignore alternatives and not<br />

criticize group consensus


Leadership<br />

• Leaders are important to the effectiveness of a<br />

group or organization<br />

– great-person theory<br />

– right person in right place at right time theory


Leadership<br />

• Fred Fiedler<br />

– contingency theory of leader effectiveness<br />

– transactional view of leadership


Leadership<br />

• Fiedler’s theory and personal characteristics of<br />

leaders<br />

– task oriented<br />

– relationship oriented<br />

– contingency view of leadership<br />

– no such thing as ideal leader for all situations


Leadership<br />

• Most effective leadership style depends on<br />

three sets of situational factors:<br />

– nature of task (clearly structured or ambiguous)<br />

– relationship between leader and group (good or<br />

bad personal relations with group members)<br />

– leader’s ability to exercise great or little power<br />

over group


Leadership<br />

• Sternberg<br />

– systems approach to understanding leadership<br />

– certain essential traits necessary for effective<br />

leadership: wisdom, intelligence, and creativity,<br />

synthesized (WICS)


Leadership<br />

Across Cultures<br />

• Emphasis on the importance of individual<br />

leaders applies in individualistic cultures like<br />

U.S.<br />

• In collectivist cultures cooperation and<br />

interdependence among group members<br />

valued


Leadership<br />

• Women in leadership positions<br />

– Leadership styles of men and women can vary<br />

considerably<br />

– Women tend to have a more democratic,<br />

collaborative, and interpersonally oriented style of<br />

managing

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!