20.06.2015 Views

phvac Dec 2006.qxd - Plumbing & HVAC

phvac Dec 2006.qxd - Plumbing & HVAC

phvac Dec 2006.qxd - Plumbing & HVAC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Heating<br />

Going green with infrared<br />

Energy savings potential largely overlooked<br />

By Simon Blake<br />

Like the late comedian Rodney<br />

Dangerfield, the infrared heating<br />

industry can’t get any respect.<br />

Despite offering equipment touted to<br />

achieve significant energy savings in<br />

warehouse and industrial heating applications,<br />

it has been largely overlooked<br />

in the move to “green” heating<br />

technologies.<br />

“There has been an oversight, particularly<br />

in LEED projects and just generally…<br />

That’s something manufacturers<br />

are trying to address,” says Bob Alcott,<br />

product and marketing manager for<br />

Schwank Ltd., Mississauga, Ont. “We’re<br />

doing everything we can in our marketing<br />

and promotional efforts to inform<br />

people that infrared is an energy use<br />

reduction product...” Rebate programs,<br />

with the exception of a few gas utility<br />

initiatives, tend to ignore infrared<br />

heating too.<br />

And yet some research has put the<br />

energy savings with natural gas-fired<br />

infrared heaters over unit heaters at<br />

about 30 percent for a typical warehouse<br />

or industrial building, allowing<br />

the infrared heater to be sized for considerably<br />

less input than the equivalent<br />

unit heater.<br />

In retrofit applications, the difference<br />

can be as much as 50 percent versus<br />

older unit heaters, says Bob Genisol,<br />

vice president of sales and marketing<br />

for Space-Ray, Charlotte, N.C.<br />

“When comparing heating appliances<br />

that use different modes of heat transfer<br />

to heat a space, it ultimately boils down<br />

to the comfort of the occupants and how<br />

much energy (fuel and electricity) it takes<br />

to reach that comfort level,” remarked<br />

Patrick Stone, director of North Ameri -<br />

can sales for Roberts-Gordon, located in<br />

Buffalo, N.Y. “In many commercial and<br />

industrial buildings, infrared heating can<br />

achieve equal or better comfort levels<br />

while using much less fuel and electricity<br />

than (forced) air heating.”<br />

Difficult to rate<br />

But there’s a problem – infrared is a<br />

combination of radiant and convective<br />

heat. “When you do a building analysis,<br />

you don’t break the two apart,” says<br />

Dave Mackenzie, vice president of Brant<br />

Radiant Heaters Ltd. in Paris, Ont. This<br />

makes it difficult to come up with a<br />

number that makes sense from an energy<br />

efficiency standpoint like the AFUE<br />

number used to rate forced air systems.<br />

“There’s really no standard to qualify<br />

its radiant output and, if there was,<br />

“There are people out there<br />

that will lead you to believe that<br />

all 40-foot tube heaters are the<br />

same, and they really are not.”<br />

This truck repair facility is a good example of the type of application where tube-type infrared heaters make a lot of sense.<br />

there’s not a lot of information out<br />

there that relates the radiant output (of<br />

the appliance) to the heating of the<br />

building.”<br />

In fact manufacturers like Brant<br />

Radiant, which manufactures the Re-<br />

Verber-Ray line, end up doing their own<br />

research and providing their own<br />

figures.<br />

“The only way that made sense for us<br />

to do research was in real world buildings,”<br />

he says. That involved heating the<br />

space with unit heaters and then removing<br />

them and installing infrared and<br />

then comparing the results. The tests<br />

primarily looked at fuel utilization for<br />

the entire building, as opposed to that<br />

for each individual heater.<br />

Not the same<br />

Tube-type infrared heaters come in a<br />

number of configurations and are constructed<br />

of different materials. Getting<br />

these factors right is key in achieving the<br />

best long-term efficiency and comfort.<br />

“(Contractors) should do their<br />

home work,” says McKenzie. “They<br />

should look at what the units are made<br />

of, what they are getting, make sure they<br />

get information. There are people out<br />

there that will lead you to believe that<br />

all 40-foot tube heaters are the same,<br />

and they really are not.”<br />

Unitary infrared heaters consist of<br />

single burners with a single length of<br />

tube and reflector, in straight, L or U<br />

designs. A U-tube configuration can<br />

result in a more uniform heat distribution,<br />

particularly when only one heater<br />

is installed.<br />

Multi-burner infrared systems<br />

typically consist of multiple unitary<br />

heaters connected to an exhaust manifold,<br />

allowing a common combustion<br />

blower or vacuum pump and a single<br />

common vent.<br />

Burners-in-series infrared systems<br />

use multiple infrared heaters in a custom-shaped<br />

system. The burners are<br />

arranged with one after another in a<br />

row to fire into a common tube and<br />

reflector system. “These systems are able<br />

to maintain radiant tube temperatures<br />

along a long length, allowing for the<br />

most even heating,” said Stone.<br />

Typically, burners-in-series systems<br />

are designed to condense as temperatures<br />

are lower. Less usable heat is wasted<br />

through the exhaust vent, thus higher<br />

combustion efficiency is achieved. All<br />

burners in the system share a common<br />

vacuum pump for combustion air supply<br />

and venting. Burners can be singlestage,<br />

dual stage or modulating.<br />

The type of construction of an<br />

infrared heater makes a significant difference<br />

in long-term efficiency.<br />

There are a number of different<br />

materials used to make the heat<br />

exchangers in tube-type infrared heat -<br />

ers. The most common construction is<br />

cold rolled steel. Its emissivity, or heat<br />

transfer efficiency, is about 66 percent.<br />

On the other hand, aluminized heattreated<br />

steel emitters have a heat transfer<br />

efficiency of 80 to 86 percent. There<br />

are also stainless steel and even titanium<br />

tubes. The difference may not be that<br />

great when the heaters are new. But a<br />

common steel tube rusts inside and the<br />

efficiency drops off while a stainless<br />

14 <strong>Plumbing</strong> & <strong>HVAC</strong> Product News – April 2009 www.plumbingandhvac.ca

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!